Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigations on hardness of investment-casted implants fabricated after vapour smoothing of FDM replicas

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is one of the additive manufacturing processes, which is used to produce three-dimensional functional and non-functional prototypes. This process is commercially acceptable for producing parts with different materials (thermoplastic, wax, etc.), which can be formed into desired shape and can be used as consumable pattern in investment casting (IC) process. The IC process has been established for production of difficult to made parts with high accuracy and finish. By combining both these novel processes, the researchers are serving the field of medicine to satisfy the needs of society. The vapour smoothing is one of the recently developed surface finishing techniques, which has potential to draw remarkable results to improve the quality of FDM replicas and support the IC process to enhance the properties of casted parts. So, in this paper an attempt has been made to develop a biomedical implant by combining these three processes. Also the effects of controlling parameters of combined processes on the hardness and microstructure of the casted implants have been investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Syam WP et al (2011) Rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing in medicine and dentistry. Virtual Phys Prototyp 6(2):79–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferreira JC et al (2004) Rapid manufacturing of medical prostheses. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 6(6):567–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pandey PM et al (2001) Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol 132:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Upcraft S et al (2003) The rapid prototyping technologies. Assem Autom 23:318–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar P et al (2012) Application of fusion deposition modelling for rapid investment casting—a review. Int J Mater Eng Innov 3:204–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar P et al (2015) Investigations for mechanical properties of hybrid investment casting: a case study. Mater Sci Forum 808:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar P et al (2013) Framework for developing a hybrid investment casting process. Asian Rev Mech Eng 2:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pham DT et al (1998) A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38:1257–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lam TW et al (1998) Reinforced thin shell objects rapid prototyping by fused deposition modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14:631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tukuru N et al (2008) Rapid prototype technique in medical field. Res J Pharm Technol 1:341–344

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chabbra M et al (2011) Rapid casting solutions: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 17:328–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosochwski A et al (2000) Rapid tooling: the state of the art. J Mater Process Technol 106:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berce P et al (2005) The application of rapid prototyping technologies for manufacturing the custom implants. In: ESAFORM 2005 conference on rapid prototyping and rapid tooling. Cluj-Napoca, Romani, pp 679–682

  14. Gibson I et al (2006) The use of rapid prototyping to assist medical applications. Rapid Prototyp J 12(1):53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chua CK et al (1998) A study of state of the art rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14:146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh R et al (2014) Development of biomedical implant (hip joint) by combining fused deposition modelling and investment casting. In: Proceedings of the international conference on research and innovations in mechanical engineering. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer, New York, pp 225–232

  17. Roath M (2012) Analysis of the microstructure and hardness of a direct digital manufactured metal used for an acetabular cup implant. In: Proceedings of the national conference of undergraduate research

  18. Ahn D et al (2009) Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. J Mater ProcessTechnol 209:5593–5600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rahmati S et al (2007) Dimensional accuracy analysis of wax patterns created by RTV silicon rubber molding using Taguchi approach. Rapid Prototyp J 13:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Galantucci LM et al (2012) Direct digital manufacturing of ABS parts: an experimental study on effectiveness of proprietary software for shrinkage compensation. Int J Digital Content Technol Appl 6:546–555

    Google Scholar 

  21. Macku M et al (2012) Applying RP-FDM technology to produce prototype castings using the investment casting method. Arch Foundry Eng 12:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Idris MH et al (2008) Evaluation of ABS patterns produced from FDM for investment casting process. In: Proceedings of the ninth Asia Pacific industrial engineering and management systems conference, pp 1299–1304

  23. Gregorian A et al (2001) Accuracy improvement in rapid prototyping machine (FDM-1650). In: Solid freeform fabrication proceedings, 12th, solid freeform fabrication symposium, pp 77–84

  24. Bidanda B et al (1991) Reverse engineering and rapid prototyping. In: Dorf RC, Kusiak A (eds) Handbook of design, manufacture and automation. Wiley, New York, pp 977–991

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pandey PM et al (2003) Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol 1:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar P et al (2016) Experimental investigations on hardness of the biomedical implants prepared by hybrid investment casting. J Manuf Process 21:160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamada T et al (2006) Mechanical property and microstructural change by thermal aging of SCS14A cast duplex stainless steel. J Nucl Mater 350:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ganesh P et al (2009) Laser rapid manufacturing of bi-metallic tube with Stellite-21 and austenitic stainless steel. Trans Indian Inst Met 62:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Asgari M et al (2011) Microstructural characterization of pulsed plasma nitrided 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 529:425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chandra K et al (2012) Low temperature thermal ageing embrittlement of austenitic stainless steel welds and its electrochemical assessment. Corros Sci 54:278–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martins M et al (2009) Microstructural characteristics and corrosion behavior of a super duplex stainless steel casting. Mater Charact 60:150–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mehr FF et al (2014) Effect of chill cooling conditions on cooling rate, microstructure and casting/chill interfacial heat transfer coefficient for sand cast A319 alloy. Int J Cast Met Res 27:288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chohan JS et al (2016) Enhancing dimensional accuracy of FDM based biomedical implant replicas by statistically controlled vapor smoothing process. Prog Addit Manuf 1(1):105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Priedeman Jr WR et al (2012) Smoothing method for layered deposition modeling. United States patent US 8,123,999B2

  35. Espalin D et al (2009) Effects of vapor smoothing on ABS part dimensions. In: Rapid 2009 conference and exposition. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Schaumburg, IL, USA, May 12–14

  36. Sood AK et al (2009) Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. J Mater Des 30:4243–4252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. MINITAB 17 Statistical software package, User Manual. Copyright © 2013 Minitab Inc

  38. Yadav N et al (2011) Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties of the investment castings produced by using expandable polystyrene pattern. Int J Adv Eng Technol 1:128

    Google Scholar 

  39. Krishnaiah K et al (2012) Applied design of experiments and Taguchi methods, 4th edn. PHI Learning Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, p 248

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to IKGPTU Jalandhar, Department of Production Engineering, GNDEC, Ludhiana, DST (GoI), for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rupinder Singh.

Additional information

Technical Editor: João Marciano Laredo dos Reis.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, D., Singh, R. & Boparai, K.S. Investigations on hardness of investment-casted implants fabricated after vapour smoothing of FDM replicas. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 178 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-2265-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-2265-y

Keywords

Navigation