Abstract
Continuity and change are the twin characteristics of any software development process as it evolves from the traditional life cycle approach to incorporating and managing flexibility from an end-user perspective. Business requirements constantly change till the release of a software product though the features of continuity are evident in the software development process itself. The idea of Lean, as borrowed from the Lean manufacturing context, is an agile methodology for managing change while the Six Sigma approach emphasizes continuous improvement as part of a defect reduction strategy. We propose a software development approach that holds together the aspects of both continuity and change under a flexible management system and illustrate the application of the continuity, change framework using an integrated Lean Six Sigma for software development in a practical context. The present research reflects the Lean Six Sigma application and implementation in the software industry, using the commonly used statistical and non-statistical tools, software engineering tools and other frameworks used within software business. We also examine some of the critical success factors (CSFs) for a successful Six Sigma initiative in the software/IT industry. The research brings out that Lean Six Sigma, when used for achieving operational excellence, can, as it turns out, do more than simply improve processes. The paper also brings out how Lean Six Sigma helps discovering innovation opportunities far beyond operations, and enhances financial performance. This paper focuses on integrated lean six sigma programs in practice, rather than dwell on the theoretical basis or a motivationally based argument. It is hoped that the adoption of methodologies outlined in this paper would enable software companies to attain improvements in terms of cost, schedule and quality.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40171-012-0009-2/MediaObjects/40171_2012_9_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40171-012-0009-2/MediaObjects/40171_2012_9_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40171-012-0009-2/MediaObjects/40171_2012_9_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40171-012-0009-2/MediaObjects/40171_2012_9_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40171-012-0009-2/MediaObjects/40171_2012_9_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40171-012-0009-2/MediaObjects/40171_2012_9_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40171-012-0009-2/MediaObjects/40171_2012_9_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40171-012-0009-2/MediaObjects/40171_2012_9_Fig8_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, K. (1999). Extreme programming explained. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Breyfoggle, F. W. (1999). Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter solutions using statistical methods. New York, NY: Wiley.
Chreim, S. (2005). The continuity-change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 567–593.
Colin, H. (2005). Rooted in supervision, branching into management: Continuity and change in the role of first- line manager. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 471–506.
George, M. L. (2002). Lean Six Sigma: Combining six sigma quality with lean speed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
George, M. L. (2003). Lean Six Sigma for service: How to use lean speed and six sigma quality to improve services and transactions. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation. New York, NY: Harper Business.
Harry, M., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Six Sigma: The breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Harter, D. E., Krishnan, M. S., & Slaughter, S. A. (2000). Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software development. Management Science, 46, 451–466.
Isaac, G., Rajendran, C., & Anantharaman, R. N. (2004). A holistic framework for TQM in the software industry: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. The Quality Management Journal, 11(3), 35–60.
Jackson, G., & Moerke, A. (2005). Continuity and change in corporate governance: Comparing Germany and Japan. Corporate Governance, 13(3), 351–360.
Jalote, P. (2000). CMM in practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Jovanovic, V., & Shoemaker, D. (1997). ISO9001 standard and software quality improvement. Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology, 4, 149–159.
Kubiak, T. (2003). An integrated approach system. Quality Progress, 36(7), 41–45.
Lasserre, P. (2003). Global strategic management. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
McAdam, R., & Evans, A. (2004). The organizational contextual factors affecting the implementation of Six-Sigma in a high technology mass-manufacturing environment. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 29–43.
Nave, D. (2002). How to compare Six Sigma, Lean and the theory of constraints: a framework for choosing what’s best for your organization. Quality Progress, 35(3), 73–78.
Phan, D. D., George, J. F., & Vogel, D. R. (1995). Managing software quality in a very large development project (case study). Information and Management, 29, 277–285.
Pranckevicius, D., Diaz, D. M, & Gitlow, H. (2008). A Lean Six Sigma case study: An application of the 5s techniques. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 5(I), 63–79.
Quinn, J. B. (1980). Strategies for change. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Schwaber, K. (2004). Agile project management with scrum. USA: Microsoft Press, A Division of Microsoft Corporation.
Su, C.-T., Chiang, T.-L., & Chang, C.-M. (2006). Improving service quality by capitalizing on an integrated Lean Six Sigma methodology. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 2(1), 1–22.
Sushil. (2000). Cornerstones of enterprise flexibility, Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
Sushil. (2001). SAP-LAP framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2(1), 51–55.
Sushil. (2005). A flexible strategy framework for managing continuity and change. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 1(1), 22–32.
Thomas, A., Barton, R., & Chiamaka, C. (2009). Applying lean six sigma in a small engineering company: A model for change. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(1), 113–129.
Volberda, H. (1998). Building the flexible firm: How to remain competitive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking (pp. 90–98). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York, NY: Maxwell Macmillan International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pillai, A.K.R., Pundir, A.K. & Ganapathy, L. Implementing Integrated Lean Six Sigma for Software Development: A Flexibility Framework for Managing the Continuity: Change Dichotomy. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 13, 107–116 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0009-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0009-2