Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Projections of the Healthcare Costs and Disease Burden due to Hepatitis C Infection under Different Treatment Policies in Malaysia, 2018–2040

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has set ambitious goals to reduce the global disease burden associated with, and eventually eliminate, viral hepatitis.

Objective

To assist with achieving these goals and to inform the development of a national strategic plan for Malaysia, we estimated the long-term burden incurred by the care and management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We compared cumulative healthcare costs and disease burden under different treatment cascade scenarios.

Methods

We attached direct costs for the management/care of chronically HCV-infected patients to a previously developed clinical disease progression model. Under assumptions regarding disease stage-specific proportions of model-predicted HCV patients within care, annual numbers of patients initiated on antiviral treatment and distribution of treatments over stage, we projected the healthcare costs and disease burden [in disability-adjusted life-years (DALY)] in 2018–2040 under four treatment scenarios: (A) no treatment/baseline; (B) pre-2018 standard of care (pegylated interferon/ribavirin); (C) gradual scale-up in direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment uptake that does not meet the WHO 2030 treatment uptake target; (D) scale-up in DAA treatment uptake that meets the WHO 2030 target.

Results

Scenario D, while achieving the WHO 2030 target and averting 253,500 DALYs compared with the pre-2018 standard of care B, incurred the highest direct patient costs over the period 2018–2030: US$890 million (95% uncertainty interval 653–1271). When including screening programme costs, the total cost was estimated at US$952 million, which was 12% higher than the estimated total cost of scenario C.

Conclusions

The scale-up to meet the WHO 2030 target may be achievable with appropriately high governmental commitment to the expansion of HCV screening to bring sufficient undiagnosed chronically infected patients into the treatment pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organisation. Global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis 2016–2021. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organisation. Regional action plan for viral hepatitis in the Western Pacific 2016–2020. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hill A, Cooke G. Hepatitis C can be cured globally, but at what cost? Science. 2014;345(6193):141–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wirtz VJ, Hogerzeil HV, Gray AL, et al. Essential medicines for universal health coverage. Lancet. 2016;389(10067):403–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim SG, Aghemo A, Chen PJ, et al. Piratvisuth T. Management of hepatitis C virus infection in the Asia-Pacific region: an update. Lancet Gastro Hepatol 2017;2(1):52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald SA, Dahlui M, Mohamed R, Naning H, Shabaruddin FH, Kamarulzaman A. Projections of the current and future disease burden of hepatitis C virus infection in Malaysia. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Azzeri A, Shabaruddin FH, Tan SS, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection at initial presentation to tertiary care in an Asian middle-income country. SE Asian J Trop Med Pub Health. 2018.

  8. Tan SS, Adlin ZN. The clinical features and treatment outcome of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in routine care. Med J Malaysia. 2017;72(3):165–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Welzel TM, Petersen J, Herzer K, et al. Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, achieved high sustained virological response rates in patients with HCV infection and advanced liver disease in a real-world cohort. Gut. 2016;65:1861–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tapper EB, Bacon BR, Curry MP, et al. Real-world effectiveness for 12 weeks of ledipasvir–sofosbuvir for genotype 1 hepatitis C: the Trio Health study. J Viral Hep. 2017;24(1):22–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheung MC, Walker AJ, Hudson BE, et al. Outcomes after successful direct-acting antiviral therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):741–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hieber L, Hecht R, Soe-Lin S, Mohamed R, Shabaruddin F, Dahlui M, Azzeri A, McDonald SA. A step-wise approach to a national hepatitis C screening strategy in Malaysia (Manuscript submitted for publication).

  13. Devleesschauwer B, Havelaar AH, Maertens de Noordhout C, et al. Calculating disability-adjusted life years to quantify burden of disease. Int J Pub Health. 2014;59:565–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stouthard ME, Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel GJ, et al. Disability weights for diseases in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Inst. Sociale Geneeskunde, University of Amsterdam; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murray CJL. Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull WHO. 1994;72:429–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organisation. Global health observatory data repository. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/?theme=main&vid=60990. Accessed 25 June 2014.

  17. Heidelbaugh JJ, Bruderly M. Cirrhosis and chronic liver failure: part I. Diagnosis and evaluation. Am Fam Phys. 2006;74(5):756–62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald SA, Mohamed R, Dahlui M, Naning H, Kamarulzaman A. Bridging the data gaps in the epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Malaysia using multi-parameter evidence synthesis. BMC Inf Dis. 2014;14(1):564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Press Statement Minister of Health Malaysia. Implementation of the rights of Government for sofosbuvir tablet to increase access for hepatitis C treatment in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Director-General of Health, Malaysia; 20 September 2017 (https://kpkesihatan.com/2017/09/20/press-statement-minister-of-health-20th-september-2017-implementation-of-the-rights-of-government-for-sofosbuvir-tablet-to-increase-access-for-hepatitis-c-treatment-in-malaysia/. Accessed 30 Mar 2018.

  20. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014.

  21. Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N. The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Stat Med. 2009;28:3049–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas A, O’Hara B, Ligges U, Sturtz S. Making BUGS Open. R News. 2006;6:12–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vemer P, Ramos IC, Van Voorn GA, et al. AdViSHE: a validation-assessment tool of health-economic models for decision makers and model users. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(4):349–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dore GJ, Ward J, Thursz M. Hepatitis C disease burden and strategies to manage the burden. J Viral Hepat. 2014;21(s1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organisation. Global report on access to hepatitis C treatment: Focus on overcoming barriers. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The Kirby Institute. Monitoring hepatitis C treatment uptake in Australia Issue 6, February 2017. https://kirby.unsw.edu.au/report/monitoring-hepatitis-c-treatment-uptake-australia-issue-6-february-2017.

  27. The Kirby Institute. Hepatitis B and C in Australia Annual Surveillance Report Supplement 2016. Sydney: The Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ministry of Health Malaysia. Global AIDS response progress report Malaysia 2016. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Iversen J, Grebely J, Catlett B, et al. Estimating the cascade of hepatitis C testing, care and treatment among people who inject drugs in Australia. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;47:77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Lindsey Hiebert at Pharos Global Health for kindly using their developed tool to estimate the screening programme cost for scenario C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FHS, MD and RM conceived the study. SAM implemented the HCV progression model, carried out the simulations, and drafted the manuscript. AA conducted the costing study and calculated disease-stage specific direct costs. SAM, AA, FHS, MD, SST, AK, RM contributed to the writing of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott A. McDonald.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this modelling study.

Funding

No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or prepare this manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

SAM, AA, FHS, MD, SST, AK, and RM have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Scott A. McDonald and Amirah Azzeri are joint first author.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 628 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McDonald, S.A., Azzeri, A., Shabaruddin, F.H. et al. Projections of the Healthcare Costs and Disease Burden due to Hepatitis C Infection under Different Treatment Policies in Malaysia, 2018–2040. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 16, 847–857 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0425-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0425-3

Navigation