Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parenting and Addictions: Current Insights From Human Neuroscience

  • Parenting & Addiction (S Kim, H Rutherford and L Strathearn, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Addiction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

A growing body of human research has documented associations between the maternal brain and maternal substance use and addictions. This neuroscience-informed approach affords the opportunity to unpack potential neurobiological mechanisms that may underscore challenges in maternal caregiving behavior among mothers with addictions and provide new directions for parenting interventions.

Recent Findings

Consistent with theoretical models of parenting and addictions, five studies evidence both hypo- and hyper-reactivity to infant affective cues across neuroimaging methods and tasks that incorporate both infant face and cry stimuli. Three structural and resting-state brain studies as a function of maternal substance use are also reported.

Summary

While human neuroimaging research converges in showing that maternal substance use is associated with differential reactivity to infant affective cues, further multi-level/multi-modal, longitudinal, and dimensional research is critically needed to advance this area of investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We refer to substance use as incorporating both illicit and legal drugs (i.e., alcohol and tobacco). Studies reviewed do not include assessments of caffeine.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Louw K-A. Substance use in pregnancy: the medical challenge. Obstet Med. 2018;11(2):54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang G. Maternal substance use: consequences, identification, and interventions. Alcohol Res. 2020;40(2):6.

  3. Gottwald SR, Thurman SK. The effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on mother–infant interaction and infant arousal in the newborn period. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 1994;14(2):217–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson AL, Morrow CE, Accornero VH, Xue L, Anthony JC, Bandstra ES. Maternal cocaine use: estimated effects on mother-child play interactions in the preschool period. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2002;23(4):191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hatzis D, Dawe S, Harnett P, Barlow J. Quality of caregiving in mothers with illicit substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Substance abuse: research and treatment. 2017;11:1178221817694038.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barba-Müller E, Craddock S, Carmona S, Hoekzema E. Brain plasticity in pregnancy and the postpartum period: links to maternal caregiving and mental health. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018;22(2):289–99.

  7. Feldman R. The adaptive human parental brain: implications for children’s social development. Trends Neurosci. 2015;38(6):387–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maupin AN, Hayes N, Mayes L, Rutherford HJV. The application of electroencephalography to investigate the neural basis of parenting. Parent-Sci Pract. 2015;15(1):9–23.

  9. Rutherford HJV, Williams SK, Moy S, Mayes LC, Johns JM. Disruption of maternal parenting circuitry by addictive process: rewiring of reward and stress systems. Front Psych. 2011;2:37.

  10. Rutherford HJV, Mayes L. Parenting and addiction: neurobiological insights. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;15:55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutherford HJV, Potenza MN, Mayes LC. The neurobiology of addiction and attachment. In: Suchman N, Pajulo M, Mayes LC, editors. Parents and Substance Addiction: Developmental Approaches to Intervention. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

  12. Landi N, Montoya J, Kober H, HJV R, Mencl E, Worhunsky P, et al. Maternal neural responses to infant cries and faces: relationships with substance use. Front Psych. 2011;2:32.

  13. Lowell AF, Maupin AN, Landi N, Potenza MN, Mayes LC, Rutherford HJ. Substance use and mothers’ neural responses to infant cues. Infant Ment Health J. 2020;41(2):264–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rutherford HJ, Yip SW, Worhunsky PD, Kim S, Strathearn L, Potenza MN, et al. Differential responses to infant faces in relation to maternal substance use: an exploratory study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;207:107805 This study compares the neural response to familiar infant cues in substance-using and non-substance-using mothers.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Swain JE, Ho SS. Early postpartum resting state functional connectivity for mothers receiving buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder: a pilot study. J Neuroendocrinol. 2019;31(9):e12770 This study examines the impact of pharmocological treatment on the maternal brain in the presence of addiction.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilbanks H, Von Mohr M, Landi N, Potenza MN, Mayes L, HJV R. Tobacco smoking and the resting maternal brain: a preliminary study of frontal EEG. Yale J Biol Med. 2016;89(2):115.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rutherford H, Gerig G, Gouttard S, Potenza MN, Mayes LC. Focus: addiction: investigating maternal brain structure and its relationship to substance use and motivational systems. Yale J Biol Med. 2015;88(3):211–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim P, Leckman JF, Mayes LC, Feldman R, Wang X, Swain JE. The plasticity of human maternal brain: longitudinal changes in brain anatomy during the early postpartum period. Behav Neurosci. 2010;124(5):695–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoekzema E, Barba-Müller E, Pozzobon C, Picado M, Lucco F, García-García D, et al. Pregnancy leads to long-lasting changes in human brain structure. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(2):287–96.

  20. Franklin TR, Acton PD, Maldjian JA, Gray JD, Croft JR, Dackis CA, et al. Decreased gray matter concentration in the insular, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and temporal cortices of cocaine patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;51(2):134–42.

  21. Swain JE, Ho SS, Fox H, Garry D, Brummelte S. Effects of opioids on the parental brain in health and disease. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2019;54:100766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang A-L, Lowen SB, Elman I, Shi Z, Fairchild VP, Bouril A, et al. Sustained opioid antagonism modulates striatal sensitivity to baby schema in opioid use disorder. J Subst Abus Treat. 2018;85:70–7.

  23. Kim S, Iyengar U, Mayes LC, Potenza MN, Rutherford HJ, Strathearn L. Mothers with substance addictions show reduced reward responses when viewing their own infant’s face. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(11):5421–39.

  24. Rutherford HJV, Maupin AN, Landi N, Potenza MN, Mayes LC. Current tobacco-smoking and neural responses to infant cues in mothers. Parent-Sci Pract. 2017;17(1):1–10.

  25. Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;35(1):4–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Knutson B, Cooper JC. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005;18(4):411–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;35(1):217–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Frank D, Dewitt M, Hudgens-Haney M, Schaeffer D, Ball B, Schwarz N, et al. Emotion regulation: quantitative meta-analysis of functional activation and deactivation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;45:202–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rutherford HJV, Byrne SP, Austin GM, Lee JD, Crowley MJ, Mayes LC. Anxiety and neural responses to infant and adult faces during pregnancy. Biol Psychol. 2017;125:115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Malak SM, Crowley MJ, Mayes LC, Rutherford H. Maternal anxiety and neural responses to infant faces. J Affect Disord. 2015;172:324–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annu Rev Psychol. 1994;45(1):25–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mathews A, Richards A, Eysenck M. Interpretation of homophones related to threat in anxiety states. J Abnorm Psychol. 1989;98(1):31–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lira Yoon K, Zinbarg RE. Threat is in the eye of the beholder: social anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45(4):839–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Fitzsimmons JR, Cuthbert BN, Scott JD, Moulder B, et al. Emotional arousal and activation of the visual cortex: an fMRI analysis. Psychophysiology. 1998;35(2):199–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Strathearn L, Fonagy P, Amico J, Montague PR. Adult attachment predicts maternal brain and oxytocin response to infant cues. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34(13):2655–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Eisenberger NI. The pain of social disconnection: examining the shared neural underpinnings of physical and social pain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(6):421–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Swain JE, Ho S-HS. Neuroendocrine mechanisms for parental sensitivity: overview, recent advances and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;15:105–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rutherford HJV, Wallace NS, Laurent HK, Mayes LC. Emotion regulation in parenthood. Dev Rev. 2015;36:1–14.

  39. Strathearn L, Mertens CE, Mayes L, Rutherford H, Rajhans P, Xu G, et al. Pathways relating the neurobiology of attachment to drug addiction. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2019;10:737 Important review of the literature laying out the neurobiological pathways implicated in attachment and addiction.

  40. Alvarez-Monjaras M, Mayes LC, Potenza MN, Rutherford HJ. A developmental model of addictions: integrating neurobiological and psychodynamic theories through the lens of attachment. Attach Hum Dev. 2018;21(6):616–637.

  41. Kim S, Kwok S, Mayes LC, Potenza MN, Rutherford HJ, Strathearn L. Early adverse experience and substance addiction: dopamine, oxytocin, and glucocorticoid pathways. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1394(1):74–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. King DL, Wölfling K, Potenza MN. Taking gaming disorder treatment to the next level. JAMA Psychiat. 2020;77(8):869–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Grant JE, Potenza MN, Weinstein A, Gorelick DA. Introduction to behavioral addictions. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010;36(5):233–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rajhans P, Goin-Kochel RP, Strathearn L, Kim S. It takes two! Exploring sex differences in parenting neurobiology and behaviour. J Neuroendocrinol. 2019;31(9):e12721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health R01 DA050636, R01 DA026437, K01 DA039299, and KL2 TR001454. The views presented in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena J. V. Rutherford.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Parenting and Addiction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rutherford, H.J.V., Kim, S., Yip, S.W. et al. Parenting and Addictions: Current Insights From Human Neuroscience. Curr Addict Rep 8, 380–388 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-021-00384-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-021-00384-6

Keywords

Navigation