Skip to main content
Log in

Adjustment of non-typical errors-in-variables models

  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this contribution, non-typical errors-in-variables (EIV) model is introduced as a more general form of the so-called EIV model which is highly relevant for geodetic data processing. Total least-squares (TLS) algorithms within a typical EIV model cannot deal with the non-typical EIV models since the first order moment/mean of the random design matrix in a non-typical EIV model is not linear. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm besides a standard solution to deal with this model. To achieve this goal, first we review a classic algorithm in order to solve this problem using traditional non-linear least-squares method within a non-linear mixed model. Then by comparison, weighted TLS algorithm within the typical EIV model can be replaced by the proposed approach after some slight modifications which results in an excellent approximate solution. This foundation is important because there is no need for linearization in the TLS algorithms. The proposed way is not sensitive to the approximate initial values of the unknown parameters and it is applicable to curve fitting, surface reconstruction or other non-typical EIV models. Here we employ it to the curve fitting. Also two examples convincingly demonstrate that the standard TLS solution of the non-typical EIV model is not admissible when it is incorrectly considered as a typical EIV model; i.e., the non-linear relationships of the elements of the random design matrix are neglected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Box MJ (1971) Bias in nonlinear estimation (with discussions). J R Stat Soc B 33:171–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (1931) The application of least squares. Philos Mag 11:146–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang X (2011) Weighted total least squares solutions for applications in geodesy. PhD Dissertation number 294, Leibniz University, Hannover

  • Fang X (2013) Weighted total least squares: necessary and sufficient conditions, fixed and random parameters. J Geod. doi:10.1007/s00190-013-0643-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang X (2014) A structured and constrained Total Least-Squares solution with cross-covariances. Stud Geophys Geod. doi:10.1007/s11200-012-0671-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Felus A (2004) Application of total least squares for spatial point process analysis. J Surv Eng 130(3):126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub G, Van Loan C (1980) An analysis of the Total Least Squares problem. SIAM J Numer Anal 17:883–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leick A (2004) GPS satellite surveying. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahboub V (2012) On weighted total least-squares for geodetic transformations. J Geod 86(5):359–367. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0524-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahboub V (2014) Variance component estimation in errors-in-variables models and a rigorous total least-squares approach. Stud Geophys et Geod 58(1):17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahboub V, Sharifi MA (2013) On weighted total least-squares with linear and quadratic constraints. J Geod. doi:10.1007/s00190-012-0598-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahboub V, Amiri-Simkooei AR, Sharifi MA (2012) Iteratively reweighted total least-squares: a robust estimation in errors-in-variables models. Surv Rev. doi:10.1179/1752270612Y.0000000017

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail E (1976) Observations and least squares. IEP-A dun-Donnelley Publisher, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neitzel F (2010) Generalization of Total Least-Squares on example of unweighted and weighted similarity transformation. J Geod 84(2010):751–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope AJ (1972) Some pitfalls to be avoided in the iterative adjustment of nonlinear problems. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the American Society of Photogrammetry, Washington, DC, pp 449–477

  • Schaffrin B, Felus Y (2008) An algorithmic approach to the total least-squares problem with linear and quadratic constraints. Stud Geophys Geod 53(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B, Uzun S (2008) Surface reconstruction via total least-squares adjustment of the semi-variogram. In International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (Vol. 37, pp. 141–148). International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

  • Schaffrin B, Wieser A (2008) On weighted total least-squares adjustment for linear regression. J Geod 82(7):415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B, Neitzel F, Uzun S, Mahboub V (2012a) Modifying Cadzow’s algorithm to generate the optimal TLS-solution for the structured EIV-model of a similarity transformation. J Geod Sci. doi:10.2478/v10156-011-0028-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B, Snow K, Neitzel F (2012b) On the Errors-In-Variables Model with singular covariance matrices. In: 21st International workshop on matrices and statistics, Będlewo, Poland

  • Shen YZ, Li BF, Chen Y (2011) An iterative solution of weighted total least squares adjustment. J Geod 85:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow K (2012) Topics in total least-squares adjustment within the errors-in-variables model: singular cofactor matrices and priori information. PhD Dissertation, report No., 502, Geodetic Science Program, School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Snow K, Schaffrin B (2012) Weighted total least-squares collocation with geodetic applications. In: SIAM conference in applied linear algebra, Valencia, Spain, June 2012

  • Stigler F (1999) Statistics on the table. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huffel S, Vandewalle J (1991) The total least-squares problem. Computational aspects and analysis. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xu PL, Liu JN, Shi C (2012) Total least squares adjustment in partial errors-in-variables models: algorithm and statistical analysis. J Geod 86(8):661–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Mahboub.

Additional information

I confirm that Dr. A. A. Ardalan and Dr. S. Ebrahimzadeh are the co-authors for this manuscript. Thank you for your assistance. Yours sincerely Vahid Mahboub.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahboub, V., Ardalan, A.A. & Ebrahimzadeh, S. Adjustment of non-typical errors-in-variables models. Acta Geod Geophys 50, 207–218 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-015-0109-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-015-0109-5

Keywords

Navigation