Introduction

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex and often severe psychological disorder characterized by pervasive emotion dysregulation, impulsive behavior, unstable relationships, and recurrent suicidal and self-injurious behavior. Individuals with BPD exhibit high rates of comorbidity and have been found to meet diagnostic criteria for an average of 3.4 to 4.2 lifetime Axis I disorders [1, 2]. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is one of the most common comorbid disorders among individuals with BPD and its core features include intrusive re-experiencing of traumatic events, avoidance of trauma-related thoughts and situations, emotional numbing, and hyperarousal. Among individuals with BPD, rates of comorbid PTSD range from approximately 30 % in community samples [3, 4] to 50 % in clinical samples [5, 6]. Females constitute approximately two-thirds of individuals with both BPD and PTSD in the community [4] and more than 85 % of this comorbid population in clinical settings [6]. Although the high degree of comorbidity between BPD and PTSD has led to some debate about whether BPD may be better conceptualized as a trauma spectrum disorder such as ‘complex’ PTSD, key differences in the clinical phenomenology and neurobiology of these disorders warrant their conceptualization as distinct, albeit commonly co-occurring disorders [7].

Individuals with both BPD and PTSD tend to be more impaired than those with either disorder alone. Compared with individuals with either BPD or PTSD, those with both diagnoses have higher rates of other Axis I disorders [4, 5, 8, 9], an increased risk of suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) [4, 5, 911], earlier onset of abuse and more severe trauma [4, 5, 12, 13], greater emotion dysregulation [5, 14], more frequent inpatient psychiatric hospitalization [15], poorer physical health [8, 12], and more impaired global functioning [13, 15]. Moreover, the presence of PTSD has been found to decrease the likelihood of attaining diagnostic remission from BPD over 6 and 10 years of naturalistic follow-up [16, 17]. Taken together, these findings suggest not only that individuals with BPD and PTSD are likely to have a particularly complex and severe presentation, but also that successful treatment of BPD may be contingent upon the resolution of PTSD.

Historically, BPD has often been viewed as a contraindication for trauma-focused treatment due to concerns that such treatment would lead to symptom worsening (e.g., increased suicidality). Over the past decade, however, research has provided convincing evidence that PTSD can be safely and effectively treated among individuals with BPD of varying levels of severity. To date, the available research supports the efficacy of several psychotherapeutic approaches to treating PTSD among individuals with BPD. Although several evidence-based pharmacological treatments for PTSD exist, none have been evaluated specifically for individuals with comorbid PTSD and BPD. Thus, the present review is restricted to psychotherapeutic treatments that have been evaluated in terms of their effect on PTSD among individuals with BPD. These treatments are grouped in terms of their general approach, including single-diagnosis, phase-based, and integrated treatments. Of note, psychotherapies that have included individuals with BPD but have not reported PTSD outcomes specific to this subgroup are not reviewed [e.g., 1820].

Psychotherapeutic treatment options

Single-diagnosis treatments

  • Single-diagnosis treatments are those that focus primarily or only on treating PTSD. These treatments may include individuals with various comorbid problems such as BPD, but comorbid problems are not targeted directly. Thus, any improvements in comorbid problems that occur during these treatments are a secondary result of treating PTSD.

Prolonged exposure (PE)

Standard procedure:

PE [21] is a brief outpatient treatment that was originally developed for women with sexual assault-related PTSD and has since been shown to be efficacious in a variety of trauma populations [22]. The primary components of PE include imaginal exposure to trauma memories and in vivo exposure to feared but safe situations. PE is typically delivered in 9–15 weekly or biweekly individual therapy sessions.

Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy of PE among individuals with full or partial BPD or BPD characteristics. One RCT [23, Class I] examined the impact of full or partial BPD on treatment outcome following PE, stress inoculation training (SIT, focused on anxiety management skills), and a combined PE/SIT treatment. Participants were female sexual and non-sexual assault survivors with a primary diagnosis of PTSD related to an assault occurring after age 16. Exclusion criteria were: acute suicidality, suicide attempt or serious self-injurious behavior in the past 3 months, ongoing abuse, substance dependence, bipolar disorder, and psychotic disorders. In the treatment completer sample (n = 58), 9 (15.5 %) met full or partial criteria for BPD. Given the small sample of BPD patients, analyses were not conducted separately by treatment. When the three treatments were combined, BPD was not significantly related to outcome. However, women with full or partial BPD were significantly less likely than those without BPD to achieve good end-state functioning (11 % vs 51 %), which was defined as being below clinical cut-offs on PTSD, depression, and general anxiety.

A second RCT [24, Class I] evaluated the effect of borderline personality characteristics (BPC) on outcomes following PE or Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT). Participants included 131 adult female rape victims with PTSD, of whom 39 (25.2 %) were identified as having a clinical level of BPC according to self-report. Women with PTSD related to an index rape occurring in adulthood or childhood that was not perpetrated by a family member were included. Women with serious suicidal intent, recent suicidal or self-injurious behavior, ongoing abuse, current substance dependence, or bipolar or psychotic disorders were excluded. Results indicated that BPC scores were unrelated to treatment dropout and there was no evidence that BPC were related to worse outcomes in PTSD or other trauma-related symptoms. PE and CPT were comparably effective for individuals with BPC.

Contraindications:

Individuals with acute suicidality (i.e., ideation with intent and a plan) and recent suicidal or serious self-injurious behavior are excluded from PE. Many studies of PE, including the two RCTs reviewed above, have also excluded individuals with ongoing abuse, substance dependence, bipolar disorder, and psychotic disorders. Of note, emerging research suggests that PE can be safely and effectively applied in several populations previously thought to be inappropriate for this treatment, such as those with substance dependence and psychotic disorders. See [25] for a recent review of contraindications for PE.

Complications:

None identified.

Special points:

The existing research on PE for this population has either included individuals meeting partial criteria for BPD [23] or has not assessed the full BPD diagnosis [24]. Further, these studies have excluded women with either an index assault occurring in childhood [23] or an index assault involving incest [24]. Both studies excluded individuals with many behaviors common in severe BPD (e.g., acute suicidality, recent suicidal and self-injurious behavior, substance dependence). Thus, additional research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of PE for individuals meeting full criteria for BPD, exhibiting more severe levels of BPD, and with childhood assault or incest-related PTSD. Finally, additional treatment may be necessary for BPD patients who do not achieve good end-state functioning after a standard course of PE.

Cognitive processing therapy (CPT)

Standard procedure:

CPT [26] is a brief outpatient treatment for PTSD that was originally developed to treat sexual assault-related PTSD and has since been found to be efficacious for a variety of trauma types [27]. CPT consists of 12 weekly or biweekly sessions that can be delivered in individual, group, or a combined format. The treatment is primarily cognitive and focuses largely on identifying and challenging trauma-related beliefs. It can also include an exposure component in the form of writing a detailed account of the traumatic event.

To date, one RCT [24, Class I; reviewed in detail above] has evaluated the effect of BPC on outcomes in CPT among adult female rape victims. This study found no effect of borderline characteristics on treatment dropout or PTSD and other trauma-related outcomes, suggesting that CPT is comparably efficacious for individuals with and without BPC.

Contraindications:

Individuals with acute suicidality (i.e., ideation with intent and a plan) and recent suicidal or serious self-injurious behavior are excluded from CPT. Other common exclusion criteria include ongoing abuse, substance dependence, bipolar disorder, and current psychosis.

Complications:

None identified.

Special points:

The only RCT that has evaluated the efficacy of CPT for this population did not assess for the full BPD diagnosis and excluded women with serious suicidal intent, recent suicidal or self-injurious behavior, ongoing abuse, current substance dependence, bipolar and psychotic disorders, or an index rape involving incest. Thus, the generalizability of these findings to individuals meeting full diagnostic criteria for BPD, exhibiting more severe levels of BPD, and incest-related PTSD is unknown.

Phase-Based Treatments

  • Phase-based treatments typically include an initial phase focused on stabilization and behavioral skills training followed by a second phase of trauma-focused treatment. Some treatments also include a third phase in which impairments in psychosocial functioning are typically addressed.

Dialectical behavior therapy for PTSD (DBT-PTSD)

Standard procedure:

DBT-PTSD [28••, 29] is an adaptation of standard DBT [30] that is designed to address PTSD related to childhood sexual abuse. DBT-PTSD is delivered as a 12-week residential treatment that includes three treatment phases. The first phase (weeks 1–4) focuses on psychoeducation, identification of typical cognitive, emotional, and behavioral strategies to escape emotions, and teaching of DBT skills to control these behaviors. The second phase (weeks 5–10) consists of trauma-focused cognitive and exposure-based interventions. The final phase (weeks 11–12) addresses radical acceptance of trauma-related facts and psychosocial functioning. Patients receive biweekly individual sessions (23 total), group DBT skills training (11 total), group focused on self-esteem (8 total), and group mindfulness practice (3 total). In addition, patients attend three non-specific groups each week (e.g., music and art therapy).

The efficacy of DBT-PTSD for adult women with and without BPD has been evaluated in an RCT comparing DBT-PTSD with a treatment as usual–waitlist control (TAU-WL) [28••]. Participants were women with childhood sexual abuse-related PTSD and at least one of the following current conditions: eating disorder, major depressive disorder, substance abuse, and/or at least four criteria for BPD. Of the 74 women in the sample, 33 (44.6 %) met full criteria for BPD. Women actively engaging in NSSI were included, and those with a life-threatening behavior in the prior 4 months, current substance dependence, a lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia, or a body mass index less than 16.5 were excluded. Results indicate that DBT-PTSD was superior to TAU-WL in improving PTSD, depression, and global functioning, but not global symptom severity, dissociation, or BPD symptoms. These results were comparable for the subgroup of women with BPD in each condition, and BPD severity was generally unrelated to treatment outcome. Among women with BPD who received DBT-PTSD, the rate of diagnostic remission of PTSD was 41.2 %.

Contraindications:

DBT-PTSD is not used with individuals with recent life-threatening behavior (e.g., serious suicide attempts) and some severe comorbidities (substance dependence, schizophrenia, and severe anorexia nervosa).

Complications:

None identified. There was no evidence of worsening of PTSD, NSSI or suicidality in DBT-PTSD.

Special points:

Although women who were actively engaging in NSSI were included, treatment occurred in a residential setting that allowed for close monitoring of patient safety. The generalizability of these findings to outpatient samples of BPD patients as well as those with recent life-threatening behavior and the specified exclusionary diagnoses (e.g., substance dependence) is unknown. In addition, DBT-PTSD is primarily intended to target PTSD and associated trauma-related problems, and its effects on BPD symptoms did not differ from those obtained in a non-active treatment control.

Integrated Treatments

  • Integrated treatments are intended to comprehensively address the full range of problems with which individuals with PTSD and BPD present. This includes directly targeting both PTSD- and BPD-related problems, as well as factors that may explain the relationships between these two disorders. In addition, other problems (e.g., additional comorbid disorders, psychosocial functioning) are addressed as needed.

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)

Standard procedure:

DBT [30] is a comprehensive cognitive behavioral therapy that is the most well researched treatment available for BPD. DBT combines change-based interventions from behavior therapy (e.g., skills training, exposure, cognitive modification, contingency management) with acceptance-based interventions derived from Western contemplative and eastern Zen practices (e.g., validation, radical acceptance). DBT was developed for chronically suicidal individuals with BPD and is idiographically applied to address a hierarchy of treatment targets: (i) life-threatening behaviors (e. g., suicide attempts, NSSI), (ii) therapy-interfering behaviors (e.g., noncompliance, nonattendance), and (iii) quality-of-life-interfering behaviors (e.g., severe Axis I disorders, significant relationship problems, financial instability). The first stage of treatment focuses on reducing behavioral dyscontrol and increasing behavioral skills in the areas of emotion regulation, distress tolerance, interpersonal effectiveness, and mindfulness. PTSD is targeted as needed in the second stage of treatment. Standard DBT is typically delivered as a 1-year outpatient treatment consisting of four modes: (i) individual therapy (1 hour/week), (ii) group skills training (2.5 hours/week), (iii) therapist consultation team (1 hour/week), and (iv) between-session telephone consultation (as needed).

Two RCTs have evaluated the efficacy of standard DBT in treating PTSD among individuals with BPD. One RCT [1, Class I] included adult women with BPD and recent and recurrent suicide attempts and/or NSSI. Among the subgroup with PTSD assigned to DBT (n = 23; 50 %), 34.8 % achieved diagnostic remission from PTSD across 1 year of treatment and 1 year of follow-up. A second RCT [31••, Class I] included adult women with BPD, PTSD, and recent and recurrent suicide attempts and/or NSSI. Among patients who received DBT (n = 9), there was a large and significant reduction in PTSD severity across 1 year of treatment and 3 months of follow-up (g = 0.9). At post-treatment, 66.7 % of patients in DBT exhibited reliable improvement in PTSD and 33.3 % achieved diagnostic remission from PTSD.

Contraindications:

DBT requires patients to achieve control over life-threatening behaviors and serious therapy-interfering behaviors prior to addressing PTSD.

Complications:

No complications related to targeting PTSD during DBT have been identified. However, several studies have shown that BPD individuals with PTSD exhibit poorer outcomes during DBT in terms of NSSI and suicidality [32, 33]. Thus, untreated/active PTSD may complicate treatment of BPD-related problems during DBT.

Special points:

In the two studies reporting PTSD outcomes during DBT, PTSD was either not routinely targeted [1] or direct targeting of PTSD via formal exposure procedures was prohibited [31••]. Thus, these results are best interpreted as demonstrating the indirect effects of DBT on PTSD when this comorbid disorder is not directly targeted. In addition, individuals with bipolar and psychotic disorders were excluded from both studies and the generalizability of these findings to individuals with those disorders is unknown.

Dialectical behavior therapy with the dbt prolonged exposure protocol (DBT + DBT PE)

Standard procedure:

The DBT PE protocol was developed to facilitate routine and direct targeting of PTSD during standard DBT [34]. The combined DBT + DBT PE treatment includes 1 year of DBT (including all four treatment modes as described above) that begins with a focus on reducing behavioral dyscontrol and increasing behavioral skills. If/when patients meet specified readiness criteria (e.g., abstinence from suicidal and self-injurious behaviors for at least 2 months, no serious therapy-interfering behaviors), the DBT PE protocol is integrated into individual therapy sessions to directly target PTSD. This protocol is based on PE [21] with adaptations made to address the specific needs and characteristics of BPD patients. The primary treatment components include imaginal exposure to trauma memories and in vivo exposure to avoided situations. Following completion of the DBT PE protocol, standard DBT is continued with a focus on addressing any remaining treatment targets (e.g., psychosocial functioning).

To date, DBT + DBT PE has been evaluated in case studies [35, Class IV; n = 2], an open trial [36•, Class IV; n = 13], and an RCT [31••, Class I; n = 26]. Each of these studies included adult women with BPD, PTSD, and recent and recurrent suicide attempts and/or NSSI. In the open trial and RCT, the DBT PE protocol was feasible to implement for 80–100 % of treatment completers who started the protocol after an average of 20 weeks of DBT; of these, 73 % completed the full protocol in an average of 13 sessions. Across both studies, patients in DBT + DBT PE showed large and significant improvements in PTSD severity (effect sizes >1.3). In addition, at post-treatment there were high rates of reliable improvement (70.0–83.3 %) and diagnostic remission of PTSD (58.3–60.0 ;%). Large and significant reductions in suicidal and self-injurious behaviors as well as a variety of secondary outcomes (i.e., dissociation, trauma-related guilt, shame, depression, anxiety, social and global adjustment) were also found. In the RCT, improvements in DBT + DBT PE were larger than those in DBT for PTSD and other outcomes.

Contraindications:

In DBT + DBT PE, patients are required to achieve control over life-threatening behaviors and serious therapy-interfering behaviors prior to beginning the DBT PE protocol.

Complications:

None identified. Of note, adding the DBT PE protocol to DBT is associated with improvement, not worsening, of PTSD and suicidal and self-injurious urges and behaviors in comparison with DBT alone [31••].

Special points:

The RCT evaluating DBT + DBT PE used a relatively small sample and replication in a large-scale RCT is needed. Individuals with bipolar and psychotic disorders were excluded from the open trial and RCT and additional research is needed to evaluate the generalizability of these findings to BPD patients with these diagnoses.

Emerging therapies

  • The following psychotherapy has been evaluated in a preliminary open trial, and an RCT is complete but not yet published.

Narrative exposure therapy (NET)

Standard procedure:

NET is a brief treatment for PTSD that is designed for survivors of multiple and complex traumas such as victims of organized violence and conflict [37]. NET is typically delivered in 5–10 weekly or biweekly individual sessions. The primary component of NET is the creation of a written, cohesive life narrative that includes significant traumatic and non-traumatic events.

NET has been evaluated in an open feasibility trial with ten adult women with BPD and PTSD [38, Class IV]. Women who were actively engaging in NSSI were included, but those with acute suicidality, a recent suicide attempt, and other severe comorbidities (e.g., substance dependence, psychosis, body mass index <18) were excluded. Treatment lasted an average of 14 sessions and was primarily delivered in an inpatient setting, although three women were treated solely on an outpatient basis. Results indicated large and significant improvements from pre-treatment to 6 months after therapy in PTSD, depression, and dissociation, but not BPD symptoms.

Contraindications:

In this study, NET was not provided to individuals with recent suicidal behavior, acute suicidality, and other severe comorbidities.

Complications:

None identified.

Special points:

Although NET was delivered to women who were actively engaging in NSSI, treatment occurred primarily in an inpatient setting where patient safety could be closely monitored. The generalizability of these findings to outpatient samples of BPD patients as well as those with significant suicidality and other severe comorbidities is unknown. In addition, NET is intended to treat PTSD and does not appear to improve BPD symptoms.

Pediatric considerations

  • To date, no psychotherapies have been evaluated as a treatment for PTSD among children or adolescents with BPD or BPD traits. However, several of the treatments reviewed above have been adapted for adolescents and/or children and evaluated in RCTs. Specifically, developmentally adapted PE has been shown to be superior to time-limited dynamic therapy and supportive counseling in improving PTSD and other outcomes among adolescents girls with sexual abuse-related PTSD [39, 40]. Similarly, an adapted version of narrative exposure therapy outperformed a waiting list in reducing PTSD among refugee children and adolescents living in exile [41]. Finally, a shortened form of DBT for adolescents has been found to be more efficacious than enhanced usual care in reducing self-harm, suicidal ideation, and depression among adolescents with repeated suicidal and self-harming behavior [42]. Future research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of these treatments specifically for children and adolescents with comorbid PTSD and BPD or BPD traits.

Conclusion

For decades, common clinical lore has suggested that providing trauma-focused treatment to individuals with BPD is likely to be ineffective at best and potentially lethal at worst. However, due to considerable advances in research over the past decade, there are now a number of psychotherapies that have been shown to be both safe and efficacious for treating PTSD among BPD patients with varying levels of severity. Ideally these findings will not only help to assuage clinicians’ concerns, but will also provide hope for individuals suffering from these complex disorders. At the same time, research in this area is still in its infancy and more rigorous and large-scale studies are needed to replicate and extend these findings.