Abstract
Background and Objective
Extensive use of ciprofloxacin to treat Salmonella typhi infections has led to the emergence of resistance, resulting in clinical failure and delayed treatment response. Interpretative breakpoints for ciprofloxacin were revised by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) in 2012. Since the majority of S. typhi isolates fall under the category of ‘intermediate susceptible’ as per CLSI criteria, we undertook molecular characterization to better define the susceptibility of these isolates.
Methods
Of 113 typhoidal Salmonella isolates collected during 2014, 33 (27 S. typhi and 6 S. paratyphi A) were randomly selected to determine the presence of chromosomal (gyrA, gyrB and parC), plasmid (qnrA, qnrB, qnrS and aac(6′)-lb-cr), and efflux-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance.
Results
To the best of our knowledge, the parC mutation Glu(84)-Gly was observed for the first time in S. typhi in India. Of 33 isolates, only one harbored the qnrB gene, which is responsible for plasmid-mediated resistance. No significant change in efflux pump activity was observed for ciprofloxacin, except one that showed a fivefold decrease. Ninety-six percent of isolates with intermediate minimum inhibitory concentration to ciprofloxacin (CLSI) had mutations in the gyrA and parC genes, which might translate to possible/probable clinical failure in patients if treated with ciprofloxacin. In contrast, the EUCAST criteria define these isolates as resistant and may result in appropriate therapy with reduced morbidity.
Conclusion
It was clear that the molecular mechanism of ciprofloxacin resistance correlates better with the EUCAST criteria than the CLSI criteria, which is also in agreement with the pefloxacin results, suggesting it as a surrogate marker for identifying fluoroquinolone susceptibility.
References
Rowe B, Ward LR, Threlfall EJ. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella typhi: a worldwide epidemic. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:106–9.
Balaji V, Sharma A, Ranjan P, Kapil A. Revised ciprofloxacin breakpoints for Salmonella typhi: its implications in India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2014;32:161–3.
García-Fernández A, Gallina S, Owczare S. Emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonell a enterica Serovar Typhi in Italy. PLoS One. 2015;10.
Bhalla AK, Lathi S, Sobti V, Krishna Prasad K, Bhargava A. A case cohort study on clinical utility of garenoxacin mesylate in typhoid: retrospective analyses. Int J Sci Stud. 2015;3:90–3.
Manchanda V, Bhalla P, Sethi M, Sharma VK. Treatment of enteric fever in children on the basis of current trends of antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica serovar typhi and paratyphi A. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;(24)2:101–6.
Verma S, Thakur S, Kanga A, Singh G, Gupta P. Emerging Salmonella Paratyphi A enteric fever and changing trends in antimicrobial resistance pattern of salmonella in Shimla. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2010;28(1):51–3.
Menezes GA, Harish BN, Khan MA, Goessens WHF, Hays JP. Antimicrobial resistance trends in blood culture positive Salmonella Typhi isolates from Pondicherry, India, 2005–2009. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):239–45.
Dutta S, Das S, Mitra U, Jain P, Roy I, Ganguly SS, et al. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence profiles and molecular subtypes of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A blood isolates from Kolkata, India during 2009–2013. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e101347.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement M100-S24. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014.
The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 4.0, 2014. Available at: http://www.eucast.org.
Gay K, Robicsek AA, Strahilevitz AJ, Par CH, Jacob G, Barrett TJ, et al. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in non-typhi serotypes of Salmonella enterica. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:297–304.
Afzal A, Sarwar Y, Ali A, Maqbool A, Salman M, Habeeb MA, et al. Molecular evaluation of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi from Pakistan. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;12:929–40.
Marchese A, Esposito S, Barbieri R, Bassetti M, Debbia E. Does the adoption of EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints affect the selection of antimicrobials to treat acute community-acquired respiratory tract infections? BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:181.
Canton R, Canut A, Morosini MI, Oliver A. Breakpoints for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: is the problem solved? Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2014;32(4):33–40.
Hombach M, Bloemberg GV, Bottger E. Effects of clinical breakpoint changes in CLSI guidelines 2010/2011 and EUCAST guidelines 2011 on antibiotic susceptibility test reporting of Gram-negative bacilli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(3):622–32.
Renuka K, Kapil A, Kabra SK, Wig N, Das BK, Prasad VV, et al. Reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and gyrA gene mutation in North Indian strains of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi and serotype Paratyphi A. Microb Drug Resist. 2004;10:146–53.
Brown JC, Shanahan PMA, Jesudason MV, Thomson CJ, Amyes SGB. Mutations responsible for reduced susceptibility to 4-quinolones in clinical isolates of multi-resistant Salmonella typhi in India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37:891–900.
Gaind R, Paglietti B, Murgia M, Dawar R, Uzzau S, Cappuccinelli P, et al. Molecular characterization of ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and Paratyphi A causing enteric fever in India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(6):1139–44.
Harish BN, Menezes GA, Sarangapani K, Parija SC. A case report and review of the literature: ciprofloxacin resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008;2(4):324–7.
Piddock LJV. Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps not just for resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:629–36.
Keith P. Efflux-mediated resistance to fluoroquinolones in gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44(9):2233–41.
Skov R, Matuschek E, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Åhman J, Petersen A, Stegger M, et al. Development of a pefloxacin disk diffusion method for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:3411–7.
Fang FC. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella and the utility of perfloxacin disk diffusion. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:3401–4.
Matuschek E, Skov R, Ahman J, Karlsson M, Petersen A, Torpdahl M, et al. EUCAST disc diffusion with pefloxacin 5 μg as screen for fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella spp. In: Variation between media, discs and testing sites. Barcelona; European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) 2014: 10–13 May 2014.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Kamini Walia, Scientist E, Division of Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, and the ICMR council for providing the grant for this research, as well as the Institutional Review Board of the Christian Medical College, Vellore (83-i/11/13). The authors also thank Dr. Arti Kapil, Professor, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, for sharing the Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) data undertaken as part of the ICMR-funded S. typhi surveillance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Balaji Veeraraghavan, Shalini Anandan, Dhiviya Prabaa Muthuirulandi Sethuvel, Nivetha Puratchiveeran, Kamini Walia and Naveen Kumar Devanga Ragupathi declare that there are no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study was funded by the ICMR, New Delhi, India (Ref. No. AMR/TF/55/13ECDII, dated 23 October 2013).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Veeraraghavan, B., Anandan, S., Muthuirulandi Sethuvel, D.P. et al. Molecular Characterization of Intermediate Susceptible Typhoidal Salmonella to Ciprofloxacin, and its Impact. Mol Diagn Ther 20, 213–219 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-016-0191-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-016-0191-6