Skip to main content
Log in

N-of-1 Randomized Trials of Ultra-Micronized Palmitoylethanolamide in Older Patients with Chronic Pain

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Ultra-micronized palmitoylethanolamide (um-PEA) represents an attractive option for chronic pain control in complex older patients at higher risk of adverse effects with traditional analgesics.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of um-PEA versus placebo on chronic pain intensity and function in individual geriatric patients.

Design

We performed randomized, blinded N-of-1 trials with two 3-week um-PEA versus placebo comparisons, separated by 2-week washout periods.

Participants

The study included outpatients aged ≥ 65 years with chronic, non-cancer, non-ischemic pain in the back, joints, or limbs.

Intervention

Patients were randomized to Um-PEA 600 mg or placebo twice daily.

Measurements

Pain intensity was measured using an 11-point visual numeric scale. Functional impairment was measured using a Back Pain Functional Scale. Impact of each N-of-1 trial was measured on the clinician’s intention to treat and confidence.

Results

Ten of 11 eligible patients consented over 7 months [all female, mean age 83.2 years (SD 4.6)]. Three patients interrupted the trial: one had diarrhea (under placebo), one for low adherence, and one for intercurrent pneumonia. A small statistically significant effect in favor of um-PEA was seen at the mixed method analyses in two patients (effect size equal to 8% of the baseline pain). A statistically significant impact on function was found in one patient. After the trial, um-PEA was prescribed to four patients; in two patients the clinician changed their pre-trial intention to treat; the clinician confidence in the treatment plan either increased (5) or remained the same (2).

Conclusions

Our experience confirmed that N-of-1 trials may help make personalized evidence-based decisions in complex older patients, with special feasibility considerations.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT02699281.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrade DC, Faria JW, Caramelli P, et al. The assessment and management of pain in the demented and non-demented elderly patient. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011;69(2B):387–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsang A, Von Korff M, Lee S, et al. Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain. 2008;9(10):883–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Persons AGSPoPPiO. The management of persistent pain in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(6 Suppl):S205–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrell B, Argoff CE, Epplin J, et al. American Geriatrics Society Panel on Pharmacological Management of Persistent Pain in Older Persons. Pharmacological management of persistent pain in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(8):1331–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Machado GC, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, et al. Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ. 2015;350:h1225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Boers M, Tangelder MJ, van Ingen H, Fort JG, Goldstein JL. The rate of NSAID-induced endoscopic ulcers increases linearly but not exponentially with age: a pooled analysis of 12 randomised trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(3):417–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Noble M, Treadwell JR, Tregear SJ, Coates VH, Wiffen PJ, Akafomo C, et al. Long-term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD006605.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fick DM, Semla TP, Beizer J, et al. By the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2227–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paladini A, Fusco M, Coaccioli S, Skaper SD, Varrassi G. Chronic pain in the elderly: the case for new therapeutic strategies. Pain Physician. 2015;18(5):E863–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Forsythe P, Bienenstock J. The mast cell-nerve functional unit: a key component of physiologic and pathophysiologic responses. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2012;98:196–221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mika J, Zychowska M, Popiolek-Barczyk K, Rojewska E, Przewlocka B. Importance of glial activation in neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;716(1–3):106–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Norden DM, Godbout JP. Review: microglia of the aged brain: primed to be activated and resistant to regulation. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2013;39(1):19–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Costa B, Comelli F, Bettoni I, Colleoni M, Giagnoni G. The endogenous fatty acid amide, palmitoylethanolamide, has anti-allodynic and anti-hyperalgesic effects in a murine model of neuropathic pain: involvement of CB(1), TRPV1 and PPARgamma receptors and neurotrophic factors. Pain. 2008;139(3):541–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bettoni I, Comelli F, Colombo A, Bonfanti P, Costa B. Non-neuronal cell modulation relieves neuropathic pain: efficacy of the endogenous lipid palmitoylethanolamide. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2013;12(1):34–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghafouri N, Ghafouri B, Larsson B, Stensson N, Fowler CJ, Gerdle B. Palmitoylethanolamide and stearoylethanolamide levels in the interstitium of the trapezius muscle of women with chronic widespread pain and chronic neck-shoulder pain correlate with pain intensity and sensitivity. Pain. 2013;154(9):1649–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paladini A, Fusco M, Cenacchi T, Schievano C, Piroli A, Varrassi G. Palmitoylethanolamide, a special food for medical purposes, in the treatment of chronic pain: a pooled data meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2016;19(2):11–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Machado LA, Kamper SJ, Herbert RD, Maher CG, McAuley JH. Analgesic effects of treatments for non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48(5):520–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Finnerup NB, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. The evidence for pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Pain. 2010;150(3):573–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guyatt G, Sackett D, Taylor DW, Chong J, Roberts R, Pugsley S. Determining optimal therapy: randomized trials in individual patients. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(14):889–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Larson EB. N-of-1 clinical trials. A technique for improving medical therapeutics. West J Med. 1990;152(1):52–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lillie EO, Patay B, Diamant J, Issell B, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Personal Med. 2011;8(2):161–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guyatt GH, Keller JL, Jaeschke R, Rosenbloom D, Adachi JD, Newhouse MT. The n-of-1 randomized controlled trial: clinical usefulness. Our three-year experience. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(4):293–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Larson EB, Ellsworth AJ, Oas J. Randomized clinical trials in single patients during a 2-year period. JAMA. 1993;270(22):2708–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marcucci M, Germini F, Coerezza A, et al. Efficacy of ultra-micronized palmitoylethanolamide (um-PEA) in geriatric patients with chronic pain: study protocol for a series of N-of-1 randomized trials. Trials. 2016;17:369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zucker DR, Schmid CH, McIntosh MW, D’Agostino RB, Selker HP, Lau J. Combining single patient (N-of-1) trials to estimate population treatment effects and to evaluate individual patient responses to treatment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(4):401–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vohra S, Shamseer L, Sampson M, Bukutu C, Schmid CH, Tate R, et al. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement. BMJ. 2015;350:h1738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Palmitoylethanolamide (PeaPure): use of a natural painkiller. https://palmitoylethanolamide4pain.com/about-2/. Accessed 9Aug 2017.

  28. Joyce CR, Zutshi DW, Hrubes V, Mason RM. Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1975;8(6):415–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bieri D, Reeve RA, Champion GD, Addicoat L, Ziegler JB. The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain. 1990;41(2):139–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale. Spine. 2000;25(16):2095–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Rating scales for low back pain. Br Med Bull. 2010;94:81–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Duan N, Kravitz RL, Schmid CH. Single-patient (n-of-1) trials: a pragmatic clinical decision methodology for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(8 Suppl):S21–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, Chalmers I. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context, 2nd ed. BMJ Books. 2001.

  34. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294(6):716–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tinetti ME. The gap between clinical trials and the real world: extrapolating treatment effects from younger to older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):397–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tinetti ME, Fried TR, Boyd CM. Designing health care for the most common chronic condition–multimorbidity. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2493–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Maciejewski ML, Bayliss EA. Approaches to comparative effectiveness research in multimorbid populations. Med Care. 2014;52(Suppl 3):S23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gore M, Tai KS, Sadosky A, Leslie D, Stacey BR. Clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and direct medical costs of patients with osteoarthritis in usual care: a retrospective claims database analysis. J Med Econ. 2011;14(4):497–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaye AD, Kaye AM, Hegazi A, Sabar R, Deaton B, Powell J, et al. Nutraceuticals: potential roles and potential risks for pain management. Pain Pract. 2002;2(2):122–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Joy TR, Monjed A, Zou GY, Hegele RA, McDonald CG, Mahon JL. N-of-1 (single-patient) trials for statin-related myalgia. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):301–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Guyatt G, Sackett D, Adachi J, et al. A clinician’s guide for conducting randomized trials in individual patients. CMAJ. 1988;139(6):497–503.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Johannessen T, Fosstvedt D. Statistical power in single subject trials. Fam Pract. 1991;8(4):384–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Guyatt G. N of 1 randomized trials: a commentary. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;76:4–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 4. why not do an N-of-1 RCT? Clin Trials. 2011;8(3):350–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Olsen LA, Aisner D, McGinnis JM, editors. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tinetti ME, Basch E. Patients’ responsibility to participate in decision making and research. JAMA. 2013;309(22):2331–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Epitech Group SpA for providing the study drugs and information on um-PEA pharmacology. We acknowledge the important contribution of the staff of the UOC Farmacia (hospital pharmacy) and of the UOC Geriatria (geriatric unit) of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan in conducting the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maura Marcucci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Funding

None.

Informed consent

All participants provided informed consent at the beginning of the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Germini, F., Coerezza, A., Andreinetti, L. et al. N-of-1 Randomized Trials of Ultra-Micronized Palmitoylethanolamide in Older Patients with Chronic Pain. Drugs Aging 34, 941–952 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-017-0506-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-017-0506-2

Navigation