Abstract
Every year, mines produce a large amount of tailings that must properly be managed. For most cases, the tailings are sent by pipes and disposed of in tailings dams. Another more and more common practice is to send a part of the tailings with or without cement binder to underground to fill mine voids (stopes). In civil engineering, a similar practice is the deposition of dredged sludge pumped and confined in a containment structure (dam for most cases). In these cases, an important challenge is to determine the pore water pressure (PWP) associated with the self-weight consolidation of the slurried backfill disposed layer by layer. A solution to the self-weight consolidation of accreting (increase in thickness) deposition of slurried material was first proposed by Gibson in late 1950s. Recently, it has been revisited and applied to mine stopes backfilled with slurried materials. The solution can only be evaluated numerically. In this paper, a truly analytical solution is proposed that is based on the Gibson approach and can be readily used to manually calculate the variation and evolution of the PWP within accreting deposition. The effect of the filling rate, fill height and backfill properties on the variation and evolution of the PWP is analyzed. The solution is proposed for accreting deposition of slurried backfill placed on pervious base. An analytical solution for estimating the PWP within slurried backfill disposed on impervious base is presented in a companion paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gibson RE (1958) The progress of consolidation in a clay layer increasing in thickness with time. Géotech 8(4):171–182
Fox PJ (2000) CS4: A large strain consolidation model for accreting soil layers. In: Geotechnics of high water content materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Pedroni L (2011) Étude expérimentale et numérique de la sédimentation et de la consolidation des boues de traitement des eaux acides. Ph.D. Thesis, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
Li L (2013) Beneficial Experience from teaching and education to research and development. Creat Educ 3(7):148–153
Li L, Alvarez IC, Aubertin JD (2013) Self-weight consolidation of a slurried deposition: tests and interpretation. Int J Geotech Eng 7(2):205–213
El Mkadmi N, Aubertin M, Li L (2014) Effect of drainage and sequential filling on the behavior of backfill in mine stopes. Can Geotech J 51(1):1–15
Ahmed SI, Siddiqua S (2014) A review on consolidation behavior of tailings. Int J Geotech Eng 8(1):102–111
Been K, Sills GC (1981) Self-weight consolidation of soft soils: an experimental and theoretical study. Geotech 31(4):519–535
Pane V, Schiffman RL (1985) A note on sedimentation and consolidation. Géotech 35(1):69–72
Aubertin M, McKenna G (2016) Tailings disposal challenges and prospects for oil sands mining operation. Geo-Chicago, Chicago, pp 359–371, August 14–18
Dobry R, Alvarez L (1967) Seismic failures of Chilean tailings dams. J Soil Mech Found Div 93(6):237–260
Jeyapalan JK, Duncan JM, Seed HB (1983) Investigation of flow failures of tailings dams. J Geotech Eng 109(2):172–189
Vick SG (1990) Planning, design, and analysis of tailings dams. BiTech, Vancouver
Priscu C (1999) Behavior of mine tailings dams under high tailings deposition rates. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal
Azam S, Li Q (2010) Tailings dam failures: a review of the last one hundred years. Geotech News 28(4):50–54
Grice T (1998) Stability of hydraulic backfill barricades. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on mining and backfill, Brisbane, pp 117–120, 14–16 April 1998
Sivakugan N, Rankine K, Rankine R (2006) Permeability of hydraulic fills and barricade bricks. Geotech Geol Eng 24(3):661–673
Sivakugan N, Rankine RM, Rankine KJ, Rankine KS (2006) Geotechnical considerations in mine backfilling in Australia. J Clean Prod 14(12):1168–1175
Sivakugan N, Rankine K, Lovisa J, Hall W (2013) Flow rate computations in hydraulic fill mine stopes. Indian Geotech J 43(3):195–202
Li L, Aubertin M (2009) Horizontal pressure on barricades for backfilled stopes: part I: fully drained conditions. Can Geotech J 46(1):37–46
Li L, Aubertin M (2011) Limit equilibrium analysis for the design of backfilled stope barricades made of waste rock. Can Geotech J 48(11):1713–1728
Yang PY, Li L, Aubertin M, Brochu-Baekelmans M, Ouellet S (2016) Stability analyses of waste rock barricades designed to retain paste backfill. ASCE Int J Geomech 17(3):04016079-1-13
Fahey M, Helinski M, Fourie A (2010) Consolidation in accreting sediments: Gibson’s solution applied to backfilling of mine stopes. Géotech 60(11):877–882
Doherty JP (2015) A numerical study into factors affecting stress and PWP in free draining mine stopes. Comput Geotech 63:331–341
Shahsavari M, Grabinsky M (2014) Cemented paste backfill consolidation with deposition-dependent boundary conditions. In: Proceedings of the 67th Canadian geotechnical conference, Regina
Shahsavari M, Grabinsky M (2015) Mine backfill pore water pressure dissipation: numerical predictions and field measurements. In: Proceedings of 68th Canadian geotechnical conference, Quebec city
Cui L, Fall M (2016) Multiphysics model for consolidation behavior of cemented paste backfill. ASCE Int J Geomech 17(3):04016077-1-23
Gibson RE, Schiffman RL, Whitman RV (1989) On two definitions of excess pore water pressure. Geotech 39(1):169–171
Terzaghi K (1943) Theory of consolidation. Wiley, New York
Holtz RD, Kovacs WD (1981) An introduction to geotechnical engineering. Civil engineering and engineering mechanics series. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1969) Soil mechanics. Wiley, New York, pp 406–422
Zheng J, Li L, Mbonimpa M, Pabst T (2017) An analytical solution of Gibson’s model for estimating the pore water pressure in accreting deposition of slurried material under one-dimensional self-weight consolidation. Part II: impervious base. Under review for Indian Geotech J
Goodwin ET (1949) The evaluation of integrals of the form \(\int_{{{ - }\infty }}^{{{ + }\infty }} {f(x)e^{{ - x^{2} }} } dx\). In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Cambridge University, pp 241–245. April 1949
GEO-SLOPE (2008) Stress-deformation modeling with SIGMA/W 2007. Manual, 3rd edn. GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta
Li L (2014) Analytical solution for determining the required strength of a side-exposed mine backfill containing a plug. Can Geotech J 51(5):508–519
Seneviratne NH, Fahey M, Newson TA, Fujiyasu Y (1996) Numerical modelling of consolidation and evaporation of slurried mine tailings. Int J Numer Anal Method 20(9):647–671
Aubertin M, Bussiere B, Chapuis RP (1996) Hydraulic conductivity of homogenized tailings from hard rock mines. Can Geotech J 33(3):470–482
Thompson BD, Grabinsky MW, Bawden WF, Counter DB (2009) In-situ measurements of cemented paste backfill in long-hole stopes. In: Proceedings of the 3rd CANUS rock mechanics symposium, Toronto
Thompson BD, Bawden WF, Grabinsky MW (2012) In situ measurements of cemented paste backfill at the Cayeli mine. Can Geotech J 49(7):755–772
Li L, Aubertin M, Belem T (2005) Formulation of a three dimensional analytical solution to evaluate stress in backfilled vertical narrow openings. Can Geotech J 42(6):1705–1717 (with Erratum 2006;43(3):338–339)
Li L, Aubertin M (2009) Influence of water pressure on the stress state in stopes with cohesionless backfill. Geotech Geol Eng 27(1):1–11
Li L, Aubertin M (2009) A three-dimensional analysis of the total and effective stresses in submerged backfilled stopes. Geotech Geol Eng 27(4):559–569
Li L (2014) A numerical analysis of the application of wick drains for continuous backfilling in mine backfilled stopes. Geosynthetic mining solutions, pp 369–382
Li L, Yang PY (2015) A numerical evaluation of continuous backfilling in cemented paste backfilled stope through an application of wick drains. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(6):897–904
James M (2009) The use of waste rock inclusions to control the effects of liquefaction in tailings impoundments. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Montreal
Bolduc FL, Aubertin M (2014) Numerical investigation of the influence of waste rock inclusions on tailings consolidation. Can Geotech J 51(9):1021–1032
Wood DM, Doherty JP, Walske ML (2016) Deposition and self-weight consolidation of a shrinking fill. Géotech Lett 6(1):72–76
Helinski M, Fourie A, Fahey M, Ismail M (2007) Assessment of the self-desiccation process in cemented mine backfills. Can Geotech J 44(10):1148–1156
Li L, Aubertin M (2009) Horizontal pressure on barricades for backfilled stopes: part II: submerged conditions. Can Geotech J 46(1):47–56
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC 402318), Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST 2013-0029), Fonds de recherche du Québec—Nature et Technologies (FRQNT 2015-MI-191676, 2017-MI-202116), and industrial partners of the Research Institute on Mines and the Environment (RIME UQAT-Polytechnique; http://rime-irme.ca/).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Sample Calculations of PWP Distribution with Microsoft Excel®
Excel® of Microsoft is used to illustrate the application of the proposed analytical solution to estimate the PWP distribution and evolution in the backfill. The following geometry and material parameters are considered:
-
H = 8 m (pour height)
-
γ = 20 kN/m3
-
c v = 0.1 m2/h
-
m = 0.2 m/h
Figure 12 shows the detailed calculation considering h 0 = 0.5 and n ranging from −55 to 55. Beyond this range, the value of f(y) becomes zero. In this illustrative calculation, the (excess) PWP at several points is calculated with z varying from 0.001 to 8 m. It can be seen that the calculation is simple and easy to do with Excel®.
Appendix 2: Sensitivity Analyses of h 0 and n in the Application of the Proposed Analytical Solution (Eq. 12)
The proposed analytical solution (Eq. 12) contains two parameters h 0 and n. To obtain accurate and reliable results, h 0 should be small enough while the range of n should be large enough. This requires a sensitivity analysis of these two parameters.
To illustrate this sensitivity analysis, the calculation example shown in “Appendix 1” is taken again here. Figure 13 shows the variation of the PWP at z = 6 m obtained by applying Eq. 12 with different h 0 and n. One sees that the results can be considered stable and accurate enough when h 0 reduces to 0.5 and n ranges from −55 to 55.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, J., Li, L., Mbonimpa, M. et al. An Analytical Solution of Gibson’s Model for Estimating the Pore Water Pressures in Accreting Deposition of Slurried Material Under One-Dimensional Self-Weight Consolidation. Part I: Pervious Base. Indian Geotech J 48, 72–83 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0234-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0234-x