Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of Soft Clays by Combined Vacuum Consolidation and Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of stone columns is one of the proven ground improvement techniques for improving the load carrying capacity of soft clay deposits. When the stone columns are installed in soft clays, there is a possibility of intrusion of fine clay particles into the column which reduces the shear strength of the stones resulting in reduction in capacity. Geosynthetic encasement has been adopted by several investigators in order to enhance the load carrying capacity. The capacity of the stone column may be further increased if the undrained shear strength of the surrounding soft soil is improved. In the present study, the possibility of applying the vacuum through encased stone column for improving the strength of soft clay soil is explored through laboratory model tests. It was observed that both stiffness and load carrying capacity of the column increased significantly after the application of vacuum suggesting that the proposed method is a viable ground improvement option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenwood DA (1970) Mechanical improvement of soils below ground surface. Proceedings of the ground engineering conference, Institute of Civil Engineering, London, pp 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell JK, Katti RK (1981) Soil improvement state of the art report. Proceedings of the 10th ICSMFE, Stockholm, pp 261–317

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van Impe WF (1989) Soil improvement techniques and their evolution. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Joulani N (1995) Laboratory and analytical investigation of sleeve reinforced stone columns. A PhD thesis submitted to the Carlton University, Ottawa

  5. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2010) Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 136(1):129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malarvizhi SN, Ilamparuthi K (2004) Load versus settlement of clay bed stabilized with stone and reinforced stone columns. Asian regional conference on geosynthetics, GeoAsia—2004, pp 322–329

  7. Raithel M, Kempfert HG, Kirchner A (2002) Geotextile-encased columns (GEC) for foundation of a dike on very soft soils. Seventh international conference on geosynthetics, Nice, pp 1025–1028

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raithel M, Kirchner A, Shade C, Leusink E (2005) Foundation of constructions on very soft soils with geotextile encased columns—state of the art. Geotechnical special publication, no. 130–142, Geo-Frontiers 2005, pp 1867–1877

  9. Short RD, Prashar Y, Metcalf B (2005) Repairing railway spur roadbed failure using geotextile encased columns. Transportation research board 84th annual meeting compendium of papers, Washington, DC

  10. Brokemper D, Sobolewski J, Alexiew D, Brok C (2006) Design and construction of geotextile encased columns supporting geogrid reinforced landscape embankments: Bastions Vijfwal Houten in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on geosynthetics, Yokohama, pp 889–892

  11. Kjellman W (1952) Consolidation of clay soil by means of atmospheric pressure. Proceedings of the conference on soil stabilization MIT, Cambridge, pp 258–263

    Google Scholar 

  12. IS 2720-Part 15 (1965) Indian standard—methods of test for soils—consolidation test

  13. Barron RA (1948) Consolidation of fine-grained soils by drain wells. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 113(2346):718–724

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sridharan A, Prakash K, Asha SR (1995) Consolidation behaviour of soils. Geotech Test J ASTM 18(1):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hansbo S (1981) Consolidation of fine-grained soils by prefabricated drains. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Stockholm, 15–19 June 1981. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 677–682

  17. Bergado DT, Asakami H, Alfaro MC, Balasubramaniam AS (1991) Smear effects of vertical drains on soft Bangkok Clay. J Geotech Eng ASCE 117(10):1509–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Almeida MSS, Ferreira CAM (1993) Field in situ and laboratory consolidation parameters of very soft clay, predictive soil mechanics. Proceedings of the worth memorial symposium. Thomas Telford, London, pp 73–93

Download references

Acknowledgments

This investigation was performed as part of a research project supported by the Department of Science and Technology of Government of India under sanction number SR/S3/MERC/065/2007, dt. 19-03-2009. The authors are grateful for the financial support to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. G. Robinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, S.G., Robinson, R.G. & Rajagopal, K. Improvement of Soft Clays by Combined Vacuum Consolidation and Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns. Indian Geotech J 44, 59–67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0067-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0067-1

Keywords

Navigation