Skip to main content
Log in

Adhesive bonding of FDM-manufactured parts made of ULTEM 9085 considering surface treatment, surface structure, and joint design

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Welding in the World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has become increasingly popular over the past years. One of the most commonly used additive manufacturing process is the fused deposition modeling (FDM). In FDM, components are produced by depositing a molten plastic filament layer by layer on a build platform. The deposition takes place in a heated build chamber. Despite the many positive characteristics, the process principle leads to one main disadvantage. The maximum size of FDM-manufactured parts is limited by the size of the build chamber. Bigger parts can only be realized as an assembly group. Adhesive bonding is a commonly used joining method in the industry to produce resilient parts especially for lightweight applications and to join dissimilar materials. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of the adhesive type, the surface character of FDM parts, and the design of the bond area on the bond strength. The parts to be investigated are made of ULTEM 9085. Six different adhesives (acrylate resin, polyurethane adhesive, and epoxy resins) and their compatibility with the ULTEM 9085 parts are investigated. Considering the surface character, the influence of different pretreatments (mechanical roughening, plasma activation) and different surface structures are tested. The surface is modified by adding a positive air gap and an interface structure, and by varying the raster angle of the top layer. Regarding the design of the bond area, six different designs (finger, scarf, butt, tongue-groove, t-peel, and overlap joint) are investigated. The results show that the maximum lap shear strength can be achieved by using two-component epoxy resins. The adhesion between the ULTEM 9085 and the polyurethane as well as for the acrylate resin is insufficient but can be increased by roughening the surface mechanically or by adding a positive air gap to the surface. The investigations also show a positive effect of the plasma treatment but only for the combination of ULTEM 9085 with the polyurethane adhesive. The best results for different bond designs are reached with the scarf and the finger joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Middelton A (2017) Wie die additive Fertigung die Welt der Produktion verändert. Lightweight Design 10(4):70–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kloke AM (2016) “Untersuchung der Werkstoff-, Prozess- und Bauteileigenschaften beim Fused Deposition Modeling Verfahren, Ph.D. Thesis, Paderborn University

  3. Habenicht G (2012) Kleben – erfolgreich und fehlerfrei. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Cicala G, Ognibene G, Portuesi S, Blanco I, Rapisarda M, Pergolizzi E, Recca G (2018) “Comparison of Ultem 9085 Used in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) with Polyetherimide Blends”, Materials, Volume 11, Issue 2, MDPI Journals

  5. Espalin D, Arcauta K, Anchondo E, Adame A, Medina F, Winter R, Hoppe T, Wicker R (2010) Analysis of bonding methods for FDM-manufactured parts. SFF Symposium Proceeding, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia R, Prabhakar P (2017) Bond interface design for single lap joints using polymeric additive manufacturing. Composite Struct 176:547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahn S-H, Montero M, Odell D, Roundy S, Wright PK (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal 8(4)

  8. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik J (2016) Mathematical modelling and FDM process parameters optimization using response surface methology based on Q-optimal design. Appl Math Modell J

  9. Bagsik A, Schöppner V (2011) Mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts manufactured with ULTEM 9085. In: Proceedings of 69th Annual Technical Conference of the Society of Plastics Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lommatzsch U (2006) “Erfolgreicher Einsatz von Plasma-Jets in der Produktion“, Adhäsion – kleben u. dichten 49 (2005), 46-50, (English Translation: adhesion – Adhesives & Sealants 50 4, 34.37)

  11. “Adhesives Technology Handbook”, 2nd Edition, William Andrew Publishing, 2009

  12. Harris AF, Beevers A (1999) The effects of grit-blasting on surface properties for adhesion. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 19:445–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Noeske M, Degenhardt J, Strudthoff S, Lommatzsch U (2004) Plasma jet treatment of five polymers at atmospheric pressure: surface modifications and the relevance for adhesion. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 24:171–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Bürenhaus.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bürenhaus, F., Moritzer, E. & Hirsch, A. Adhesive bonding of FDM-manufactured parts made of ULTEM 9085 considering surface treatment, surface structure, and joint design. Weld World 63, 1819–1832 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-019-00810-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-019-00810-4

Keywords

Navigation