Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing Spasticity in a Pregnant Woman with Spinal Cord Injury: a Review

  • Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation (C Sadowsky, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper aims to review the available treatment options for spasticity management that can be used for pregnant women with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Recent Findings

There are extensive reviews exploring the approach to care for the parturient with SCI. These often include a discussion on common medications used and their potential impact on pregnancy and lactation. However, there are no specific guidelines on managing spasticity in pregnancy. Existing review articles show a low level of evidence for commonly utilized physical interventions in spasticity management. There are several case reports on the use of intrathecal baclofen and focal injections with botulinum neurotoxin during pregnancy.

Summary

The approach to management should recognize the interaction of pregnancy with secondary complications of SCI. Treatment decisions should be based on severity of spasticity, patient goals, and education of potential risks and benefits of different options with regard to pregnancy, lactation, maternal, and fetal outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Adams MM, Hicks AL. Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(10):577–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Holtz KA, Lipson R, Noonan VK, Kwon BK, Mills PB. Prevalence and effect of problematic spasticity after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(6):1132–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns AS, Lanig I, Grabljevec K, New PW, Bensmail D, Ertzgaard P, et al. Optimizing the management of disabling spasticity following spinal cord damage: the Ability Network—an international initiative. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(12):2222–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, Wood D, Wijck FV, Burridge J, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):2–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burridge JH, Wood DE, Hermens HJ, Voerman GE, Johnson GR, Wijck FV, et al. Theoretical and methodological considerations in the measurement of spasticity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):69–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lance JW. Symposium synopsis. Spasticity: disorder of motor control. In: Feldman RG, Young RR, editors. Spasticity: disorder of motor control. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers; 1980. p. 485–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rekand T, Hagen EM, Gronning M. Spasticity following spinal cord injury. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012;132(8):970–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorgey AS, Dudley GA. Spasticity may defend skeletal muscle size and composition after incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(2):96–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lofvenmark I, Werhagen L, Norrbrink C. Spasticity and bone density after a spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(13):1080–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jung IY, Kim HR, Chun SM, Leigh JH, Shin HI. Severe spasticity in lower extremities is associated with reduced adiposity and lower fasting plasma glucose level in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:378–378-382.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. New PW. Secondary conditions in a community sample of people with spinal cord damage. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;39(6):665–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tibbett J, Widerstrom-Noga EG, Thomas CK, Field-Fote EC. Impact of spasticity on transfers and activities of daily living in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018;15:1–14.

  13. McKay WB, Sweatman WM, Field-Fote EC. The experience of spasticity after spinal cord injury: perceived characteristics and impact on daily life. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(5):478–86. Epub 2018 Jan 16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, ed. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama at Birmingham; 2018.

  15. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury model systems 2016 annual report—public version. 2016:15.

  16. Jackson AB, Wadley V. A multicenter study of women's self-reported reproductive health after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(11):1420–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. • Iezzoni LI, Chen Y, McLain AB. Current pregnancy among women with spinal cord injury: findings from the US national spinal cord injury database. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(11):821–6. This cross-sectional study represents data from 1907 women with SCI. Current pregnancy rates among reproductive-aged women with SCI were found to be similar to rates of other US women with and without chronic mobility impairments (after adjusting for age differences).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Baker ER, Cardenas DD. Pregnancy in spinal cord injured women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(5):501–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghidini A, Healey A, Andreani M, Simonson MR. Pregnancy and women with spinal cord injuries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(10):1006–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghidini A, Simonson MR. Pregnancy after spinal cord injury: a review of literature. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2011;16(3):93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sterling L, Keunen J, Wigdor E, Sermer M, Maxwell C. Pregnancy outcomes in women with spinal cord lesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(1):39–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dawood R, Altanis E, Ribes-Pastor P, Ashworth F. Pregnancy and spinal cord injury. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;16:99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Camune BD. Challenges in the management of the pregnant woman with spinal cord injury. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2013;27(3):225–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Signore C, Spong CY, Krotoski D, Shinowara NL, Blackwell SC. Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):935–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bertschy S, Bostan C, Meyer T, Pannek J. Medical complications during pregnancy and childbirth in women with SCI in Switzerland. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(3):183–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan EK, Tan EL. Alterations in physiology and anatomy during pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(6):791–802.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Talbot L, Maclennan K. Physiology of pregnancy. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine. 2016;17(7):341–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. • Le Liepvre H, Dinh A, Idiard-Chamois B, et al. Pregnancy in spinal cord-injured women, a cohort study of 37 pregnancies in 25 women. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(2):167–71. This is a retrospective observational study of 25 women (37 pregnancies). Main complications include UTIs, pyelonephritis, pressure sores.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baker ER, Cardenas DD, Benedetti TJ. Risks associated with pregnancy in spinal cord-injured women. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(3 Pt 1):425–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Iezzoni LI, Wint AJ, Smeltzer SC, Ecker JL. Effects of disability on pregnancy experiences among women with impaired mobility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(2):133–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oshima S, Kirschner KL, Heinemann A, Semik P. Assessing the knowledge of future internists and gynecologists in caring for a woman with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(10):1270–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion: number 275, September 2002. Obstetric management of patients with spinal cord injuries. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(3):625–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. McLain AB, Massengill T, Klebine P. Information/education page. Pregnancy and women with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(3):497–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. SCI Fact Sheets: pregnancy and women with spinal cord injury. Model systems knowledge translation center. https://msktc.org/sci/factsheets/pregnancy-and-women-spinal-cord-injury. May 2015. Accessed April 14, 2018.

  35. Pregnancy and spinal cord injury an information booklet for women with SCI. https://scisexualhealth.ca/female-fertility-and-pregnancy/. Updated 2015. Accessed April 14, 2018.

  36. • Lanig IS, New PW, Burns AS, et al. Optimizing the management of spasticity in people with spinal cord damage: a clinical care pathway for assessment and treatment decision making from the Ability Network, an international initiative. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(8):1681–7. This describes a clinical care pathway to guide assessment and treatment of disabling spasticity in adults.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nene AV, Rainha Campos A, Grabljevec K, Lopes A, Skoog B, Burns AS. Clinical assessment of spasticity in people with spinal cord damage: recommendations from the ability network, an international initiative. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99 (9):1917–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. • Andretta E, Landi LM, Cianfrocca M, Manassero A, Risi O, Artuso G. Bladder management during pregnancy in women with spinal-cord injury: an observational, multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3620-8. This cross-sectional survey of 52 women with SCI (representing 67 pregnancies) describes management of neurogenic bladder, focusing on increased awareness of bladder issues and changes in bladder management during pregnancy.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pannek J, Bertschy S. Mission impossible? Urological management of patients with spinal cord injury during pregnancy: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(10):1028–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Salomon J, Schnitzler A, Ville Y, Laffont I, Perronne C, Denys P, et al. Prevention of urinary tract infection in six spinal cord-injured pregnant women who gave birth to seven children under a weekly oral cyclic antibiotic program. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13(3):399–402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. • Michau A, Dinh A, Denys P, et al. Control cross-sectional study evaluating an antibiotic prevention strategy in 30 pregnancies under clean intermittent self-catheterization and review of literature. Urology. 2016;91:58–63. This is a cross-sectional study of 25 women (30 pregnancies). Participants who received weekly oral cyclic antibiotic strategy to prevent UTIs showed lower incidence of UTIs, cystitis but higher colonization rates. No significant increase in adverse fetal outcomes were reported.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Smania N, Picelli A, Munari D, Geroin C, Ianes P, Waldner A, et al. Rehabilitation procedures in the management of spasticity. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(3):423–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. • Khan F, Amatya B, Bensmail D, Yelnik A. Non-pharmacological interventions for spasticity in adults: an overview of systematic reviews. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2017. This review evaluated evidence from 18 systematic reviews. Low quality evidence for rehabilitation programs targeting spasticity, including vibration therapy for SCI and stretching for other neurologic conditions.

  44. Harvey LA, Katalinic OM, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Lannin NA, Schurr K. Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD007455.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bovend'Eerdt TJ, Newman M, Barker K, Dawes H, Minelli C, Wade DT. The effects of stretching in spasticity: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(7):1395–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stevenson VL. Rehabilitation in practice: spasticity management. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(4):293–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nakhostin Ansari N, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Rastgoo M. Efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound and infrared in the management of muscle spasticity. Brain Inj. 2009;23(7):632–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sahin N, Ugurlu H, Karahan AY. Efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of spasticity: a randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(1):61–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Borg-Stein J, Dugan SA, Gruber J. Musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(3):180–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mills PB, Dossa F. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for management of limb spasticity: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95(4):309–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Oo WM. Efficacy of addition of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to standardized physical therapy in subacute spinal spasticity: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2013–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sivaramakrishnan A, Solomon JM, Manikandan N. Comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for spasticity in spinal cord injury—a pilot randomized cross-over trial. J Spinal Cord Med 2018;41(4): 397–06.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Keskin EA, Onur O, Keskin HL, Gumus II, Kafali H, Turhan N. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves low back pain during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2012;74(1):76–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Crothers E, Coldron Y, Cook T, Watson T, Notcutt W. Safe use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for musculoskeletal pain during pregnancy. ACPWH Journal. 2012;111:22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL, Connolly S, et al. Spasticity after spinal cord injury: an evidence based review of current interventions. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2007;13(1):81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kesiktas N, Paker N, Erdogan N, Gulsen G, Bicki D, Yilmaz H. The use of hydrotherapy for the management of spasticity. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(4):268–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. da Silva JR, Borges PS, Agra KF, Pontes IA, Alves JG. Effects of an aquatic physical exercise program on glycemic control and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:390. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-390.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Barakat R, Perales M, Cordero Y, Bacchi M, Motolla M. Influence of land or water exercise in pregnancy on outcomes: a cross-sectional study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(7):1397–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Schrepfer R. Aquatic exercise. In: Kisner C, Colby LA, editors. Therapeutic exercise foundations and techniques. 5th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 2007. p. 276–7.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ward EJ, McIntyre A, van Kessel G, Hague WM. Immediate blood pressure changes and aquatic physiotherapy. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2005;24(2):93–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Naro A, Leo A, Russo M, Casella C, Buda A, Crespantini A, et al. Breakthroughs in the spasticity management: are non-pharmacological treatments the future? J Clin Neurosci. 2017;39:16–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Geigle PR, Kallins M. Exoskeleton-assisted walking for people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(7):1493–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. EKSO GT Bionic Operating Manual 2013:5.

  64. Gracies JM, Nance P, Elovic E, McGuire J, Simpson DM. Traditional pharmacological treatments for spasticity. Part II: general and regional treatments. Muscle Nerve Suppl. 1997;6:S92–120.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Micromedex® (electronic version). http://www.micromedexsolutions.com.ezp.welch.jhmi.edu/. Updated April 2018. Accessed 04/20, 2018.

  66. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pregnancy and lactation labeling rule. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/Labeling/ucm093307.htm. Updated 02/08/2018. Accessed 04/24/2018.

  67. Guttuso T, Shaman M Jr, Thornburg LL. Potential maternal symptomatic benefit of gabapentin and review of its safety in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:280–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bradley LJ, Kirker SGB. Pregabalin in the treatment of spasticity: a retrospective case series. Disabil Rehabil: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal. 2008;30(16):1230–1230-1232.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Edwards JA, Reid YJ, Cozens DD. Reproductive toxicity studies with oxybutynin hydrochloride. Toxicology. 1986;40(1):31–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Walker HW, Lee MY, Bahroo LB, Hedera P, Charles D. Botulinum toxin injection techniques for the management of adult spasticity. PM R. 2015;7(4):417–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Syme MR, Paxton JW, Keelan JA. Drug transfer and metabolism by the human placenta. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(8):487–514.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lange DJ, Brin MF, Warner CL, Fahn S, Lovelace RE. Distant effects of local injection of botulinum toxin. Muscle Nerve. 1987;10(6):552–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Aranda MA, Herranz A, del Val J, Bellido S, Garcia-Ruiz P. Botulinum toxin A during pregnancy, still a debate. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(8):e81–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bodkin CL, Maurer KB, Wszolek ZK. Botulinum toxin type A therapy during pregnancy. Mov Disord. 2005;20(8):1081–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. de Oliveira Monteiro E. Botulinum toxin and pregnancy. Skinmed. 2006;5(6):308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Krug H, Krause P, Kupsch A, Kühn AA. Safe administration of botulinum toxin type a injections during pregnancy: a report of two cases. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2015;2(2):187–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Li Yim JF, Weir CR. Botulinum toxin and pregnancy—a cautionary tale. Strabismus. 2010;18(2):65–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Newman W, Davis T, Padaliya B, et al. Botulinum toxin type A therapy during pregnancy. Mov Disord. 2004;19(11):1384–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Moser E, Ligon K, Singer C, Sethi K. Botulinum toxin A (Botox) therapy during pregnancy. Neurology. 1997;48(3):69008.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Tan M, Kim E, Koren G, Bozzo P. Botulinum toxin type A in pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 2013;59(11):1183–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Morgan JC, Iyer SS, Moser ET, Singer C, Sethi KD. Botulinum toxin A during pregnancy: a survey of treating physicians. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(1):117–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. • Brin MF, Kirby RS, Slavotinek A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes following exposure to onabotulinumtoxinA. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(2):179–87. This is a 24 year retrospective review of the Allergan safety database. Two hundred thirty-two pregnancies were eligible with known outcomes. In this study, the prevalence of fetal defects in onabotulinum toxin A exposed mothers before/during pregnancy (2.7%) is comparable with background rates in the general population.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Heetla HW, Staal MJ, Proost JH, van Laar T. Clinical relevance of pharmacological and physiological data in intrathecal baclofen therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2199–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Morton CM, Rosenow J, Wong C, Kirschner KL. Intrathecal baclofen administration during pregnancy: a case series and focused clinical review. PM R. 2009;1(11):1025–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Tandon SS, Hoskins I, Azhar S. Intrathecal baclofen pump—a viable therapeutic option in pregnancy. Obstet Med. 2010;3(3):119–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. DeVries-Rizzo M, Warren D, Delaney G, Levin S, Campbell C, DeRibaupierre S. Intrathecal baclofen and pregnancy: implications for clinical care. Can J Neurosci Nurs. 2009;31(3):21–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Dalton CM, Keenan E, Jarrett L, Buckley L, Stevenson VL. The safety of baclofen in pregnancy: intrathecal therapy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2008;14(4):571–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Roberts AG, Graves CR, Konrad PE, Groomes TE, Pfister AA, Damian MM, et al. Intrathecal baclofen pump implantation during pregnancy. Neurology. 2003;61(8):1156–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Munoz FC, Marco DG, Perez AV, Camacho MM. Pregnancy outcome in a woman exposed to continuous intrathecal baclofen infusion. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34(7–8):956.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Delhaas EM, Verhagen J. Pregnancy in a quadriplegic patient treated with continuous intrathecal baclofen infusion to manage her severe spasticity. Case report. Paraplegia. 1992;30(7):527–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Duncan SD, Devlin LA. Use of baclofen for withdrawal in a preterm infant. J Perinatol. 2013;33:327–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Ratnayaka BD, Dhaliwal H, Watkin S. Drug points: neonatal convulsions after withdrawal of baclofen. BMJ. 2001;323(7304):85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Lin H, Barton N, Wiegand T. Prevention of neonatal abstinence syndrome in the setting of intrauterine baclofen exposure. Journal of Medical Toxicology. 2014;10:85–6.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Abrams DI. The therapeutic effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: an update from the national academies of sciences, engineering and medicine report. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;49:7–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Pooyania S, Ethans K, Szturm T, Casey A, Perry D. A randomized, double-blinded crossover pilot study assessing the effect of nabilone on spasticity in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:703–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Hagenbach U, Luz S, Ghafoor N, Berger JM, Grotenhermen F, Brenneisen R, et al. The treatment of spasticity with delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:551–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Hawley LA, Ketchum JM, Morey C, Collins K, Charlifue S. Cannabis use in individuals with spinal cord injury or moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in Colorado. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99(8):1584–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.02.003. Accessed 04/24/2018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Drossel C, Forchheimer M, Meade M. Characteristics of individuals with spinal cord injury who use cannabis for therapeutic purposes. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2016;22(1):3–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no. 722: marijuana use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e205–9.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Metz T, Stickrath E. Marijuana use in pregnancy and lactation: a review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):761–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Mark K, Terplan M. Cannabis and pregnancy: maternal child health implications during a period of drug policy liberalization. Prev Med. 2017;104:46–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Andresen S, Biering-Sorensen F, Hagen E, Nielsen J, Bach F, Finnerup N. Cannabis use in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury in Denmark. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49:152–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippines G. Cabahug.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabahug, P.G. Managing Spasticity in a Pregnant Woman with Spinal Cord Injury: a Review. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 6, 245–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-018-0198-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-018-0198-5

Keywords

Navigation