Skip to main content
Log in

Deflectometry in cylindrical coordinates using a conical mirror: principles and proof of concept

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engineering applications for precision cylindrical parts have required increasingly tight geometric tolerances to guarantee their correct functionality. In addition to demanding better machine tools and manufacturing processes, it is also important to have the means to verify if the qualities of precision cylindrical components meet the requirements. Optical measurement techniques are excellent options for this task since they are contactless, fast and precise. This paper proposes the concept of deflectometry in cylindrical coordinates for measuring roundness in precision cylindrical parts. Deflectometry is an optical technique that indirectly measures the shape deviations of a mirror-like surface from the distortions in reflected images by the measured surface. Flat or smooth surfaces with good surface finishes are among the main applications. Measurement uncertainties of a few nanometers have been reported in the literature. The new concept presented in this paper uses deflectometry through a 45° conical mirror. The conical mirror turns the cylindrical surface into a planar image by an optical transformation, making possible to measure the geometric deviations using deflectometry. This paper presents the proposed optical configuration, the required sequence of fringes to be reflected, measurement and reconstruction algorithms and the results of proof-of-concept experiments. The preliminary results show very good performance for roundness measurements of cross sections. However, it was not possible to measure efficiently the cylinder generatrix straightness. The concept presented here may give rise to a new family of optical roundness measurement machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pfeifer T (2002) Production metrology. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Munich; Reprint 2015 ed. edition (21 Aug 2002)

  2. VDI – The Association of German Engineers. VDI/VDE 2601 (1991) Requirements on the surface structure to cover function capability of surfaces manufactured by cutting; list of parameters

  3. International Organization for Standardization (2012) ISO 1101: geometrical product specifications (GPS)—geometrical tolerancing—tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out, 3rd edn. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  4. Humienny Z et al (2001) Geometrical product specifications: course for technical universities. Warsaw University of Technology Printing House, Warsaw

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith GT (2002) Industrial metrology: surfaces and roundness, 1st edn. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. International Organization for Standardization (2011) ISO 12181-1: geometrical product specifications (GPS)—roundness—part 1: vocabulary and parameters of roundness, 1st edn. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization for Standardization (2011) ISO 12181-2: Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—roundness—part 2: specification operators, 1st edn. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  8. Albertazzi A, Dal Pont A (2005) Preliminary measurement performance evaluation of a new white light interferometer for cylindrical surfaces. Am J Phys US 13:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  9. Albertazzi A, Dal Pont A (2006) A white light interferometer for measurement of external cylindrical surfaces. In: Osten W (ed) Fringe 2005. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29303-5_85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Viotti MR, Albertazzi A, Fantin AV, Dal Pont A (2008) Comparison between a white-light interferometer and a tactile formtester for the measurement of long inner cylindrical surfaces. Opt Lasers Eng 46(5):396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2007.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Viotti MR, Albertazzi A, Dal Pont A, Fantin AV (2007) Evaluation of a novel algorithm to align and stitch adjacent measurements of long inner cylindrical surfaces with white light interferometry. Opt Lasers Eng 45(8):852–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2007.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Albertazzi A, Viotti MR, Miggiorin RM, Dal Pont A (2008) Applications of a white light interferometer of wear measurement of cylinders. Proc SPIE 7064(2008):70640B–1–70640B–10. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.796058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Albertazzi A, Viotti MR; Dal Pont A (2006) A white-light interferometer for inner cylindrical surfaces. In: Interferometry XIII: applications 62930F, 13 Aug 2006. SPIE, pp 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.678050

  14. Weckenmann A, Bruning J, Patterson S, Knight P (2001) Grazing incidence interferometry for high precision measurements of cylindrical form deviations. Cirp Ann Oxf 50(1):381–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62145-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen F, Brown GM, Song MM (2000) Overview of three-dimensional shape measurement using optical methods. Opt Eng 39(1):10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bothe T, Li W, von Kopylow C, Jüptner W (2004) High-resolution 3 D shape measurement on specular surfaces by fringe reflection. Proc SPIE 5457:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang L, Idir M, Zuo C, Asundi A (2018) Review of phase measuring deflectometry. Opt Lasers Eng 107:247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pérard D, Beyerer J (1997) Three-dimensional measurement of specular free-form surfaces with a structured-lighting reflection technique. Proc SPIE 3204-11:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Höfer S, Heizmann M, Werling S (2011) Deflectometry for the inspection of specular surfaces. Workshop on “non-destructive inspection technologies”, Zurich: [s.n.]

  20. Häusler G, Faber C, Olesch E, Ettl S (2013) Deflectometry vs. interferometry. Proc SPIE 8788:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang F, Wang Z, Wen Y, Qu W (2015) Two-dimensional phase unwrapping algorithms for fringe pattern analysis: a comparison study. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 9302, no 93023F

  22. Knauer MC, Kaminski J, Häusler G (2004) Phase measuring deflectometry: a new approach to measure specular free-form surfaces. Proc SPIE 5457:366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sárosi Z et al (2011) Detection of surface defects on sheet metal parts using one-shot deflectometry in the infrared range. In: FLIR technical series: application note for research & science, Zurich, pp 1–10. http://www.flir.co.uk/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=50056. Accessed 6 Nov 2015

  24. Zhang S (2010) Recent progresses on real-time 3D shape measurement using digital fringe projection techniques. Opt Lasers Eng 48(2):149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshizawa T, Wakayama T (2009) Surface profilometry Handbook of optical metrology: principles and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Guo H, Feng P, Tao T (2010) Specular surface measurement by using least squares light tracking technique. Opt Lasers Eng 48(2):166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiao YL, Su X, Chen W, Liu Y (2012) Three-dimensional shape measurement of aspheric mirror based on fringe reflection photogrammetry. Appl Opt 51(4):457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Srinivasan V, Liu HC, Halioua M (1984) Automated phase-measuring profilometry of 3-D diffuse objects. Appl Opt 23(18):3105–3108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Q, Su X, Xiang L, Sun X (2012) 3-D shape measurement based on complementary gray-code light. Opt Lasers Eng 50(4):574–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li W, Bothe T, von Kopylow C, Jüptner W (2004) Evaluation methods for gradient measurement techniques. In: Optical metrology in production engineering, [s.l.]. SPIE, pp 300–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.546002

  31. Wu Y, Yue H, Yi J, Li M, Liu Y (2014) Single-shot three-dimensional shape measurement of specular surfaces by orthogonal color fringe pattern reflection technique. In: Optical metrology and inspection for industrial applications III, [s.l.]. SPIE, pp 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2072410

  32. Southwell WH (1980) Wave-front estimation from wave-front slope measurements. J Opt Soc Am 70(8):998–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang L, Asundi A (2012) Improvement of least-squares integration method with iterative compensations in fringe reflectometry. Appl Opt 51(31):7459–7465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Harker M, O’Leary P (2015) Regularized reconstruction of a surface from its measured gradient field: algorithms for spectral, Tikhonov, constrained, and weighted regularization. J Math Imaging Vis N Y 51(1):46–70

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Z (1999) Flexible camera calibration by viewing a plane from unknown orientations. In: Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2012, vol 1(c), pp 0–7

  36. Harker M, O’Leary P (2008) Least squares surface reconstruction from measured gradient fields. In: 2008 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, [s.l.]. IEEE, pp 1–7

  37. Harker M, O’Leary P (2011) Least squares surface reconstruction from gradients: direct algebraic methods with spectral, Tikhonov, and constrained regularization. In: CVPR 2011, [s.l.]. IEEE, pp 2529–2536

  38. Harker M, O’Leary P (2013) Direct regularized surface reconstruction from gradients for industrial photometric stereo. Comput Ind Leoben 64(9):1221–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Harker M, O’Leary P (2013) Computes the Global least squares reconstruction of a surface from its gradient field with spectral filtering, using either polynomial, cosine, or Fourier bases. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/authors/321598. Accessed 25 Jan 2016

  40. Henzold G (2006) Geometrical dimensioning and tolerancing for design, manufacturing and inspection: a handbook for geometrical product specification using ISO and ASME standards, 2nd edn. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  41. Muralikrishnan B, Raja J (2009) Computational surface and roundness metrology. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  42. International Bureau of Weight and Measures (2008) Evaluation of measurement data: guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express thanks to PHOTONITA for the technical support and for the development of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos José Ferreira Carvalho.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Lincoln Cardoso Brandao.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carvalho, M.J.F., Veiga, C.L.N. & Albertazzi, A. Deflectometry in cylindrical coordinates using a conical mirror: principles and proof of concept. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 380 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1885-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1885-6

Keywords

Navigation