Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information Analysis of an Ambient Intelligent Geriatric Management (AmbIGeM) System Compared to Usual Care to Prevent Falls in Older People in Hospitals

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Ambient Intelligent Geriatric Management (AmbIGeM) system combines wearable sensors with artificial intelligence to trigger alerts to hospital staff before a fall. A clinical trial found no effect across a heterogenous population, but reported a reduction in the injurious falls rate in a post hoc analysis of patients on Geriatric Evaluation Management Unit (GEMU) wards. Cost-effectiveness and Value of Information (VoI) analyses of the AmbIGeM system in GEMU wards was undertaken.

Methods

An Australian health-care system perspective and 5-year time horizon were used for the cost-effectiveness analysis. Implementation costs, inpatient costs and falls data were collected. Injurious falls were defined as causing bruising, laceration, fracture, loss of consciousness, or if the patient reported persistent pain. To compare costs and outcomes, generalised linear regression models were used to adjust for baseline differences between the intervention and usual care groups. Bootstrapping was used to represent uncertainty. For the VoI analysis, 10,000 different sample sizes with randomly sampled values ranging from 1 to 50,000 were tested to estimate the optimal sample size of a new trial that maximised the Expected Net Benefits of Sampling.

Results

An adjusted 0.036 fewer injurious falls (adjusted rate ratio of 0.56) and AUD$4554 lower costs were seen in the intervention group. However, uncertainty that the intervention is cost effective for the prevention of an injurious fall was present at all monetary values of this effectiveness outcome. A new trial with a sample of 4376 patients was estimated to maximise the Expected Net Benefit of Sampling, generating a net benefit of AUD$186,632 at a benefit-to-cost ratio of 1.1.

Conclusions

The benefits to cost ratio suggests that a new trial of the AmbIGeM system in GEMU wards may not be high-value compared to other potential trials, and that the system should be implemented. However, a broader analysis of options for preventing falls in GEMU is required to fully inform decision making.

Trial Registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN 12617000981325).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. MyHospitals, Admitted Patient Care 2020-21. 2022 [cited September 2022]; Available from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/sectors/admitted-patients.

  2. Cumming RG, Salkeld G, Thomas M, Szonyi G. Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling on activities of daily living, SF-36 scores, and nursing home admission. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(5):M299-305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tinetti ME, Williams CS. Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(18):1279–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morello RT, Barker AL, Watts JJ, Haines T, Zavarsek SS, Hill KD, et al. The extra resource burden of in-hospital falls: a cost of falls study. Med J Aust. 2015;203(9):367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehlberg EA, Lucero RJ, Weaver MT, McDaniel AM, Chandler AM, Richey PA, et al. Impact of the CMS no-pay policy on hospital-acquired fall prevention related practice patterns. Innov Aging. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shorr RI, Chandler AM, Mion LC, Waters TM, Liu M, Daniels MJ, et al. Effects of an intervention to increase bed alarm use to prevent falls in hospitalized patients: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(10):692–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ranasinghe DC, Shinmoto Torres RL, Hill K, Visvanathan R. Low cost and batteryless sensor-enabled radio frequency identification tag based approaches to identify patient bed entry and exit posture transitions. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):118–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Visvanathan R, Ranasinghe DC, Lange K, Wilson A, Dollard J, Boyle E, et al. Effectiveness of the wearable sensor based ambient intelligent geriatric management system (AmbIGeM) in preventing falls in older people in hospitals. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022;77(1):155–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dollard J, Hill K, Wilson A, Ranasinghe DC, Lange K, Jones K, et al. Patient acceptability of a novel technological solution (ambient intelligent geriatric management system) to prevent falls in geriatric and general medicine wards: a mixed-methods study. Gerontology. 2022;68(9):1070–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Independent Health and Aged Care Pricing Authority. Australian National Subacute and Non-Acute Patient Classification, Version 5.0. 2021 [cited]; Available from: https://www.ihacpa.gov.au/health-care/classification/subacute-and-non-acute-care.

  11. Wilson EC. A practical guide to value of information analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(2):105–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Visvanathan R, Ranasinghe DC, Wilson A, Lange K, Dollard J, Boyle E, et al. Effectiveness of an ambient intelligent geriatric management system (AmbIGeM) to prevent falls in older people in hospitals: protocol for the AmbIGeM stepped wedge pragmatic trial. Inj Prev. 2019;25(3):157–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Preventing falls and harm from falls in older people. Best practice guidelines for Australian hospitals. Canberra; 2009.

  14. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Norton RN, Tilyard MW, Buchner DM. Randomised controlled trial of a general practice programme of home based exercise to prevent falls in elderly women. BMJ. 1997;315(7115):1065–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Haines TP, Hill AM, Hill KD, McPhail S, Oliver D, Brauer S, et al. Patient education to prevent falls among older hospital inpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(6):516–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Independent Hospital Pricing Authority. Australian Hospital Patient Costing Standards, Version 4.0 (Part 3, Costing Guidelines). 2018 [cited]; Available from https://www.ihpa.gov.au/publications/australian-hospital-patient-costing-standards-version-40.

  17. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 5. How do you measure fall rates and fall prevention practices? January 2013 [cited]; Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/hospital/fall-prevention/toolkit/measure-fall-rates.html.

  18. Tuffaha HW, Gordon LG, Scuffham PA. Value of information analysis in healthcare: a review of principles and applications. J Med Econ. 2014;17(6):377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edney LC, Haji Ali Afzali H, Cheng TC, Karnon J. Estimating the reference incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the Australian health system. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(2):239–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Falls: Assessment and Prevention of Falls in Older People (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No.161). Appendix K, Full Health Economic Report. 2013 [cited]; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK327874/.

  21. Pya N. scam: Shape Constrained Additive Models. R package version 1.2-11. 2021 [cited]; Available from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=scam.

  22. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2021 [cited]; Available from https://www.R-project.org/.

  23. South Australian Department of Health, Statewide Older People Clinical Network. Geriatric Evaluation and Management Unit Model of Care; 2013.

  24. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National, state and territory population. 2020 [cited]; Available from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/dec-2020.

  25. Geerligs L, Rankin NM, Shepherd HL, Butow P. Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Medical Services Advisory Committee. Technical Guidelines for preparing assessment reports for the Medical Services Advisory Committee—Service Type: Investigative (version 3.0); 2017.

  27. Jutkowitz E, Alarid-Escudero F, Choi HK, Kuntz KM, Jalal H. Prioritizing future research on allopurinol and febuxostat for the management of gout: value of information analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(10):1073–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li L, Uyei J, Nucifora KA, Kessler J, Stevens ER, Bryant K, et al. Using value of information methods to determine the optimal sample size for effectiveness trials of alcohol interventions for HIV-infected patients in East Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):590.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kunst NR, Alarid-Escudero F, Paltiel AD, Wang SY. A value of information analysis of research on the 21-gene assay for breast cancer management. Value Health. 2019;22(10):1102–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Caron A, Vandewalle V, Marcilly R, Rochat J, Dervaux B. The optimal sample size for usability testing, from the manufacturer’s perspective: a value-of-information approach. Value Health. 2022;25(1):116–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Morris ME, Webster K, Jones C, Hill AM, Haines T, McPhail S, et al. Interventions to reduce falls in hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac077.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hill AM, McPhail SM, Waldron N, Etherton-Beer C, Ingram K, Flicker L, et al. Fall rates in hospital rehabilitation units after individualised patient and staff education programmes: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9987):2592–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank SA Health (Tomi Adejoro) and WA Health (Ian Massingham) for support and provision of data. We would also like to acknowledge the clinical, administrative and information technology staff from both hospitals, the research staff and students that supported the conduct of the trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clarabelle T. Pham.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by a project grant (1082197) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Conflicts of Interest

Previously, there was a patent filed (mid-2013) by Drs Ranasinghe and Visvanathan titled, “System, method, software application and data signal for determining movement” but this has since lapsed. Professor Visvanathan is the Head of Unit of the Aged & Extended Care Services at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital in South Australia within which the GEMU ward is a service. Professor Visvanathan is providing advice to Live 24/7, a start-up based in San Jose, USA. Dr Dollard was awarded The Hospital Research Foundation Research Travel Award and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences (University of Adelaide) Research Travel Award in 2017 to attend AmbIGeM related meetings. The remaining authors declare no other conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

CP and JK designed and conducted the economic evaluation and value of information analysis, and contributed to the cost data collection, data interpretation and drafting of the manuscript. MS and EW contributed to the design and interpretation of the value of information analysis and drafting of the manuscript. RV and KH equally contributed to the study design, selecting participating sites, conducting the research, data collection, data interpretation and drafting of the manuscript. DR contributed to the technology design and implementation, conducting the research, data collection, data interpretation and drafting of the manuscript. KL designed and conducted the statistical analysis and contributed to interpretation and drafting of the manuscript. JD and AW were involved in the conduct of the study, data collection, data interpretation and drafting the manuscript.

Data Availability

Requests for health economics data should be directed to the senior author (jonathan.karnon@flinders.edu.au) and will require collaboration with the chief investigator team. Any requests will be assessed for scientific rigor (by a panel consisting of JK, RV, KH and DR) and given the involvement of hospital patient data, the request must first meet ethics request guidelines and be approved by the ethics committees of TQEH/Lyell McEwin Hospital (LMH)/Modbury Hospital (MH), Curtin University, and SCGH. The requestor will be responsible for preparing documentation to the standard required to meet the conditions of the various ethics committees. A data sharing agreement will be necessary and funding requested for facilitation of this process and provision of data. Given the multiple analyses planned as well as underway currently, data sharing is at this stage embargoed for a further 2 years.

Ethics Approval

Ethics and governance approval was granted by the TQEH/Lyell McEwin Hospital /Modbury Hospital (HREC/15/TQEH/17), Curtin University (HRE2017-0449) and SCGH (PRN 2015-110).

Consent to Participate

A waiver of consent was approved in Western Australia and opt-out consent was approved in South Australia.

Consent for Publication

A waiver of consent was approved in Western Australia and opt-out consent was approved in South Australia.

Code Availability

The authors can provide more details upon request.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 270 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pham, C.T., Visvanathan, R., Strong, M. et al. Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information Analysis of an Ambient Intelligent Geriatric Management (AmbIGeM) System Compared to Usual Care to Prevent Falls in Older People in Hospitals. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 21, 315–325 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-022-00773-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-022-00773-6

Navigation