Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Loss of Work Productivity in Patients with Overactive Bladder Treated with Antimuscarinics in Spain: Study in Routine Clinical Practice Conditions

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a syndrome characterized by presenting symptoms of urgency, with or without urge incontinence, and normally accompanied by day and night frequency.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of lost work productivity [number of days of sick leave] in patients treated with fesoterodine versus tolterodine and solifenacin to treat OAB in Spain.

Methods

A retrospective, observational study was carried out using the records (digital databases) of actively working patients (2008–2013). The study population comprised of patients from two autonomous communities; 31 primary care centres agreed to participate. Patients who began first treatment with antimuscarinics (fesoterodine, solifenacin or tolterodine) and who met certain inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the study. Follow-up lasted for 1 year. The main outcome measures were comorbidity, medication possession ratio (MPR), treatment persistence, and number of days of sick leave and associated costs. Indirect costs were considered to be those related to lost work productivity (number of days of sick leave, exclusively), (1) due to OAB and (2) overall total. The cost was expressed as the average cost per patient (cost/unit). Multivariate analyses (Cox, ANCOVA) were used to correct the models.

Results

A total of 3094 patients were recruited into the study; 43.0 % were treated with solifenacin, 29.2 % with tolterodine, and 27.8 % with fesoterodine. The average age of patients was 54 years (standard deviation 9.2), and 62.2 % were women. The comparison of fesoterodine versus solifenacin and tolterodine showed a higher MPR (90.0 vs. 87.0 and 86.1 %, respectively), higher treatment persistence (40.2 vs. 34.7 and 33.6 %), lower use of sick leave (22.8 vs. 52.9 and 36.7 %), total number of days of sick leave (5.1 vs. 9.7 and 9.3 days) and costs corrected for covariates (€371 vs. €703 and €683); p < 0.05.

Conclusions

Despite the possible limitations of this study, active patients who began treatment with fesoterodine to treat OAB (compared with solifenacin or tolterodine) had fewer days of sick leave, resulting in lower costs due to lost productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamaguchi O, Nishizawa O, Takeda M, Yokoyama O, Homma Y, Kakizaki H, et al. Neurogenic Bladder Society. Clinical guidelines for overactive bladder. Int J Urol. 2009;16:126–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirby M, Artibani W, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Diaz DC, De Ridder D, et al. Overactive bladder: the importance of new guidance. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:1263–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunskaar S, Arnold EP, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Herzog AR, Mallett VT. Epidemiology natural history of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2000;11:301–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Griebling TL. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011;108:1138–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Irwin DE, Milson I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1306–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castro D, Espuña M, Prieto M, Badia X. Prevalence of overactive bladder in Spain: a population-based study. Arch Esp Urol. 2005;58:131–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martinez Agullo E, Ruiz Cerda JL, Gomez Perez L, Ramirez Backhaus M, Delgado Oliva F, Rebollo P, et al. Prevalencia de incontinencia urinaria y vejiga hiperactiva en la poblacion española: resultados del estudio EPICC. Actas Urol Esp. 2009;33:159–66.

  8. Martínez Agulló E, Ruíz Cerdá JL, Gómez Pérez L, Rebollo P, Pérez M, Chaves J. Impact of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder syndrome on health-related quality of life of working middle-aged patients and institutionalized elderly patients. Actas Urol Esp. 2010;34:242–50.

  9. Bartoli S, Aguzzi G, Tarricone R. Impact on quality of life of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder: a systematic literature review. Urology. 2010;75:491–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sexton CC, Notte SM, Maroulis C, Dmochowski RR, Cardozo L, Subramanian D, et al. Persistence and adherence in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome with anticholinergic therapy: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65:567–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yi J, Jeong SJ, Chung MS, Park H, Lee SW, Doo SH, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of combined medication of two different antimuscarinics for treatment of adults with idiopathic overactive bladder in whom a single agent antimuscarinic therapy failed. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;2:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter KF, Wagg A, Kerridge T, Chick H, Chambers T. Falls risk reduction and treatment of overactive bladder symptoms with antimuscarinic agents: a scoping review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:490–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Andersson KE. Antimuscarinic mechanisms and the overactive detrusor: an update. Eur Urol. 2011;59:377–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chapple C, van Kerrebroeck P, Tubaro A, Haag-Molkenteller C, Forst HT, Massow U, et al. Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1204–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Sand PK, Forst HT, Haag-Molkenteller C, Massow U, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. J Urol. 2007;178:2488–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Corcos J, Angulo JC, Garely AD, Carlsson M, Gong J, Guan Z, Fesoterodine Assessment and Comparison Versus Tolterodine (FACT) Study Group. Effect of fesoterodine 4 mg on bladder diary and patient-reported outcomes during the first week of treatment in subjects with overactive bladder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27:1059–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelleher CJ, Tubaro A, Wang JT, Kopp A. Impact of fesoterodine on quality of life: pooled data from 2 randomized trials. BJU Int. 2008;102:56–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Arlandis-Guzman S, Errando-Smet C, Trocio J, Arumi D, Rejas J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antimuscarinics in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in Spain: a decision-tree model. BMC Urology. 2011;11:9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reeves P, Irwin D, Kelleher C, Milsom I, Kopp Z, Calvert N, et al. The current and future burden and cost of overactive bladder in five European countries. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1050–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mullins CD, Subak LL. New perspectives on overactive bladder: quality of life impact, medication persistency, and treatment costs. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11(4 Suppl):S101–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Steiner JF, Prochazka AV. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:105–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Benner JS, Glynn RJ, Mogun H, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC, Avorn J. Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients. JAMA. 2002;288:455–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lamberts H, Wood M, Hofmans-Okkes ÍM, editors. The international classification of primary care in the European community: with a multi-language layer. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weiner JP, Starfield BH, Steinwachs DM, Mumford LM. Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix. Med Care. 1991;29:452–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Instituto Nacional de Estadística 2012. Encuesta de costes laborales del año 2012. Available at: http://www.ine.es/infoine. Accessed Jun 2014.

  28. Thompson SG, Barber JA. How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed? BMJ. 2000;320:1197–200.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sicras-Mainar A, Rejas J, Navarro-Artieda R, Aguado-Jodar A, Ruiz-Torrejón A, Ibáñez-Nolla J, et al. Health economics perspective of fesoterodine, tolterodine or solifenacin as first-time therapy for overactive bladder syndrome in the primary care setting in Spain. BMC Urol. 2013;13:51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011;108:1132–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ganz ML, Smalarz AM, Krupski TL, Anger JT, Hu JC, Wittrup-Jensen KU, et al. Economic costs of overactive bladder in the United States. Urology. 2010;75:526–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goren A, Zou KH, Gupta S, Chen C. Direct and indirect cost of urge urinary incontinence with and without pharmacotherapy. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68:336–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Balkrishnan R, Bhosle MJ, Camacho FT, Anderson RT. Predictors of medication adherence and associated health care costs in an older population with overactive bladder syndrome: a longitudinal cohort study. J Urol. 2006;175(3 Pt 1):1067–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Malhotra B, Gandelman K, Sachse R, Wood N, Michel MC. The design and development of fesoterodine as a prodrug of 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), the active metabolite of tolterodine. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16:4481–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaplan SA, Schneider T, Foote JE, Guan Z, Carlsson M, Gong J. Superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release with rapid onset: a prospective, head-to-head, placebo-controlled trial. BJU Int. 2011;107:1432–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Castro-Diaz D, Miranda P, Sanchez-Ballester F, Lizarraga I, Arumi D, Rejas J. Dose and aging effect on patients reported treatment benefit switching from the first overactive bladder therapy with tolterodine ER to fesoterodine: post-hoc analysis from an observational and retrospective study. BMC Urol. 2012;12:19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wagg A, Khullar V, Michel MC, Oelke M, Darekar A, Bitoun CE. Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of flexible-dose fesoterodine in elderly patients with overactive bladder: open-label extension of the SOFIA trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33:106–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sicras-Mainar A, Rejas J, Navarro-Artieda R, Aguado-Jodar A, Ruiz-Torrejón A, Ibáñez-Nolla J, et al. Antimuscarinic persistence patterns in newly treated patients with overactive bladder: a retrospective comparative analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:485–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu EQ, Birnbaum H, Marynchenko M, Mareva M, Williamson T, Mallett D. Employees with overactive bladder: work loss burden. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47:439–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kannan H, Radican L, Turpin RS. Burden of illness associated with lower urinary tract symptoms including overactive bladder/urinary incontinence. Urology. 2009;74:34–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoni Sicras-Mainar.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used for the conduct of this study.

Conflict of interest

Antoni Sicras-Mainar, Ruth Navarro-Artieda, Amador Ruiz-Torrejón, Marc Sáez-Zafra and Gabriel Coll-de Tuero have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author contributions

Antoni Sicras-Mainar contributed to the planning and design of the manuscript, as well as data collection and statistical analysis. All authors contributed to the data interpretation, and writing, review and approval of the submitted manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sicras-Mainar, A., Navarro-Artieda, R., Ruiz-Torrejón, A. et al. Impact of Loss of Work Productivity in Patients with Overactive Bladder Treated with Antimuscarinics in Spain: Study in Routine Clinical Practice Conditions. Clin Drug Investig 35, 795–805 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-015-0342-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-015-0342-2

Keywords

Navigation