Opinion statement
The Safety Plan was developed to help individuals at risk of suicide to prevent and/or manage suicidal crises. The risk of suicide is elevated for people with serious mental illness, that is, a mental illness that interferes with the ability to carry out one or more major life activities. Serious mental illness makes it difficult to think clearly, make decisions, and take positive action. In other words, it impairs executive functioning. A wide variety of diagnoses, including depression (unipolar or bipolar), borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and schizophrenia, are associated with this kind of impairment. A Safety Plan in easy reach reduces the burden of problem-solving when a crisis is looming and the ability to think clearly is impaired. There is no need to figure out what to do to interrupt a darkening mood, because strategies that may help are already written out. There is no need to look up emergency contact information, because it has already been compiled. Essential as this information can be, a well-constructed Safety Plan is more than just a list of strategies and contacts. When the items are individualized and described in detail, they can be potent reminders of cherished memories, simple pleasures that give comfort, and people who care who are in reach and can be counted on to respond when needed. In other words, a well-constructed Safety Plan can reassure its owner that s/he is neither helpless nor alone. Since 2008, the construction of a Safety Plan has been mandated for every patient at risk of suicide at every facility under the auspices of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Today, 8 years since the issuance of this mandate, VA clinicians have not only become accustomed to developing and reviewing Safety Plans in the medical record but also, as this review will suggest, begun to discover for themselves how helpful a Safety Plan can be. As it is not yet known which patients (e.g., with respect to age, sex, or diagnosis) are likeliest to benefit, or whether the impact varies with the timing of its construction (e.g., at time of discharge, or the day before), setting, (e.g., in the emergency department or the inpatient unit), and/or mode of delivery (e.g., in group or individual sessions), these and other questions that aim to optimize Safety Plan effectiveness merit further investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief 2016, available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db241.htm. Accessed 19 August 2016.
US Dept of Veterans Affairs. In: VA Office of Suicide Prevention Data Report 2016. Suicide Among Veterans and Other Americans 2001–2014. Available at: http://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/2016suicidedatareport.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2016.
Stanley B, Brown GK. Safety planning intervention: a brief intervention to mitigate suicide risk. Cogn Behav Pract. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2011.01.001.
Nash WP, Silva C, Litz B. The historic origins of military and veteran mental health stigma and the stress injury model as a means to reduce it. Psychiat Ann. 2009. doi:10.3928/00485713-20090728-05.
Kuehn BN. Military probes epidemic of suicide. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;304(13):1427–30.
De Leo D, Heller T. Intensive case management in suicide attempters following discharge from inpatient psychiatric care. Aust J of Prim Health. 2007;13(3):49–58.
Walsh E, Harvey K, White I, Higgitt A, Fraser J, Murray R. Suicidal behaviour in psychosis: prevalence and predictors from a randomised controlled trial of case management. Brit J Psychiat. 2001;178:255–60.
Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Murray AM, Brown MZ, Gallop RJ, Heard HL, et al. Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiat. 2006;63:757–66.
Grote NK, Swartz HA, Geibel SL, Zuckoff A, Houck PR, Frank E. A randomized controlled trial of culturally relevant, brief interpersonal psychotherapy for perinatal depression. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(3):313–21.
de Mello MF, Mari J, Bacaltchuk J, Verdeli H, Neugebauer R. A systematic review of research findings on the efficacy of interpersonal therapy for depressive disorders. Eur Arch Psy Clin N. 2005. doi:10.1007/s00406-004-0542-x.
Brown GK, Ten Have T, Henriques GR, Xie SX, Hollander JE, Beck AT. Cognitive therapy for the prevention of suicide attempts: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2005. doi:10.1001/jama.294.5.563.
Stanley B, Brown GK. Safety Plan treatment manual to reduce suicide risk: veteran version. Washington DC: US Department of Veterans Affairs 2008, available at http://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/va_safety_planning_manual.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.
Stanley B, Brown GK, Currier GW, Lyons C, Chesin M, Knox KL. Brief intervention and follow-up for suicidal patients with repeat emergency department visits enhances treatment engagement. Am J Public Health. 2015. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302656.
• Currier GW, Brown GK, Brenner LA, Chesin M, Knox KL, Ghahramanlou-Holloway M, et al. Rationale and study protocol for a two-part intervention: safety planning and structured follow-up among veterans at risk for suicide and discharged from the emergency department. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.003. This article is recommended because it describes how telephone follow-up after a Safety Planning encounter in the Emergency Room was designed to increase the likelihood that a patient would return for ongoing treatment.
• Rings JA, Alexander PA, Silvers VN, Gutierrez PM. Adapting the Safety Planning Intervention for use in a Veterans psychiatric inpatient group setting. J Ment Health Couns. 2013;34(2):95–110. This article is important because it describes a novel approach to Safety Plan construction. In a group session, cofacilitated by two clinicians, the development of each participant’s Safety Plans is informed by the suggestions and support exchanged among members of the group.
• Kayman DJ, Goldstein MF, Dixon L, Goodman M. Perspectives of suicidal veterans on safety planning: findings from a pilot study. Crisis. 2015. doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000348. This article is recommended not only because it sheds light on facilitators and barriers to the use of Safety Plans but also because it summarizes specific and practical suggestions, made by Veteran patients, for engaging individuals in Safety Planning, ongoing treatment, and self-care.
• Larsen ME, Nicholas J, Christensen H. A systematic assessment of smartphone tools for suicide prevention. PLOS ONE. 2016. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152285. This article reviews the many smartphone applications for suicide prevention that are currently available, including some that contain potentially harmful content. The article is recommended as a resource for clinicians who wish to find comprehensive and evidence-informed smartphone applications for their patients’ use.
Bush NE, Dobscha SK, Crumpton R, Denneson LM, Hoffman JE, Crain A, et al. A Virtual Hope Box smartphone app as an accessory to therapy: proof-of-concept in a clinical sample of veterans. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2015;45(1):1–9. doi:10.1111/sltb.12103.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the (1) VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (RR&D) grant V1 I21 RX001911-01A1, Suicide Safety Planning Group Treatment—“Project Life Force” (M. Goodman, principal investigator); (2) the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs, James J Peters VA Medical Center; (3) the VA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry for Suicide Prevention (PSCI-SP), “Toward Identification of Best Practices in Safety Planning” (D. J. Kayman, Principal Investigator); and (4) the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Integrated Service Network 2 South (VISN 2S), Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC). The authors also wish to acknowledge and thank the suicide prevention specialists of VISN 2S for their generosity in sharing their time and expertise with Dr. Kayman throughout the PSCI-SP-supported Safety Planning Quality Improvement project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Jaime Wilsnack and Marjorie F. Goldstein declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Deborah J. Kayman reports grants from Department of Veterans Affairs, during the conduct of the study.
Marianne Goodman reports grants from Department of Defense; grants from Department of Veterans Affairs, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals; and personal fees from New York State Psychiatric Association, outside the submitted work.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Suicide
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kayman, D.J., Goldstein, M.F., Wilsnack, J. et al. Safety Planning for Suicide Prevention. Curr Treat Options Psych 3, 411–420 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-016-0099-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-016-0099-0