Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological Perspectives to Quantify and Mitigate Liquefaction in Sands

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though the qualitative effects of grain size and grain shape on the tendency or resistance of a sand to liquefaction are well established, quantitative correlations between them are elusive. Most of the studies in this direction used conventional methods to quantify the size and shape of the grains, which include sieve analysis and visual observations. The current study evaluates the size and shape of sand grains through image-based characterizations and relates them to the liquefaction potential of the sand measured in laboratory cyclic simple shear tests. Microscopic images of sand particles were captured and analyzed using MATLAB codes to arrive at the mean particle size, sphericity, roundness, and surface roughness of the sand particles. Cyclic simple shear tests were carried out on sands and sand-like glass beads of different sizes and sands with rounded and angular grains. Results showed that smaller grain size and regular shape of the particle with high sphericity and roundness increase the liquefaction tendency by many folds. In the undrained cyclic simple shear tests carried out in the study, spherical particles liquefied in 8 cycles, whereas river sand with subrounded particles liquefied in 13 cycles and manufactured sand with relatively elongated particles liquefied in 16 cycles, particle size being almost same for these three assemblies. Decrease in the liquefaction potential of loose granular assemblies with an increase in grain size and shape irregularity is correlated to the microscopic mechanisms and discussed in light of their tendency for densification, fluid flow patterns and porewater pressure development. Tests with geosynthetic inclusions showed definite reduction in liquefaction potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. Verdugo R, Gonzalez J (2015) Liquefaction-induced ground damages during the 2010 Chile earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 79:280–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Potter SH, Becker JS, Johnston DM, Rossiter KP (2015) An overview of the impacts of the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes. Int J Disast Risk Reduct 14:6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jalil A, Fathani TF, Satyarno I, Wilopo W (2021) Liquefaction in Palu: the cause of massive mudflows. Geoenvironment Disast 8:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mavroulis S, Lekkas E, Carydis P (2021) Liquefaction phenomena induced by the 26 November 2019, mw = 6.4 Durres (Albania) earthquake and liquefaction susceptibility assessment in the affected area. Geosciences 11(5):215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei LM, Yang J (2014) On the role of grain shape in static liquefaction of sand–fines mixtures. Geotechnique 64(9):740–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho GC, Dodds J, Santamarina JC (2006) Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(5):591–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shin H, Santamarina JC (2013) Role of particle angularity on the mechanical behavior of granular mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(2):353–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thakur MM, Penumadu D (2021) Influence of friction and particle morphology on triaxial shearing of granular materials. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 147(11):04021118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang J, Wei LM (2012) Collapse of loose sand with the addition of fines: the role of particle shape. Geotechnique 62(12):1111–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Castro G, Poulos SJ (1977) Factors affecting liquefaction and cyclic mobility. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 103(6):501–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hird CC, Hassona FAK (1990) Some factors affecting the liquefaction and flow of saturated sands in laboratory tests. Eng Geol 28:149–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang J, Dai BB (2011) Is the quasi-steady state a real behaviour? A micromechanical perspective. Geotechnique 61(2):175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morimoto T, Aoyagi Y, Koseki J (2019) Effects of induced anisotropy on multiple liquefaction properties of sand with initial static shear. Soils Found 59:1148–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vangla P, Roy N, Latha GM (2018) Image based shape characterization of granular materials and its effect on kinematics of particle motion. Granular Matter 20(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wadell H (1935) Volume, shape, and roundness of quartz particles. J Geol 43(3):250–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wadell H (1932) Volume, shape, and roundness of rock particles. J Geol 40(5):443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng J, Hryciw RD (2015) Traditional soil particle sphericity, roundness and surface roughness by computational geometry. Geotechnique 65(6):494–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roy N, Vangla P, Frost JD, Latha GM (2021) An enhanced automated particle angularity measurement method. J Test Eval 50(2):20210048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kjellman W (1951) Testing the shear strength of clay in Sweden. Geotechnique 2(3):225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hubler JF, Athanasopoulos-Zekkos A, Zekkos D (2017) Monotonic, cyclic, and postcyclic simple shear response of three uniform gravels in constant volume conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(9):04017043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kantesaria N, Sachan A (2021) Cyclic degradation and pore-water pressure response of high-plasticity compacted clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 147(11):04021113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang X, Ge L, Chang KT, Kwok AO (2016) Strain-controlled cyclic simple shear tests on sand with radial strain measurements. J Mater Civ Eng 28(4):04015169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Madhusudhan BR, Boominathan A, Banerjee S (2020) Cyclic simple shear response of sand–rubber tire chip mixtures. Int J Geomech 20(9):04020136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rasouli H, Fatahi B (2022) Liquefaction and post-liquefaction resistance of sand reinforced with recycled geofibre. Geotext Geomembr 50(1):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang X, Russell AR (2020) Assessing liquefaction resistance of fiber-reinforced sand using a new pore pressure ratio. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 146(1):04019125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper is financially supported by the SERB POWER fellowship of the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India. The cyclic simple shear setup used for experiments was procured through the financial support from DST FIST grants. Authors sincerely thank the funding agency for the support.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided through Fund for Improvement of S&T Infrastructure (FIST) Phase 3 and SERB POWER FELLOWSHIP (SPF/2021/000041) of the Department of Science and Technology, India and Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP) of the Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR), Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gali Madhavi Latha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latha, G.M., Lakkimsetti, B. Morphological Perspectives to Quantify and Mitigate Liquefaction in Sands. Indian Geotech J 52, 1244–1252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00649-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00649-5

Keywords

Navigation