Abstract
The variant selection of martensites (ε-M and α′-M) and ε-M reversion in dynamic tensile high-manganese TRIP steel were investigated. α′-M variant pairs with a zigzag morphology frequently formed, and the pairs of neighboring α′-M variants were examined in terms of mechanical work and strain energy reduction. The occurrence of a primary α′-M variant is determined by mechanical work, but high products of mechanical work and strain energy reduction are essential for secondary variant selection. In contrast to α′-M variant pair selection, ε-M variant selection can be attributed to the highest mechanical work. During ε-M→α′-M transformation, the mechanical work of ε-M reversion is higher than that of α′-M variant, thereby implying that ε-M reversion in 〈110〉 γ grain is possible. ε-M plate distribution also affects the feasibility of ε-M reversion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O. Grässel, L. Krüger, G. Frommeyer, L.W. Meyer, Int. J. Plast 16(10–11), 1391 (2000)
G. Frommeyer, U. Brüx, P. Neumann, ISIJ Int. 43(3), 438 (2003)
C. Cayron, F. Barcelo, Y.D. Carlan, Acta Mater. 58(4), 1395 (2010)
E. Nagy, V. Mertinger, F. Tranta, J. Sólyom, Mater. Sci. Eng. A378(1–2), 308 (2004)
J. Dash, H.M. Otte, Acta Metall. 11(10), 1169 (1963)
H. Kitahara, R. Ueji, N. Tsuji, Y. Minamino, Acta Mater. 54(5), 1279 (2006)
S.H. Lee, J.Y. Kang, H.N. Han, K.H. Oh, H.C. Lee, D.W. Suh, S.J. Kim, ISIJ Int. 45(8), 1217 (2005)
G. Miyamoto, N. Iwata, N. Takayama, T. Furuhara, Acta Mater. 60(3), 1139 (2012)
L. Malet, M.R. Barnett, P.J. Jacques, S. Godet, Scr. Mater. 61(5), 520 (2009)
S. Morito, H. Tanaka, R. Konishi, T. Furuhara, T. Maki, Acta Mater. 51, 1789 (2003)
H. Okamoto, M. Oka, I. Tamura, Trans. JIM 19(12), 674 (1978)
J.C. Bokros, E.R. Parker, Acta Metall. 11(12), 1291 (1963)
H.Z. Wang, P. Yang, W.M. Mao, F.Y. Lu, J. Alloys Compd. 558, 26 (2013)
G.B. Olson, M. Cohen, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 11, 1 (1981)
S. Kundu, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 516(1–2), 290 (2009)
J. Hamidreza, B. Ehsan, S. Akinobu, T. Nobuhiro, J. Alloys Compd. 577(S1), S668 (2013)
J.R. Patel, M. Cohen, Acta Metall. 1(5), 531 (1953)
M. Humbert, B. Petit, B. Bolle, N. Gey, Mater. Sci. Eng. A454–455, 508 (2007)
H. Schumann, Kristall geometrie, 1st edn. (VEB Deutscher Verlag, Leipzig, 1979), pp. 133–164
L.N. Wang, P. Yang, W.M. Mao, Acta Metall. Sin. 52(9), 1045 (2016)
P. Yang, T.Y. Liu, F.Y. Lu, L. Meng, Steel Res. Int. 83(4), 368 (2012)
C. Cayron, Mater. Charact. 94, 93 (2014)
S. Kundu, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Scr. Mater. 57, 869 (2007)
Y.P. Lü, B. Hutchinson, D.A. Molodov, G. Gottstein, Acta Mater. 58(8), 3079 (2010)
F. Gauzzi, R. Montanari, Mater. Sci. Eng. A273–275, 524 (1999)
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51271028).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Available online at http://link.springer.com/journal/40195
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, LN., Yang, P., Jin, T. et al. Different Mechanisms of ε-M and α′-M Variant Selection and the Influencing Factors of ε-M Reversion During Dynamic Tension in TRIP Steel. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 31, 449–455 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-017-0651-y
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-017-0651-y