Skip to main content
Log in

Soil water repellency and influencing factors of Nitraria tangutorun nebkhas at different succession stages

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil water repellency (WR) is an important physical characteristic of soil surface. It is capable of largely influencing the hydrological and geomorphological processes of soil, as well as affecting the ecological processes of plants, such as growth and seed germination, and has thus been a hot topic in recent research around the world. In this paper, the capillary rise method was used to study the soil WR characteristics of Nitraria tangutorun nebkhas. Soil water repellencies at different succession stages of Nitraria tangutorun were investigated, and the relationships between soil WR and soil organic matter, total N, and total P, soil texture, pH, and concentrations of CO3 2−, HCO3 , Cl, SO4 2−, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ were discussed. Soil WR may be demonstrated at the following nebkhas dune evolvement stages: extremely degraded>degraded>stabilized>well developed>newly developed>quick sand. Apart from some soil at the bottom, the WR of other soils (crest and slope of dune) was found to be largest at the topsoil, and decreased as the soil depth increased. The results showed that multiple factors affected soil WR characteristics, e.g. WR increased significantly as the contents of soil organic matter and total N increased, but did not change as the total P content increased. Soil texture was a key factor affecting soil WR; soil WR increased significantly as clay content increased, and decreased significantly as sand content increased. Low pH was shown to be more suitable for the occurrence of soil WR. Four cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+ and Na+) and two anions (Cl and SO4 2−) enhanced soil WR, while CO3 2− decreased it. HCO3 did not show any observable effect. Finally, we established a best-fit general linear model (GLM) between soil-air-water contact angle (CA) and influencing factors (CA=5.606 sand+6.496 (clay and silt)-2.353 pH+470.089 CO3 2−+11.346 Na+-407.707 Cl-14.245 SO4 2−+0.734 total N-519.521). It was concluded that all soils contain subcritical WR (0°<CA<90°). The development and succession of Nitraria tangutorun nebkhas may improve the formation of soil subcritical WR. There exist significant relationships between soils subcritical WR and soil physical or chemical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes R B, Richardson D, Berry J W, et al. 1945. Flame photometry a rapid analytical procedure. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition, 17(10): 605–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauters T W J, DiCarlo D A, Steenhuis T S, et al. 1998. Preferential flow in water-repellent sands. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62: 1185–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito E, Santiago J L, de Blas E, et al. 2003. Deforestation of water-repellent soils in Galicia (NW Spain): effects on surface runoff and erosion under simulated rainfall. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 28: 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund K, Persson L. 1996. Water repellence of cultivated organic soils. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 46: 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell P S. 1993. Improving sustainable production from water repellent sands. Western Australia Journal of Agriculture, 34: 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R, Shipitalo M J. 2007. Aggregate disintegration and wettability for long-term management systems in the northern Appalachians. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71: 759–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R. 2009. Extent of soil water repellency under long-term no-till soils. Geoderma, 149(1–2): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cann M A. 2000. Clay spreading on water repellent sands in the south east of South Australia-promoting sustainable agriculture. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232: 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerdà A, Doerr S H. 2007. Soil wettability, runoff and erodibility of major dry-Mediterranean land use types on calcareous soils. Hydrological Processes, 21(17): 2325–2336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosentino D, Hallett P D, Michel J C, et al. 2010. Do different methods for measuring the hydrophobicity of soil aggregates give the same trends in soil amended with residue? Geoderma, 159(1–2): 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czachor H, Doerr S H, Lichner L. 2010. Water retention of repellent and subcritical repellent soils: New insights from model and experimental investigations. Journal of Hydrology, 380(1–2): 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBano L F. 1991. The effects of fire on soil properties. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. General Technical Report, 280: 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBano L F. 2000. Water repellency in soils: a historical overview. Journal of Hydrology, 4–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jonge L W, Jacobsen O H, Moldrup P. 1999. Soil water repellency: effects of water content, temperature and particle size. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63: 437–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker L W, Ritsema C J. 1994. How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil. 1. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resources Research, 30: 2507–2517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker L W, Ritsema C J. 1996. Preferential flow paths in a water repellent clay soil with grass cover. Water Resources Research, 32: 1239–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker L W, Oostindie K, Ritsema C J. 2005. Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43: 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick W, Tabatabai M. 1979. Ion chromatographic determination of sulfate and nitrate in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43(5): 899–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerr S H. 1998. On standardizing the ‘water drop penetration time’ and the ‘molarity of an ethanol droplet’ techniques to classify soil hydrophobicity: a case study using medium textured soils. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23: 663–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerr S H, Shakesby R A, Walsh R P D. 1998. Spatial variability of soil hydrophobicity in fire-prone eucalyptus and pine forests, Portugal. Soil Science, 163: 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerr S H, Shakesby R A, Walsh R P D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51: 33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerr S H, Llewellyn C T, Douglas P, et al. 2005. Extraction of compounds associated with water repellency in sandy soils of different origin. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43: 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerr S H, Ritsema C J, Dekker L W, et al. 2007. Water repellence of soils: new insights and emerging research needs. Hydrological Processes, 21: 2223–2228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannini G, Lucchesi S. 1983. Effect of fire on hydrophobic and cementing substances of soil aggregates. Soil Science, 136: 231–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannini G, Lucchesi S, Cervelly S. 1987. The natural evolution of a burnt soil: a 3 year investigation. Soil Science, 143: 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjiioannou T, Papastathopoulous D. 1970. EDTA titration of calcium and magnesium with a calcium-selective electrode. Talanta, 17(5): 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett P D, Baumgartl T, Young I M. 2001. Subcritical water repellency of aggregates from a range of soil management practices. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65: 184–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han F G, Han S H, Chang Z, et al. 2008. Study on characteristics and variance tendency of the main climatic factors in Minqin Desert area in recent 46 years. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 22(11): 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne D J, McIntosh J C. 2000. Hydrophobic compounds in sands in New Zealand; extraction, characterization and proposed mechanisms for repellency expression. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232: 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert K R, Preisler H K, Wohlgemuth P M, et al. 2006. Prescribed burning effects on soil physical properties and soil water repellency in a steep chaparral watershed, southern California, USA. Geoderma, 130: 284–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo J D F, Dekker L W, Ritsema C J, et al. 2000. Occurrence of soil water repellency in arid and humid climates. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232: 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jex G W, Bleakley B H, Hubbell D H, et al. 1985. High humidity-induced increase in water repellency in some sandy soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 49: 1177–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordán A, Martínez-Zavala L, Bellinfante N. 2008. Heterogeneity in soil hydrological response from different land cover types in southern Spain. Catena, 74: 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordán A, Zavala L M, Mataix-Solera J, et al. 2013. Soil water repellency: origin, assessment and geomorphological consequences. Catena, 108: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez-Flores J C, Woche S K, Bachmann J, et al. 2008. Comparing capillary rise contact angle of soil aggregates and homogenized soil. Geoderma, 146: 336–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letey J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In: DeBano L F, Letey J. Proceedings of a Symposium on Water Repellent Soils, 6–10 May 1969, Riverside: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis S A, Wu J Q, Robichaud P R. 2006. Assessing burn severity and comparing soil water repellency, Hayman Fire, Colorado. Hydrological Processes, 20: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X J, Li X R, Song W M, et al. 2008. Effects of crust and shrub patches on runoff, sedimentation, and related nutrient (C, N) redistribution in the desertified steppe zone of the Tengger Desert, Northern China. Geomorphology, 96: 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C Y, Chou W C, Tsai J S, et al. 2006. Water repellency of Casuarina windbreaks (Casuarina equisetifolia Forst.) caused by fungi in central Taiwan. Ecological Engineering, 26: 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallik A U, Rahman A A. 1985. Soil water repellency in regularly burned Calluna heathlands: comparison of three measuring techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 20: 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Zavala L, Jordán-López A. 2009. Influence of different plant species on water repellency in Mediterranean heathland soils. Catena, 76(3): 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mataix-Solera J, Doerr S H. 2004. Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forest in the south-east of Spain. Geoderma, 118: 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mataix-Solera J, Arcenegui V, Guerrero C, et al. 2007. Water repellency under different plant species in a calcareous forest soil in a semiarid Mediterranean environment. Hydrological Processes, 21(17): 2300–2309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mataix-Solera J, Arcenegui V, Guerrero C, et al. 2008. Can terra rossa become water repellent by burning? A laboratory approach. Geoderma, 147: 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mataix-Solera J, Cerdà A, Arcenegui V, et al. 2011. Fire effects on soil aggregation: a review. Earth-Science Reviews, 109(1): 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGhie D A, Posner A M. 1980. Water repellence of heavy textured western Australian surface soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 18: 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGhie D A, Posner M A. 1981. The effect of plant top material on thewater repellence of fired sands and water-repellent soils. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 32: 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKissock I, Gilkes R J, Van Bronswijk W. 2003. The relationship of soil water repellency to aliphatic C and kaolin measured using DRIFT. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 41: 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod M, Aislabie J, Smith J, et al. 2001. Viral and chemical tracer movement through contrasting soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30: 2134–2140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow N R. 1976. Capillary-pressure correlations for uniformly wetted porous-media. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 15: 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega A, Lorite J. 2007. Macrofungi diversity in cork-oak and holm-oak forests in Andalusia (southern Spain); an efficient parameter for establishing priorities for its evaluation and conservation. Central European Journal of Biology, 2: 276–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park D M, Cisar J L, Williams K E, et al. 2004. Alleviation of soil water repellency in sand based Bermudagrass in South Florida. Acta Horticulturae, 661: 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson J A, Allen S E. 1975. A wet oxidation procedure suitable for determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material Commun. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 6: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul E A, Clark F E. 1996. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. New York: Academic Press, 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quyum A. 2001. Moisture movement through hydrophobic soils. MSc Thesis, Calgary: University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez-Flores J C, Bachmann J, Marmur A. 2010. Direct determination of contact angles of model soils in comparison with wettability characterization by capillary rise. Journal of Hydrology, 382(1–4): 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritsema C J, Dekker L W. 1994. How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil: 2. Dynamics of fingered flow. Water Resources Research, 30: 2519–2531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritsema C J, Dekker L W. 1998. Three dimensional patterns of moisture, water repellency, bromide and pH in a sandy soil. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 31: 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritsema C J, Dekker L W. 2000. Preferential flow in water repellent sandy soils: principles and modeling implications. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232: 308–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts F J, Carbon B A. 1971. Water repellence in sandy soils of southwestern Australia. I. Some studies related to field occurrence. CSIRO (Australia) Division of Plant Industry. Field Station Record, 10: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts F J, Carbon B A. 1972. Water repellence in sandy soils of southwestern Australia. II. Some chemical characteristics of hydrophobic skins. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 10(1): 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi J L. 2000. A case study of Minqin Oasis in China. Water International, 25(3): 418–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirtcliffe N J, McHale G, Newton M I, et al. 2006. Critical conditions for the wetting of soils. Applied Physics Letters, 89(9): 094101–094101-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebold A, Walliser A, Nardin M, et al. 1997. Capillary rise for thermodynamic characterization of solid particle surface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 186: 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenhuis T S, Rivera J C, Hernández C J M, et al. 2001. Water repellency in New York state soils. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 9: 624–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teramura H A. 1980. Relationship between stand age and water repellency of chaparral soils. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 104: 42–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela M E, Benito E, de Blas E. 2005. Impact of wildfires on surface water repellency in soils of northwest Spain. Hydrological Processes, 19: 3649–3657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black I A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1): 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis M G, Horne D J. 1992. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science, 20: 91–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis M G, Horne D J, Palmer A S. 1993. Water repellency in a New Zealand development sequence of yellow-brown sands. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 31: 641–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X F, Xi T. 1995. Critical wetting angle for spontaneous liquid infiltration into orderly packed fibres or spheres. Journal of Materials Science, 30: 5099–5102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavala L M, González F A, Jordán A. 2009. Intensity and persistence of water repellency in relation to vegetation types and soil parameters in Mediterranean SW Spain. Geoderma, 152(3–4): 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LiChao Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, H., Li, X., Liu, L. et al. Soil water repellency and influencing factors of Nitraria tangutorun nebkhas at different succession stages. J. Arid Land 6, 300–310 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0199-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0199-2

Keywords

Navigation