Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of the growing-maize canopy and irrigation characteristics on the ability to funnel sprinkler water

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stemflow is vital for supplying water, fertilizer, and other crop essentials during sprinkler irrigation. Exploring the spatial and temporal variations of crop stemflow and its influencing factors will be essential to preventing soil water and nutrient ion’s migration to deeper layers, developing, and optimizing effective sprinkler irrigation schedules. Based on the two-year experimental data, we analyzed the variation patterns (stemflow amount, depth, rate, and funneling ratio) of maize stemflow during the growing season, and clarified its vertical distribution pattern. Meanwhile, effects of sprinkler irrigation and maize morphological parameters on stemflow were investigated. The results showed that stemflow increased gradually as maize plant grew. Specifically, stemflow was small at the pre-jointing stage and reached the maximum at the late filling stage. The upper canopy generated more stemflow than the lower canopy until the flare opening stage. After the tasseling stage, the middle canopy generated more stemflow than the other positions. Variation in canopy closure at different positions was the main factor contributing to the above difference. As sprinkler intensity increased, stemflow also increased. However, the effect of droplet size on stemflow was inconsistent. Specifically, when sprinkler intensity was less than or equal to 10 mm/h, stemflow was generated with increasing droplet size. In contrast, if sprinkler intensity was greater than or equal to 20 mm/h, stemflow tended to decreased with increasing droplet size. Compared with other morphological parameters, canopy closure significantly affected the generation of stemflow. Funneling ratio was not significantly affected by plant morphology. Based on the results of different sprinkler intensities, we developed stemflow depth versus canopy closure and stemflow rate versus canopy closure power function regression models with a high predictive accuracy. The research findings will contribute to the understanding of the processes of stemflow involving the hydro-geochemical cycle of agro-ecosystems and the implementation of cropland management practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carlyle-Moses D E, Iida S, Germer S, et al. 2018. Expressing stemflow commensurate with its ecohydrological importance. Advances in Water Resources, 121: 472–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattan P, Bussiere F, Nouvellon A. 2007. Evidence of large rainfall partitioning patterns by banana and impact on surface runoff generation. Hydrological Processes, 21(16): 2196–2205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen N, Zhang Y, Zhao C. 2021. On the importance of stemflow to the woody plants in drylands: Individual vs. ecosystem scales. Journal of Hydrology, 601: 126591, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Li H, Wang J, et al. 2020. Effects of pressure and nozzle size on the spray characteristics of low-pressure rotating sprinklers. Water, 12(10): 2904, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockford R H, Richardson D P. 2015. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrological Processes, 14(1617): 2903–2920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ploey J. 1982. A stemflow equation for grasses and similar vegetation. CATENA, 9(1): 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorr G J, Wang S, Mayo L C, et al. 2015. Impaction of spray droplets on leaves: influence of formulation and leaf character on shatter, bounce and adhesion. Experiments in Fluids, 56(7): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J L, Oestergaard K T, Guyot A, et al. 2015. Spatial variability of throughfall and stemflow in an exotic pine plantation of subtropical coastal Australia. Hydrological Processes, 29(5): 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasson R P D M, Krajewski W F. 2011. Characterization of the drop-size distribution and velocity-diameter relation of the throughfall under the maize canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151(9): 1244–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge M S, Wu P T, Zhu D L, et al. 2018. Analysis of kinetic energy distribution of big gun sprinkler applied to continuous moving hose-drawn traveler. Agricultural Water Management, 201: 118–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germer S, Werther L, Elsenbeer H. 2010. Have we underestimated stemflow? Lessons from an open tropical rainforest. Journal of Hydrology, 395(3–4): 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover J, Gwynne M D. 1962. Light rainfall and plant survival in east Africa. I. Maize. Journal of Ecology, 50: 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwitz S R. 1986. Infiltration-excess caused by Stemflow in a cyclone-prone tropical rainforest. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 11(4): 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou P, Liu Y E, Liu W M, et al. 2021. Quantifying maize grain yield losses caused by climate change based on extensive field data across China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 174: 105811, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Y H, Wang Q G, Liu H J. 2005. Winter wheat canopy interception and its influence factors under sprinkler irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 74(3): 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm F R, Manges H L. 2000. Partitioning of sprinkler irrigation water by a corn canopy. Transactions of the ASABE, 43(4): 909–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levia D F, Frost E E. 2003. A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems. Journal of Hydrology, 274(1–4): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levia D F, Germer S. 2015. A review of stemflow generation dynamics and stemflow-environment interactions in forests and shrublands. Reviews of Geophysics, 53(3): 673–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levia D F, Hudson S A, Llorens P, et al. 2017. Throughfall drop size distributions: a review and prospectus for future research. Wiley Interdiplinary Reviews: Water, 4(4): e1225, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Xiao Q F, Niu J Z, et al. 2016. Process-based rainfall interception by small trees in Northern China: The effect of rainfall traits and crown structure characteristics. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 218–219: 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H J, Zhang R H, Zhang L W, et al. 2015. Stemflow of water on maize and its influencing factors. Agricultural Water Management, 158: 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma B, Wu F Q, Ma F, et al. 2008. Effect of leaf area and rainfall intensity on the stemflow of Glycine max. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 6(6): 58–62. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma F, Wu F Q, Ma B, et al. 2008. Effects of leaf area and rainfall intensity on stemflow amount through corn canopy. Transactions of the CSAE, 24(10): 25–28. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave M, Abrahams A D. 2002. Vegetation influences on water yields from grassland and shrubland ecosystems in the Chihuahuan Desert. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 27(9): 1011–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panozzo A, Cortivo C D, Ferrari M, et al. 2019. Morphological changes and expressions of AOX1A, CYP81D8, and putative PFP genes in a large set of commercial maize hybrids under extreme waterlogging. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10(62): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park H T, Hattori S. 2002. Applicability of stand structural characteristics to stemflow modeling. Journal of Forest Research, 7(2): 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrignani A, Ochsner T E. 2015. Canopeo: a powerful new tool for measuring fractional green canopy cover. Agronomy Journal, 107(6): 2312–2320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffigna P G, Tanner C B, Keeney D R. 1976. Non-uniform infiltration under potato canopies caused by interception, stemflow, and hilling. Agronomy Journal, 68(2): 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sher A, Khan A, Ashraf U, et al. 2018. Characterization of the effect of increased plant density on canopy morphology and stalk lodging risk. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9: 1047, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi M, Tsujimura M, Tanaka T. 2015. Significance of stemflow in groundwater recharge. I: Evaluation of the stemflow contribution to recharge using a mass balance approach. Hydrological Processes, 10(1): 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonello K C, Van Stan II J T, Rosa A G, et al. 2021. Stemflow variability across tree stem and canopy traits in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 308–309: 108551, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Elewijck L L. 1989. Stemflow on maize: A stemflow equation and the influence of rainfall intensity on stemflow amount. Soil Technology, 2(1): 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waiters R J, Price A G. 1988. The influence of stemflow from standing dead trees on the fluxes of some ions in a mixed deciduous forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18(11): 1490–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walczak A. 2021. The use of world water resources in the irrigation of field cultivations. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 22(4): 186–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P K, Pruppacher H R. 1976. Acceleration to terminal velocity of cloud and raindrops. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 16(3): 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X P, Zhang Y F, Wang Z N, et al. 2013. Influence of shrub canopy morphology and rainfall characteristics on stemflow within a vegetated sand dune in the Tengger Desert, N&W China. Hydrological Processes, 27(10): 1501–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y L, Li M N, Hui X, et al. 2020. Alfalfa canopy water interception under low-pressure sprinklers. Agricultural Water Management, 230: 105919, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford W G, Anderson J, Rice P M. 1997. Stemflow contribution to the ‘fertile island’ effect in Creosote bush, Larrea tridentata. Journal of Arid Environments, 35(3): 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu D F. 1987. Sprinkler intensity and soil infiltration. Water Saving Irrigation, (2): 15–20. (in Chinese)

  • Wu Y S, He D, Wang E L, et al. 2021. Modelling soybean and maize growth and grain yield in strip intercropping systems with different row configurations. Field Crops Research, 265: 108122, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J M, Yang J Y, Liu S, et al. 2014. An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data. Agricultural Systems, 127(5): 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X L, Shao M A, Wei X R. 2018. Stemflow production differ significantly among tree and shrub species on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Journal of Hydrology, 568: 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin X A, Fang Q, Yang T H, et al. 2020. Effect of simulated corn stemflow on soil erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 34(3): 67–72. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabret, Rakovec, Sraj. 2018. Influence of meteorological variables on rainfall partitioning for deciduous and coniferous tree species in urban area. Journal of Hydrology, 558: 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata N, Robles O, Playán E, et al. 2018. Low-pressure sprinkler irrigation in maize: Differences in water distribution above and below the crop canopy. Agricultural Water Management, 203: 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata N, Salvador R, Latorre B, et al. 2021. Effect of a growing maize canopy on solid-set sprinkler irrigation: kinetic energy dissipation and water partitioning. Irrigation Science, (39): 329–346.

  • Zhang Y F, Wang X P, Hu R, et al. 2015. Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow, and interception loss by two xerophytic shrubs within a rain-fed revegetated desert ecosystem, northwestern China. Journal of Hydrology, 527: 1084–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y F, Wang X P, Hu R, et al. 2016. Throughfall and its spatial variability beneath xerophytic shrub canopies within water-limited arid desert ecosystems. Journal of Hydrology, 539: 406–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y F, Wang X P, Pan Y X, et al. 2020. Relative contribution of biotic and abiotic factors to stemflow production and funneling efficiency: A long-term field study on a xerophytic shrub species in Tengger Desert of northern China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280: 107781, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y S, Zhu D L. 2017. Influence of sprinkler irrigation droplet diameter, application intensity and specific power on flower damage. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 4(2): 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W X, Zhang M, Li J S, et al. 2018. Influence of sprinkler height on irrigation performance of center pivot irrigator. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 34(10): 107–112. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Fan J L, Zhang F C, et al. 2018. Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow and interception loss by maize canopy on the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management, 195: 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Fan J L, Zhang F C, et al. 2019. Throughfall and stemflow heterogeneity under the maize canopy and its effect on soil water distribution at the row scale. Science of the Total Environment, 660(10): 1367–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z R, Zhu D L, Ge M S. 2021. The spatial variation mechanism of size, velocity, and the landing angle of throughfall droplets under maize canopy. Water, 13(15): 2083, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z R, Zhu D L, Ge M S. 2022. Drop size distribution and effective determination of the constitution of throughfall droplets under maize canopy. CLEAN-Soil Air Water, 50(5): 20210280, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.202100280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zul Hilmi Saidin A, Delphis F, Levia B C, et al. 2022. Vertical distribution and transport of radiocesium via branchflow and stemflow through the canopy of cedar and oak stands in the aftermath of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Science of the Total Environment, 125: 151698, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52009111), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFE010300), and the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province, China (2020ZDLNY01-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, Yangling, 712100, China

    Zhongrui Zhu, Delan Zhu & Maosheng Ge

  2. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, Yangling, 712100, China

    Zhongrui Zhu, Delan Zhu & Maosheng Ge

  3. Breeding and Seed Production of Agricultural Crops of Tashkent State Agrarian University, Tashkent, 100140, Uzbekistan

    Changxin Liu

Authors
  1. Zhongrui Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Delan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maosheng Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Changxin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delan Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Z., Zhu, D., Ge, M. et al. Effects of the growing-maize canopy and irrigation characteristics on the ability to funnel sprinkler water. J. Arid Land 14, 787–810 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0022-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0022-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation