Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle assessment of concrete production with a focus on air pollutants and the desired risk parameters using genetic algorithm

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Through a new systematic perspective, the HSE-integrated management system attempts to examine the relationships between safety, health and environment. The purpose of this system is to provide a coordinated, comprehensive and precautionary assessment of the issues and incidents within concrete plants.

Methods

In addition to a life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete through air pollutant emissions in this study, the extraction and monitoring of pollutant from three concrete plants in the city of Mashhad are carried out via fieldwork. In the present study, a number of factors such as the extent and time of exposure to each pollutant are estimated using the meta-heuristic genetic algorithm approach (GA) in order to create the desirable risk rate (risk rate ≤ 3).

Results

The results of life cycle assessment indicate the production of 348 kg Carbon Dioxide (CO2) per cubic meter of concrete processing. However, in addition to its environmental effects, CO2 in concentrations of more than 5000 ppm may cause asphyxiation as well as epidemiologic effects on the staff.

Conclusion

The results of the study show that in order to reduce the risks of developing chronic diseases such as lung cancer, the staff in cement processing sector must be exposed to a period of at most 3.5 h for each 8-h work interval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winder C, Stacey NH. Occupational toxicology. 2nd ed. In: CRC Press LLC; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maesano IA, Dab W. Air pollution and the lung: epidemiological approach. Med Sci. 2006;22(6–7):589–94.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin LD, Perry CJ. PCI design handbook: precast and Prestressed concrete. 6th ed. Chicago: Precast Concrete Institute; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ivaskova M, Kotes P, Brodnan M. Air pollution as an important factor in construction materials deterioration in Slovak Republic. Procedia Eng. 2015;108:131–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Celik K, Meral C, Gursel AP, Mehta PK, Horvath A, Monteiro PJM. Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of self-consolidating concrete mixtures made with blended Portland cements containing fly ash and limestone powder. Cement Concrete Comp. 2015;56:59–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gauderman WJ, McConnell R, Gilliland F, London S, Thomas D, Avol E, et al. Association between air pollution and lung function growth in Southern California children. ATS J. 2000;162(4):1383–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ivanov I. Universal health coverage for the working poor, World Health Organization (WHO); 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Torén K, Bergdahl IA, Nilsson T, Järvholm B. Occupational exposure to particulate air pollution and mortality due to ischaemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(8):515–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawania KK, Biswas WK. Achieving environmentally friendly building envelope for Western Australia’s housing sector: a life cycle assessment approach. IJSBE. 2016;5(2):210–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith SH, Durham SA. A cradle to gate LCA framework for emissions and energy reduction in concrete pavement mixture design. IJSBE. 2016;5(1):23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barrna LT, Benetto E, Perrodin Y. Environmental impact and risk assessment of mineral wastes reuse strategies: review and critical analysis of approaches and applications. Resour Conserv Recy. 2007;50(4):351–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vieira DR, Calmon JL, Coelho FZ. Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater. 2016;127(15):656–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Serres N, Braymand S, Feugeas F. Environmental evaluation of concrete made from recycled concrete aggregate implementing life cycle assessment. J Build Eng. 2016;5:24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smailyte G, Kurtinaitis J, Andersen A. Mortality and cancer incidence among Lithuanian cement producing workers. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(6):529–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Valipour M, Yekkalar M, Shekarchi M, Panahi S. Environmental assessment of green concrete containing natural zeolite on the global warming index in marine environments. J Clean Prod. 2014;65:418–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gursel A, Masanet E, Horvath A, Stadel A. Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: a critical review. Cem Concr Compos. 2014;51:38–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laurent A, Bakas I, Clavreul J, Bernstad A, Niero M, Gentil E, et al. Review of LCA studies of solid waste management system – part II: Methodoligal guidnace for a better paractice. Waste Manag. 2014;34(3):589–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Y, Wang Y, Li D. Estimation and uncertainty analysis on carbon dioxide emissions from construction phase of real highway projects in China. J Clean Prod. 2017;144:337–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Garcia EF, Cabello JF, Camara EM, Macias EJ. Repercussion the use phase in the life cycle assessment of structures in residential buildings using one-way slabs. J Clean Prod. 2017;143:191–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller SA, Monteiro PJM, Ostertag CP, Horvath A. Concrete mixture proportioning for desired strength and reduced global warming potential. Constr Build Mater. 2016;128:410–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gursel AP, Ostertag CP. Impact of Singapore's importers on life-cycle assessment of concrete. J Clean Prod. 2016;118:140–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dong YH, Ng ST, Kwan AHK, Wu SK. Substituting local data for overseas life cycle inventories – a case study of concrete products in Hong Kong. J Clean Prod. 2015;87:414–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peters S, Thomassen Y, Fechter-Rink E, Kromhout H. Personal exposure to inhalable cement dust among construction workers. J Environ Monit. 2009;11(1):174–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nisbet MA, Marceau ML, VanGeem MG. Environmental life cycle inventory of portland cement concrete. Portland Cement Assosiation; 2002.

  25. Ochsendorf J. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of buildings concrete sustainability hub. Massachusetts institute of. Technology. 2010;

  26. Sjunnesson J. Life cycle assessment of concrete. Lund University Publications; 2005.

  27. Boulenger M. Life cycle assessment of concrete structures using public databases: comparison of a fictitious bridge and tunnel. KTH architecture and the built. Environment. 2011;

  28. Lemay L. Life cycle assessment of concrete buildings. National Ready Mixed Concrete Association; 2011.

  29. Rich DQ. Accountability studies of air pollution and health effects: lessons learned and recommendations for future natural experiment opportunities. Environ Int. 2017;100:62–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lipowski A, Lipowska D. Roulette-wheel selection via stochastic acceptance. Physica A: Stat Mech Appl. 2012;391(6):2193–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Srinivas M, Patnaik LM. Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1994;24(4):656–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pope CA, Dockery D. Ambient air quality standards, ministry of environmental protection of the People’s Republic of China. 2014.

  33. CEOH (Center of Excellence for Occupational Health). Environmental Institute of Tehran University of medical Siences. Permissible limits of occupational exposure. Ministry of Health and Medical Education. 2015.

  34. Lin LY, Chen HW, Su TL, Hong GB, Huang LC, Chuang KJ. The effects of indoor particle exposure on blood pressure and heart rate among young adults: an air filtration-based intervention study. Atmos Environ. 2011;45(31):5540–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lu X, Lessner L, Carpenter DO. Association between hospital discharge rate for female breast cancer and residence in a zip code containing hazardous waste sites. Environ Res. 2014;134:375–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Block ML, Elder A, Auten RL, Bilbo SD, Chen H, Chen JC, et al. The outdoor air pollution and brain health workshop. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33(5):972–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hajat S, Haines A, Goubet SA, Atkinson RW, Anderson HR. Association of air pollution with daily GP consultations for asthma and other lower respiratory conditions in London. Thorax. 1999;54:597–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ostro BD, Eskeland GS, Sanchez JM, Feyzioglu T. Air pollution and health effects: a study of medical visits among children in Santiago, Chile. Env Health Perspect. 1999;107:69–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Ferdowsi University of Mashhad for the financial supports of this research.

Funding

This work is a part of a research project and financially supported by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Mohammad Gheibi, Mohsen Karrabi, Mahyar Shakerian & Mehrdad Mirahmadi

Authors
  1. Mohammad Gheibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohsen Karrabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahyar Shakerian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mehrdad Mirahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MG, MS and MM were the main investigator, collected and modeled the data, MK supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Karrabi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gheibi, M., Karrabi, M., Shakerian, M. et al. Life cycle assessment of concrete production with a focus on air pollutants and the desired risk parameters using genetic algorithm. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 16, 89–98 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-018-0302-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-018-0302-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation