Skip to main content
Log in

Changes of forest fire regime and landscape pattern under different harvesting modes in a boreal forest of Northeast China

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest management such as timber harvesting shapes fire regimes and landscape patterns, and these patterns often differ significantly from those under natural disturbances. Our objective was to examine the effects of timber harvesting modes on fire regimes and landscape patterns in a boreal forest of Northeast China. We used a spatially explicit landscape model, LANDIS, to simulate the changes of forest landscape in the Huzhong forest region of the Great Khingan Mountains under no-cutting, clear-cutting, gradual-cutting and selective-cutting modes. Results showed that: (1) the fine fuel loadings generally decreased while the coarse fuel loadings increased with the increase of timber harvesting intensity; (2) the potential burn area significantly varied among different cutting modes, but the potential fire frequency had no obvious difference. Moreover, timber harvesting generally increased the potential fire risk; (3) clear-cutting mode significantly decreased the mean patch size and the aggregation of larch forests and increased the mean patch size and the aggregation of white birch forests. Therefore, clear-cutting mode should be abandoned, and selective-cutting mode be recommended for the sustainable forest management in the Great Khingan Mountains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baeza M, De Luís M, Raventós J, et al. 2002. Factors influencing fire behaviour in shrublands of different stand ages and the implications for using prescribed burning to reduce wildfire risk. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(2): 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bataineh M, Kenefic L, Weiskittel A, et al. 2013. Influence of partial harvesting and site factors on the abundance and composition of natural regeneration in the Acadian Forest of Maine, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 306: 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berbert J M, Fagan W F. 2012. How the interplay between individual spatial memory and landscape persistence can generate population distribution patterns. Ecological Complexity, 12: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birt A G, Xi W M, Coulson R N. 2009. LANDISVIEW: A visualization tool for landscape modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(11): 1339–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond W J, Keeley J E. 2005. Fire as a global ‘herbivore’: The ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(7): 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bu R C, He H S, Hu Y M, et al. 2008. Using the LANDIS model to evaluate forest harvesting and planting strategies under possible warming climates in Northeastern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 254(3): 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carleton T J, MacLellan P. 1994. Woody vegetation response to fire versus clear-cutting logging: A comparative survey in the central Canadian boreal forest. Ecoscience, 1(2): 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, He H S, Hu Y M, et al. 2008. Historic and current fire regimes in the Great Xing’an Mountains, Northeastern China: Implications for long-term forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 254(3): 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal R L, Tappeiner J C. 2002. The effects of partial cutting on stand structure and growth of western hemlock-Sitka spruce stands in southeast Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management, 159(3): 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fall A, Fortin M J, Kneeshaw D D, et al. 2004. Consequences of various landscape-scale ecosystem management strategies and fire cycles on age-class structure and harvest in boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34(2): 310–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finney M A. 2001. Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior. Forest Science, 47(2): 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannigan M, Stocks B, Turetsky M, et al. 2009. Impacts of climate change on fire activity and fire management in the circumboreal forest. Global Change Biology, 15(3): 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming R A, Candau J-N, McAlpine R S. 2002. Landscape-scale analysis of interactions between insect defoliation and forest fire in central Canada. Climatic Change, 55(1–2): 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster D R, Knight D H, Franklin J F. 1998. Landscape patterns and legacies resulting from large, infrequent forest disturbances. Ecosystems, 1(6): 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J F, Forman R T. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology, 1(1): 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J, Syphard A D, Mladenoff D J, et al. 2001. Simulating the effects of different fire regimes on plant functional groups in Southern California. Ecological Modelling, 142(3): 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R H, Romme W H, Turner M G. 1999. Predicting forest fire effects at landscape scales. In: Mladenoff D J, Baker W L. Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge: University Press, 163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner T A, Barlow J, Parry LW, et al. 2007. Predicting the uncertain future of tropical forest species in a data vacuum. Biotropica, 39(1): 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong X, Chang Y, Bu R C, et al. 2006. Long-term effects of different forest harvesting modes on forest landscape pattern in Huzhong Forestry Bureau. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25(7): 805–812. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson E J, Shifley S R, Mladenoff D J, et al. 2000. Spatial simulation of forest succession and timber harvesting using LANDIS. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30(1): 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H S, Mladenoff D J. 1999. Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest-landscape fire disturbance and succession. Ecology, 80(1): 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H S, DeZonia B E, Mladenoff D J. 2000. An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 15(7): 591–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H S, Mladenoff D J, Gustafson E J. 2002a. Study of landscape change under forest harvesting and climate warming-induced fire disturbance. Forest Ecology and Management, 155(1–3): 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H S, Hao Z Q, Larsen D R, et al. 2002b. A simulation study of landscape scale forest succession in northeastern China. Ecological Modelling, 156(2–3): 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H S, Shang B Z, Crow T R, et al. 2004. Simulating forest fuel and fire risk dynamics across landscapes-LANDIS fuel module design. Ecological Modelling, 180(1): 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H S. 2008. A review of LANDIS and other forest landscape models for integration with wildlife models. In: Millspaugh J J, Thompson F R. Models for Planning Wildlife Conservation in Large Landscapes. Burlington, MA: Academic Press, 321–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y M, Xu C G, Chang Y, et al. 2004. Application of spatially explicit landscape model (LANDIS): A case researches in Huzhong area, Mt. Daxing’anling. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(9): 1846–1856. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter M L ffixJr. 1993. Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests. Biological Conservation, 65(2): 115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane R E, Cary G J, Flannigan M D, et al. 2013. Exploring the role of fire, succession, climate, and weather on landscape dynamics using comparative modeling. Ecological Modelling, 266: 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konoshima M, Montgomery C A, Albers H J, et al. 2008. Spatial- endogenous fire risk and efficient fuel management and timber harvest. Land Economics, 84(3): 449–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z H, He H S, Yang J. 2012. Emulating natural fire effects using harvesting in an eastern boreal forest landscape of northeast China. Journal of Vegetation Science, 23(4): 782–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z H, Yang J, He H S. 2013. Studying the effects of fuel treatment based on burn probability on a boreal forest landscape. Journal of Environmental Management, 115: 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer C G. 1977. The presettlement forest and natural disturbance cycle of northeastern Maine. Ecology, 58(1): 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald R L, Chen H Y H, Palik B P, et al. 2014. Influence of harvesting on understory vegetation along a boreal riparian-upland gradient. Forest Ecology and Management, 312: 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallik A U, Kreutzweiser D P, Spalvieri C M. 2014. Forest regeneration in gaps seven years after partial harvesting in riparian buffers of boreal mixedwood streams. Forest Ecology and Management, 312: 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff D J, Host G E, Boeder J R, et al. 1996. LANDIS: A spatial model of forest landscape disturbance, succession, and management. In: GIS and Environmental Modeling: Progress and Research Issues. Fort Collins, CO, USA: GIS World Books, 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff D J, He H S. 1999. Design, behavior and application of LANDIS, an object-oriented model of forest landscape disturbance and succession. In: Mladenoff D J, Baker W L. Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff D J. 2004. LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecological Modelling, 180(1): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pausas J G. 2006. Simulating Mediterranean landscape pattern and vegetation dynamics under different fire regimes. Plant Ecology, 187(2): 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet J, Omi P N. 2002. Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 11(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff V C, Mladenoff D J, Gustafson E J, et al. 2006. Modeling forest harvesting effects on landscape pattern in the Northwest Wisconsin pine barrens. Forest Ecology and Management, 236(1): 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnicky T C, Hunter M L. 1993. Avian nest predation in clearcuts, forests, and edges in a forest-dominated landscape. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 57(2): 358–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüger N, Gutiérrez Á G, Kissling W D, et al. 2007. Ecological impacts of different harvesting scenarios for temperate evergreen rain forest in southern Chile-A simulation experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 252(1–3): 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang Z B, He H S, Lytle D E, et al. 2007. Modeling the long-term effects of fire suppression on central hardwood forests in Missouri Ozarks, using LANDIS. Forest Ecology and Management, 242(2–3): 776–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant B R, Gustafson E J, Li W, et al. 2004. Modeling biological disturbances in LANDIS: A module description and demonstration using spruce budworm. Ecological Modelling, 180(1): 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant B R, Scheller R M, Miranda B R, et al. 2009. Simulating dynamic and mixed-severity fire regimes: A process-based fire extension for LANDIS-II. Ecological Modelling, 220(23): 3380–3393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson W A, Vertinsky I, Schreier H, et al. 2000. Using forest fire hazard modelling in multiple use forest management planning. Forest Ecology and Management, 134(1–3): 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M G. 1989. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 20(1): 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M G, Gardner R H, O’Neill R V. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. New York: Springer, 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin D O, Swanson F J, Marks B, et al. 1996. Comparison of managed and pre-settlement landscape dynamics in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 85(1–3): 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X G, He H S, Li X Z. 2007. The long-term effects of fire suppression and reforestation on a forest landscape in Northeastern China after a catastrophic wildfire. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(1): 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z W, He H S, Chang Y, et al. 2011. Development of customized fire behavior fuel models for boreal forests of Northeastern China. Environmental Management, 48(6): 1148–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H C. 1998. Da Hinggan Ling Mountains Forests in China. Beijing: Science Press, 1–231. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, He H S, Gustafson E J. 2004. A hierarchical fire frequency model to simulate temporal patterns of fire regimes in LANDIS. Ecological Modelling, 180(1): 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H R, Tang S Z. 2007. Review on the study of ecology-based forest harvesting. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 9: 83–87. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y L. 1991. Vegetation in Great Xing’an Mountains of China. Beijing: Science Press, 1–216. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongwei Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Hu, Y., Chang, Y. et al. Changes of forest fire regime and landscape pattern under different harvesting modes in a boreal forest of Northeast China. J. Arid Land 7, 841–851 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-015-0015-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-015-0015-2

Keywords

Navigation