Skip to main content
Log in

Sciatic nerve excursion during neural mobilization with ankle movement using dynamic ultrasound imaging: a cross-sectional study

  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Ankle movement is used as a sensitizing maneuver for sciatica during neurodynamic techniques. In vivo studies on the sciatic nerve biomechanics associated with ankle movement during different positions of neighboring joints are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate sciatic nerve excursion during ankle dorsiflexion in different positions in a healthy population.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study. High-resolution dynamic ultrasound imaging was used to measure longitudinal excursion of the sciatic nerve in the posterior thigh of 27 healthy participants during ankle dorsiflexion in six positions of the neck, hip, and knee. Both the long and short distance of the nerve excursion were measured. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for data analysis, and Eta squared (r) was used to quantify the effect size.

Results

Ankle dorsiflexion resulted in distal sciatic nerve excursion that was significantly higher in positions in which the knee was extended (median 0.7–1.6 mm) than in positions in which the knee was flexed (median 0.5–1.4 mm) (P ≤ 0.049, r ≥ 0.379). There were no significant differences in nerve excursion between positions where the neck was neutral compared with positions where the neck was flexed (P ≥ 0.710, r ≤ 0.072) or between positions where the hip was neutral compared with positions where the hip was flexed (P ≥ 0.456, r ≤ 0.143).

Conclusion

The positions of adjacent joints, particularly the knee, had an impact on the excursion of the sciatic nerve in the thigh during ankle movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets used and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The custom code used in this study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Efstathiou MA, Stefanakis M, Savva C, Giakas G (2015) Effectiveness of neural mobilization in patients with spinal radiculopathy: a critical review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 19(2):205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kasehagen B, Ellis R, Mawston G, Allen S, Hing W (2016) Assessing the reliability of ultrasound imaging to examine radial nerve excursion. Ultrasound Med Bio 42(7):1651–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrade RJ, Nordez A, Hug F, Ates F, Coppieters MW, Pezarat-Correia P et al (2016) Non-invasive assessment of sciatic nerve stiffness during human ankle motion using ultrasound shear wave elastography. J Biomech 49(3):326–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd BS, Topp KS, Coppieters MW (2013) Impact of movement sequencing on sciatic and tibial nerve strain and excursion during the straight leg raise test in embalmed cadavers. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 43(6):398–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll M, Yau J, Rome K, Hing W (2012) Measurement of tibial nerve excursion during ankle joint dorsiflexion in a weight-bearing position with ultrasound imaging. J Foot Ankle Res. 5(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rebain R, Baxter GD, McDonough S (2002) A systematic review of the passive straight leg raising test as a diagnostic aid for low back pain (1989 to 2000). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(17):E388-395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Troup JDG (1981) Straight-leg-raising (SLR) and the qualifying tests for increased root tension. Spine 6(5):526–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alshami AM, Babri AS, Souvlis T, Coppieters MW (2008) Strain in the tibial and plantar nerves with foot and ankle movements and the influence of adjacent joint positions. J Appl Biomech 24(4):368–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis R, Osborne S, Whitfield J, Parmar P, Hing W (2017) The effect of spinal position on sciatic nerve excursion during seated neural mobilisation exercises: an in vivo study using ultrasound imaging. J Man Manip Ther 25(2):98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coppieters MW, Alshami AM, Babri AS, Souvlis T, Kippers V, Hodges PW (2006) Strain and excursion of the sciatic, tibial, and plantar nerves during a modified straight leg raising test. J Orthop Res 24(9):1883–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coppieters MW, Andersen LS, Johansen R, Giskegjerde PK, Hoivik M, Vestre S et al (2015) Excursion of the sciatic nerve during nerve mobilization exercises: An in vivo cross-sectional study using dynamic ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 45(10):731–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dilley A, Summerhayes C, Lynn B. An in vivo investigation of ulnar nerve sliding during upper limb movements. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007;22(7): 774–779.

  13. Paquette P, Lamontagne M, Higgins J, Gagnon DH. Repeatability and minimal detectable change in longitudinal median nerve excursion measures during upper limb neurodynamic techniques in a mixed population: A pilot study using musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Bio; 2015;41(7): 2082–2086.

  14. Ridehalgh C, Moore A, Hough A (2014) Normative sciatic nerve excursion during a modified straight leg raise test. Man Ther 19(1):59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang PH, Chen YJ, Chang KV, Wu WT, Özçakar L (2020) Ultrasound measurements of superficial and deep masticatory muscles in various postures: reliability and influencers. Sci Rep 10(1):14357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu WT, Chen LR, Chang HC, Chang KV, Özçakar L (2021) Quantitative ultrasonographic analysis of changes of the suprascapular nerve in the aging population with shoulder pain. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:640747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosner B (2016) Fundamentals of biostatistics, 8th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis R, Hing W, Dilley A, McNair P (2008) Reliability of measuring sciatic and tibial nerve movement with diagnostic ultrasound during a neural mobilisation technique. Ultrasound Med Biol 34(8):1209–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Petty NJ, Moore AP (2001) Neuromusculoskeletal examination and assessmet, 2nd edn. Elsevier Health Sciences, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bronner S, Agraharasamakulam S, Ojofeitimi S (2010) Reliability and validity of electrogoniometry measurement of lower extremity movement. J Med Eng Technol 34(3):232–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nussbaumer S, Leunig M, Glatthorn JF, Stauffacher S, Gerber H, Maffiuletti NA (2010) Validity and test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shamsi M, Mirzaei M, Khabiri SS (2019) Universal goniometer and electro-goniometer intra-examiner reliability in measuring the knee range of motion during active knee extension test in patients with chronic low back pain with short hamstring muscle. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 11(4):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ridehalgh C, Moore A, Hough A (2012) Repeatability of measuring sciatic nerve excursion during a modified passive straight leg raise test with ultrasound imaging. Man Ther 17(6):572–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Armstrong RA (2014) When to use the bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 34(5):502–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rothman KJ (1990) No adjustments are needed for multiple comparison. Epidemiology 1(1):43–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2005) Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. Lancet 365(9470):1591–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Konstantopoulos S, Hedges LV (2019) Statistically analysing effect sizes: fixed- and randon effects models. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 3rd edn. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 245–280

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Ellis RF, Hing WA, McNair PJ (2012) Comparison of longitudinal sciatic nerve movement with different mobilization exercises: An in vivo study utilizing ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42(8):667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Balaban O, Aydin T, Inal S (2018) Movement of sciatic nerve with dorsiflexion and plantar flexion of foot: A new identification method by ultrasound. J Clin Anesth 44:66–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ridehalgh C, Moore A, Hough A (2015) Sciatic nerve excursion during a modified passive straight leg raise test in asymptomatic participants and participants with spinally referred leg pain. Man Ther 20(4):564–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alshami AM, Souvlis T, Coppieters MW (2008) A review of plantar heel pain of neural origin: differential diagnosis and management. Man Ther 13(2):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank all participants who volunteered to participate in this study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AA conceived the idea and the design of the study, drafted the manuscript, analyzed and interpreted the data. TA wrote the initial draft, collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data. MA and TH performed the ultrasound imaging. MT created a new software code used in the work. FA interpreted the data. All authors revised the manuscript critically, approved the version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali M. Alshami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was ethically approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the institution (blinded for review) (PGS-2019-03-306, 4 November 2019). This study was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshami, A.M., Alshammari, T.K., AlMuhaish, M.I. et al. Sciatic nerve excursion during neural mobilization with ankle movement using dynamic ultrasound imaging: a cross-sectional study. J Ultrasound 25, 241–249 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-021-00595-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-021-00595-7

Keywords

Navigation