Skip to main content
Log in

How Well Do We Understand Earthquake Induced Liquefaction?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil liquefaction following large earthquakes is a major contributor to damage to infrastructure and economic loss, as borne out by the earthquakes in Japan and New Zealand in 2011. While extensive research has been conducted on soil liquefaction and our understanding of liquefaction has been advancing, several uncertainties remain. In this paper the basic premise that liquefaction is an ‘undrained’ event will be challenged. Evidence will be offered based on dynamic centrifuge tests to show that rapid settlements occur both in level ground and for shallow foundations. It will also be shown that the definition of liquefaction based on excess pore pressure generation and the subsequent classification of sites as liquefiable and non-liquefiable is not satisfactory, as centrifuge test data shows that both loose and dense sand sites produce significant excess pore pressure. Experimental evidence will be presented that shows that the permeability of sands increases rapidly at very low effective stresses to allow for rapid drainage to take place from liquefied soil. Based on these observations a micro-mechanical view of soil liquefaction that brings together the Critical State view of soil liquefaction and the importance of dynamic loading will be presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear wave velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 126(11):1015–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arulmoli K, Muraleetharan KK, Hossain MM, Fruth LS (1992) VELACS laboratory testing program, soil data report, The Earth Technology Corporation Project No: 90–0562. Irvine, California

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beaty MH, Byrne P (2007) Liquefaction and deformation analysis using a total stress approach. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(8):1059–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan AJ, Madabhushi SPG (2011) Measurement of coefficient of consolidation during reconsolidation of liquefied sand. ASTM Geotech Test J 34(2):64–72

    Google Scholar 

  5. Casagrande A (1936) Characteristics of cohesionless soils affecting the stability of slopes and earth fills. J Boston Soc Civ Eng 1:257–294

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casagrande A (1971) On liquefaction phenomena, reprinted in Geotechnique 21(3):1–21

  7. Castro G (1969) Liquefaction of sands. PhD Thesis, Harvard University; reprinted as Hazard Soil Mechanics Series, No. 8, p l–112

  8. Coelho PALF, Haigh SK, Madabhushi SPG, O’Brien AS (2007) Post-earthquake behaviour of footings when using densification as a liquefaction resistance measure. Ground Improv J 11(1):45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixon SJ, Burke JW (1973) Liquefaction case history. J Soil Mech Found Eng, ASCE 99:921–937

    Google Scholar 

  10. Finn WDL, Yogendrakumar M, Yoshida N, Yoshida H (1986) TARA-3: a program to compute the response of 2-D embankments and soil-structure interaction systems to seismic loading. University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghosh B, Madabhushi SPG (2007) Centrifuge modelling of seismic soil-structure interaction effects. J Nucl Eng Des 237:887–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haigh SK, Eadington J, Madabhushi SPG (2012) Permeability and stiffness of sands at very low effective stresses. Geotechnique 62(1):69–75

    Google Scholar 

  13. Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. J Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 26:115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishihara K, Tatsuoka F, Yasuda S (1974) Undrained deformation and liquefaction of sand under cyclic stresses. Soil Found 15(1):29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishihara K, Li S (1972) Liquefaction of saturated sand in triaxial torsional shear test. Soil Found 12(2):19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishihara K (1985) Stability of natural deposits during earthquake. In: Proceedings of XI international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, San Francisco, vol. 1

  17. Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43(3):351–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey. ISBN 013374943-6

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luong MP (1980) Stress–strain aspects of cohesionless soils under cyclic and transient loading. In: Proceedings of international symposium on soil under cyclic and transient loading, Swansea, p 315–324

  20. Luong MP, Sidaner JF (1981) Undrained behaviour of cohesionless soils under cyclic and transient loading. In: Proceedings of international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics. St Louis, USA

  21. Mitrani H, Madabhushi SPG (2010) Cementation liquefaction remediation for existing building. Ground Improv J 163(G12):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Madabhushi SPG, Haigh SK (2009) Effect of superstructure stiffness on liquefaction-induced failure mechanisms. Int J Geotech Earthquake Eng 1(1):72–88

    Google Scholar 

  23. Madabhushi SPG (2008) Future trends in geotechnical earthquake engineering. In: Sitharam TG, Babu GLS (eds) Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference. Key Note Lecture, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, pp 379–389

  24. Madabhushi SPG, Thusyanthan I, Lubkowski Z, Pecker A (2008) In: Elghazouli A (ed) Shallow Foundations, Seismic design of buildings to Eurocode 8. Spon Press, London. ISBN 978041544762-1

  25. Muhunthan B, Schofield AN (2000) Liquefaction and dam failures. Proc GeoDenver, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35(3):442–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roscoe KH, Schofield AN, Wroth CP (1958) On the yielding of soils. Geotechnique 8:22–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schofield AN (1980) Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations. Geotechnique 25(4):743–761

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Schofield AN (1981) Dynamic and earthquake geotechnical centrifuge modelling. In Proceedings of international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, St Louis, vol. III, pp 1081–1100

  30. Schofield AN, Wroth CP (1968) Critical state soil mechanics. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Seed HB, Lee KL (1966) Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Eng 92:105–134

    Google Scholar 

  32. Seed HB, Lee KL, Idriss IM (1969) Analysis of Sheffield dam failure. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Eng 95:1453–1490

    Google Scholar 

  33. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found, ASCE 97(SM9):1249–1273

    Google Scholar 

  34. Seed HB (1979) Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes. ASCE J Geotech Eng 105(2):201–255

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tokimatsu K, Seed HB (1987) Evaluation of settlements in sand due to earthquake shaking. J Geotech Eng ASCE 113(8):861–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zienkiewicz OC, Chan AHC, Pastor M, Schrefler BA, Shiomi T (1999) Computational geomechanics. Wiley, USA. ISBN 9780471982852

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gopal S. P. Madabhushi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madabhushi, G.S.P., Haigh, S.K. How Well Do We Understand Earthquake Induced Liquefaction?. Indian Geotech J 42, 150–160 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-012-0018-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-012-0018-2

Keywords

Navigation