Skip to main content
Log in

Walking Speed and Health‐Related Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between slower walking and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Methods

We used North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis data to conduct a study of participants completing both the regular semiannual and supplemental spring 2010 surveys. Question 10 of the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (“How much has your MS slowed down your walking?”) was used to assess patient-perceived impact of walking speed on HRQoL. HRQoL assessments included the Short Form-12 (SF-12), EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Short Form-6 Dimension (SF-6D), and a visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

A total of 3,670 registrants completed both surveys and were included. Unadjusted analyses showed that compared with those classifying the impact of MS on walking speed as “not at all” (n = 661), participants stating MS impacted their walking speed “a little” (n = 722), “moderately” (n = 486), “quite a bit” (n = 714), and “extremely” (n = 1,087) reported poorer SF-12 physical component scale (PCS) (r = −0.69, p < 0.001), mental component scale (MCS) (r = −0.16, p < 0.001), and health status index scores (r = −0.50 to −0.51 for the EQ-VAS, EQ-5D and SF-6D, p < 0.001 for all). After adjustment for demographics and additional MS-related disability and symptoms, the impact of walking speed remained significant, although less profound for the PCS (reductions of 3.59–12.31 across walking speed classifications) and index scores (reductions ranging from 1.98 to 14.06, 0.04 to 0.13, and 0.02 to 0.07 for the EQ-VAS, EQ-5D, and SF-6D). Reduction in walking speed was no longer associated with a worse MCS (p > 0.05 all classifications of walking speed).

Conclusion

Incremental decrements in HRQoL were observed as patients perceived greater levels of reduction in their walking speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kobelt G, Berg J, Atherly D, et al. Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study in the United States. Neurology. 2006;66:1696–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisk JD, Brown MG, Sketris IS, et al. A comparison of health utility measures for the evaluation of multiple sclerosis treatments. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:58–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller DM, Rudick RA, Cutter G, et al. Clinical significance of the multiple sclerosis functional composite: relationship to patient-reported quality of life. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:1319–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu N, Minden SL, Hoaglin DC, et al. Quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: data from the Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2007;30:233–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) online English version; 2010. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/ (Accessed 16 Sep 2012).

  6. Jeffery D, Kirzinger S, Halper J, et al. Health-related quality of life, EDSS and Timed 25-Foot Walk in a multiple sclerosis population of a real-world observational outcomes study: baseline data from ROBUST. Value Health. 2009;12:A372.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson D Jr, Zhao N, Gathany T, et al. Health perceptions and clinical characteristics of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: baseline data from an international clinical trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:1121–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoogervorst EL, Zwemmer JN, Jelles B, et al. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): relation to established measures of impairment and disability. Mult Scler. 2004;10(5):569–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jongen PJ, Lehnick D, Sanders E, et al. Health-related quality of life in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients during treatment with glatiramer acetate: a prospective, observational, international, multi-centre study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:133.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller DM, Cohen JA, Kooijmans M, et al. Change in clinician-assessed measures of multiple sclerosis and subject-reported quality of life: results from the IMPACT study. Mult Scler. 2006;12:180–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connor P, Lee L, Ng PT, et al. Determinants of overall quality of life in secondary progressive MS: a longitudinal study. Neurology. 2001;57:889–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services/Food and Drug Admin. Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims; 2009. http://www.ispor.org/workpaper/FDA%20PRO%20Guidance.pdf (Accessed Sep 16 2012).

  13. Hobart JC, Riaza A, Lamping DL, et al. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology. 2003;60:31–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, et al. How to score version 2 of the SF-12® Health Survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). Lincoln: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42:851–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor R. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. JDMS. 1990;1:35–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marrie RA, Goldman M. Validity of performance scales for disability assessment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2007;13:1176–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kieseier BC, Pozzilli C. Assessing walking disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012;18:914–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All authors have contributed substantially to the study and/or authoring the manuscript.

The following details the contribution of each author:

Dr. Coleman had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Kohn, Baker, Sidovar, Coleman.

Acquisition of data: Sidovar, Coleman.

Analysis and interpretation of data: Kohn, Baker, Sidovar, Coleman.

Drafting of the manuscript: Kohn, Baker, Sidovar, Coleman.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kohn, Baker, Sidovar, Coleman.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Sidovar, Coleman.

Study supervision: Coleman.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Coleman has received grant funding from Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. Mr. Sidovar is a paid employee of Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. and holds stock in the company. Drs. Kohn and Baker have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Funding

This research was funded by Acorda Therapeutics, Inc., Ardsely, NY. NARCOMS is supported by the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers and its Foundation. The authors of this report take full responsibility for the integrity, accuracy, and contents of the report. The funding source reviewed the final manuscript. The authors approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig I. Coleman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohn, C.G., Baker, W.L., Sidovar, M.F. et al. Walking Speed and Health‐Related Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis. Patient 7, 55–61 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-013-0028-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-013-0028-x

Keywords

Navigation