Abstract
Jetting phenomenon is an injection error without thoroughly understanding by far. In this study, short shot experiments and numerical simulations were performed to investigate the trigger factor inducing jetting phenomenon in injection molding. Polycarbonate was prepared for short shot experiments that carried out in a typical end-gated rectangular mold under different injection speed, mold temperature and melt temperature. It was found that repeatability of jetting was poor and with higher melt temperature came more frequency of folding. Then, three repeatable evolutions of jetting were successfully simulated. Through analyzing the quantities during the initial stage of jetting and comparing with those in simple filling pattern, it has been numerically revealed that velocity kept constant before melt impinged on the wall opposite to gate. The pressure did not increase with the increase in melt flow length and was extremely small, which turned out jetting was not a pressure-driven flow any more. Shear rate in the initial stage of jetting was less than 10 s−1, while shear rate in front of the pillar can be as low as 10−4 s−1, leading that viscosity approached zero-shear-rate viscosity and melt can be seen as a Newtonian fluid. Due to without wetting mold wall enough, friction between mold wall and melt was weak as well as the internal friction among layers of melt, which resulted in melt moving without deformation. Based on the results, a reasonable mechanism was proposed that jetting occurred for lack of shear rate. Jetting could be effectively depressed by changing the magnitude or direction of velocity, which provides a theoretical guidance for mold design and products.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40430-020-02278-6/MediaObjects/40430_2020_2278_Fig12_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Özdemir A, Uluer O, Gldaş A (2004) Flow front advancement of molten thermoplastic materials during filling stage of a mold cavity. Polym Test 23(8):957–966
Liu SJ, Chang JH (2010) The occurrence of surface roughness in gas assist injection molded nylon composites. Polym Compos 21(2):322–331
Goodship V (2004) Troubleshooting injection moulding, vol 15. iSmithers Rapra Publishing, Shrewsbury
Spencer RS, Gilmore GD (1951) Some flow phenomena in the injection molding of polystyrene. J Colloid Sci 6(2):118–132
White JL, Dee HB (1974) Flow visualization for injection molding of polyethylene and polystyrene melts. Polym Eng Sci 14(3):212–222
Sleeman MJ, West GH (1974) Rheology and product properties in injection moulding. Polym Int 6(2):109–118
Kunio O, White JL, Clark ES (1976) Jetting phenomena in injection mold filling mold filling. Polym Eng Sci 16(8):585–592
Chan Y, White JL, Oyanagi Y (1978) Influence of glass fibers on the extrusion and injection molding characteristics of polyethylene and polystyrene melts. Polym Eng Sci 18(4):268–272
Akay M, Barkley D (1992) Jetting and fibre degradation in injection moulding of glass-fibre reinforced polyamides. J Mater Sci 27(21):5831–5836
Hua S, Zhang S, Cao W et al (2016) Simulation of jetting in injection molding using a finite volume method. Polymers 8(5):172
Krug S, Evans JRG, Maat JHHT (2013) Jetting and weld lines in ceramic injection moulding. Br Ceram Trans 98(4):178–181
Sardarian M, Mirzaee O, Habibolahzadeh A (2016) Numerical simulation and experimental investigation on jetting phenomenon in low pressure injection molding (LPIM) of alumina. J Mater Process Technol 243:374–380
Chang DH (2007) Rheology and processing of polymeric materials. Polymer processing, vol 2. Oxford University Press Inc., New York
Chau SW, Lin YW (2006) Three-dimensional simulation of melt filling and gas penetration in gas-assisted injection molding process using a finite volume formulation. J Polym Eng 26(5):431–450
Michaeli W, Hoffmann S, Kratz M et al (2001) Simulation opportunities by a three-dimensional calculation of injection moulding based on the finite element method. Int Polym Process 16(4):398–403
Silva L (2004) Viscoelastic compressible flow and applications in 3D injection molding simulation. Ph.D. thesis, Mines Paristech, Paris
Groisman A, Steinberg VV (2002) Elastic turbulence in a polymer solution flow. Nature 405(6782):53–55
Balkovsky E, Fouxon A, Lebedev V (2000) Turbulent dynamics of polymer solutions. Phys Rev Lett 84(20):4765
Zhang S, Hua S, Cao W et al (2019) 3D viscoelastic simulation of jetting in injection molding. Polym Eng Sci 59:E397–E405
Favero JL, Secchi AR, Cardozo NSM et al (2010) Viscoelastic fluid analysis in internal and in free surface flows using the software OpenFOAM. Comput Chem Eng 34(12):1984–1993
Griffiths RW, Turner JS (1988) Folding of viscous plumes impinging on a density or viscosity interface. Geophys J Int 95(2):397–419
Ribe NM, Habibi M, Bonn D (2012) Liquid rope coiling. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44(44):249–266
Ribe NM (2004) Coiling of viscous jets. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 460(2051):3223–3239
Maleki M, Habibi M, Golestanian R et al (2004) Liquid rope coiling on a solid surface. Phys Rev Lett 93(21):214502
Jo C, Br M (1981) Viscous fluid buckling of plane and axisymmetric jets. J Fluid Mech 113(-1):221–239
Ubbink O, Issa RI (1999) A method for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes. J Comput Phys 153(1):26–50
Leonard BP (1991) The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 88:17–74
Leonard BP (1979) A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 19:59–98
Jain N, Barry C, Barry M (2001) Criteria for flow instabilities in end-gated injection molds. J Soc Plast Eng ANTEC 47:471–475
Ville L, Silva L, Coupez T (2011) Convected level set method for the numerical simulation of fluid buckling. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 66(3):324–344
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Technical Editor: Lincoln Cardoso Brandao.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hua, S. Experimental and numerical investigation of jetting phenomenon in injection molding. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 193 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02278-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02278-6