Abstract
Background and Objective
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent and chronic condition characterized by pain and physical disability. Currently, many treatments are available, and they primarily target pain relief. The objectives of this study were to systematically review economic evaluations for pharmaceutical management of OA pain and to provide methodological recommendations for future economic evaluation.
Methods
Published literature was identified by searching the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (1948–16 November 2011) with In-Process records and EMBASE (1980–2011 Week 47) via Ovid; The Cochrane Library (Issue 4 of 4, 2011) and the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED) via Wiley; and PubMed (for non-MEDLINE records). The main search terms were OA and economic evaluations. Two reviewers independently screened all identified articles and extracted the data from those included in the final review.
Results
Twelve articles reporting the cost-effectiveness of various pharmaceuticals were included, with five being trial-based and seven being model-based economic evaluations. The mean health economics quality score of the included articles was 84 (minimum–maximum: 63–99). These evaluations varied in study design, treatments compared, and outcomes measured.
Conclusion
The existing economic evaluations on pharmaceutical management of OA pain were of acceptable quality. Comparability of economic evaluations could be improved by selecting standard comparators, adopting a longer time horizon, and directly measuring health utilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonnet CS, Walsh DA. Osteoarthritis, angiogenesis and inflammation. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(1):7–16.
Sharma L, Kapoor D, Issa S. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: an update. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18(2):147–56.
Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16(2):137–62.
Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma JW, Dieppe P, et al. EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(12):1145–55.
Reginster JY, Bruyere O, Neuprez A. Current role of glucosamine in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(5):731–5.
Grey matters: a practical search tool for evidence-based medicine. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2011.
Chiou CF, Hay JW, Wallace JF, Bloom BS, Neumann PJ, Sullivan SD, et al. Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies. Med Care. 2003;41(1):32–44.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.
Black C, Clar C, Henderson R, MacEachern C, McNamee P, Quayyum Z, et al. The clinical effectiveness of glucosamine and chondroitin supplements in slowing or arresting progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2009;13(52):1–148.
Torrance GW, Raynauld JP, Walker V, Goldsmith CH, Bellamy N, Band PA, et al. A prospective, randomized, pragmatic, health outcomes trial evaluating the incorporation of hylan G-F 20 into the treatment paradigm for patients with knee osteoarthritis (Part 2 of 2): economic results. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2002;10(7):518–27.
Bruyere O, Scholtissen S, Neuprez A, Hiligsmann M, Toukouki A, Reginster JY. Impact of chondroitin sulphate on health utility in patients with knee osteoarthritis: towards economic analysis. J Med Econ. 2009;12(4):356–60.
Scholtissen S, Bruyere O, Neuprez A, Severens JL, Herrero-Beaumont G, Rovati L, et al. Glucosamine sulphate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: cost-effectiveness comparison with paracetamol. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64(6):756–62.
Castelnuovo E, Cross P, Mt-Isa S, Spencer A, Underwood M, TOIB study team. Cost-effectiveness of advising the use of topical or oral ibuprofen for knee pain; the TOIB study [ISRCTN: 79353052. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(7):1077–81.
Marshall DA, Strauss ME, Pericak D, Buitendyk M, Codding C, Torrance GW. Economic evaluation of controlled-release oxycodone vs oxycodone–acetaminophen for osteoarthritis pain of the hip or knee. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(4):205–14.
Herrero-Beaumont G, Ivorra JA, Del Carmen TM, Blanco FJ, Benito P, Martin-Mola E, et al. Glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study using acetaminophen as a side comparator. Arthr Rheum. 2007;56(2):555–67.
Kahan A, Uebelhart D, De VF, Delmas PD, Reginster JY. Long-term effects of chondroitins 4 and 6 sulfate on knee osteoarthritis: the study on osteoarthritis progression prevention, a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthr Rheum. 2009;60(2):524–33.
Underwood M, Ashby D, Carnes D, Castelnuovo E, Cross P, Harding G, et al. Topical or oral ibuprofen for chronic knee pain in older people. The TOIB study. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12(22):iii–iv, ix–155.
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833–40.
Yen ZS, Lai MS, Wang CT, Chen LS, Chen SC, Chen WJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for osteoarthritis of the knee in Taiwan. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(9):1797–803.
Kamath CC, Kremers HM, Vanness DJ, O’Fallon WM, Cabanela RL, Gabriel SE. The cost-effectiveness of acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and selective COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Value Health. 2003;6(2):144–57.
Contreras-Hernandez I, Mould-Quevedo JF, Torres-Gonzalez R, Goycochea-Robles MV, Pacheco-Dominguez RL, Sanchez-Garcia S, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis for joint pain treatment in patients with osteoarthritis treated at the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS): Comparison of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) vs cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors. Cost Eff Res Allocation. 2008;6:21.
Ward A, Bozkaya D, Fleischmann J, Dubois D, Sabatowski R, Caro JJ. Modeling the economic and health consequences of managing chronic osteoarthritis pain with opioids in Germany: comparison of extended-release oxycodone and OROS hydromorphone. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(10):2333–45.
Latimer N, Lord J, Grant RL, O’Mahony R, Dickson J, Conaghan PG, et al. Cost effectiveness of COX 2 selective inhibitors and traditional NSAIDs alone or in combination with a proton pump inhibitor for people with osteoarthritis. BMJ. 2009;339:b2538.
Brereton N, Winn B, Akehurst R. The cost-effectiveness of celecoxib vs diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis in the UK; an update to the NICE model using data from the CONDOR trial. J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):465–72.
Hays RD, Stewart AL. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992.
World Health organization. Chronic rheumatic conditions. Department of Chronic Disease and health promotion, 2011. http://www.who.int/chp/topics/rheumatic/en. Accessed 24 May 2012.
Disclosure
This work received no funding support, and none of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, F., Tanvejsilp, P., Campbell, K. et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Management for Osteoarthritis Pain. Drugs Aging 30, 277–284 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0062-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0062-3