Skip to main content
Log in

Robust optimization of turbomachinery cascades using inverse methods

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is widely known that real-world airfoils and turbomachinery cascades are subjected to small perturbations in their geometries due to the manufacturing errors and operational and environmental conditions. As a result, the performance requirements of such systems can be significantly affected, leading to poor designs or even severe failures during operation. In this context, the concept of robust optimal design in computational fluid dynamics is very interesting and can be conveniently carried out by using modern multiobjective numerical optimization techniques, in which the interest is to generate optimal and robust aerodynamic shapes that are less sensitive to small perturbations during their useful life. However, the large number of evaluations of the cost functions makes the use of direct methods in the robust optimization of turbomachinery cascades in aerodynamics very costly, sometimes unfeasible. Those difficulties motivate the study reported in this paper, in which a robust optimization strategy by using inverse methods is proposed consisting in the use of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to be combined with robustness functions specially adapted to turbomachinery cascades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kontoleontos EA, Giannakoglou KC, Koubogiannis DG (2005) Robust design of compressor cascade airfoils using evolutionary algorithms and surrogate models. Proceedings of the first international conference on experiments/process/simulation/optimization (IC-EpsMsO), Athens

  2. Huyse L, Lewis M (2001) Aerodynamic shape optimization of two dimensional airfoils under uncertain operating conditions. ICASE Report No. 2001-1, ICASE. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA

  3. Obayashi S, Takanashi S (1996) Genetic optimization of target pressure distributions for inverse design methods. AIAA J 34:881–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Srinivas N, Deb K (1993) Multiobjective using non-dominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Technical Report. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Technology, India

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eschenauer J, Koski J, Osyczka A (1990) Multicriteria design optimization. Springer, Heidelberg

  6. Beyer H, Sendhoff B (2007) Robust optimization: a comprehensive survey. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:3190–3218

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar A, Nair PB, Keane AJ, Shahpar S (2008) Robust design using Bayesian Monte Carlo. Int J Numer Meth Eng 73:1497–1517

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gostelow JP (1984) Cascade aerodynamics. Pergamon Press, New York

  9. Manzanares N (1994) Axial flow turbomachinery analysis (in Portuguese). PhD Thesis, Instituto Tecnológico da Aeronáutica

  10. Sanger NL (1973) Two-dimensional analytical and experimental performance comparison for a compressor stator section with d-factor of 0.47. Technical Report TN D-7429. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland

  11. Schlichting H (1959) Application of boundary-layer theory in turbomachinery. J Basic Eng, pp 543–551

  12. Lee KH, Park GJ (1996) Robust design for unconstrained optimization problems using the Taguchi method. AIAA J 34:1059–1063

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee KH, Park GJ (1996) Robust optimization considering tolerance of design variables. J Comput Struct 79:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Florian A (1992) An efficient sampling scheme: updates Latin-Hyper-Cube sampling. Probab Eng Mech 7:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. The Mathworks Inc (2013) Genetic algorithm and direct search toolbox guide. http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf/doc/gads/gadstb.pdf. Accessed 04 August 2013

  16. Emery JC, Herrig LJ, Erwin JR, Felix R (1958) Systematic two-dimensional cascade tests of NACA 65-series compressor blades at low speeds. Technical report 1368, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field

  17. Moran J (1984) An introduction to theoretical and computational aerodynamics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Minas Gerais State Agency FAPEMIG for the financial support to their research activities, especially through research projects APQ-02386-10 (N. Manzanares-Filho) and TEC-APQ-02522-12 (A.M.G. de Lima) and the Brazilian Research Council – CNPq for the continued support to their research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. G. de Lima.

Additional information

Communicated by Marcelo A. Trindade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reis, C.J.B., Manzanares-Filho, N. & de Lima, A.M.G. Robust optimization of turbomachinery cascades using inverse methods. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 297–305 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0309-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0309-5

Keywords

Navigation