Abstract
Though the qualitative effects of grain size and grain shape on the tendency or resistance of a sand to liquefaction are well established, quantitative correlations between them are elusive. Most of the studies in this direction used conventional methods to quantify the size and shape of the grains, which include sieve analysis and visual observations. The current study evaluates the size and shape of sand grains through image-based characterizations and relates them to the liquefaction potential of the sand measured in laboratory cyclic simple shear tests. Microscopic images of sand particles were captured and analyzed using MATLAB codes to arrive at the mean particle size, sphericity, roundness, and surface roughness of the sand particles. Cyclic simple shear tests were carried out on sands and sand-like glass beads of different sizes and sands with rounded and angular grains. Results showed that smaller grain size and regular shape of the particle with high sphericity and roundness increase the liquefaction tendency by many folds. In the undrained cyclic simple shear tests carried out in the study, spherical particles liquefied in 8 cycles, whereas river sand with subrounded particles liquefied in 13 cycles and manufactured sand with relatively elongated particles liquefied in 16 cycles, particle size being almost same for these three assemblies. Decrease in the liquefaction potential of loose granular assemblies with an increase in grain size and shape irregularity is correlated to the microscopic mechanisms and discussed in light of their tendency for densification, fluid flow patterns and porewater pressure development. Tests with geosynthetic inclusions showed definite reduction in liquefaction potential.
References
Verdugo R, Gonzalez J (2015) Liquefaction-induced ground damages during the 2010 Chile earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 79:280–295
Potter SH, Becker JS, Johnston DM, Rossiter KP (2015) An overview of the impacts of the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes. Int J Disast Risk Reduct 14:6–14
Jalil A, Fathani TF, Satyarno I, Wilopo W (2021) Liquefaction in Palu: the cause of massive mudflows. Geoenvironment Disast 8:21
Mavroulis S, Lekkas E, Carydis P (2021) Liquefaction phenomena induced by the 26 November 2019, mw = 6.4 Durres (Albania) earthquake and liquefaction susceptibility assessment in the affected area. Geosciences 11(5):215
Wei LM, Yang J (2014) On the role of grain shape in static liquefaction of sand–fines mixtures. Geotechnique 64(9):740–745
Cho GC, Dodds J, Santamarina JC (2006) Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(5):591–602
Shin H, Santamarina JC (2013) Role of particle angularity on the mechanical behavior of granular mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(2):353–355
Thakur MM, Penumadu D (2021) Influence of friction and particle morphology on triaxial shearing of granular materials. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 147(11):04021118
Yang J, Wei LM (2012) Collapse of loose sand with the addition of fines: the role of particle shape. Geotechnique 62(12):1111–1125
Castro G, Poulos SJ (1977) Factors affecting liquefaction and cyclic mobility. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 103(6):501–516
Hird CC, Hassona FAK (1990) Some factors affecting the liquefaction and flow of saturated sands in laboratory tests. Eng Geol 28:149–170
Yang J, Dai BB (2011) Is the quasi-steady state a real behaviour? A micromechanical perspective. Geotechnique 61(2):175–183
Morimoto T, Aoyagi Y, Koseki J (2019) Effects of induced anisotropy on multiple liquefaction properties of sand with initial static shear. Soils Found 59:1148–1159
Vangla P, Roy N, Latha GM (2018) Image based shape characterization of granular materials and its effect on kinematics of particle motion. Granular Matter 20(1):1–19
Wadell H (1935) Volume, shape, and roundness of quartz particles. J Geol 43(3):250–280
Wadell H (1932) Volume, shape, and roundness of rock particles. J Geol 40(5):443–451
Zheng J, Hryciw RD (2015) Traditional soil particle sphericity, roundness and surface roughness by computational geometry. Geotechnique 65(6):494–506
Roy N, Vangla P, Frost JD, Latha GM (2021) An enhanced automated particle angularity measurement method. J Test Eval 50(2):20210048
Kjellman W (1951) Testing the shear strength of clay in Sweden. Geotechnique 2(3):225–232
Hubler JF, Athanasopoulos-Zekkos A, Zekkos D (2017) Monotonic, cyclic, and postcyclic simple shear response of three uniform gravels in constant volume conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(9):04017043
Kantesaria N, Sachan A (2021) Cyclic degradation and pore-water pressure response of high-plasticity compacted clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 147(11):04021113
Kang X, Ge L, Chang KT, Kwok AO (2016) Strain-controlled cyclic simple shear tests on sand with radial strain measurements. J Mater Civ Eng 28(4):04015169
Madhusudhan BR, Boominathan A, Banerjee S (2020) Cyclic simple shear response of sand–rubber tire chip mixtures. Int J Geomech 20(9):04020136
Rasouli H, Fatahi B (2022) Liquefaction and post-liquefaction resistance of sand reinforced with recycled geofibre. Geotext Geomembr 50(1):69–81
Zhang X, Russell AR (2020) Assessing liquefaction resistance of fiber-reinforced sand using a new pore pressure ratio. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 146(1):04019125
Acknowledgements
The research presented in this paper is financially supported by the SERB POWER fellowship of the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India. The cyclic simple shear setup used for experiments was procured through the financial support from DST FIST grants. Authors sincerely thank the funding agency for the support.
Funding
Funding for this study was provided through Fund for Improvement of S&T Infrastructure (FIST) Phase 3 and SERB POWER FELLOWSHIP (SPF/2021/000041) of the Department of Science and Technology, India and Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP) of the Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR), Government of India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Latha, G.M., Lakkimsetti, B. Morphological Perspectives to Quantify and Mitigate Liquefaction in Sands. Indian Geotech J 52, 1244–1252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00649-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00649-5