Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis of emergencies/urgencies in gynecology and during the first trimester of pregnancy

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several surgical and/or medical emergencies/urgencies may occur in gynecologic patients and in pregnant women during the first trimester. Particularly, ectopic pregnancies, ruptured or hemorrhagic ovarian cysts, ovarian or adnexal torsions, threatened or inevitable miscarriages, phlogistic gynecological disorders, complications involving the uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and spontaneous uterine rupture are possible acute complications. The diagnosis is suspected on the basis of symptoms (acute pelvic and/or abdominal pain, with or without vaginal bleeding or discharge, until acute abdomen with peritonitis), by means physical evaluation (abdominal, pelvic, and bimanual gynecological examinations), by means of transabdominal (TAS) and/or transvaginal (TVS) sonography, and laboratory tests. However, the diagnosis is often not that simple, especially when the symptoms and clinical signs are minimal, and ultrasound (US) examination is not diriment. The differential diagnosis of abdominal/pelvic pain is broad and includes primarily gastrointestinal and urogenital disorders. Generally, TAS should usually be used in conjunction with TVS for evaluation of the female pelvis. If the US examination is not conclusive, CT or MRI, especially in pregnant patients, should be considered.

Riassunto

Diverse emergenze/urgenze chirurgiche e/o mediche possono interessare le pazienti ginecologiche e le gravide al primo trimestre. In particolare, le gravidanze ectopiche, le cisti ovariche rotte o torte, le torsioni ovariche o annessiali, le minacce d’aborto o gli aborti inevitabili, le patologie infiammatorie ginecologiche, i fibromi uterini complicati, l’endometriosi e la rottura uterina spontanea rappresentano possibili complicanze acute. La diagnosi può essere sospettata in base alla sintomatologia (algie pelviche e/o addominali acute, con eventuali perdite vaginali, fino a un quadro di addome acuto con peritonite), alla visita (valutazione addominale, pelvica ed esplorazione ginecologica bimanuale), all’ecografia transaddominale (TAS) e/o transvaginale (TVS), e agli esami di laboratorio. Tuttavia, la diagnosi spesso non è semplice, soprattutto quando i sintomi e i segni clinici sono lievi e l’ecografia non è dirimente. La diagnosi differenziale del dolore addominale/pelvico comprende un’ampia varietà di disordini, in particolare gastrointestinali e urogenitali. Generalmente, la valutazione della pelvi femminile dovrebbe essere eseguita mediante ecografia sia transaddominale che transvaginale. Se l’esame ecografico non consente di fare diagnosi, dovrebbero essere presi in considerazione la TC o, specialmente nelle donne gravide, la RMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyd CA, Riall TS (2012) Unexpected gynecologic findings during abdominal surgery. Curr Probl Surg 49:195–251

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta S, Manyonda IT (2009) Acute complications of fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23(5):609–617. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gramith F, Sirr S, Hollerman J, Hawks L (1991) Transvaginal versus transabdominal sonography in patients suspected of having ectopic pregnancy. Minn Med 74(1):27–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambert MJ, Villa M (2004) Gynecologic ultrasound in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am 22(3):683–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cicchiello LA, Hamper UM, Scoutt LM (2011) Ultrasound evaluation of gynecologic causes of pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 38(1):85–114, viii. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2011.02.005

  6. Simsek T, Dogan A, Simsek M, Pestereli E (2008) Heterotopic triplet pregnancy (twin tubal) in a natural cycle with tubal rupture: case report and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34(4 Pt 2):759–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Casadio P, Formelli G, Spagnolo E, De Angelis D, Marra E, Armillotta F et al (2009) Laparoscopic treatment of interstitial twin pregnancy. Fertil Steril 92:390.e13–390.e17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nama V, Manyonda I (2009) Tubal ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279(4):443–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2004) The management of tubal pregnancy. Guideline no. 21, May 2004, Reviewed 2010

  10. Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F (2007 ) Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD000324

  11. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA (2012) The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(1):44.e1–56.e13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A (2012) Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(1):14–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lau S et al (2013) Conservative medical and surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 72:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moawad NS, Tulandi T (1999) Current diagnosis and treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Varras M, Akrivis C, Hadjopoulos G, Antoniou N (2003) Heterotopic pregnancy in a natural conception cycle presenting with tubal rupture: a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 106(1):79–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai XX, Gao HJ, Yang XF, Dong MY, Zhu YM (2012) Expectant management of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy. Chin Med J (Engl) 125(7):1341–1344

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ugurlucan FG, Bastu E, Dogan M, Kalelioglu I, Alanya S, Has R (2012) Management of cesarean heterotopic pregnancy with transvaginal ultrasound-guided potassium chloride injection and gestational sac aspiration, and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(5):671–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moragianni VA, Hamar BD, McArdle C, Ryley DA (2012) Management of a cervical heterotopic pregnancy presenting with first-trimester bleeding: case report and review of the literature. Fertil Steril 98(1):89–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Julania S, Tai R (2013) Heterotopic simultaneous splenic and intrauterine pregnancy after spontaneous conception and review of literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39:367–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2006) The management of early pregnancy loss. Green-top Guideline No. 25 October 2006

  21. Rackow BW, Patrizio P (2007) Successful pregnancy complicated by early and late adnexal torsion after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 87:697

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoover K, Jenkins TR (2011) Evaluation and management of adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(2):97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Glanc P, Salem S, Farine D (2008) Adnexal masses in the pregnant patient: a diagnostic and management challenge. Ultrasound Q 24(4):225–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Huchon C, Fauconnier A (2010) Adnexal torsion: a literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150(1):8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Valsky DV, Esh-Broder E, Cohen SM, Lipschuetz M, Yagel S (2010) Added value of the gray-scale whirlpool sign in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(5):630–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vijayaraghavan SB (2004) Sonographic whirlpool sign in ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med 23(12):1643–1649 (quiz 1650–1651)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koo YJ, Lee JE, Lim KT, Shim JU, Mok JE, Kim TJ (2011) A 10-year experience of laparoscopic surgery for adnexal masses during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 113(1):36–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hasson J, Tsafrir Z, Azem F, Bar-On S, Almog B, Mashiach R et al (2010) Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(6):536.e1–536.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Leiserowitz G (2006) Managing ovarian masses during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 61:463–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Whitecar MP, Turner S, Higby MK (1999) Adnexal masses in pregnancy: a review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:19–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yuen P, Ng PS, Leung PL, Rogers MS (2004) Outcome in laparoscopic management of persistent adnexal mass during the second trimester of pregnancy. Surg Endosc 18:1354–1357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ko ML, Lai TH, Chen SC (2009) Laparoscopic management of complicated adnexal masses in the first trimester of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 92:283–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathevet P, Nessah K, Dargent D, Mellier G (2003) Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses in pregnancy: a case series. Eur J Obstet Gyncol Biol 108:217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Timor-Tritsch IE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A, Murphy KE, Heller DS (1998) Transvaginal sonographic markers of tubal inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:56–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jaiyeoba O, Soper DE (2011) A practical approach to the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2011:753037. doi:10.1155/2011/753037

  36. Mirhashemi R, Schoell WM, Estape R, Angioli R, Averette HE (1999) Trends in the management of pelvic abscesses. J Am Coll Surg 188(5):567–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Stefano Zucchini and Elena Marra declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal studies

The study described in this article did not include any procedures involving humans or animals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Zucchini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zucchini, S., Marra, E. Diagnosis of emergencies/urgencies in gynecology and during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound 17, 41–46 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-013-0059-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-013-0059-0

Keywords

Navigation