Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi Objective Optimization of Yarn Quality and Fibre Quality Using Evolutionary Algorithm

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series E Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quality and cost of resulting yarn play a significant role to determine its end application. The challenging task of any spinner lies in producing a good quality yarn with added cost benefit. The present work does a multi-objective optimization on two objectives, viz. maximization of cotton yarn strength and minimization of raw material quality. The first objective function has been formulated based on the artificial neural network input–output relation between cotton fibre properties and yarn strength. The second objective function is formulated with the well known regression equation of spinning consistency index. It is obvious that these two objectives are conflicting in nature i.e. not a single combination of cotton fibre parameters does exist which produce maximum yarn strength and minimum cotton fibre quality simultaneously. Therefore, it has several optimal solutions from which a trade-off is needed depending upon the requirement of user. In this work, the optimal solutions are obtained with an elitist multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). These optimum solutions may lead to the efficient exploitation of raw materials to produce better quality yarns at low costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Deb, Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms (Wiley, Chichester, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Sette, L.V. Langenhove, Optimising the fibre-to-yarn production process: finding a blend of fibre qualities to create an optimal price/quality yarn. Autex Res. J. 2, 57 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. A. Skordos, M.P.F. Sutcliffe, J.W. Klintworth, P. Adolfsson, in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference SAMPE EUROPE, March, Paris, France (2006)

  4. A. Majumdar, S.P. Singh, A. Ghosh, Modelling, optimization and decision making techniques in designing of functional clothing. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 36, 398 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Majumdar, V.K. Kothari, A. Mondal, P. Hatua, Optimization of woven fabric parameters for ultraviolet radiation protection, in Proceedings of the 39th Textile Research Symposium, New Delhi, December 2010

  6. M.C. Ramesh, R. Rajamanickam, S. Jayaraman, The prediction of yarn tensile properties by using artificial neural networks. J. Text. Inst. 86, 459 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L.V. Langenhove, S. Sette, The use of neural nets to predict yarn tensile properties. J. Text. Inst. 87, 400 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Guha, R. Chattopadhyay, Jayadeva, predicting yarn tenacity: a comparison of mechanistic, statistical and neural network models. J. Text. Inst. 92, 139 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Majumdar, P.K. Majumdar, B. Sarkar, Prediction of single yarn tenacity of ring and rotor spun yarns from the HVI results using artificial neural networks. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 29, 157 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.P. Chellamani, V. Thanabal, A. Basu, T.V. Ratnam, Relationship between USDA calibration cotton properties and yarn strength/unevenness. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 29, 12 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Haykin, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 2nd edn. (Pearson Education, Singapore, 2004), p. 161

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.M. Zurada, Introduction to Artificial Neural Systems (Jaico Publishing House, Mumbai, 2003), p. 175

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.H. Holland, Adaptation In Natural And Artificial Systems (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning Reading (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Srinvas, K. Deb, Multi-objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Evol. Comput. J. 2, 221 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 6, 182 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anindya Ghosh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghosh, A., Das, S. & Banerjee, D. Multi Objective Optimization of Yarn Quality and Fibre Quality Using Evolutionary Algorithm. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. E 94, 15–21 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40034-013-0015-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40034-013-0015-8

Keywords

Navigation