Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Training Leading to Repetition Failure on Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 18 February 2016

Abstract

Background

It remains unclear whether repetitions leading to failure (failure training) or not leading to failure (non-failure training) lead to superior muscular strength gains during resistance exercise. Failure training may provide the stimulus needed to enhance muscular strength development. However, it is argued that non-failure training leads to similar increases in muscular strength without the need for high levels of discomfort and physical effort, which are associated with failure training.

Objective

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of failure versus non-failure training on muscular strength.

Methods

Five electronic databases were searched using terms related to failure and non-failure training. Studies were deemed eligible for inclusion if they met the following criteria: (1) randomised and non-randomised studies; (2) resistance training intervention where repetitions were performed to failure; (3) a non-failure comparison group; (4) resistance training interventions with a total of ≥3 exercise sessions; and (5) muscular strength assessment pre- and post-training. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool the results of the included studies and generate a weighted mean effect size (ES).

Results

Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis (combined studies). Training volume was controlled in four studies (volume controlled), while the remaining four studies did not control for training volume (volume uncontrolled). Non-failure training resulted in a 0.6–1.3 % greater strength increase than failure training. A small pooled effect favouring non-failure training was found (ES = 0.34; p = 0.02). Significant small pooled effects on muscular strength were also found for non-failure versus failure training with compound exercises (ES = 0.37–0.38; p = 0.03) and trained participants (ES = 0.37; p = 0.049). A slightly larger pooled effect favouring non-failure training was observed when volume-uncontrolled studies were included (ES = 0.41; p = 0.047). No significant effect was found for the volume-controlled studies, although there was a trend favouring non-failure training. The methodological quality of the included studies in the review was found to be moderate. Exercise compliance was high for the studies where this was reported (n = 5), although limited information on adverse events was provided.

Conclusion

Overall, the results suggest that despite statistically significant effects on muscular strength being found for non-failure compared with failure training, the small percentage of improvement shown for non-failure training is unlikely to be meaningful. Therefore, it appears that similar increases in muscular strength can be achieved with failure and non-failure training. Furthermore, it seems unnecessary to perform failure training to maximise muscular strength; however, if incorporated into a programme, training to failure should be performed sparingly to limit the risks of injuries and overtraining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ratamess NA, Evetoch TK, Housh TJ, et al. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687–708. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kraemer WJ, Adams K, Cafarelli E, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand: progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(2):364–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Richens B, Cleather DJ. The relationship between the number of repetitions performed at given intensities is different in endurance and strength trained athletes. Biol Sport. 2014;31(2):157–61. doi:10.5604/20831862.1099047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimano T, Kraemer WJ, Spiering BA, et al. Relationship between the number of repetitions and selected percentages of one repetition maximum in free weight exercises in trained and untrained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(4):819–23. doi:10.1519/r-18195.1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith D, Bruce-Low S. Strength training methods and the work of Arthur Jones. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2004;7:52–68.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Willardson JM. The application of training to failure in periodized multiple-set resistance exercise programs. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(2):628–31. doi:10.1519/r-20426.1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Willardson JM, Norton L, Wilson G. Training to failure and beyond in mainstream resistance exercise programs. Strength Cond J. 2010;32(3):21–9. doi:10.1519/SSC.0b013e3181cc2a3a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sale DG. Influence of exercise and training on motor unit activation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1987;15:95–151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van den Tillaar R, Ettema G. The, “sticking period” in a maximum bench press. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(5):529–35. doi:10.1080/02640411003628022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher J, Steele J, Bruce-Low S, et al. Evidence-based resistance training recommendations. Med Sport. 2011;15(3):147–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith RC, Rutherford OM. The role of metabolites in strength training: I. A comparison of eccentric and concentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;71(4):332–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vandenburgh HH. Motion into mass: how does tension stimulate muscle growth? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987;19(5 Suppl):S142–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Andersen CH, et al. Muscle activation strategies during strength training with heavy loading vs. repetitions to failure. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(7):1897–903. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318239c38e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Drinkwater EJ, Lawton TW, Lindsell RP, et al. Training leading to repetition failure enhances bench press strength gains in elite junior athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(2):382–8. doi:10.1519/r-15224.1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahtiainen JP, Pakarinen A, Alen M, et al. Muscle hypertrophy, hormonal adaptations and strength development during strength training in strength-trained and untrained men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89(6):555–63. doi:10.1007/s00421-003-0833-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ronnestad BR, Nygaard H, Raastad T. Physiological elevation of endogenous hormones results in superior strength training adaptation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(9):2249–59. doi:10.1007/s00421-011-1860-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. West DW, Phillips SM. Associations of exercise-induced hormone profiles and gains in strength and hypertrophy in a large cohort after weight training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(7):2693–702. doi:10.1007/s00421-011-2246-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: a review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(4):950–8. doi:10.1519/r-16874.1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Willardson JM, Burkett LN. A comparison of 3 different rest intervals on the exercise volume completed during a workout. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):23–6. doi:10.1519/r-13853.1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Willardson JM, Burkett LN. The effect of rest interval length on the sustainability of squat and bench press repetitions. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(2):400–3. doi:10.1519/r-16314.1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Willardson JM, Burkett LN. The effect of rest interval length on bench press performance with heavy vs. light loads. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(2):396–9. doi:10.1519/r-17735.1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krieger JW. Single versus multiple sets of resistance exercise: a meta-regression. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(6):1890–901. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b370be.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall PW, McEwen M, Robbins DW. Strength and neuromuscular adaptation following one, four, and eight sets of high intensity resistance exercise in trained males. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(12):3007–16. doi:10.1007/s00421-011-1944-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Naclerio F, Faigenbaum AD, Larumbe-Zabala E, et al. Effects of different resistance training volumes on strength and power in team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(7):1832–40. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182736d10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Akima H, Saito A. Activation of quadriceps femoris including vastus intermedius during fatiguing dynamic knee extensions. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113(11):2829–40. doi:10.1007/s00421-013-2721-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cook SB, Murphy BG, Labarbera KE. Neuromuscular function after a bout of low-load blood flow-restricted exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(1):67–74. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31826c6fa8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schoenfeld BJ, Contreras B, Willardson JM, et al. Muscle activation during low- versus high-load resistance training in well-trained men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(12):2491–7. doi:10.1007/s00421-014-2976-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Maximizing strength development in athletes: a meta-analysis to determine the dose–response relationship. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(2):377–82. doi:10.1519/r-12842.1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rhea MR, Alvar BA, Burkett LN, et al. A meta-analysis to determine the dose response for strength development. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(3):456–64. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000053727.63505.d4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309(6954):597–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Izquierdo M, Ibanez J, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, et al. Differential effects of strength training leading to failure versus not to failure on hormonal responses, strength, and muscle power gains. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;100(5):1647–56. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01400.2005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rooney KJ, Herbert RD, Balnave RJ. Fatigue contributes to the strength training stimulus. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(9):1160–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9, w64.

  34. Giessing J, Fisher J, Steele J, et al. The effects of low volume resistance training with and without advanced techniques in trained participants. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. Epub 2014 Oct 10.

  35. Folland JP, Irish CS, Roberts JC, et al. Fatigue is not a necessary stimulus for strength gains during resistance training. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(5):370–3 (discussion 374).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sampson JA, Groeller H. Is repetition failure critical for the development of muscle hypertrophy and strength? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015. doi:10.1111/sms.12445.

  37. Izquierdo-Gabarren M, De Txabarri Gonzalez, Exposito R, Garcia-pallares J, et al. Concurrent endurance and strength training not to failure optimizes performance gains. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(6):1191–9. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c67eec.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kramer JB, Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, et al. Effects of single vs. multiple sets of weight training: impact of volume, intensity, and variation. J Strength Cond Res. 1997;11(3):143–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Laframboise MA, Degraauw C. The effects of aerobic physical activity on adiposity in school-aged children and youth: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2011;55(4):256–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sanborn K, Boros R, Hruby J, et al. Short-term performance effects of weight training with multiple sets not to failure vs. a single set to failure in women. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14(3):328–31.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Andersen JL, Aagaard P. Effects of strength training on muscle fiber types and size; consequences for athletes training for high-intensity sport. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20:32–8. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01196.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gabriel DA, Kamen G, Frost G. Neural adaptations to resistive exercise: mechanisms and recommendations for training practices. Sports Med. 2006;36(2):133–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jones DA, Rutherford OM, Parker DF. Physiological changes in skeletal muscle as a result of strength training. Q J Exp Physiol. 1989;74(3):233–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. McDonagh MJ, Davies CT. Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;52(2):139–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Folland JP, Williams AG. The adaptations to strength training: morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med. 2007;37(2):145–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Abe T, DeHoyos DV, Pollock ML, et al. Time course for strength and muscle thickness changes following upper and lower body resistance training in men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81(3):174–80. doi:10.1007/s004210050027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Garfinkel S, Cafarelli E. Relative changes in maximal force, EMG, and muscle cross-sectional area after isometric training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(11):1220–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Housh DJ, Housh TJ, Johnson GO, et al. Hypertrophic response to unilateral concentric isokinetic resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992;73(1):65–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Tracy BL, Ivey FM, Hurlbut D, et al. Muscle quality: II. Effects of strength training in 65- to 75-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999;86(1):195–201.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mijnarends DM, Meijers JM, Halfens RJ, et al. Validity and reliability of tools to measure muscle mass, strength, and physical performance in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(3):170–8. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2012.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Narici MV, Hoppeler H, Kayser B, et al. Human quadriceps cross-sectional area, torque and neural activation during 6 months strength training. Acta Physiol Scand. 1996;157(2):175–86. doi:10.1046/j.1365-201X.1996.483230000.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Moritani T. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;58(3):115–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Narici MV, Roi GS, Landoni L, et al. Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;59(4):310–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rutherford OM. Muscular coordination and strength training: implications for injury rehabilitation. Sports Med. 1988;5(3):196–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rutherford OM, Jones DA. The role of learning and coordination in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;55(1):100–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Duchateau J, Semmler JG, Enoka RM. Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;101(6):1766–75. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00543.2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Adam A, De Luca CJ. Recruitment order of motor units in human vastus lateralis muscle is maintained during fatiguing contractions. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90(5):2919–27. doi:10.1152/jn.00179.2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Adam A, De Luca CJ. Firing rates of motor units in human vastus lateralis muscle during fatiguing isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;99(1):268–80. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01344.2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Carpentier A, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Motor unit behaviour and contractile changes during fatigue in the human first dorsal interosseus. J Physiol. 2001;534(Pt 3):903–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Bigland-Ritchie B, Johansson R, Lippold OC, et al. Changes in motoneurone firing rates during sustained maximal voluntary contractions. J Physiol. 1983;340:335–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Bigland-Ritchie B, Woods JJ. Changes in muscle contractile properties and neural control during human muscular fatigue. Muscle Nerve. 1984;7(9):691–9. doi:10.1002/mus.880070902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Christova P, Kossev A. Motor unit activity during long-lasting intermittent muscle contractions in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;77(4):379–87. doi:10.1007/s004210050348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Garland SJ, Enoka RM, Serrano LP, et al. Behavior of motor units in human biceps brachii during a submaximal fatiguing contraction. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994;76(6):2411–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, West DW, et al. Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012;113(1):71–7. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Schoenfeld BJ, Peterson MD, Ogborn D, et al. Effects of low- vs. high-load resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(10):2954–63. doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000000958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Munn J, Herbert RD, Hancock MJ, et al. Resistance training for strength: effect of number of sets and contraction speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(9):1622–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Duchateau J, Enoka RM. Human motor unit recordings: origins and insight into the integrated motor system. Brain Res. 2011;1409:42–61. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle. J Physiol. 1977;264(3):673–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Van Cutsem M, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol. 1998;513(Pt 1):295–305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB, Yemm R. Changes in firing rate of human motor units during linearly changing voluntary contractions. J Physiol. 1973;230(2):371–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Gruber M, Gruber SB, Taube W, et al. Differential effects of ballistic versus sensorimotor training on rate of force development and neural activation in humans. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(1):274–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kamen G, Knight CA. Training-related adaptations in motor unit discharge rate in young and older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(12):1334–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Zatsiorsky VM, Kraemer WJ. Science and practice of strength training. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Dons B, Bollerup K, Bonde-Petersen F, et al. The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber composition and muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1979;40(2):95–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ahtiainen JP, Häkkinen K. Strength athletes are capable to produce greater muscle activation and neural fatigue during high-intensity resistance exercise than nonathletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(4):1129–34. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181aa1b72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW, 2141, Australia

    Tim Davies, Rhonda Orr, Mark Halaki & Daniel Hackett

Authors
  1. Tim Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rhonda Orr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Halaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Hackett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Hackett.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this review.

Conflict of interest

Tim Davies, Rhonda Orr, Mark Halaki and Daniel Hackett declare that they have no conflicts of interest that are relevant to the content of this review.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davies, T., Orr, R., Halaki, M. et al. Effect of Training Leading to Repetition Failure on Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 46, 487–502 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0451-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0451-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation