Introduction

Benzimidazole is an important structural moiety which is present in many natural and synthetic compounds with a variety of interesting biological activities [1], such as anticancer [2], antiarrhythmic [3], antihistaminic [4], antiulcerative [5], antihypertensives, antiviral, antitumor [1], antibacterial, antifungals [6], anti-inflammatory [7], anticonvulsant, antidiabetic properties [8], and antidepressant [9]. The first benzimidazole was described by Hobrecker in 1872, who obtained 2,5 (or 2,6)-dimethylbenzimidazole by the reduction of 2-nitro-4-methylacetanilide [10]. Three years later, Ladenburg procured the identical compound by refluxing 3,4-diaminotoluene with acetic acid [11]. Various methodologies have been used for the synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives, which include conversion of esters using an aluminum reagent [12], the oxidative cyclodehydrogenation of Schiff bases, which is generated from o-phenylenediamine and aldehydes in the presence of several catalysts [13], such as cabalt(II) chloride hexahydrate [14], iodine [15], cetylpyridinium bromide [16], the condensation of o-aryldiamines and aldehyde in refluxing nitrobenzene [17], direct condensation of o-aryldiamines and carboxylic acids [18, 19] or their derivatives [20] in the presence of catalysts, such as polyphosphoric acid [21], ionic liquids [22], p-TsOH [23], SiO2 as solid support [24], microwave irradiation using polyphosphoric acid [25], and intramolecular N-arylations of amidines mediated by potassium hydroxide [26]. Although these reported approaches are significant, but some of them have drawbacks like strict reaction conditions, prolonged reaction period, low yield, expensive catalysts, non-recoverability of the catalysts, use of toxic solvents, and co-occurrence of several side reactions. In this report, we have synthesized a magnetic copper-incorporated fluorapatite (γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp) as higly efficient and green catalyst for the preparation of benzimidazoles derivatives.

Experimental part

Materials and reagents

FeCl2·4H2O, FeCl3·6H2O, ammonia solution (25%), Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, (NH4)2HPO4, o-phenyl diamine, Cu(OAc)2, TBAF, benzaldehydes, and other organic compounds were purchased from commercial sources.

Physical measurements

Melting points were recorded on a Büchi B-545 apparatus in open capillary tubes. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz Bruker DRX-400, DMSO-d 6 as solvent, and TMS as an internal standard. FT-IR spectra were determined on an α-Bruker spectrometer. XRD was carried out on a Philips Analytical PC-APD. The Cu contents of samples were determined by ICP-OES on a Varian 730-ES instrument.

Synthesis of nano-Fe3O4 MNPs

Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized by reported chemical co-precipitation technique of ferric and ferrous ions in alkali solution [27,28,29]. FeCl2·4H2O (0.368 g) and FeCl3·6H2O (1.0 g) were dissolved in deionized water (30 mL) under Ar atmosphere at room temperature. A magnetic stirring bar was added to the flask, and then, an ammonia solution (25%, 10 mL) was added into the mixed Fe(III)/Fe(II) solution with constant stirring at room temperature to increase pH until 11. After 1 h stirring, the black precipitate of Fe3O4 was collected by external magnet and washed with hot water three times.

Synthesis of γ-Fe2O3@FAp MNPs

γ-Fe2O3@FAp nanoparticles were synthesized using reported procedure with minor modifications [17]. The prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticles (0.429 g, 1.85 mmol) were dissolved in 15 mL deionized water and tetra-butyl ammonium fluoride (TBAF) (0.78 g, 3 mmol) was added. The solution was stirred vigorously for 10 min at room temperature. A solution of (NH4)2HPO4 (1.19 g, 9 mmol) and Ca(NO3)2.4H2O (3.54 g, 15 mmol) in 30 mL deionized water was added dropwise over 30 min to the mixture and heated at 80°C for 1 h. Subsequently, it cooled to room temperature and aged overnight. The solution was magnetic decanted and washed with hot deionized water (DW), three times. The product was air-dried and then kept in a furnace at 300°C for 3 h to give a dark-brown powder.

Synthesis of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp MNPs

As shown in Scheme 1, 500 mg γ-Fe2O3@FAp was stirred with 8 mmol Cu(NO3)2·4H2O in 100 mL water at room temperature for a period of 2 h. The obtained slurry was magnetic decanted, washed with DW repeatedly, and dried at 100°C yielding γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp nanoparticles [30].

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Synthesis of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp MNPs

General procedure for the synthesis of benzimidazoles

To a mixture of an aldehyde (1 mmol) and 1,2-phenylenediamine (1.2 mmol) in acetonitrile (5 mL), γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp (0.04 g) was added. The mixture was stirred at 80°C, and the progress of reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the catalyst was separated by an external magnet, washed with CH2Cl2, dried, and reused for a consecutive run under the same reaction conditions. To obtain the desired product, the solvent was evaporated and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The extract was concentrated, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography using ethyl acetate-n-hexane (2:8) as eluent to afford the desired product 3.

2-Phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (Table 2, Entry 1)

m.p. 291–293 °C (lit.28, m.p. 292 °C); FT-IR (KBr): \(\bar{\nu };\) 3408, 3043, 1611, 1590, 1465, 755, 706 cm−1, 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ 12.92 (s, 1H, NH), 8.55 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.68 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.57–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.26–7.24 (m, 2H).

Results and discussion

Preparation and characterization of the catalyst

As described in the experimental section, Fe3O4 NPs were synthesized by a chemical co-precipitation technique of ferric and ferrous ions in alkali solution. Then, Fe3O4 NPs were coated with fluorapatite and was heated in the air at 100°C and then kept in the 300°C furnace for 3 h to give a reddish-brown powder γ-Fe2O3@FAp NPs. Structure of the catalyst was established by XRD, SEM, TEM, ICP, and FT-IR analyses.

Characterization of catalyst

XRD analysis

Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp NPs. The standard XRD data for γ-Fe2O3 and FAp are also depicted in the figure for comparison. Diffraction peaks at around 2θ = 17.4°, 21.4°, 27.7°, 30.4°, 35.3°, 37.5°, 39.6°, 41.6°, and 50.7 are readily distinguished from the XRD pattern. They agree with the cubic structure of maghemite (JCPDS file no. 39-1346).

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD pattern of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp NPs

Diffraction peaks at around 2θ = 12.7°, 19.6°, 25.5°, 26.7°, 29.7°, 30.2°, 32.8°, 33.9, 37.3°, 37.7°, 38.7°, 39.9°, 41.7°, 46.0°, 46.9°, 47.6°, 49.5°, 55.1°, 56.7°, 58.3°, 59.8°, 60.7°, 61.6°, 62.7°, 62.9°, and 66.3° are related to the FAp (JCPDS file no. 71-0880). The average crystallite size was calculated to be 12 nm for γ-Fe2O3 and 25 nm for FAp using the Scherrer equation.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

The synthesized γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp nanoparticles were characterized by SEM (Fig. 2). The SEM image of the catalyst proved its spherical morphology. The average size of synthesized nanoparticles is about 50 nm according to the measurement software.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM image of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

TEM image of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp is presented in Fig. 3. The average size of the nanoparticle was calculated to be 66 nm.

Fig. 3
figure 3

TEM image of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp

Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES)

The ICP-AES was used to exact determination of the copper content of the material synthesized. Analysis confirmed 0.28 mmol Cu per gram of the γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp.

FT-IR

In the FT-IR spectrum of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp, the bending mode of O–P–O which are overlapping with the stretching vibration of Fe–O appeared at 569 and 604 cm−1. The stretching vibrations of P–O bonds appeared at 1040 cm−1. The strong and broad band at 3024 cm−1 corresponds to the O–H groups and adsorbed water. The absence of a medium band at 632 cm−1 (relating to the stretching mode of OH in hydroxyapatite) refuses the presence of hydroxyapatite in the structure (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

FT-IR spectra of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp

Catalytic activity of nano γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp for the synthesis of benzimidazoles

We have examined catalytic activity of nano-γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp for the synthesis of benzimidazoles (Scheme 2). At first, the reaction of o-phenylenediamine with benzaldehyde was chosen as a model reaction to optimize the reaction conditions (Table 1).

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Synthesis of benzimidazoles

Table 1 Optimization of the synthesis of benzimidazolea

We found that in the presence of 0.04 g of nano γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp, the best yield of the product was obtained at 80°C in acetonitrile (Table 1, Entry 2). To show the role of the catalyst, similar reaction in the absence of the catalyst and in the presence of  lower amount of nanomagnetic γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp was also examined. Under these conditions, the reactions led to the formation of the desired product in low yields and long reaction time (Entries 4 and 5).

To establish the generality of this method, the synthesis of various benzimidazoles was studied using different benzaldehydes under optimized reaction conditions (Table 2).

Table 2 γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp catalyzed synthesis of benzimidazoles

The reaction with aliphatic aldehydes such as acetaldehyde and phenylacetaldehyde resulted in a complex mixture due to aldol condensation.

A plausible mechanism for the formation of benzimidazoles catalyzed by γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp is shown in Scheme 3. The Lewis acid properties of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp by coordination with the carbonyl group of aldehyde facilitate nucleophilic addition of 1,2-phenylenediamine to the activated aldehyde I to afford intermediate II. In the next step, the catalyst activates intermediate II followed by intramolecular Michael-type addition to afford the intermediate III. Finally, air oxidation of the intermediate III furnishes the desired products (3a–o).

Scheme 3
scheme 3

Plausible mechanism for one-pot synthesis of benzimidazoles catalyzed by γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp

The reusability of a catalyst determines its lifetime. In this regard, the recyclability of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp was investigated in a model reaction of o-phenylenediamine and benzaldehyde under optimized reaction conditions. The recovered catalyst washed with CH2Cl2, dried at room temperature, and reused for a similar reaction. The result showed that after 12 successive runs, catalytic activity of the catalyst was retained without any loss of activity (led to 83% average yield).

To examine the efficiency of the present method for the synthesis of benzimidazoles, preparation of compound 3a was compared with some of those reported in the literature (Table 3). It is evident from the results that the present protocol shows a very good comparability with previously reported data in terms of reaction times, yield, and reusability of the catalyst.

Table 3 Comparison of our results with previously reported data for the synthesis of 3a

Conclusions

We have introduced the utilization of γ-Fe2O3@CuFAp, as a recyclable nanomagnetic catalyst, for green and efficient synthesis of aryl-substituted benzimidazoles through the condensation of 1,2-phenylenediamines with various aryl aldehydes. This method offers some advantages in terms of simplicity of performance, short reaction times, excellent yields, and mild condition. The current protocol could serve as a valuable alternative to known synthetic methods of benzimidazoles and is amenable for iterative combinatorial library generation.