Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crustal stress partitioning in the complex seismic active areas of Romania

  • Original Study
  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyzing the partitioning of stress and deformation in active orogenic settings is of fundamental importance for understanding the mechanisms driving the geodynamic evolution and seismicity, particularly in complex orogenic settings. In this respect, a quantitative understanding is obtained by coupling the large-scale geodynamic evolution with partitioning of local deformation and stress patterns derived from analyzing the seismicity character, focal plane solutions and kinematics of genetically related active structures. The goal of the present paper is to investigate the stress field characteristics in relation with the specific geotectonics and seismogenic zones of Romania. The principal stress components are computed by inverting the fault plane solutions provided by a completed and updated catalogue for the crustal earthquakes recorded since 1929 up to 2012. Our investigation is justified to the extent that the basic hypothesis of properly representing the seismic area partitioning by individual clusters of events is relevant at the scale of each earthquake-prone area and from statistical point of view (minimum 20–30 events). The catalogue covers mostly the area in front of the Carpathians Arc: Moesian Platform, Barlad Depression, North Dobrogean Orogen, Southern Carpathians belt (Făgăraş-Câmpulung, Central Southern Carpathian and Danubian seismogenic zones) and western part of Romania (Banat region). The seismicity is sporadic and the available fault plane solutions are less representative for the entire area in the inner side of the Carpathians and for the Dobrogea region, located between Danube river and Black Sea. Therefore, for these last two regions the resulted stress field properties are considered as preliminary. The formal stress inversion applied on groups of focal mechanisms proved to be a better estimation of the tectonic stress orientation that can be achieved in the study region in comparison with single focal mechanism, as shown in the World Stress Map Project 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bala A, Toma-Danila D, Radulian M (2019) Focal mechanisms in Romania: statistical features representative for earthquake-prone areas and spatial correlations with tectonic provinces. Acta Geod Geophys 54:263–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth A, Reinecker J, Heidbach O (2008) Stress derivation from earthquake focal mechanisms. World Stress Map Project

  • Bott MHP (1959) The mechanics of oblique-slip faulting. Geol Mag 96:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbunar OF, Radulian M (2011) Geometrical constraints for the configuration of the Vrancea (Romania) intermediate-depth seismicity nest. J Seismolog 15:579–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delvaux D, Moeys R, Stapel G, Petit C, Levi K, Miroshnich K, Ruzhich V, Sankov V (1997) Paleostress reconstructions and geodynamics of the Baikal region, Central Asia, Part 2. Cenozoic rifting. Tectonophysics 282:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fojtíková L, Vavryčuk V (2018) Tectonic stress regime in the 2003–2004 and 2012–2015 earthquake swarms in the Ubaye Valley, French Alps. Pure Appl Geophys 175:1997–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidbach O, Reinecker J, Tingay M, Muller B, Sperner B, Fuchs K, Wenzel F (2007a) Plate boundary forces are not enough: second- and third-order stress patterns highlighted in the World Stress Map database. Tectonics 26:6014. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007tc002133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidbach O, Ledermann P, Kurfeß D, Peters G, Buchmann T, Matenco L, Negut M, Sperner B, Müller B, Nuckelt A, Schmitt G (2007b) Attached or not attached: Slab dynamics beneath Vrancea, Romania. In: International symposium on strong Vrancea earthquakes and risk mitigation Oct. 4–6, 2007, Bucharest, Romania, 2007, 3–20, Ed. MATRIX ROM, Bucharest. http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/beilagen/1/proceedings/

  • Heidbach O, Custodio S, Kingdon A, Mariucci MT, Montone P, Müller B, Pierdominici S, Rajabi M, Reinecker J, Reiter K, Tingay M, Williams J, Ziegler M (2016) Stress map of the Mediterranean and Central Europe. GFZ Data Serv. https://doi.org/10.5880/WSM.Europe2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippolyte J-C (2002) Geodynamics of Dobrogea (Romania): new constraints on the evolution of the Tornquist—Teisseyre Line, the Black Sea and the Carpathians. Tectonophysics 357:33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippolyte J-C, Sandulescu M, Badescu DN, Badescu L (1996) L’activite d’un segmant de la ligne Tornquist—Teisseyre depuis le Jurassique superieur: la faille de Peceneaga—Camena Roumanie). C R Acad Sci Paris 323(ser. II):1043–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail-Zadeh A, Maţenco L, Radulian M, Cloetingh S, Panza GF (2012) Geodynamics and intermediate-depth seismicity in Vrancea (The South-Eastern Carpathians): current state-of-the art. Tectonophyiscs 530–531:50–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund B, Slunga R (1999) Stress tensor inversion using detailed microearthquake information and stability constraints: application to Olfus in southwest Iceland. J Geophys Res 104(B7):14947–14964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund B, Townend J (2007) Calculating horizontal stress orientations with full or partial knowledge of the tectonic stress tensor. Geophys J Int 170:1328–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malita Z, Radulescu F (2010) Focal mechanisms of some crustal earthquakes that occurred in the Pannonian depression (Arad– south Timisoara area), the Moesian platform and North Dobrogean Orogen. Rev Roum de Geophys 54:19–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Garzón P, Bohnhoff M, Kwiatek G, Dresesn G (2013) Stress tensor changes related to fluid injection at The Geysers geothermal field, California. Geophys Res Lett 118:2596–2601. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.504328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael AJ (1984) Determination of stress from slip data: faults and folds. J Geophys Res 89:11.517–11.526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller B, Wehrle V, Hettel S, Sperner B, Fuchs F (2003) A new method for smoothing oriented data and its application to stress data. In: Fracture and in-situ stress characterization of hydrocarbon reservoirs, Spec. Publ. Ser., vol. 209, edited by M. Ameen, pp 107–126, 2003, Geol. Soc., London

  • Oros E, Popa M, Moldovan IA, Popescu E (2008) Seismological database for Banat seismic region (Romania)—Part 2: the Catalogue of the Focal Mechanism Solutions. Romanian J Phys 53:965–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M, Mandrescu N, Popescu E, Utale A, Panza GF (2000) Characterization of Romanian seismic zones. In: Panza GF, Radulian M, Trifu CI (eds) Seismic Hazard of the Circum-Pannonian Region, Pure Appl. Geophys., 157, 57–77

  • Radulian M, Bonjer K-P, Popa M, Popescu E (2007) Seismicity patterns in SE Carpathians at crustal and subcrustal domains: tectonic and geodynamic implications. In: International symposium on strong Vrancea earthquakes and risk mitigation Oct. 4–6, 2007, Bucharest, Romania, 93-102, Ed. MATRIX ROM, Bucharest

  • Radulian M, Bala A, Popescu E, Toma-Danila D (2018) Earthquake mechanism and characterization of seismogenic zones in south-eastern part of Romania. Ann Geophys 61(1):SE108. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M, Bala A, Ardeleanu L, Toma-Danila D, Petrescu L, Popescu E (2019) Revised catalogue of earthquake mechanisms for the events occurred in Romania until the end of twentieth century: rEFMC. Acta Geod Geoph 54:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raileanu V, Bala A, Dinu C, Radulian M, Popescu E, Diaconescu V, Mateciuc D, Popa M (2007) Crustal seismicity and deep structure in the SE Carpathians and its foreland. In: International symposium on strong Vrancea earthquakes and risk mitigation Oct. 4–6, 2007, Bucharest, Romania, pp 86–89, http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/beilagen/1/proceedings/

  • Raileanu V, Dinu C, Ardeleanu L, Diaconescu M, Popescu E, Bala A (2009) Crustal seismicity and associated fault systems in Romania. In: Proceedings of the 27-th ECGS workshop: seismicity patterns in the Euro-Med Region, in Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Sismologie, pp 153–160

  • Săndulescu M (1984) Geotectonics of Romania (in Romanian), Ed. Tehnică, Bucharest, Romania, 1984, p 334

  • Tondi R, Achauer U, Landes M, Davi R, Besutiu L (2009) Unveiling seismic and density structure beneath the Vrancea seismogenic zone (Romania). J Geophys Res 114:B11307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavryčuk V (2014) Iterative joint inversion for stress and fault orientations from focal mechanisms. Geophys J Int 199:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavryčuk V (2015) Moment tensor decompositions revisited. J Seismol 19(1):231–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WSM World Stress Map, Scientific Technical Report 16-01 (2016)

  • Zoback ML (1992) First and second order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: the World Stress Map Project. J Geophys Res 97:11703–11728

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank to dr. Oliver Heidbach which gives a considerable help in assembling the Fig. 4 with the setting of the regional stress field in Romania and the background after WSM 2016. The work in this paper was realized in the frame of NUCLEU Program, Projects No. PN 18 15 01 01/2018. We would like to thank the careful and constructive review by prof. Alik Ismail-Zadeh through which the paper gained in value.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Earth Physics, Magurele, Romania

    A. Bala, M. Radulian & D. Toma-Danila

  2. Academy of Romanian Scientists, Bucharest, Romania

    M. Radulian

Authors
  1. A. Bala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Radulian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Toma-Danila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Radulian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bala, A., Radulian, M. & Toma-Danila, D. Crustal stress partitioning in the complex seismic active areas of Romania. Acta Geod Geophys 55, 389–403 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-020-00299-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-020-00299-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation