Abstract
Coronary microvascular disease or dysfunction (CMVD) has been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Despite a growing prevalence, guidelines on definitive treatment are lacking. Proposed mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction and resultant inflammation have been demonstrated as the underlying cause. Imaging modalities such as echocardiography, cardiac MRI, PET, and in some instances CT, have been shown to be useful in diagnosing CMVD mainly through assessment of coronary blood flow. Invasive measurements through thermodilution and pressure sensor-guided Doppler microcatheters have also been utilized. Treatment options are directed at targeting inflammatory pathways and angina. In our review, we highlight the current literature on the background of CMVD, diagnostic modalities, and management of this disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Coronary microvascular disease, despite its growing prevalence, has been a challenging diagnosis. |
Current modalities involve imaging through PET, echocardiography, cardiac MRI, and CT. |
Invasive measures such as thermodilution also assist with diagnosis. |
Treatment options are mainly focused on anti-inflammatory and anti-anginal pathways. |
Introduction
The prevalence of cardiovascular disease in adults is nearly 50% and growing [1]. Given this alarming statistic, the burden of chest pain in patients, especially women, who are found to have nonobstructive coronary artery disease has been appreciated to be around 81% in one study [2]. In general, the prevalence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease has been noted to be as high as 50% in patients presenting with stable angina [3]. In 1967, Likoff et al. described patients with clinical presentation of ischemic heart disease but normal coronary angiograms thereby first bringing to awareness this unknown anomaly [4]. In 1973, Kemp described and coined the term “cardiac syndrome x” in patients presenting with chest pain and normal coronary arteries [5]. In 1988, Cannon et al. further coined the term “microvascular angina” or “Syndrome X” when studying the coronary flow and cardiac metabolic activity of patients who presented with normal coronary angiography but persistent angina [6]. Despite such a large prevalence, and the increasing number of studies since then, guidelines on definitive management of coronary microvascular disease or coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMVD) is lacking [7]. Furthermore, CMVD has been associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular events [8]. The economic burden of CMVD is substantial, with patients reporting poor quality of life and productivity factors such as limitations in total productivity and increased worker absenteeism. This burden has been estimated to nearly $14,000 per patient annually [9]. In this review, we aim to provide insight into the background of CMVD, diagnostic imaging modalities, and management. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Anatomy and Pathophysiology of Coronary Microcirculation and Dysfunction
In a topological study of a post-mortem human heart, Schwarz et al. evaluated over 200,000 segments of the left coronary tree. Median diameter across all segments was 92.3 µm, with a median length of 441 µm. Diameter classes ranged from greater than 400 µm to 30 to 45 µm. The three most prevalent segments were 75–90 µm (16.6%), 60–75 µm (16.1%), and 90–105 µm (13.8%). In the subepicardium, midmyocardium, and subendocardium, the most prevalent diameter class was 60–75 µm, accounting for 27.4, 25.2, and 28.6%, respectively [10]. In regard to metabolic stimuli, arterioles with diameter of < 30 µm have been reported as being the most sensitive. Myogenic responsiveness has been appreciated in arterioles between diameters of 30 to 60 µm with flow sensitivity appreciated in arterioles of diameters from 120 to 150 µm [11].
Dysfunction of the coronary microvasculature has been appreciated to involve both impairment of dilation and contraction. Clinical chest pain associated with CMVD has been linked more closely to over-constriction and spasming of the vessels [12]. The two most appreciated mechanisms involving increased resistance in the microcirculation are poor vasodilation of the endothelium because of decreased nitric oxide, as well as decreased coronary blood flow responsiveness to acetylcholine. Primary impairment in the relaxation of smooth muscle cells is another purported mechanism of dysfunction, which has been reported as being non-dependent from classic vasodilatory chemicals [13].
Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Associations
In a study of over 2000 low-to-moderate risk cardiac patients presenting with chest pain, 82% of patients with CMVD were found to be women. Even with coronary flow reserve being similar in both men and women with CMVD, woman were still reported to have dysfunction three times more likely than men when assessed through positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT). Mean age of patients with CMVD in the study was 51.
In terms of race, Hispanics accounted for 21% and non-Whites accounted for 38% of patients with CMVD [14]. Although, in several other studies, prevalence of CMVD has not been shown to differ significantly between genders [15,16,17,18].
In terms of risk factors, notable associations have been found in women who have impaired coronary flow reserve and age, hypertension, smoking history, elevated heart rate, and low HDL [19]. Dyslipidemia has been appreciated to be an important association and cause of microvascular dysfunction. Some of the theorized mechanisms underlying dyslipidemia-induced microvascular dysfunction include abnormalities in production and destruction in endothelium-derived relaxing factor, alterations in dilatory response, and serotonin-potentiated vasoconstriction [20]. Diabetes mellitus has also been shown to be an associated risk factor [21]. CMVD has also been shown to play a major role in other cardiovascular conditions such as ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA), myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [22, 23]. The mechanism believed to be behind these diseases, especially HFpEF, is a chronic inflammatory state. The sub-mechanisms underlying this chronic inflammatory state include decreased nitric oxide with a resultant rise in reactive oxygen species and resultant inflammation and poor function of the endothelium. The inflammation is driven by inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukins 1 beta and 6. Cytotoxicity as a result of poorly regulated interleukin 1 beta has also been associated. These mechanisms have been seen in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease and CMVD [24].
Classification and Diagnostic Criteria
In 2007, Camici et al. proposed a clinical classification for coronary microvascular dysfunction. This classification was divided into four major categories. The first category was coronary microvascular dysfunction in the absence of coronary artery and myocardial disease. The second category was in the presence of myocardial diseases such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertension, aortic stenosis, and infiltrative heart disease. The third category was in the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease such as stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes. The fourth category was iatrogenic dysfunction seen in instances of distal emboli that form because of coronary recanalization [25].
The Coronary Vasomotion Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS) in their 2014 and 2015 summits, proposed the following criteria for coronary microvascular disease: “(1) presence of symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia, (2) objective documentation of myocardial ischemia, as assessed by currently available techniques, (3) absence of obstructive coronary artery disease defined as < 50% coronary diameter reduction and/or fractional flow reserve of > 0.80, and (4) confirmation of a reduced coronary blood flow reserve and/or inducible microvascular spasm.” [26].
Diagnostic Imaging Modalities
Echocardiography
Echocardiography, especially coronary flow velocity reserve assessment, has been noted to be a beneficial imaging modality in detecting disease of the microvascular system. Coronary blood flow velocity can be assessed with pulsed wave Doppler on transthoracic echocardiography of the mid to distal tract of the left anterior descending artery. Transesophageal echocardiography can also be used if assessing the proximal tract of the left anterior descending artery. Another modality is myocardial contrast echocardiography, which utilizes microbubbles and ultrasound. In this modality, coronary blood flow velocity is found to be enhanced during stress with opacification of the myocardium through microbubbles [27]. Vogel et al. also demonstrated the usefulness of echocardiography in determining myocardial blood flow [28].
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) has been established as a modality for assessing CMVD, with disease-specific protocol calling for repeat first pass perfusion or early gadolinium enhancement [29]. Thomson et al. evaluated 118 patients from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE)-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (CVD) study with 1.5T CMRI using first-pass gadolinium perfusion imaging and adenosine. Myocardial perfusion reserve index was compared with coronary reactivity testing. Results obtained from the study demonstrated that a threshold myocardial perfusion reserve index of 1.84 was predictive of CMVD with a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 74% [30]. Kotecha et al. evaluated 50 patients with stable angina using adenosine stress 1.5-T CMRI with quantification of myocardial blood flood myocardial perfusion mapping in comparison to coronary angiography. In their study, they found that global stress myocardial blood flow of < 1.82 ml/g/min was able to differentiate between obstructive three-vessel disease and CMVD [31]. Rahman et al. evaluated 3-T CMRI in 75 patients using both visual and quantitative techniques such as stress myocardial blood flow, transmural myocardial perfusion reserve, and subendocardial myocardial perfusion reserve. In their study, subendocardial myocardial perfusion reserve was found to have a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 72%. Myocardial perfusion reserve was found to have a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 90% [32].
Positron Emission Tomography
PET has been an important modality in assessing coronary flow reserve. Through dynamic PET, myocardial blood flood, which helps to determine coronary flow reserve, can be evaluated at rest and with stress [33]. Coronary blood flow has been shown to be a useful tool in evaluating CMVD even in patients with normal PET [34]. Myocardial blood flow is acquired using 0–15 water, N-13 ammonia, or Rubidium-82 [35]. In a study of over 1000 patients to evaluate gender differences in coronary microvascular dysfunction, Murthy et al. found that although there were no gender differences, coronary flow reserve measured through PET was a strong predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events [16].
Computed Tomography
Although data are scarce in the use of CT in assessing CMVD, one of the main reported advantages is the ability to assess anatomy and functionality in one study. Risk factors of course include radiation and renal insult. Other concerns include misestimation of myocardial blood flow [36]. Grover et al., in their study of 30 patients with microvascular angina, demonstrated a lower mean total coronary lumen volume and mean myocardial mass compared to patients who were without angina [37].
Invasive Assessment
Invasive measures have also been proposed to be helpful in assessing for microvascular disease. Microvascular resistance can be measured through thermodilution. Hyperemic microvascular resistance can be measured as well through pressor sensor when utilized with guidewires that have Doppler capabilities [38].
Treatment and Future Trends in Management
Treatment for CMVD is focused on targeting pathways that promote inflammation and thrombosis [39] and vasomotor dysfunction [40]. The main therapeutics are those that have been well established in targeting these pathways such as aspirin, statin therapy, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or receptor blockers. Some proposed anti-anginal treatments have been beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, nitrates, and ranolazine [39]. Vasomotor dysfunction is also regulated through the above mechanisms through Quinapril, a type of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, that has been appreciated to be a novel therapy by targeting inflammatory pathways based off results from the WISE study [41]. Statin therapy is one of the first-line medications in the treatment of CMVD [42]. In a systematic review and meta-analysis by Yong et al., their study showed an improvement in coronary flow reserve in over 200 patients on statin therapy with a standard mean difference of 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.36–0.85). This improvement in coronary flow reserve was irrespective of a time period when evaluated up to 12 months of follow-up time [43]. Gliflozins have also been proposed as a possible treatment modality through modulation of vascular endothelial cell activation and overall function of the endothelium, especially in patients with HFpEF, where microvascular dysfunction is believed to be an underlying cause [44]. Low-dose tricyclic antidepressants, through targeting of nociceptor activity, have also been demonstrated to be a potential target. Non-pharmacological treatment options include basics such as exercise, healthy diet, weight reduction, smoking cessation, stress reduction, and unique therapies such as enhanced external counterpulsation and spinal cord stimulation [45]. Data and guidelines are still lacking for definitive management of CMVD [7]. We provide a potential algorithm for diagnosis and management of patients presenting with concern for CMVD (Fig. 1).
Proposed algorithm for diagnosis and management of CMVD. CMVD (coronary microvascular disease), CAD (coronary artery disease), DM (diabetes mellitus), HFpEF (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction), STEMI (ST segment elevation myocardial infarction), USA (unstable angina), NSTEMI (non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction), TTE (transthoracic echocardiography), PET (positron emission tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), CT (computed tomography)
Conclusions
CMVD, as outlined by our review, is a challenging diagnosis despite the growing literature of evidence. Prognosis is equally confounding with mixed results in terms of all-cause mortality, in-hospital mortality, and non-cardiac deaths [46]. Pending trials including the Women’s Ischemia Trial to Reduce Events in Nonobstructive CAD (WARRIOR) trial may help provide further insight into this multifaceted disease [47].
References
Virani SS, American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: a Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(8):254–743. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950 (Epub 2021 Jan 27. PMID: 33501848).
Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, Reis SE, Smith KM, Handberg EM, Johnson BD, Sopko G, Bairey Merz CN. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2825–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.054 (PMID:20579539;PMCID:PMC2898523).
Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrøm SZ, Pedersen F, Galatius S, Madsen JK, Jørgensen E, Kelbæk H, Prescott E. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(6):734–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr331 (Epub 2011 Sep 11 PMID: 21911339).
Likoff W, Segal BL, Kasparian H. Paradox of normal selective coronary arteriograms in patients considered to have unmistakable coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1967;276(19):1063–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196705112761904 (PMID: 6025663).
Kemp HG Jr. Left ventricular function in patients with the anginal syndrome and normal coronary arteriograms. Am J Cardiol. 1973;32(3):375–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(73)80150-x (PMID: 4725594).
Cannon RO 3rd, Epstein SE. “Microvascular angina” as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61(15):1338–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(88)91180-0 (PMID: 3287885).
Sinha A, et al. Coronary microvascular disease: current concepts of pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. 2020;10(1):22–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000223.
Chen C, Wei J, AlBadri A, Zarrini P, Bairey Merz CN. Coronary microvascular dysfunction—epidemiology, pathogenesis, prognosis, diagnosis. Risk Factors Therapy Circ J. 2016;81(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1002 (Epub 2016 Nov 29 PMID: 27904032).
Schumann CL, Mathew RC, Dean JL, Yang Y, Balfour PC Jr, Shaw PW, Robinson AA, Salerno M, Kramer CM, Bourque JM. Functional and economic impact of INOCA and influence of coronary microvascular dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(7):1369–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.01.041 (Epub 2021 Apr 14. PMID: 33865784; PMCID: PMC8273074).
Schwarz JCV, van Lier MGJTB, van den Wijngaard JPHM, Siebes M, Van Bavel E. Topologic and hemodynamic characteristics of the human coronary arterial circulation. Front Physiol. 2020;10:1611. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01611 (PMID: 32038291; PMCID: PMC6989553).
Chilian WM. Coronary microcirculation in health and disease. Summary of an NHLBI workshop. Circulation. 1997;95(2):522–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.95.2.522.PMID:9008472;PMCID:PMC4037233.
Pries AR, Badimon L, Bugiardini R, Camici PG, Dorobantu M, Duncker DJ, Escaned J, Koller A, Piek JJ, de Wit C. Coronary vascular regulation, remodelling, and collateralization: mechanisms and clinical implications on behalf of the working group on coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(45):3134–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv100 (Epub 2015 Jun 25 PMID: 26112888).
Lanza GA, Crea F. Primary coronary microvascular dysfunction: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and management. Circulation. 2010;121(21):2317–25. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.900191 (PMID: 20516386).
Safdar B, D’Onofrio G, Dziura J, Russell RR, Johnson C, Sinusas AJ. Prevalence and characteristics of coronary microvascular dysfunction among chest pain patients in the emergency department. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020;9(1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872618764418 (Epub 2018 Mar 15 PMID: 29543037).
Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Appelman YE, Harms HJ, de Haan S, van den Oever ML, van Kuijk C, Allaart CP, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA, Lubberink M, van Rossum AC, Knaapen P. Coronary risk factors and myocardial blood flow in patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: a quantitative [15O]H2O PET/CT study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(1):102–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1956-0 (Epub 2011 Oct 18. PMID: 22005845; PMCID: PMC3227802).
Murthy VL, Naya M, Taqueti VR, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, Dorbala S, Blankstein R, Rimoldi O, Camici PG, Di Carli MF. Effects of sex on coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiac outcomes. Circulation. 2014;129(24):2518–27. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008507 (Epub 2014 Apr 30. PMID: 24787469; PMCID: PMC4076200).
Rosen SD, Uren NG, Kaski JC, Tousoulis D, Davies GJ, Camici PG. Coronary vasodilator reserve, pain perception, and sex in patients with syndrome X. Circulation. 1994;90(1):50–60. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.90.1.50 (PMID: 8026038).
Sara JD, Widmer RJ, Matsuzawa Y, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(11):1445–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.06.017 (PMID: 26404197).
Mygind ND, Michelsen MM, Pena A, Frestad D, Dose N, Aziz A, Faber R, Høst N, Gustafsson I, Hansen PR, Hansen HS, Bairey Merz CN, Kastrup J, Prescott E. Coronary microvascular function and cardiovascular risk factors in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: the iPOWER Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(3): e003064. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.003064 (PMID:27068634;PMCID:PMC4943278).
Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Wollschläger H, Just H. Endothelial dysfunction of the coronary microvasculature is associated with coronary blood flow regulation in patients with early atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1991;84(5):1984–92. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.84.5.1984.
Marciano C, Galderisi M, Gargiulo P, Acampa W, D’Amore C, Esposito R, Capasso E, Savarese G, Casaretti L, Lo Iudice F, Esposito G, Rengo G, Leosco D, Cuocolo A, Perrone-Filardi P. Effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus on coronary microvascular function and myocardial perfusion in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(7):1199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2117-9 (Epub 2012 Apr 12 PMID: 22526959).
Vancheri F, Longo G, Vancheri S, Henein M. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2880. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092880 (PMID:32899944;PMCID:PMC7563453).
Del Buono MG, Montone RA, Camilli M, Carbone S, Narula J, Lavie CJ, Niccoli G, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(13):1352–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.042 (PMID:34556322;PMCID:PMC8528638).
Zanatta E, et al. Inflammation and coronary microvascular dysfunction in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20225563.
Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):830–40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra061889 (PMID: 17314342).
Ong P, Camici PG, Beltrame JF, Crea F, Shimokawa H, Sechtem U, Kaski JC, Bairey Merz CN, Coronary Vasomotion Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS). International standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina. Int J Cardiol. 2018;250:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.08.068 (Epub 2017 Sep 8. PMID: 29031990).
Carbone A, D’Andrea A, Sperlongano S, Tagliamonte E, Mandoli GE, Santoro C, Evola V, Bandera F, Morrone D, Malagoli A, D’Ascenzi F, Bossone E, Cameli M, Echocardiography study group of the Italian Society of Cardiology. Echocardiographic assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction: Basic concepts, technical aspects, and clinical settings. Echocardiography. 2021;38(6):993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.15059 (Epub 2021 May 5. PMID: 33948990; PMCID: PMC8252466).
Vogel R, Indermühle A, Reinhardt J, Meier P, Siegrist PT, Namdar M, Kaufmann PA, Seiler C. The quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in humans by contrast echocardiography: algorithm and validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(5):754–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.044 (PMID: 15734622).
Kramer CM, et al. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15(1):91. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-91.
Thomson LE, Wei J, Agarwal M, Haft-Baradaran A, Shufelt C, Mehta PK, Gill EB, Johnson BD, Kenkre T, Handberg EM, Li D, Sharif B, Berman DS, Petersen JW, Pepine CJ, Bairey Merz CN. Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(4):e002481. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002481 (PMID: 25801710; PMCID: PMC4375783).
Kotecha T, Martinez-Naharro A, Boldrini M, Knight D, Hawkins P, Kalra S, Patel D, Coghlan G, Moon J, Plein S, Lockie T, Rakhit R, Patel N, Xue H, Kellman P, Fontana M. Automated pixel-wise quantitative myocardial perfusion mapping by CMR to detect obstructive coronary artery disease and coronary microvascular dysfunction: validation against invasive coronary physiology. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(10):1958–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.022 (Epub 2019 Feb 13. PMID: 30772231; PMCID: PMC8414332).
Rahman H, Scannell CM, Demir OM, Ryan M, McConkey H, Ellis H, Masci PG, Perera D, Chiribiri A. High-resolution cardiac magnetic resonance imaging techniques for the identification of coronary microvascular dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(5):978–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.10.015 (Epub 2020 Nov 25 PMID: 33248969).
Campisi R, Marengo FD. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in women with nonobstructive ischemic heart disease as assessed by positron emission tomography. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7(2):196–205. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.04.08.PMID:28540214;PMCID:PMC5422845.
Taqueti VR, Di Carli MF. Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging for the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease in the era of multimodality cardiovascular imaging. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57(6):644–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2015.03.004 (Epub 2015 Mar 12. PMID: 25770849; PMCID: PMC5926794).
Bravo PE, et al. Role of PET to evaluate coronary microvascular dysfunction in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. Heart Fail Rev. 2017;22(4):455–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-017-9628-1.
Tonet E, Pompei G, Faragasso E, Cossu A, Pavasini R, Passarini G, Tebaldi M, Campo G. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: PET, CMR and CT assessment. J Clin Med. 2021;10(9):1848. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091848 (PMID:33922841;PMCID:PMC8123021).
Grover R, Leipsic JA, Mooney J, Kueh SH, Ohana M, Nørgaard BL, Eftekhari A, Bax JJ, Murphy DT, Hague CJ, Seidman MA, Blanke P, Sedlak T, Sellers SL. Coronary lumen volume to myocardial mass ratio in primary microvascular angina. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11(6):423–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2017.09.015 (Epub 2017 Sep 22 PMID: 28993120).
Beck S, Pereyra VM, Seitz A, McChord J, Hubert A, Bekeredjian R, Sechtem U, Ong P. Invasive diagnosis of coronary functional disorders causing angina pectoris. Eur Cardiol. 2021;5(16): e27. https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2021.06 (PMID:34276812;PMCID:PMC8280748).
Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Shimokawa H, Berry C. Treatment of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116(4):856–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa006 (PMID:32087007;PMCID:PMC7061279).
Cassar A, Chareonthaitawee P, Rihal CS, Prasad A, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Lack of correlation between noninvasive stress tests and invasive coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(3):237–44. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.841056 (Epub 2009 May 8. PMID: 20031721; PMCID: PMC2771952).
Pauly DF, et al. In women with symptoms of cardiac ischemia, nonobstructive coronary arteries, and microvascular dysfunction, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is associated with improved microvascular function: A double-blind randomized study from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Am Heart J. 2011;162(4):678–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.011.
Kayikcioglu M, Payzin S, Yavuzgil O, Kultursay H, Can LH, Soydan I. Benefits of statin treatment in cardiac syndrome-X1. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(22):1999–2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00478-0 (PMID: 14613735).
Yong J, Tian J, Yang X, Xing H, He Y, Song X. Effects of oral drugs on coronary microvascular function in patients without significant stenosis of epicardial coronary arteries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of coronary flow reserve. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;30(7): 580419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.580419 (PMID:33195465;PMCID:PMC7661556).
Salvatore T, Caturano A, Galiero R, Di Martino A, Albanese G, Vetrano E, Sardu C, Marfella R, Rinaldi L, Sasso FC. Cardiovascular benefits from gliflozins: effects on endothelial function. Biomedicines. 2021;9(10):1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101356 (PMID:34680473;PMCID:PMC8533063).
Samim A, Nugent L, Mehta PK, Shufelt C, Bairey Merz CN. Treatment of angina and microvascular coronary dysfunction. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2010;12(4):355–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-010-0083-8 (PMID:20842559;PMCID:PMC3914311).
Niccoli G, Camici PG. Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: what is the prognosis? Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020;22(Suppl E):E40–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suaa057 (Epub 2020 Mar 30. PMID: 32523437; PMCID: PMC7270909).
Handberg EM, Merz CNB, Cooper-Dehoff RM, Wei J, Conlon M, Lo MC, Boden W, Frayne SM, Villines T, Spertus JA, Weintraub W, O’Malley P, Chaitman B, Shaw LJ, Budoff M, Rogatko A, Pepine CJ. Rationale and design of the Women’s Ischemia Trial to Reduce Events in Nonobstructive CAD (WARRIOR) trial. Am Heart J. 2021;237:90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2021.03.011 (Epub 2021 Mar 18 PMID: 33745898).
Acknowledgements
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Funding
The authors did not receive funding for this manuscript. No Rapid Service Fee was received by the journal for the publication of this article.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Author Contributions
Study Conception and Design: R.A.T., J.R.L., K.C. Manuscript Preparation/Drafting: R.A.T., J.R.L., P.R.L., A.M., U.R., W.K., K.C. Expert Review: P.R.L., A.M., U.R., W.K., K.C.
Disclosures
Ravi A. Thakker, MD, Jorge Rodriguez Lozano, MD, Patricia Rodriguez Lozano, MD, Afaq Motiwala, MD, Umamahesh Rangasetty, MD, Wissam Khalife, MD, and Khaled Chatila, MD have nothing to disclose.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Thakker, R.A., Rodriguez Lozano, J., Rodriguez Lozano, P. et al. Coronary Microvascular Disease. Cardiol Ther 11, 23–31 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00250-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00250-6