Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Properties of Soils at Large Strains in Roorkee Region Using Field and Laboratory Tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of the dynamic properties of natural soil deposits is important to study the site response, to predict the ground motion and to proceed to seismic zonation. In this paper, dynamic behavior of soils in Roorkee (India) region has been investigated. The study focuses primarily on four sites: Solani Riverbed site, Bhagwanpur site, Bahadrabad site, and Haridwar site. The soil samples were collected from different depths at these four sites using SPT. Soil samples collected were tested in the laboratory for index properties and subjected to bender element tests to measure the maximum shear wave velocity. Dynamic behavior of soil samples collected from all sites was investigated by a series of cyclic triaxial tests. Strain controlled undrained cyclic triaxial tests were carried out as per ASTM D3999 for determination of dynamic soil properties (i.e., shear modulus and damping ratio). The effects of shear strain (in the range 0.03–2%) on shear modulus and damping ratio have been investigated at different depths. The results show that the variation in shear modulus and damping ratio with shear strain is greater for the samples collected from greater depths as compared to the samples collected from shallower depths. Variation in shear modulus and damping ratio with shear strain were compared with the published literature and found to be in good agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IS 1893-Part 1 (2002) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: general provisions and buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

  2. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education Pvt. Ltd., Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  3. Towhata I (2008) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Report no. EERC-70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

  5. Kokusho T (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found 20:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98:667–692

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Takagi Y (1978) Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading. Soils Found 18:39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tatsuoka F, Iwasaki T, Takagi Y (1978) Hysteretic damping of sands under cyclic loading and its relation to shear modulus. Soils Found 18:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sitharam TG, Govindaraju L, Shridharan A (2004) Dynamic properties and liquefaction potential of soils. Curr Sci 87:1354–1362

    Google Scholar 

  10. Govindaraju L (2005) Liquefaction and dynamic properties of sandy soils. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Karnataka, India

  11. Hanumanthrao C, Ramana GV (2006) Dynamic soil properties of Yamuna sand. In: Thirteenth symposium on earthquake engineering, Roorkee, India, pp 430–438

  12. Maheshwari BK, Kale SS, Kaynia AM (2012) Dynamic properties of solani sand at large shear strains: a parametric study. Int J Geotech Eng 6:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanzo G, Vucetic M, Doroudian M (1997) Reduction of shear modulus at small strains in simple shear. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123:1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vucetic M, Lanzo G, Doroudian M (1998) Damping at small strains in cyclic simple shear test. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124:585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. IS 2131 (1981) Method for standard penetration test for soils, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

  16. IS 2720-Part 4 (1983) Methods of test for soils grain size analysis, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

  17. IS 2720-Part 3 (1980) Methods of test for soils-determination of specific gravity, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

  18. IS 2720-Part 14 (1986) Methods of test for soils-determination of density index (relative density) of cohesionless soils, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

  19. ASTM D2487 (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  20. De Alba P, Baldwin K, Janoo V, Roe G, Celikkel B (1984) Elastic wave velocities and liquefaction potential. Geotech Test J ASTM 7:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dyvik R, Madshus C (1985) Laboratory measurement of Gmax using bender elements. Advances in the art of testing soils under cyclic conditions. ASCE, New York, pp 186–196

    Google Scholar 

  22. Viggiani G, Atkinson JH (1995) Interpretation of bender element tests. Geotechnique 45:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kirar B, Maheshwari BK, Muley P (2016) Correlation between shear wave velocity (Vs) and SPT resistance (N) for Roorkee region. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 2(1):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43:351–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ASTM D3999 (2011) Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  26. Maheshwari BK, Kale SS, Kaynia AM (2013) Effects of cyclic loads on dynamic properties of soils in the Ganga basin. Int J Geotech Eng 7:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng ASCE 117:89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stokoe KH, Darendeli MB, Gilbert RB, Menq FY, Choi WK (2004) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. In: NSF/PEER international workshop on uncertainties in nonlinear soil properties and their impact on modeling dynamic soil response, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif

  29. Hanumanthrao C, Ramana GV (2008) Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117:719–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Cyclic Triaxial System used for experiments was procured from the financial assistance received from Seismology Division, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. K. Maheshwari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirar, B., Maheshwari, B.K. Dynamic Properties of Soils at Large Strains in Roorkee Region Using Field and Laboratory Tests. Indian Geotech J 48, 125–141 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0258-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0258-2

Keywords

Navigation