Skip to main content
Log in

Friction Cost Estimates of Productivity Costs in Cost-of-Illness Studies in Comparison with Human Capital Estimates: A Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cost-of-illness (COI) studies often include the ‘indirect’ cost of lost production resulting from disease, disability, and premature death, which is an important component of the economic burden of chronic conditions assessed from the societal perspective. In most COI studies, productivity costs are estimated primarily as the economic value of production forgone associated with loss of paid employment (foregone gross earnings); some studies include the imputed value of lost unpaid work as well. This approach is commonly but imprecisely referred to as the human capital approach (HCA). However, there is a lack of consensus among health economists as to how to quantify loss of economic productivity. Some experts argue that the HCA overstates productivity losses and propose use of the friction cost approach (FCA) that estimates societal productivity loss as the short-term costs incurred by employers in replacing a lost worker. This review sought to identify COI studies published during 1995–2017 that used the FCA, with or without comparison to the HCA, and to compare FCA and HCA estimates from those studies that used both approaches. We identified 80 full COI studies (of which 75% focused on chronic conditions), roughly 5–8% of all COI studies. The majority of those studies came from three countries, Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands, that have officially endorsed use of the FCA. The FCA results in smaller productivity loss estimates than the HCA, although the differential varied widely across studies. Lack of standardization of HCA and FCA methods makes productivity cost estimates difficult to compare across studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Personal communication, Peter Neumann, March 26, 2018.

  2. CEA studies were excluded.

  3. The review of partial COI studies was not similarly updated due to time constraints.

  4. This number excludes one study that looked at the entire European Union, and another study examining 29 countries worldwide. Both of these studies included the Netherlands and Germany.

  5. https://www.zorginstituutnederland.nl/.

References

  1. Mushkin SJ, Collings FD. Economic costs of disease and injury. Public Health Rep. 1959;74:795–809.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Weisbrod BA. Economics of Public Health. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rice DP. Estimating the cost of illness. Am J Publ Health. 1967;57(3):424–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larg A, Moss JR. Cost-of-illness studies. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29(8):653–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Finkelstein E, Corso P. Cost-of-illness analyses for policy making: a cautionary tale of use and misuse. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2003;3(4):367–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarricone R. Cost-of-illness analysis: what room in health economics? Health Policy. 2006;77(1):51–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olsen JA, Smith RD. Theory versus practice: a review of ‘willingness-to-pay’ in health and health care. Health Econ. 2001;10(1):39–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krol M, Brouwer W. How to estimate productivity costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(4):335–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Onukwugha E, McRae J, Kravetz A, Varga S, Khairnar R, Mullins CD. Cost-of-illness studies: an updated review of current methods. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(1):43–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang G, Grosse SD, Schooley MW. Conducting research on the economics of hypertension to improve cardiovascular health. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(6 Suppl 2):S115–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Krol M, Papenburg J, Tan SS, Brouwer W, Hakkaart L. A noticeable difference? Productivity costs related to paid and unpaid work in economic evaluations on expensive drugs. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(4):391–402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gold MR, Siegel, Gold MR, Siegel JE. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, first edn. New York: Oxford Univ Press; 1996.

  13. Segel JE. Cost-of-illness studies—a primer: RTI-UNC Center of Excellence in Health Promotion Economics; 2006.

  14. Zhang W, Bansback N, Anis AH. Measuring and valuing productivity loss due to poor health: a critical review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(2):185–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Joensuu JT, Huoponen S, Aaltonen KJ, Konttinen YT, Nordstrom D, Blom M. The cost-effectiveness of biologics for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119683.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, Brock DW, Feeny D, Krahn M, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1093–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10(5):460–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. The impact of indirect costs on outcomes of health care programs. Health Econ. 1994;3(6):385–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF, van Ineveld BM, van Roijen L. The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ. 1995;14(2):171–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koopmanschap MA, van Ineveld BM. Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of disease. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(9):1005–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liljas B. How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13(1):1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Birnbaum H. Friction-cost method as an alternative to the human-capital approach in calculating indirect costs. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(2):103–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van den Hout W. The value of productivity in health policy. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13(4):311–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brouwer WB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. Productivity costs measurement through quality of life? A response to the recommendation of the Washington Panel. Health Econ. 1997;6(3):253–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van den Hout W. The value of productivity: human-capital versus friction-cost method. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(Suppl 1):i89–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Johannesson M, Karlsson G. The friction cost method: a comment. J Health Econ. 1997;16(2):249–55 (discussion 57–9).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kigozi J, Jowett S, Lewis M, Barton P, Coast J. Estimating productivity costs using the friction cost approach in practice: a systematic review. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(1):31–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Garber AM, Lipscomb J, Luce BR, Manning WG, et al. Productivity costs, time costs and health-related quality of life: a response to the Erasmus Group. Health Econ. 1997;6(5):505–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nyman JA. Productivity costs revisited: toward a new US policy. Health Econ. 2012;21(12):1387–401.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johannesson M, Meltzer D. Some reflections on cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 1998;7(1):1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hanly P, Timmons A, Walsh PM, Sharp L. Breast and prostate cancer productivity costs: a comparison of the human capital approach and the friction cost approach. Value Health. 2012;15(3):429–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hanly P, Soerjomataram I, Sharp L. Measuring the societal burden of cancer: the cost of lost productivity due to premature cancer-related mortality in Europe. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(4):E136–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pearce AM, Hanly P, Timmons A, Walsh PM, O’Neill C, O’Sullivan E, et al. Productivity losses associated with head and neck cancer using the human capital and friction cost approaches. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13(4):359–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Waitzman N, Scheffler RM, Romano PS. The cost of birth defects: estimates of the value of prevention. Lanham: University Press of America; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tranmer JE, Guerriere DN, Ungar WJ, Coyte PC. Valuing patient and caregiver time: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(5):449–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lamsal R, Zwicker JD. Economic evaluation of interventions for children with neurodevelopmental disorders: opportunities and challenges. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15(6):763–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Max W, Rice DP, Sung H-Y, Michel M. Valuing human life: estimating the present value of lifetime earnings. UCSF: Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. 2000. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82d0550k.

  38. Haddix AC, Teutsch SM, Corso PS. Prevention effectiveness: a guide to decision analysis and economic evaluation. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Grosse SD, Krueger KV, Mvundura M. Economic productivity by age and sex: 2007 estimates for the United States. Med Care. 2009:S94–S103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Max WPD, Rice DP, Sung H-Y. Michel M. Valuing Human Life: Estimating the present value of lifetime earnings; 2000. p. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Becker GS. Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. J Polit Econ. 1962;70(5, Part 2):9–49.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Trogdon JG, Murphy LB, Khavjou OA, Li R, Maylahn CM, Tangka FK, et al. Costs of chronic diseases at the state level: the chronic disease cost calculator. Prev Chron Dis. 2015;03(12):E140.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR, Guy GP Jr, Banegas MP, de Moor JS, Li C, et al. Medical costs and productivity losses of cancer survivors–United States, 2008–2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(23):505–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng Z, Yabroff KR, Guy GP, Jr., Han X, Li C, Banegas MP, et al. Annual medical expenditure and productivity loss among colorectal, female breast, and prostate cancer survivors in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(5):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hoefman RJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. How to include informal care in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1105–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Van den Berg B, Brouwer W, van Exel J, Koopmanschap M, van den Bos GA, Rutten F. Economic valuation of informal care: lessons from the application of the opportunity costs and proxy good methods. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(4):835–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Russell LB. Completing costs: patients’ time. Med Care. 2009;47(7_Supplement_1):S89–S93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Weisbrod BA. The valuation of human capital. J Polit Econ. 1961;69(5):425–36.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rice DP. Economic costs of cardiovascular diseases and cancer, 1962: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Division of Community Health Services: Public Health Service; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lofland JH, Locklear JC, Frick KD. Different approaches to valuing the lost productivity of patients with migraine. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(9):917–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lofland JH, Pizzi L, Frick KD. A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(3):165–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Grosse SD, Krueger KV. The income-based human capital valuation methods in public health economics used by forensic economics. J Forensic Econ. 2011;22(1):43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stone PW, Chapman RH, Sandberg EA, Liljas B, Neumann PJ. Measuring costs in cost-utility analyses. Int J Tech Assess Health Care. 2000;16(1):111–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Krol M, Papenburg J, Koopmanschap M, Brouwer W. Do productivity costs matter?: the impact of including productivity costs on the incremental costs of interventions targeted at depressive disorders. PharmacoEcon. 2011;29(7):601–19.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zimovetz EA, Wolowacz SE, Classi PM, Birt J. Methodologies used in cost-effectiveness models for evaluating treatments in major depressive disorder: a systematic review. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2012;10(1):1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Dewey HM, Thrift AG, Mihalopoulos C, Carter R, Macdonell RA, McNeil JJ, et al. Lifetime cost of stroke subtypes in Australia findings from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2003;34(10):2502–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Saka Ö, McGuire A, Wolfe C. Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing. 2009;38(1):27–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Van Eeden M, van Heugten C, van Mastrigt G, van Mierlo M, Visser-Meily J, Evers S. The burden of stroke in the Netherlands: estimating quality of life and costs for 1 year poststroke. BMJ Open. 2015;5(11):e008220.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kang H-Y, Lim S-J, Suh HS, Liew D. Estimating the lifetime economic burden of stroke according to the age of onset in South Korea: a cost of illness study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):646.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Murphy N, Confavreux C, Haas J, König N, Roullet E, Sailer M, et al. Economic evaluation of multiple sclerosis in the UK, Germany and France. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13(5):607–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P. Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis in The Netherlands. Eur J Health Econ. 2006;7(2):55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wieser S, Horisberger B, Schmidhauser S, Eisenring C, Brügger U, Ruckstuhl A, et al. Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(5):455–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lakic D, Tasic L, Kos M. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in Serbia. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014;71(2):137–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chang SM, Cho S-J, Jeon HJ, Hahm B-J, Lee HJ, Park J-I, et al. Economic burden of schizophrenia in South Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2008;23(2):167–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Konnopka A, Bödemann M, König H-H. Health burden and costs of obesity and overweight in Germany. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(4):345–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Goeree R, Farahati F, Burke N, Blackhouse G, O’Reilly D, Pyne J, et al. The economic burden of schizophrenia in Canada in 2004. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21(12):2017–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ehrnborg C, Hakkaart-Van Roijen L, Jonsson B, Rutten FF, Bengtsson B-Å, Rosen T. Cost of illness in adult patients with hypopituitarism. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17(6):621–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Menzin J, Marton JP, Menzin JA, Willke RJ, Woodward RM, Federico V. Lost productivity due to premature mortality in developed and emerging countries: an application to smoking cessation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Raciborski F, Kłak A, Kwiatkowska B. Indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatologia. 2015;53(5):268–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. de Kinderen RJ, Evers SM, Rinkens R, Postulart D, Vader CI, Majoie MH, et al. Side-effects of antiepileptic drugs: the economic burden. Seizure. 2014;23(3):184–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Eriksson JK, Johansson K, Askling J, Neovius M. Costs for hospital care, drugs and lost work days in incident and prevalent rheumatoid arthritis: how large, and how are they distributed? Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(4):648–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Strauch K, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, et al. Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine. 2010;35(18):1714–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Dee A, Callinan A, Doherty E, O’Neill C, McVeigh T, Sweeney MR, et al. Overweight and obesity on the island of Ireland: an estimation of costs. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e006189.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Ortega-Ortega M, Oliva-Moreno J, de Dios Jiménez-Aguilera J, Romero-Aguilar A, Espigado-Tocino I. Productivity loss due to premature mortality caused by blood cancer: a study based on patients undergoing stem cell transplantation. Gac Sanit. 2015;29(3):178–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Oliva J, Lobo F, López-Bastida J, Zozaya N, Romay R. Indirect costs of cervical and breast cancers in Spain. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6(4):309–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A, Sullivan R. Economic burden of cancer across the European Union: a population-based cost analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(12):1165–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Serrier H, Sultan-Taieb H, Luce D, Bejean S. Estimating the social cost of respiratory cancer cases attributable to occupational exposures in France. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(6):661–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lal A, Moodie M, Ashton T, Siahpush M, Swinburn B. Health care and lost productivity costs of overweight and obesity in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012;36(6):550–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Neovius K, Rehnberg C, Rasmussen F, Neovius M. Lifetime productivity losses associated with obesity status in early adulthood. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012;10(5):309–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Van Beeck EF, van Roijen L, Mackenbach JP. Medical costs and economic production losses due to injuries in the Netherlands. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1997;42(6):1116–23.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Neubauer S, Welte R, Beiche A, Koenig H-H, Buesch K, Leidl R. Mortality, morbidity and costs attributable to smoking in Germany: update and a 10-year comparison. Tobacco Control. 2006;15(6):464–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Zheng H, Ehrlich F, Amin J. Productivity loss resulting from coronary heart disease in Australia. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(3):179–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Hutubessy RC, van Tulder MW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM. Indirect costs of back pain in the Netherlands: a comparison of the human capital method with the friction cost method. Pain. 1999;80(1–2):201–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Wenig CM, Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T, Schweikert B. Costs of back pain in Germany. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(3):280–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ekwueme DU, Weniger BG, Chen RT. Model-based estimates of risks of disease transmission and economic costs of seven injection devices in sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(11):859–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Fautrel B, Clarke AE, Guillemin F, Adam V, St-Pierre Y, Panaritis T, et al. Costs of rheumatoid arthritis: new estimates from the human capital method and comparison to the willingness-to-pay method. Med Dec Making. 2007;27(2):138–50.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Potapchik E, Popovich L. Social cost of substance abuse in Russia. Value Health Reg Issues. 2014;4:1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Panopalis P, Petri M, Manzi S, Isenberg DA, Gordon C, Jl Senécal, et al. The systemic lupus erythematosus Tri-Nation study: cumulative indirect costs. Arthritis Care Res. 2007;57(1):64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Boonen A, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Spoorenberg A, Schouten H, Rutten-van Molken M, et al. Work status and productivity costs due to ankylosing spondylitis: comparison of three European countries. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(5):429–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P, Jonsson B. Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis in Europe: method of assessment and analysis. Eur J Health Econ. 2006;7(Suppl 2):S5–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Lim ME, Bowen JM, O’reilly D, McCarron CE, Blackhouse G, Hopkins R, et al. Impact of the 1997 Canadian guidelines on the conduct of Canadian-based economic evaluations in the published literature. Value Health. 2010;13(2):328–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. von der Schulenburg J-MG, Greiner W, Jost F, Klusen N, Kubin M, Leidl R, et al. German recommendations on health economic evaluation: third and updated version of the Hanover Consensus. Value Health. 2008;11(4):539–44.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Knies S, Severens JL, Ament AJ, Evers SM. The transferability of valuing lost productivity across jurisdictions. Differences between national pharmacoeconomic guidelines. Value Health. 2010;13(5):519–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Marcotte DE, Wilcox-Gok V. Estimating the employment and earnings costs of mental illness: recent developments in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(1):21–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Carias C, Chesson HW, Grosse SD, Li R, Meltzer MI, Miller GF, et al. Recommendations of the second panel on cost effectiveness in health and medicine: a reference, not a rule book. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54(4):600–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Achelrod D, Blankart CR, Linder R, von Kodolitsch Y, Stargardt T. The economic impact of Marfan syndrome: a non-experimental, retrospective, population-based matched cohort study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Balogh O, Brodszky V, Gulácsi L, Herédi E, Herszényi K, Jókai H, et al. Cost-of-illness in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: a cross-sectional survey in Hungarian dermatological centres. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(1):101–9.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Boonen A, Brinkhuizen T, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Severens JL. Impact of ankylosing spondylitis on sick leave, presenteeism and unpaid productivity, and estimation of the societal cost. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(6):1123–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Borghouts JA, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM. Cost-of-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996. Pain. 1999;80(3):629–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Huscher D, Mittendorf T, von Hinüber U, Kötter I, Hoese G, Pfäfflin A, et al. Evolution of cost structures in rheumatoid arthritis over the past decade. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(4):738–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Huscher D, Merkesdal S, Thiele K, Zeidler H, Schneider M, Zink A. Cost of illness in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus in Germany. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(9):1175–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Kaitelidou D, Ziroyanis PN, Maniadakis N, Liaropoulos LL. Economic evaluation of hemodialysis: implications for technology assessment in Greece. Int J Tech Assess Health Care. 2005;21(1):40–6.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Kanters TA, Hagemans ML, van der Beek NA, Rutten FF, van der Ploeg AT, Hakkaart L. Burden of illness of Pompe disease in patients only receiving supportive care. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011;34(5):1045–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Michael MD, Bálint A, Lovász BD, Gulácsi L, Strbák B, Golovics PA, et al. Work disability and productivity loss in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in Hungary in the era of biologics. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(1):121–8.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Minden K, Niewerth M, Listing J, Biedermann T, Schöntube M, Zink A. Burden and cost of illness in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(7):836–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Ponto KA, Merkesdal S, Hommel G, Pitz S, Pfeiffer N, Kahaly GJ. Public health relevance of Graves’ orbitopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(1):145–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. van den Wijngaard C, Hofhuis A, Wong A, Harms MG, de Wit GA, Lugnér AK, et al. The cost of Lyme borreliosis. Eur J Pub Health. 2017;27(3):538–47.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Virta L, Joranger P, Brox JI, Eriksson R. Costs of shoulder pain and resource use in primary health care: a cost-of-illness study in Sweden. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Wacker M, Jörres R, Schulz H, Heinrich J, Karrasch S, Karch A, et al. Direct and indirect costs of COPD and its comorbidities: results from the German COSYCONET study. Respir Med. 2016;111:39–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Anirban Basu and Don Husereau along with two anonymous reviewers for comments on previous versions. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J. Pike conducted the literature reviews and extracted the data necessary for analysis. J. Pike wrote the initial manuscript. S. Grosse initiated the project idea. S. Grosse and J. Pike performed numerous quality assurance checks on the data extraction, researched the literature, performed analyses on the data, and edited multiple versions of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamison Pike.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J. Pike and S. Grosse declare that they have no conflicts of interest. No funding/support was used for this study. There are no financial disclosures or conflicts of interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 61 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pike, J., Grosse, S.D. Friction Cost Estimates of Productivity Costs in Cost-of-Illness Studies in Comparison with Human Capital Estimates: A Review. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 16, 765–778 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0416-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0416-4

Navigation