Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integration of Renewable Energy based Trigeneration Cycle: A Review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gas turbine (GT), organic Rankine cycle and Kalina cycle are foundation of most prominent technologies for the revival of heat which is wasted in terms of generation of power. A significant phase for improvising efficiency of a renewable energy source would be curated through an amalgamation including cooling, heating and power cycle integrated to a renewable-based trigeneration cycle, which has been formally presented in this paper. On this relation geothermal energy, solar energy and biomass are proposed for viable supply of renewable energy. An ejector refrigeration cycle, Li/Br refrigeration cycle and absorption refrigeration cycle are incorporated to constitute the cooling cycle. Solar tower systems, parabolic trough collector system and linear Fresnel reflector systems are the three principal concentrating solar power technologies that can be effectively utilized as assimilation of solar and GT cogeneration systems. Performance of the integration of solar-, biomass- and geothermal-based trigeneration cycles can be assessed by running a simulation analysis in various simulation software such as THERMOFLEX with PEACE software, DYnamic Energy Systems OPTimizer tools, Specific Exergy Costing, Cycle Tempo, Aspen-HYSYS software, ECLIPSE process simulation package and Engineering Equation Solver software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GT:

Gas turbine

KC:

Kalina cycle

CSP:

Concentrating solar power

PTC:

Parabolic trough collector

EES:

Engineering equation solver

CCHP:

Combined cooling, heating and power

SPECO:

Specific exergy costing

DYSOPT:

DYnamic energy systems optimizer

SOFC:

Solid oxide fuel cell

ISGCP:

Integrated solar gas turbine cogeneration power plant

RORC:

Regenerative organic Rankine cycle

ISCCS:

Integrated solar combined cycle systems

SEGS:

Solar electric generating systems

SRCA:

Sport-Recreation Center Ajdinovici

VCRC:

Vapor compression refrigeration cycle

BCHP:

Building cooling heating and power

LEC:

Levelized energy cost

GEF:

Global environment facility

ORC:

Organic Rankine cycle

ERC:

Ejector refrigeration cycle

ST:

Solar tower

LFR:

Linear Fresnel reflector

CHP:

Combined heat and power

CHRP:

Combined heating, refrigeration and power

DWH:

Domestic water heater

HRSG:

Heat recovery steam generator

CC:

Combustion chamber

AC:

Air compressor

References

  1. J.D. Spelling, A thesis on, Hybrid Solar Gas Turbine Power Plant—A Thermoeconomic Analysis. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Industrial Engineering and Management Department of Energy Technology, Sweden (2013)

  2. E.M.A. Mokheimer, Y.N. Dabwan, Md.A. Habib, Optimal integration of solar energy with fossil fuel gas turbine cogeneration plants using three different CSP technologies in Saudi Arabia. Appl. Energy 185, 1268–1280 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Bellos, C. Tzivanidis, K.A. Antonopoulos, Parametric analysis and optimization of a solar assisted gas turbine. Energy Convers. Manag. 139, 151–165 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. F.A. Al-Sulaiman, F. Hamdullahpur, I. Dincer, Performance assessment of a novel system using parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power production. Renew. Energy 48, 161–172 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. F.A. Al-Sulaiman, F. Hamdullahpur, Exergy modeling of a new solar driven trigeneration system. Sol. Energy 85, 2228–2243 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Nami, E. Akrami, Analysis of a gas turbine-based hybrid system by utilizing energy, exergy and exergoeconomic methodologies for steam, power and hydrogen Production. Energy Convers. Manag. 143, 326–337 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Baghernejad, M. Yaghoubi, K. Jafarpur, Exergoeconomic optimization and environmental analysis of a novel solar-trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose. Sol. Energy 134, 165–179 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Wang, Y. Dai, L. Gao, M. Shaolin, A new combined cooling, heating and power system driven by solar energy. Renew. Energy 34, 2780–2788 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Anvari, H. Taghavifar, A. Parvishi, Thermo- economical consideration of Regenerative organic Rankine cycle coupling with the absorption chiller systems incorporated in the trigeneration system. Energy Convers. Manag. 148, 317–329 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.K. Pandey, V.V. Tyagi, J.A. Selvaraj, N.A. Rahim, S.K. Tyagi, Recent advances in solar photovoltaic systems for emerging trends and advanced applications. Renew. Sustain. Eenergy Rev. 53, 859–884 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Rashidi, P. Ifaei, E.J. Iman, A. Ataei, C.K. Yoo, Thermodynamic and economic studies of two new high efficient power-cooling cogeneration systems based on Kalina and absorption refrigeration cycles. Energy Convers. Manag. 127, 170–186 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Wang, Z. Yan, E. Zhou, Y. Dai, Parametric analysis and optimization of a Kalina cycle driven by solar energy. Appl. Therm. Eng. 50, 408–415 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Modi, F. Haglind, Performance analysis of a Kalina cycle for a central receiver solar thermal power plant with direct steam generation. Appl. Therm. Eng. 65, 201–208 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Ashouri, A. Vandani, K. Mohammadi, M. Mehrpooya, Md.H. Ahmadi, A. Abdollahpour, Techno-economic assessment of a Kalina cycle driven by a parabolic Trough solar collector. Energy Convers. Manag. 105, 1328–1339 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. O.K. Singh, S.C. Kaushik, Thermoeconomic evaluation and optimization of a Brayton–Rankine–Kalina combined triple power cycle. Energy Convers. Manag. 71, 32–42 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Wang, Q. Tang, M. Wang, X. Feng, Thermodynamic performance comparison between ORC and Kalina cycles for multi-stream waste heat recovery. Energy Convers. Manag. 143, 482–492 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Semprini, D. Sánchez, P.A. De, Performance analysis of a micro gas turbine and solar dish integrated system under different solar-only and hybrid operating conditions. Sol. Energy 132, 279–293 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Franchini, A. Perdichizzi, S. Ravelli, G. Barigozzi, A comparative study between parabolic trough and solar tower technologies in solar rankine cycle and integrated solar combined cycle plants. Sol. Energy 98(C), 302–314 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.C. Ferreira, M.L. Nunes, J.C.F. Teixeira, L.A.S.B. Martins, S.F.C.F. Teixeira, Thermodynamic and economic optimization of a solar-powered Stirling engine for micro-cogeneration purposes. Energy 111, 1–17 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Huang, Y.D. Wang, S. Rezvani, D.R. Wright McIlveen, M. Anderson, N.J. Hewitt, Biomass fuelled trigeneration system in selected buildings. Energy Convers. Manag. 52, 2448–2454 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Shelar, G.N. Kulkarni, Off grid diesel engine-based trigeneration systems with thermal storage and compression chiller for enhanced performance. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 36, 1–15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Magalhães, J. Martins, A. Joyce, L. Coelho, N. Tavares, R. Pereira, Solar trigeneration system model for off-grid residential applications. Int. Feder. Inf. Process. 375–384 (2012)

  23. Y.-Y. Jing, H. Bai, J. Wang, L. Liu, Life cycle assessment of a solar combined cooling heating and power system in different operation strategies. Appl. Energy 92, 843–853 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. F.A. Al-Sulaiman, F. Hamdullahpur, I. Dincer, Performance comparison of three trigeneration systems using organic rankine cycles. Energy 36, 5741–5754 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. E.T. Calva, M.P. Nunez, M.A.R. Toral, Thermal integration of trigeneration systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 25, 973–984 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Baghernejad, M. Yaghoubi, K. Jafarpur, Exergoeconomic comparison of three novel trigeneration systems using SOFC, biomass and solar energies. Appl. Therm. Eng. 104, 534–555 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. Khalid, I. Dincer, M.A. Rosen, Thermoeconomic analysis of a solar-biomass integrated multigeneration system for a community. Appl. Therm. Eng. 120, 645–653 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Zhao, P. Zhao, Y. Dai, Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a solar-driven regenerative organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based on flat-plate solar collectors. Appl. Therm. Eng. 50, 816–825 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Ogriseck, Integration of Kalina cycle in a combined heat and power plant, a case study. Appl. Therm. Eng. 29, 2843–2848 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. M.K. Gupta, S.C. Kaushik, K.R. Ranjan, N.L. Panwar, V.S. Reddy, S.K. Tyagi, Thermodynamic performance evaluation of solar and other thermal power generation systems: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50, 567–582 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. V. Zare, A comparative thermodynamic analysis of two tri-generation systems utilizing low-grade geothermal energy. Energy Convers. Manag. 118, 264–274 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. L. Hongqiang, Z. Xiaofeng, L. Lifang, Z. Rong, Z. Guoqiang, Exergy and environmental assessments of a novel trigeneration system taking biomass and solar energy as co-feeds. Appl. Therm. Eng. 104, 697–706 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. D.F. Dominkovic, B. Cosic, Z.B. Medic, N. Duic, A hybrid optimization model of biomass trigeneration system combined with pit thermal energy storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 104, 90–99 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Dersch, M. Geyer, U. Herrmann, S.A. Jones, B. Kelly, R. Kistner, W. Ortmanns, P. Robert, P. Henry, Trough integration into power plants—a study on the performance and economy of integrated solar combined cycle system. Energy 29, 947–959 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. M.J. Montes, A. Rovira, M. Munoz, J.M. Martinez-Vall, Performance analysis of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle using Direct Steam Generation in parabolic trough collectors. Appl. Energy 88, 3228–3238 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. E.M.A. Mokheimer, Y.N. Dabwan, Md.A. Habib, S.M.A. Said, F.A. Al-Sulaiman, Development and assessment of integrating parabolic trough collectors with steam generation side of gas turbine cogeneration systems in Saudi Arabia. Appl. Energy 141, 131–142 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. P. Schwarzbozl, R. Buck, C. Sugarmen, A. Ring, M.J.M. Crespo, P. Altwegg, J. Enrile, Solar gas turbine systems: design, cost and perspectives. Sol. Energy 80, 1231–1240 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. E.J. Sheu, A. Mitsos, A.A. Eter, E.M.A. Mokheimer, M.A. Habib, A. Al-Qutub, A review of hybrid solar–fossil fuel power generation systems and performance metrics. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 134, 1–17 (2012)

  39. M. Horn, H. Fuhring, J. Rheinlander, Economic analysis of integrated solar combined cycle power plants. A sample case: the economic feasibility of an ISCCS power plant in Egypt. Energy 29, 935–945 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. E. Açikkalp, Md.H. Ahmadi, Performance evaluation of PEM fuel cell-chemical heat pump—absorption refrigerator hybrid system. Int. J. Amb. Energy (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2020.1712238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. F. Mašic, A. Merzic, A. Bosovic, M. Music, A Microgrid Concept for Thermal and Electrical Energy Supply of a Sport Recreation Center: case study S.R.C.A. IETE J. Res. 1–13 (2020)

  42. A. S. Canbolat, A.H. Bademlioglu, O. Kaynakli, A modeling of electricity generation by using geothermal assisted organic Rankine cycle with internal heat recovery. Energy Sour. Part A Recov. Utiliz. Environ. Effects 41, 1–17 (2019)

  43. M.M. Naeimi, Md.E. Yazdi, G.R. Salehi, Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and exergo environmental analysis and optimization of a solar hybrid CCHP system. Energy Sour. Part A Recov. Utiliz. Environ. Effects 41, 1–21 (2019)

  44. H. Bagheri, A. Azimi, Thermodynamic analysis of a CCHP system for a building using solar collectors and PV panels in two different climate zones in Iran. Energy Sour. Part A Recov. Utiliz. Environ. Effects 42, 1–20 (2020)

  45. E.Ö. Küçük, M. Kiliç, Comparative performance analysis of ORC-VCRC combined systems based on refrigerant selection. Sci. Technol. Built Environ. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2020.1778400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. M. Al-Ali, I. Dincer, Performance assessment of integrated energy systems for HVAC applications. Int. J. Green Energy (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.970271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. R. Asadi, E. Assareh, R. Moltames, M. Olazar, M. Nedaei, F. Parvaz, Optimisation of combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) systems incorporating the solar and geothermal energy: a review study. Int. J. Amb. Energy (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2019.1630299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. F.A. Boyaghchi, M. Chavoshi, V. Sabeti, Optimization of a novel combined cooling, heating and power cycle driven by geothermal and solar energies using the water/CuO (copper oxide) nanofluid. Energy 91, 685–699 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  49. E. Bellos, C. Tzivanidis, Evaluation of a solar driven trigeneration system with conventional and new criteria. Int. J. Sustain. Energy (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2018.1494173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. N. Phuangpornpitak, S. Tia, Opportunities and challenges of integrating renewable energy in smart grid system. Energy Procedia 34, 282–290 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  51. A.K. Alsaif, Challenges and benefits of integrating the renewable energy technologies into the AC power system grid. Am. J. Eng. Res. 6, 95–100 (2017)

  52. A. Avila-Marin, Volumetric receivers in solar thermal power plants with central receiver system technology: a review. Sol. Energy 85, 891–910 (2011)

  53. Y. Huang, Y.D. Wang, S. Rezvani, D.R. McIlveen-Wright, M. Anderson, N.J. Hewitt, Biomass fuelled trigeneration system in selected buildings. Energy Convers. Manag. 52, 2448–2454 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  54. S. Karellas, K. Braimakis, Energy–exergy analysis and economic investigation of a cogeneration and trigeneration ORC–VCC hybrid system utilizing biomass fuel and solar power. Energy Convers. Manag. 107, 103–113 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  55. M. Jradi, S. Riffat, Tri-generation systems: Energy policies, prime movers, cooling technologies, configurations and operation strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 32, 396–415 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  56. D.B.E. Santo, Energy and exergy efficiency of a building internal combustion engine Trigeneration system under two different operational strategies. Energy Build. 53, 28–38 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  57. D. Raghulnath, K. Saravanan, J. Mahendran, M.R. Kumar, P. Lakshmanan, Analysis and optimization of organic Rankine cycle for IC engine waste heat recovery system. Mater. Today Proc. 21, 2214–7853 (2019).

  58. H. Ghaebi, T. Parikhani, H. Rostamzadeh, B. Farhang, Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a novel combined cooling and power (CCP) cycle by integrating of ejector refrigeration and Kalina cycles. Energy (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. A. Lazzaretto, G. Tsatsaronis, SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy 31, 1257–1289 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, M., Chandra, H., Banchhor, R. et al. Integration of Renewable Energy based Trigeneration Cycle: A Review. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 102, 851–865 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-021-00690-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-021-00690-y

Keywords

Navigation