Skip to main content
Log in

Formation mechanism study on tooth surface of two gear finishing processes: combined theoretical and experimental approaches

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the necessary conditions, high precision and good mechanical performance gear is very important for a high speed and precision transmission system. To meet the requirement of the performance, gear finishing processes including gear honing and gear grinding have been mainly adopted. To compare the tooth surface of these two gear finishing processes, this paper gives the formation mechanism of gear tooth surface texture and conducts some comparative experiments on the gear surface texture and residual stress. Based on the spatial engagement principle and the discrete points of work-piece gear tooth spiral involute surface, the tooth surface contact area models of gears from the two processes are built, respectively, and the prediction models of honing paths and grinding paths are generated according to the velocity vector of the sampling points on tooth surface. Then the contrast and verification tests of the prediction models are carried out on internal gearing power honing machine and worm wheel gear grinding machine, respectively. Results indicate that the predicted curve shape honing paths and the longitudinal linear shape grinding paths of tooth surface are both similar to the experiment ones, respectively. Furthermore, some detailed quantitative analyses of tooth surface qualities including surface texture and tooth surface residual stress has been finished. It is found that the surface roughness value of gear grinding work-piece gear tooth surface is lower than that of gear honing process and the distribution of compressive residual stress on gear tooth surface is associated with the principles and parameters of the two processes. This research has theoretical and instructional significance for the improvement of gear honing and grinding processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

(H) and (G):

Gear honing and gear grinding

r b1 :

The base circle radius of work-piece gear

λ 1 :

The generating angle of involute at the contact point

v O1 :

The velocity vector of the contact point on the tooth surface of work-piece gear

v O2 :

The velocity vector of the contact point on the tooth surface of honing wheel or grinding wheel

v 12 :

The relative velocity vector of a random contact point in coordinate system S(O − x − y − z)

n :

The tooth surface normal vector in coordinate system S(O − x − y − z)

r O1 :

The position vector of contact points on work-piece gear tooth surface in coordinate system S(O − x − y − z)

r O2 :

The position vector of contact points on honing wheel tooth surface in coordinate system S(O − x − y − z)

r 1 :

The position vector of contact points on work-piece gear tooth surface in coordinate system S1(O 1 − x 1 − y 1 − z 1)

β :

The helix angle of work-piece gear

m n :

The module of work-piece gear

v z :

The feed velocity of Z 1 axis

β :

The helix angle of work-piece gear

m n :

The module of work-piece gear

Σ:

The crossed axis angle between work-piece gear and honing wheel or grinding wheel

N 1 :

The tooth number of work-piece gear and grinding wheel

N 2 :

The tooth number of grinding wheel

φ 1 :

The rotation angle of work-piece gear

φ 2 :

The rotation angle of honing wheel or grinding wheel

w O1 :

The angular velocity vector of work-piece gear in coordinate system S(O − x − y − z)

w O2 :

The angular velocity vector of honing wheel in coordinate system S(O − x − y − z)

M OP :

The coordinate transmission matrix from Sp(O p − x p − y p − z p) to S(O − x − y − z)

M O1 :

The coordinate transmission matrix from S1(O 1 − x 1 − y 1 − z 1) to S(O − x − y − z)

r O1 :

The position vector of contact points on work-piece gear tooth surface in coordinate system S(O − x − y − z)

r O2 :

The position vector of contact points on honing wheel or grinding wheel tooth surface in coordinate system S(O − x − y − z)

References

  1. Karpuschewski B, Knoche HJ, Hipke M (2008) Gear finishing by abrasive processes [J]. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(2):621–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brinksmeier E, Giwerzew A (2005) Hard gear finishing viewed as a process of abrasive wear[J]. Wear 258(1–4):62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu Y, Wang X, Lin J et al (2015) Early chatter detection in gear grinding process using servo feed motor current [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klocke F, BrummM, Kampka M (2014) Process model for honing larger gears [C]. In: International gear conference, pp 119–128

  5. Klocke F, Brumm M, Reimann J (2013) Development and validation of a cutting force model for generating gear grinding [J]. Forsch Ing Eng Res 77(3–4):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ling S, Zhang B, Zhang J et al (2014) Two gear-grinding techniques to improve pitch deviations of ultra-precision gears[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 229(11):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Huiliang, Li Jubo, Gao Yang (2015) Closed-loop feedback flank errors correction of topographic modification of helical gears based on form grinding [J]. Math Prob Eng 2015:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ding H, Tang J, Zhong J (2016) Accurate nonlinear modeling and computing of grinding machine settings modification considering spatial geometric errors for hypoid gears[J]. Mech Mach Theory 99:155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Denkena B, Schindler A, Woiwode S (2016) Calculation method of the contact area in flank machining for continuous generating grinding[J]. Appl Math Model 40(15–16):7138–7146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Denkena B, Köhler J, Schindler A et al (2014) Continuous generating grinding—material engagement in gear tooth root machining[J]. Mech Mach Theory 81(11):11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jolivet S, Mezghani S, Mansori ME et al (2014) Numerical simulation of tooth surface finish effects on gear noise[C]. In: ASME 2014, Biennial conference on engineering systems design and analysis, V001T04A007–V001T04A007

  12. Jolivet S, Mezghani S, Mansori ME et al (2015) Dependence of tooth flank finishing on powertrain gear noise[J]. J Manuf Syst 42:467–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen H, Tang J, Zhou W (2013) Modeling and predicting of surface roughness for generating grinding gear[J]. J Mater Process Technol 213(5):717–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang YZ, Chen YY, Zhou GM et al (2016) Roughness model for tooth surfaces of spiral bevel gears under grinding[J]. Mech Mach Theory 104:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiang CJ, Fong ZH, Chang KL (2009) Computerized gear cutting simulation using a pseudo-planar method[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 223(12):1541–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dietz C, Wegener K, Thyssen W (2016) Continuous generating grinding: machine tool optimisation by coupled manufacturing simulation[J]. J Manuf Process 23:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Köhler J, Schindler A, Woiwode S (2012) Continuous generating grinding—tooth root machining and use of CBN-tools[J]. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):291–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zwolak J, Palczak A (2016) Effect of gear teeth finishing method on properties of teeth surface layer and its resistance to pitting wear creation[J]. J Cent South Univ 23(1):68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qinxue Pan, Shuai Liu, Dingguo Xiao (2015) The method of gear residual stress measurement based on ultrasonic technology [J]. Acta Armamentarii 36(9):1757–1765

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mallipeddi D, Norell M, Nyborg L (2015) Stress distribution over gear teeth after grinding, running-in and efficiency testing[C]. In: International conference on gears, VDI-Berichte 2255.2. 2015, 2, pp 973–984

  21. Sorsa A, Leiviskä K, Santa-Aho S et al (2013) An efficient procedure for identifying the prediction model between residual stress and Barkhausen noise[J]. J Nondestr Eval 32(4):341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fergani O, Shao Y, Lazoglu I et al (2014) Temperature effects on grinding residual stress [J]. Proc Cirp 14:2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakatsuka N, Hirai Y, Kusakabe A et al (2014) Effect of coolant supplied through grinding wheel on residual stress of grinding surface[J]. Adv Mater Res 1017:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nélias D, Boucly V (2008) Prediction of grinding residual stresses[J]. Int J Mater Form 1(1):1115–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tönissen S, Klocke F, Feldhaus B et al (2012) Residual stress prediction in quick point grinding[J]. Prod Eng Res Devel 6(3):243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51575154) and National Science and Technology Major Project (2013ZX04002051) for supporting this research under Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lian Xia.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Márcio Bacci da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, J., Yuan, B., Wang, D. et al. Formation mechanism study on tooth surface of two gear finishing processes: combined theoretical and experimental approaches. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 39, 5159–5170 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0872-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0872-z

Keywords

Navigation