Skip to main content
Log in

CFD modelling of helically coiled tube flocculators for velocity gradient assessment

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Helical tubes are used as reactors in applications such as food processing and water and wastewater treatment. In water and wastewater treatment plants, helically coiled tube flocculators (HCTFs) provide efficiency gains over the more traditionally used baffled tanks. Their superior performance has been credited to more favourable velocity gradients (G) but detailed fluid dynamics information on the response of such reactors to varying design and operational conditions is still lacking. In this study, three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were conducted to address this shortcoming. A validated CFD model of HCTFs was applied to assess the impact of varying reactor diameter and operating flow rate on the distributions of G, axial velocity and secondary flow structures. The developed flow region of the reactor was characterised for the occurrence and corresponding response of two cross-section zones, which govern the reactor efficiency. An equation is proposed associating G with a normalised parameter involving the reactor torsion, curvature and Reynolds number, which can be used to support the rational design, optimisation and operation control of HCTFs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a, b :

Regression function coefficients (dimensionless)

d :

Helical tube diameter (m)

D :

Helical tube curvature diameter (m)

G :

Velocity gradient (s−1)

\(\overline{G}\) :

Mean velocity gradient (s−1)

G p :

Local velocity gradient (s−1)

K :

Energy dissipation parameter (dimensionless)

K′ :

Adapted K parameter (dimensionless)

p :

Distance between consecutive passes divided by 2π (m)

P :

Instantaneous static pressure (Pa)

Q :

Flow rate (m3 s−1)

r :

Helical tube radius (m)

R :

Helical tube curvature radius (m)

R 2 :

Determination coefficient in regression analysis (dimensionless)

Re:

Reynolds number (dimensionless)

S M :

Momentum source term (kg m−2 s−2)

u, v, w :

Velocity components in the Cartesian coordinate system (m s−1)

U i :

Component of instantaneous velocity in ith direction (m s−1)

\(\overline{V}\) :

Mean axial velocity (m s−1)

\(\kappa\) :

Helical tube curvature (dimensionless)

\(\lambda\) :

Ratio between curvature and torsion (dimensionless)

\(\mu\) :

Dynamic viscosity of the fluid (Pa s)

\(\rho\) :

Specific mass of the fluid (kg m−3)

\(\tau\) :

Helical tube torsion (dimensionless)

References

  1. Al-Hashimi MAI, Ashjyan ASK (1989) Effectiveness of helical pipes in the flocculation process of water. Filtr Sep 26(6):422–429

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger SA, Talbot L (1983) Flow in curved pipes. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 15:461–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Camp TR, Stein PC (1943) Velocity gradients and internal work in fluid motion. J Boston Soc Civil Eng 85:219–237

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carissimi E, Miller JD, Rubio J (2007) Characterization of the high kinetic energy dissipation of the flocs generator reactor. Int J Miner Process 85(1–3):41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carissimi E, Rubio J (2005) The flocs generator reactor-FRG: a new basis for flocculation and solid-liquid separation. Int J Miner Process 75(3–4):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cioncolini A, Santini L (2006) An experimental investigation regarding the laminar to turbulent flow transition in helically coiled pipes. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 30:367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cioncolini A, Santini L (2006) On the laminar to turbulent flow transition in diabetic helically coiled pipe flow. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 30:653–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dean WR (1927) Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Phil Mag 4(20):208–223

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dean WR (1929) The stream-line motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Phil Mag 5(30):673–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elmaleh S, Jabbouri A (1991) Flocculation energy requirement. Water Res 25(8):939–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Galier S, Issanchou S, Moulin P, Clifton MJ, Aptel P (2003) Electrochemical measurement of velocity gradient at the wall of a helical tube. AIChE J 49(8):1972–1979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Germano M (1982) On the effect of torsion on a helical pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 125:1–8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Germano M (1989) The Dean equations extended to a helical pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 203:289–305

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gregory J (1981) Flocculation in laminar tube flow. Chem Eng Sci 36(11):1789–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grohmann A, Reitter M, Wiesmann U (1981) New flocculation units with high efficiency. Water Sci Technol 13(11/12):567–573

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haarhoff J, van der Walt JJ (2001) Towards optimal design parameters for around-the-end hydraulic flocculators. J Water Suppl Res Technol 50(3):149–159

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hameed MS, Muhammed TJ, Sapre AA (1995) Improved technique for river water flocculation. Filtr Sep 32(1):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huttl TJ, Friedrich R (2000) Influence of curvature and torsion on turbulent flow in helically coiled pipes. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21(3):345–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mishra P, Gupta SN (1979) Momentum transfer in curved pipes—I. Newton Fluids Ind Eng Chem Process Design Dev 18(1):130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Palazoglu TK, Sandeep KP (2004) Effect of tube curvature ratio on the residence time distribution of multiple particles in helical tubes. Food Sci Technol 37:387–393

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thiruvenkatachari R, Ngo HH, Hagare P, Vigneswaran S, Ben Aim R (2002) Flocculation-cross-flow microfiltration hybrid system for natural organic matter (NON) removal using hematite as a flocculent. Desalination 147(1–3):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tiwari P, Antal SP, Podowski MZ (2006) Tree-dimensional fluid mechanics of particulate two-phase flows in U-bend and helical conduits. Phys Fluids 18(4):043304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vashisth S, Kumar V, Nigam K (2008) A review of the potential applications of curved geometries in process industry. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:3291–3337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vigneswaran S, Setiadi T (1986) Flocculation study on spiral flocculator. Water Air Soil Pollut 29(2):165–188

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto K, Akita T, Ikeuchi H, Kita Y (1995) Experimental study of the flow in a helical circular tube. Fluid Dyn Res 16(4):237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamamoto K, Aribowo A, Hayamizu Y, Hirose T, Kawahara K (2002) Visualization of the flow in a helical pipe. Fluid Dyn Res 30:251–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu B, Zheng B, Lin CX, Pena OJ, Ebadian MA (2003) Laser Doppler anemometry measurements of laminar flow in helical pipes. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 27(8):855–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. B. Rauen.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Francisco Ricardo Cunha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sartori, M., Oliveira, D.S., Teixeira, E.C. et al. CFD modelling of helically coiled tube flocculators for velocity gradient assessment. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 37, 187–198 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0141-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0141-3

Keywords

Navigation