Abstract
Background and Objectives
Pharmacokinetics play an integral role in the pediatric drug development process. The determination of pharmacokinetic parameters, particularly clearance, in different age groups directly informs dosing strategies for subsequent efficacy trials. Allometric scaling for prediction of pediatric clearance from the observed clearance in adults has been used in this effort. Clinical trial simulation, a powerful tool used to inform clinical trial design, requires both an estimate of clearance along with an estimate of the expected pharmacokinetic variability. The standard deviations (SD) of individual clearance values for adults are typically used and may lead to inaccurate predictions by not taking into account the more widespread distribution of factors such as body weight in the pediatric population. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of allometric prediction of drug clearance as well as methods for predicting clearance variability in children 6 years of age and older.
Methods
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical pharmacology reviews of pediatric studies conducted from 2002 onwards were reviewed to collate adult and pediatric clearance and clearance variability for studies including children 6 years of age and older. A set of 1,000 virtual adults {A} and a set of 5,000 virtual children (aged 2–17) {P} were generated on the basis of the White American NHANES database. Pediatric clearances were predicted in method 1 by using the geometric mean adult clearance from the in vivo study and calculating pediatric clearance for each virtual child within a subset {P′} of {P} that contained only those children that were within the age range of the in vivo pediatric study. In method 2, adult clearance values were randomly generated from the geometric mean adult clearance and standard deviation and assigned to each virtual adult in {A}. For each adult, allometric clearance scaling was completed with each virtual child within {P′}. The prediction error for the predicted and observed clearance and the clearance variability metric, coefficient of variation (CV), was calculated. The prediction accuracy as a function of the lowest age range (2 years and older) included in the study was also assessed.
Results
Thirty-nine unique drugs were included in the study. For both method 1 and method 2, 100 % of predicted pediatric mean clearances were within 2-fold of the observed values and approximately 82 % were within a 30 % prediction error. There was a significant increase in the prediction accuracy of CV using method 2 vs. method 1. There was a major bias towards underprediction of pediatric CV in method 1 whereas method 2 was precise and not biased. Clearance and CV prediction accuracy were not a function of the age range included in the in vivo studies. The observed CV between the adult and pediatric study groups was not significantly different although, on average, the observed pediatric CV was 32 % greater than that from adult studies.
Conclusions
Allometric scaling may be a useful tool during pediatric drug development to predict drug clearance and dosing requirements in children 6 years of age and older. A novel methodology is reported that employs virtual adult and pediatric populations and adult pharmacokinetic data to accurately predict clearance variability in specific pediatric subpopulations. This approach has important implications for both clinical trial simulations and sample size determination for pediatric pharmacokinetic studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang Y, Jadhav PR, Lala M, Gobburu JV. Clarification on precision criteria to derive sample size when designing pediatric pharmacokinetic studies. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52:1601–6.
US FDA. Medical, statistical, and clinical pharmacology reviews of pediatric studies conducted under Section 505A and 505B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), as amended by the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA). http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/ucm049872.htm. Accessed 1 Sept 2012.
US FDA. Summaries of medical and clinical pharmacology reviews—summaries of medical and clinical pharmacology reviews as of 15 Jan 2008. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/ucm161894.htm. Accessed 1 Sept 2012.
Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, (NHANES III). 1997. National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, MD 20782. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm.
Willmann S, Hohn K, Edginton A, Sevestre M, Solodenko J, Weiss W, et al. Development of a physiology-based whole-body population model for assessing the influence of individual variability on the pharmacokinetics of drugs. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2007;34:401–31.
Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition. 1989;5:303–11.
Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH. Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. J Pediatr. 1978;93:62–6.
Johnson TN, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Tucker GT. Prediction of the clearance of eleven drugs and associated variability in neonates, infants and children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45:931–56.
Graves RE. Accuracy of regression equation prediction across the range of estimated premorbid IQ. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000;22:316–24.
Holford NH, Buclin T. Safe and effective variability—a criterion for dose individualization. Ther Drug Monit. 2012;34:565–8.
Edginton AN, Fotaki N. Oral drug absorption in pediatric populations. Oral drug absorption: prediction and assessment, 2nd ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2010.
Edginton AN, Willmann S. Physiology-based versus allometric scaling of clearance in children; an eliminating process based comparison. Paed Perinat Drug Ther. 2006;7:146–53.
Anderson BJ. Pediatric models for adult target-controlled infusion pumps. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20:223–32.
Mahmood I. Prediction of drug clearance in children: impact of allometric exponents, body weight, and age. Ther Drug Monit. 2007;29:271–8.
Anderson BJ, Holford NH. Tips and traps analyzing pediatric PK data. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21:222–37.
Jones VM. Acetaminophen injection: a review of clinical information. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011;25:340–9.
Yu J, He J, Zhang Y, Qin F, Xiong Z, Li F. An ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of anastrozole in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. Biomed Chromatogr. 2011;25:511–6.
Mallikaarjun S, Salazar DE, Bramer SL. Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of aripiprazole following multiple oral dosing in normal healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44:179–87.
Ravis WR, Reid S, Sica DA, Tolbert DS. Pharmacokinetics of eplerenone after single and multiple dosing in subjects with and without renal impairment. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45:810–21.
Strolin BM, Whomsley R, Nicolas JM, Young C, Baltes E. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of 14C-levetiracetam, a new antiepileptic agent, in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59:621–30.
Burgos-Vargas R, Foeldvari I, Thon A, Linke R, Tuerck D. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44:866–72.
DeVane CL, Nemeroff CB. Clinical pharmacokinetics of quetiapine: an atypical antipsychotic. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001;40:509–22.
Thyrum PT, Wong YW, Yeh C. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of quetiapine in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2000;24:521–33.
Martin PD, Warwick MJ, Dane AL, Cantarini MV. A double-blind, randomized, incomplete crossover trial to assess the dose proportionality of rosuvastatin in healthy volunteers. Clin Ther. 2003;25:2215–24.
Taburet AM, Naveau S, Zorza G, Colin JN, Delfraissy JF, Chaput JC, et al. Pharmacokinetics of zidovudine in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990;47:731–9.
Bergshoeff AS, Fraaij PL, Verweij C, van Rossum AM, Verweel G, Hartwig NG, et al. Plasma levels of zidovudine twice daily compared with three times daily in six HIV-1-infected children. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54:1152–4.
Wilner KD, Hansen RA, Folger CJ, Geoffroy P. The pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in healthy volunteers treated with cimetidine or antacid. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;49(Suppl 1):57S–60S.
Acknowledgments
The authors report no conflicts of interest. No sources of funding were used for the conduct of this study. The opinions and findings expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the US Food and Drug Administration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The MatLab code is available to those who would like it upon emailing the corresponding author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edginton, A.N., Shah, B., Sevestre, M. et al. The Integration of Allometry and Virtual Populations to Predict Clearance and Clearance Variability in Pediatric Populations over the Age of 6 Years. Clin Pharmacokinet 52, 693–703 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-013-0065-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-013-0065-6