Skip to main content
Log in

Different Mechanisms of ε-M and α′-M Variant Selection and the Influencing Factors of ε-M Reversion During Dynamic Tension in TRIP Steel

  • Published:
Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) Aims and scope

Abstract

The variant selection of martensites (ε-M and α′-M) and ε-M reversion in dynamic tensile high-manganese TRIP steel were investigated. α′-M variant pairs with a zigzag morphology frequently formed, and the pairs of neighboring α′-M variants were examined in terms of mechanical work and strain energy reduction. The occurrence of a primary α′-M variant is determined by mechanical work, but high products of mechanical work and strain energy reduction are essential for secondary variant selection. In contrast to α′-M variant pair selection, ε-M variant selection can be attributed to the highest mechanical work. During ε-M→α′-M transformation, the mechanical work of ε-M reversion is higher than that of α′-M variant, thereby implying that ε-M reversion in 〈110〉 γ grain is possible. ε-M plate distribution also affects the feasibility of ε-M reversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O. Grässel, L. Krüger, G. Frommeyer, L.W. Meyer, Int. J. Plast 16(10–11), 1391 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Frommeyer, U. Brüx, P. Neumann, ISIJ Int. 43(3), 438 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Cayron, F. Barcelo, Y.D. Carlan, Acta Mater. 58(4), 1395 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Nagy, V. Mertinger, F. Tranta, J. Sólyom, Mater. Sci. Eng. A378(1–2), 308 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Dash, H.M. Otte, Acta Metall. 11(10), 1169 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Kitahara, R. Ueji, N. Tsuji, Y. Minamino, Acta Mater. 54(5), 1279 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.H. Lee, J.Y. Kang, H.N. Han, K.H. Oh, H.C. Lee, D.W. Suh, S.J. Kim, ISIJ Int. 45(8), 1217 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Miyamoto, N. Iwata, N. Takayama, T. Furuhara, Acta Mater. 60(3), 1139 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Malet, M.R. Barnett, P.J. Jacques, S. Godet, Scr. Mater. 61(5), 520 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Morito, H. Tanaka, R. Konishi, T. Furuhara, T. Maki, Acta Mater. 51, 1789 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Okamoto, M. Oka, I. Tamura, Trans. JIM 19(12), 674 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J.C. Bokros, E.R. Parker, Acta Metall. 11(12), 1291 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H.Z. Wang, P. Yang, W.M. Mao, F.Y. Lu, J. Alloys Compd. 558, 26 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G.B. Olson, M. Cohen, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 11, 1 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kundu, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 516(1–2), 290 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Hamidreza, B. Ehsan, S. Akinobu, T. Nobuhiro, J. Alloys Compd. 577(S1), S668 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.R. Patel, M. Cohen, Acta Metall. 1(5), 531 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Humbert, B. Petit, B. Bolle, N. Gey, Mater. Sci. Eng. A454–455, 508 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Schumann, Kristall geometrie, 1st edn. (VEB Deutscher Verlag, Leipzig, 1979), pp. 133–164

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.N. Wang, P. Yang, W.M. Mao, Acta Metall. Sin. 52(9), 1045 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Yang, T.Y. Liu, F.Y. Lu, L. Meng, Steel Res. Int. 83(4), 368 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Cayron, Mater. Charact. 94, 93 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Kundu, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Scr. Mater. 57, 869 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y.P. Lü, B. Hutchinson, D.A. Molodov, G. Gottstein, Acta Mater. 58(8), 3079 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Gauzzi, R. Montanari, Mater. Sci. Eng. A273–275, 524 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51271028).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Yang.

Additional information

Available online at http://link.springer.com/journal/40195

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, LN., Yang, P., Jin, T. et al. Different Mechanisms of ε-M and α′-M Variant Selection and the Influencing Factors of ε-M Reversion During Dynamic Tension in TRIP Steel. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 31, 449–455 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-017-0651-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-017-0651-y

Keywords

Navigation