Skip to main content
Log in

Minimizing Radiation Exposure in Imaging Studies: The European Experience

  • Radiation Exposure and Reduction (R Semelka, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Radiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the European Community, a 1997/43 Euratom directive establishes that indication and execution of diagnostic procedures should follow three basic principles: the justification principle (article 3: “if an exposure cannot be justified, it should be prohibited”), the optimization principle (article 4: “according to the ALARA principle, all doses should be kept As Low As Reasonably Achievable”), and the responsibility principle (article 5: “both the referring physician ordering the test—the prescriber—and the practitioner are responsible for the justification of the test exposing the patient to ionizing radiation”). Any responsible prescription should follow these principles, also reinforced by the recommendations of the Medical Imaging guidelines of the European Commission (first released in 2001) and by the 2014 position paper on use of medical radiation issued by the European Society of Cardiology, stating that X-rays and gamma-rays are proven (class I) carcinogens and cardiologists should make every effort to perform the right imaging exam, with the right dose, to the right patient; an informed physician (or radiologist, or cardiologist) “cannot be afraid of the essential and often life-saving use of medical radiation, but must be very afraid of radiation unawareness.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Picano E. Sustainability of medical imaging. Education and debate. BMJ. 2004;328:578–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heath I. When good intentions meet vested interests. BMJ. 2013;335:1075–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. •• Council Directive 97/43 EURATOM of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/public_health/threats_to_health/c11546b_en. The legal foundations of justification and optimization in Europe in the attempt to guarantee high levels of protection for the population.

  4. Correia MJ, Hellies A, Andreassi MG, Ghelarducci B, Picano E. Lack of radiological awareness among physicians working in a tertiary-care cardiological centre. Int J Cardiol. 2005;103:307–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Regulla D, Edler H. Patient exposure in medical X-ray imaging in Europe. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114:11–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bundesgerichtshof (BGH, en: Federal Supreme Court). Korperverletzung durch medizinisch nicht indizierte roentgenaufnahmen. NJW. 1998;12:833–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 37(2–4), 2007.

  8. Best PJ, Skelding KA, Mehran R, Chieffo A, Kunadian V, Madan M, Mikhail GW, Mauri F, Takahashi S, Honye J, Hernández-Antolín R, Weiner BH. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions’ Women in Innovations (WIN) Group. SCAI consensus document on occupational radiation exposure to the pregnant cardiologist and technical personnel. EuroIntervention. 2011;6(7):866–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaw P, Duncan A, Vouuouka A, Ozsvath K. Radiation exposure and pregnancy. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:285–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, Clark DA, Cusma JT, Dehmer GJ, Kern MJ, Laskey WK, O’Laughlin MP, Oesterle S, Popma JJ, O’Rourke RA, Abrams J, Bates ER, Brodie BR, Douglas PS, Gregoratos G, Hlatky MA, Hochman JS, Kaul S, Tracy CM, Waters DD, Waters DD Jr, American College of Cardiology. Task force on clinical expert consensus documents. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2170–214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart AWJ, Giles D, Hewitt D. Malignant disease in childhood and diagnostic irradiation in utero. Lancet. 1956;2:447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. •• European Commission on Radiation Protection 118: Referral guidelines for imaging. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/doc/118_en.pdf (last accessed 27 November 2010). The first guidelines of imaging, far too serious to be left deregulated in the hands of imaging specialists.

  13. Patel MR, Spertus JA, Brindis RG, Hendel RC, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM, Raskin IE. American College of Cardiology Foundation. ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1606–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. •• BEIR VII Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, Phase 2. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=030909156X. The current standard for assessing cancer risks due to radiation exposure.

  15. •• Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, de González AB. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499–505. Direct proof in young patients of the link between low dose diagnostic exposure and development of cancer: the cumulative radiation doses from 2–3 head CTs could almost triple the risk of brain tumors.

  16. •• Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, Giles GG, Wallace AB, Anderson PR, Guiver TA, McGale P, Cain TM, Dowty JG, Bickerstaffe AC, Darby SC. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;346:f2360. Direct proof in young patients of the link between low dose diagnostic exposure and development of cancer: no extrapolations, no theory, no hypothesis needed. The risk of cancer increases by 16% for each additional CT scan.

  17. Baysson H, Réhel JL, Boudjemline Y, Petit J, Girodon B, Aubert B, Laurier D, Bonnet D, Bernier MO. Risk of cancer associated with cardiac catheterization procedures during childhood: a cohort study in France. BMC Public Health. 2013;22(13):266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Picano E, Vañó E. The radiation issue in cardiology: the time for action is now. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011;21(9):35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibbons RJ, Miller TD, Hodge D, et al. Application of appropriateness criteria to stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies and stress echocardiograms in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1283–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carpeggiani C, Marraccini P, Morales MA, Prediletto R, Landi P, Picano E. Trends of increasing medical radiation exposure in a population hospitalized for cardiovascular disease (1970–2009). PLoS One. 2013;e811611.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Einstein AJ, Tilkemeier P, Fazel R, et al. Radiation safety in nuclear cardiology—current knowledge and practice. JAMA. 2013;173:1021–23.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Terranova G, Ferro M, Carpeggiani C, Recchia V, Braga L, Semelka RC, Picano E. Low quality and lack of clarity of current informed consent forms in cardiology: how to improve them. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:649–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Picano E. Informed consent and communication of risk from radiological and nuclear medicine examinations: how to escape from a communication inferno. Education and debate. BMJ. 2004;329:849–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carpeggiani C, Kraft G, Caramella D, Semelka R, Picano E. Radioprotection (un)awareness in cardiologists, and how to improve it. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:1369–74.

  25. Gimbel RW, Fontelo P, Stephens MB, et al. Radiation exposure and cost influence physician medical image decision making: a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 2013;51:628–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Picano E. Stress echocardiography: a historical perspective. Am J Med. 2003;114:126–30. Special article.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Abbott BG, Zaret BL. Contemporary cardiology and hysteric nucleophobia. Am J Med. 2003;114:131–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. •• Picano E, Vañó E, Rehani MM, Cuocolo A, Mont L, Bodi V, Bar O, Maccia C, Pierard L, Sicari R, Plein S, Mahrholdt H, Lancellotti P, Knuuti J, Heidbuchel H, Di Mario C, Badano LP. The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:665–72. The European Society of cardiology position paper with the updated catalogue of doses for all major cardiology imaging examinations and prepared with the contributions of all imaging subspecialties.

  29. European Society of Radiology. ESR statement on radiation protection: globalisation, personalised medicine and safety (the GPS approach). Insights Imaging. 2013;4:737–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Moynihan R, Heneghan C, Godlee F. Too much medicine: from evidence to action. BMJ 2013;347:f7141 (4 Dec. 2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Malone J, Guleria R, Craven C, Horton P, Järvinen H, Mayo J, O’reilly G, Picano E, Remedios D, Le Heron J, Rehani M, Holmberg O, Czarwinski R. Justification of diagnostic medical exposures: some practical issues. Report of an International Atomic Energy Agency Consultation. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:523–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Topol EJ. Runaway use of radiation harming patients. Medscape 17 Dec. 2012.

  33. Andreassi MG, Picano E. Reduction of radiation to children: our responsibility to change. Circulation. 2014;130:135–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugenio Picano.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Radiation Exposure and Reduction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Picano, E., Carpeggiani, C. Minimizing Radiation Exposure in Imaging Studies: The European Experience. Curr Radiol Rep 3, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-014-0082-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-014-0082-8

Keywords

Navigation