Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Management for Osteoarthritis Pain

A Systematic Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluation

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent and chronic condition characterized by pain and physical disability. Currently, many treatments are available, and they primarily target pain relief. The objectives of this study were to systematically review economic evaluations for pharmaceutical management of OA pain and to provide methodological recommendations for future economic evaluation.

Methods

Published literature was identified by searching the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (1948–16 November 2011) with In-Process records and EMBASE (1980–2011 Week 47) via Ovid; The Cochrane Library (Issue 4 of 4, 2011) and the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED) via Wiley; and PubMed (for non-MEDLINE records). The main search terms were OA and economic evaluations. Two reviewers independently screened all identified articles and extracted the data from those included in the final review.

Results

Twelve articles reporting the cost-effectiveness of various pharmaceuticals were included, with five being trial-based and seven being model-based economic evaluations. The mean health economics quality score of the included articles was 84 (minimum–maximum: 63–99). These evaluations varied in study design, treatments compared, and outcomes measured.

Conclusion

The existing economic evaluations on pharmaceutical management of OA pain were of acceptable quality. Comparability of economic evaluations could be improved by selecting standard comparators, adopting a longer time horizon, and directly measuring health utilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonnet CS, Walsh DA. Osteoarthritis, angiogenesis and inflammation. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(1):7–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma L, Kapoor D, Issa S. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: an update. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18(2):147–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16(2):137–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma JW, Dieppe P, et al. EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(12):1145–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reginster JY, Bruyere O, Neuprez A. Current role of glucosamine in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(5):731–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grey matters: a practical search tool for evidence-based medicine. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2011.

  7. Chiou CF, Hay JW, Wallace JF, Bloom BS, Neumann PJ, Sullivan SD, et al. Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies. Med Care. 2003;41(1):32–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Black C, Clar C, Henderson R, MacEachern C, McNamee P, Quayyum Z, et al. The clinical effectiveness of glucosamine and chondroitin supplements in slowing or arresting progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2009;13(52):1–148.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Torrance GW, Raynauld JP, Walker V, Goldsmith CH, Bellamy N, Band PA, et al. A prospective, randomized, pragmatic, health outcomes trial evaluating the incorporation of hylan G-F 20 into the treatment paradigm for patients with knee osteoarthritis (Part 2 of 2): economic results. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2002;10(7):518–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruyere O, Scholtissen S, Neuprez A, Hiligsmann M, Toukouki A, Reginster JY. Impact of chondroitin sulphate on health utility in patients with knee osteoarthritis: towards economic analysis. J Med Econ. 2009;12(4):356–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scholtissen S, Bruyere O, Neuprez A, Severens JL, Herrero-Beaumont G, Rovati L, et al. Glucosamine sulphate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: cost-effectiveness comparison with paracetamol. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64(6):756–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Castelnuovo E, Cross P, Mt-Isa S, Spencer A, Underwood M, TOIB study team. Cost-effectiveness of advising the use of topical or oral ibuprofen for knee pain; the TOIB study [ISRCTN: 79353052. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(7):1077–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marshall DA, Strauss ME, Pericak D, Buitendyk M, Codding C, Torrance GW. Economic evaluation of controlled-release oxycodone vs oxycodone–acetaminophen for osteoarthritis pain of the hip or knee. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(4):205–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrero-Beaumont G, Ivorra JA, Del Carmen TM, Blanco FJ, Benito P, Martin-Mola E, et al. Glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study using acetaminophen as a side comparator. Arthr Rheum. 2007;56(2):555–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kahan A, Uebelhart D, De VF, Delmas PD, Reginster JY. Long-term effects of chondroitins 4 and 6 sulfate on knee osteoarthritis: the study on osteoarthritis progression prevention, a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthr Rheum. 2009;60(2):524–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Underwood M, Ashby D, Carnes D, Castelnuovo E, Cross P, Harding G, et al. Topical or oral ibuprofen for chronic knee pain in older people. The TOIB study. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12(22):iii–iv, ix–155.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yen ZS, Lai MS, Wang CT, Chen LS, Chen SC, Chen WJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for osteoarthritis of the knee in Taiwan. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(9):1797–803.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamath CC, Kremers HM, Vanness DJ, O’Fallon WM, Cabanela RL, Gabriel SE. The cost-effectiveness of acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and selective COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Value Health. 2003;6(2):144–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Contreras-Hernandez I, Mould-Quevedo JF, Torres-Gonzalez R, Goycochea-Robles MV, Pacheco-Dominguez RL, Sanchez-Garcia S, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis for joint pain treatment in patients with osteoarthritis treated at the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS): Comparison of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) vs cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors. Cost Eff Res Allocation. 2008;6:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ward A, Bozkaya D, Fleischmann J, Dubois D, Sabatowski R, Caro JJ. Modeling the economic and health consequences of managing chronic osteoarthritis pain with opioids in Germany: comparison of extended-release oxycodone and OROS hydromorphone. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(10):2333–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Latimer N, Lord J, Grant RL, O’Mahony R, Dickson J, Conaghan PG, et al. Cost effectiveness of COX 2 selective inhibitors and traditional NSAIDs alone or in combination with a proton pump inhibitor for people with osteoarthritis. BMJ. 2009;339:b2538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brereton N, Winn B, Akehurst R. The cost-effectiveness of celecoxib vs diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis in the UK; an update to the NICE model using data from the CONDOR trial. J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):465–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hays RD, Stewart AL. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. World Health organization. Chronic rheumatic conditions. Department of Chronic Disease and health promotion, 2011. http://www.who.int/chp/topics/rheumatic/en. Accessed 24 May 2012.

Download references

Disclosure

This work received no funding support, and none of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Xie.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xie, F., Tanvejsilp, P., Campbell, K. et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Management for Osteoarthritis Pain. Drugs Aging 30, 277–284 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0062-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0062-3

Keywords

Navigation