Skip to main content
Log in

Safety Risk Assessment and Risk Prediction in Underground Coal Mines Using Machine Learning Techniques

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk management focusses on the identification of uncertainties and its impacts associated with various functional activities carried out to achieve various mandates, goals and objectives of the company. To assess the risk level (as ‘very high’, ‘high’, ‘medium’ or ‘low’), consequences and likelihood analysis are to be done based on the judgmental knowledge and experiences of the participants. The traditional methods of risk classification are time consuming and laborious if the inputs are voluminous. In this study, the hazards occurring in different sections of underground mining have been categorized, and associated risks have been predicted using different machine learning modelling techniques, namely KNN, SVM, logistic regression and decision tree by keeping the prescribed guidelines of the DGMS intact and using it as the basic building blocks to model the machine learning classification models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data are collected from a mine and are available with the corresponding author. It will be shared if needed by the reviewers, but cannot be published.

Code availability

Full python code available with the corresponding author and can be shared if needed by the reviewers, but cannot be published.

References

  1. L. Khandu (2020) Safety risk assessment and management in mining industry. B.Tech. Thesis, NIT, Rourkela, Spring, 2020

  2. S.J. Butani, Relative risk analysis of injuries in coal mining by age and experience at present company. J. Occup. Accid. 10(3), 209–216 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Allanson (2002) Strata control in underground coal mines: A risk management perspective,Proceedings of the 2002 Coal Operators' Conference, Mining Engineering, University of Wollongong,135–153

  4. J. Joy, Occupational safety risk management in Australian mining. Occup. Med. 54(5), 311–315 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Ionica, E. Edelhauser, S. Irimie (2007) Quality risk management–An integrated approach in the mining industry. Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering, Annals of the Oradea University, Volume VI (XVI), 1941–1946

  6. D. Komljenovic, W.A. Groves, V.J. Kecojevic, Injuries in US mining operations–A preliminary risk analysis. Saf. Sci. 46(5), 792–801 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Z.A. Md-Nor, V. Kecojevic, D. Komijenivic, W. Groves, Risk assessment for haul truck-related fatalities in mining. Min. Eng. 60(3), 43–49 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.M. Patterson, S.A. Shappell, Operator error and system deficiencies: analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42(4), 1379–1385 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Bahn, Workplace hazard identification and management: the case of an underground mining operation. Saf. Sci. 57, 129–137 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Juuso, E. K. & Koistinen, A. H. (2015).Decision support for risk management in mining industry, MMEA WP5. 2.7, Mining Deliverable D5. 2.7. 3

  11. D.P. Tripathy, C.K. Ala, Risk assessment in underground coal mines using fuzzy logic in the presence of uncertainty. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D 99(1), 157–163 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Abbasi, Defining safety hazards & risks in mining industry: a case-study in United States. Asian J. Appl. Sci. Technol. (AJAST) 2(2), 1071–1078 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Vlachos (2018). Certifiable risk management & business continuity approach in mining industry. In Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering (MCM'18), DOI (Vol. 10).MMME 108

  14. S. Sarkar, S. Vinay, J. Maiti (2016). Text mining based safety risk assessment and prediction of occupational accidents in a steel plant. In 2016 International Conference on Computational Techniques in Information and Communication Technologies (ICCTICT), IEEE, 439–444

  15. S. Sarkar, S. Vinay, R. Raj, J. Maiti, P. Mitra, Application of optimized machine learning techniques for prediction of occupational accidents. Comput. Oper. Res. 106, 210–224 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Xie, G. Fu, Y. Xue, Z. Zhao, P. Chen, B. Lu, S. Jiang, Risk prediction and factors risk analysis based on IFOA-GRNN and apriori algorithms: application of artificial intelligence in accident prevention. Process Safety Environ. Protec. 122, 169–184 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E.Y. Boateng, J. Otoo, D. Abaye, Basic tenets of classification algorithms K-nearest-neighbor, support vector machine, random forest and neural network: a review. J. Data Anal. Inform. Process 8(4), 341–357 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P.C. Sen, M. Hajra, M. Ghosh, Supervised classification algorithms in machine learning: A survey and review, in Emerging Technology in Modelling and Graphics. (Springer, Singapore, 2020), pp. 99–111

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Boutaba, M.A. Salahuddin, N. Limam, S. Ayoubi, N. Shahriar, F. Estrada-Solano, O.M. Caicedo, A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 9(1), 1–99 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Xi, H. Gu, H. Baniasadi, D. Raftery, Statistical Analysis and Modeling of Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics Data (Humana Press, New York, Methods Mol. Biol., 2014), pp. 333–353

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Agresti, C.R. Mehta, N.R. Patel, Exact inference for contingency tables with ordered categories. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85(410), 453–458 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Sasaki, The Truth of the F-Measure (University of Manchester, Technical report, School of Computer Science, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. Vovk (2015) The fundamental nature of the log loss function. In Fields of Logic and Computation II, Cham, Springer, ,307–31.

Download references

Funding

No Funding Sources for the completion of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satyajeet Parida.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tripathy, D.P., Parida, S. & Khandu, L. Safety Risk Assessment and Risk Prediction in Underground Coal Mines Using Machine Learning Techniques. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D 102, 495–504 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-021-00290-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-021-00290-1

Keywords

Navigation