Abstract
Gas turbine (GT), organic Rankine cycle and Kalina cycle are foundation of most prominent technologies for the revival of heat which is wasted in terms of generation of power. A significant phase for improvising efficiency of a renewable energy source would be curated through an amalgamation including cooling, heating and power cycle integrated to a renewable-based trigeneration cycle, which has been formally presented in this paper. On this relation geothermal energy, solar energy and biomass are proposed for viable supply of renewable energy. An ejector refrigeration cycle, Li/Br refrigeration cycle and absorption refrigeration cycle are incorporated to constitute the cooling cycle. Solar tower systems, parabolic trough collector system and linear Fresnel reflector systems are the three principal concentrating solar power technologies that can be effectively utilized as assimilation of solar and GT cogeneration systems. Performance of the integration of solar-, biomass- and geothermal-based trigeneration cycles can be assessed by running a simulation analysis in various simulation software such as THERMOFLEX with PEACE software, DYnamic Energy Systems OPTimizer tools, Specific Exergy Costing, Cycle Tempo, Aspen-HYSYS software, ECLIPSE process simulation package and Engineering Equation Solver software.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GT:
-
Gas turbine
- KC:
-
Kalina cycle
- CSP:
-
Concentrating solar power
- PTC:
-
Parabolic trough collector
- EES:
-
Engineering equation solver
- CCHP:
-
Combined cooling, heating and power
- SPECO:
-
Specific exergy costing
- DYSOPT:
-
DYnamic energy systems optimizer
- SOFC:
-
Solid oxide fuel cell
- ISGCP:
-
Integrated solar gas turbine cogeneration power plant
- RORC:
-
Regenerative organic Rankine cycle
- ISCCS:
-
Integrated solar combined cycle systems
- SEGS:
-
Solar electric generating systems
- SRCA:
-
Sport-Recreation Center Ajdinovici
- VCRC:
-
Vapor compression refrigeration cycle
- BCHP:
-
Building cooling heating and power
- LEC:
-
Levelized energy cost
- GEF:
-
Global environment facility
- ORC:
-
Organic Rankine cycle
- ERC:
-
Ejector refrigeration cycle
- ST:
-
Solar tower
- LFR:
-
Linear Fresnel reflector
- CHP:
-
Combined heat and power
- CHRP:
-
Combined heating, refrigeration and power
- DWH:
-
Domestic water heater
- HRSG:
-
Heat recovery steam generator
- CC:
-
Combustion chamber
- AC:
-
Air compressor
References
J.D. Spelling, A thesis on, Hybrid Solar Gas Turbine Power Plant—A Thermoeconomic Analysis. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Industrial Engineering and Management Department of Energy Technology, Sweden (2013)
E.M.A. Mokheimer, Y.N. Dabwan, Md.A. Habib, Optimal integration of solar energy with fossil fuel gas turbine cogeneration plants using three different CSP technologies in Saudi Arabia. Appl. Energy 185, 1268–1280 (2017)
E. Bellos, C. Tzivanidis, K.A. Antonopoulos, Parametric analysis and optimization of a solar assisted gas turbine. Energy Convers. Manag. 139, 151–165 (2017)
F.A. Al-Sulaiman, F. Hamdullahpur, I. Dincer, Performance assessment of a novel system using parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power production. Renew. Energy 48, 161–172 (2012)
F.A. Al-Sulaiman, F. Hamdullahpur, Exergy modeling of a new solar driven trigeneration system. Sol. Energy 85, 2228–2243 (2011)
H. Nami, E. Akrami, Analysis of a gas turbine-based hybrid system by utilizing energy, exergy and exergoeconomic methodologies for steam, power and hydrogen Production. Energy Convers. Manag. 143, 326–337 (2017)
A. Baghernejad, M. Yaghoubi, K. Jafarpur, Exergoeconomic optimization and environmental analysis of a novel solar-trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose. Sol. Energy 134, 165–179 (2016)
J. Wang, Y. Dai, L. Gao, M. Shaolin, A new combined cooling, heating and power system driven by solar energy. Renew. Energy 34, 2780–2788 (2009)
S. Anvari, H. Taghavifar, A. Parvishi, Thermo- economical consideration of Regenerative organic Rankine cycle coupling with the absorption chiller systems incorporated in the trigeneration system. Energy Convers. Manag. 148, 317–329 (2017)
A.K. Pandey, V.V. Tyagi, J.A. Selvaraj, N.A. Rahim, S.K. Tyagi, Recent advances in solar photovoltaic systems for emerging trends and advanced applications. Renew. Sustain. Eenergy Rev. 53, 859–884 (2016)
J. Rashidi, P. Ifaei, E.J. Iman, A. Ataei, C.K. Yoo, Thermodynamic and economic studies of two new high efficient power-cooling cogeneration systems based on Kalina and absorption refrigeration cycles. Energy Convers. Manag. 127, 170–186 (2016)
J. Wang, Z. Yan, E. Zhou, Y. Dai, Parametric analysis and optimization of a Kalina cycle driven by solar energy. Appl. Therm. Eng. 50, 408–415 (2013)
A. Modi, F. Haglind, Performance analysis of a Kalina cycle for a central receiver solar thermal power plant with direct steam generation. Appl. Therm. Eng. 65, 201–208 (2014)
M. Ashouri, A. Vandani, K. Mohammadi, M. Mehrpooya, Md.H. Ahmadi, A. Abdollahpour, Techno-economic assessment of a Kalina cycle driven by a parabolic Trough solar collector. Energy Convers. Manag. 105, 1328–1339 (2015)
O.K. Singh, S.C. Kaushik, Thermoeconomic evaluation and optimization of a Brayton–Rankine–Kalina combined triple power cycle. Energy Convers. Manag. 71, 32–42 (2013)
Y. Wang, Q. Tang, M. Wang, X. Feng, Thermodynamic performance comparison between ORC and Kalina cycles for multi-stream waste heat recovery. Energy Convers. Manag. 143, 482–492 (2017)
S. Semprini, D. Sánchez, P.A. De, Performance analysis of a micro gas turbine and solar dish integrated system under different solar-only and hybrid operating conditions. Sol. Energy 132, 279–293 (2016)
G. Franchini, A. Perdichizzi, S. Ravelli, G. Barigozzi, A comparative study between parabolic trough and solar tower technologies in solar rankine cycle and integrated solar combined cycle plants. Sol. Energy 98(C), 302–314 (2013)
A.C. Ferreira, M.L. Nunes, J.C.F. Teixeira, L.A.S.B. Martins, S.F.C.F. Teixeira, Thermodynamic and economic optimization of a solar-powered Stirling engine for micro-cogeneration purposes. Energy 111, 1–17 (2016)
Y. Huang, Y.D. Wang, S. Rezvani, D.R. Wright McIlveen, M. Anderson, N.J. Hewitt, Biomass fuelled trigeneration system in selected buildings. Energy Convers. Manag. 52, 2448–2454 (2011)
M. Shelar, G.N. Kulkarni, Off grid diesel engine-based trigeneration systems with thermal storage and compression chiller for enhanced performance. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 36, 1–15 (2015)
P. Magalhães, J. Martins, A. Joyce, L. Coelho, N. Tavares, R. Pereira, Solar trigeneration system model for off-grid residential applications. Int. Feder. Inf. Process. 375–384 (2012)
Y.-Y. Jing, H. Bai, J. Wang, L. Liu, Life cycle assessment of a solar combined cooling heating and power system in different operation strategies. Appl. Energy 92, 843–853 (2012)
F.A. Al-Sulaiman, F. Hamdullahpur, I. Dincer, Performance comparison of three trigeneration systems using organic rankine cycles. Energy 36, 5741–5754 (2011)
E.T. Calva, M.P. Nunez, M.A.R. Toral, Thermal integration of trigeneration systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 25, 973–984 (2005)
A. Baghernejad, M. Yaghoubi, K. Jafarpur, Exergoeconomic comparison of three novel trigeneration systems using SOFC, biomass and solar energies. Appl. Therm. Eng. 104, 534–555 (2016)
F. Khalid, I. Dincer, M.A. Rosen, Thermoeconomic analysis of a solar-biomass integrated multigeneration system for a community. Appl. Therm. Eng. 120, 645–653 (2017)
M. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Zhao, P. Zhao, Y. Dai, Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a solar-driven regenerative organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based on flat-plate solar collectors. Appl. Therm. Eng. 50, 816–825 (2013)
S. Ogriseck, Integration of Kalina cycle in a combined heat and power plant, a case study. Appl. Therm. Eng. 29, 2843–2848 (2009)
M.K. Gupta, S.C. Kaushik, K.R. Ranjan, N.L. Panwar, V.S. Reddy, S.K. Tyagi, Thermodynamic performance evaluation of solar and other thermal power generation systems: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50, 567–582 (2015)
V. Zare, A comparative thermodynamic analysis of two tri-generation systems utilizing low-grade geothermal energy. Energy Convers. Manag. 118, 264–274 (2016)
L. Hongqiang, Z. Xiaofeng, L. Lifang, Z. Rong, Z. Guoqiang, Exergy and environmental assessments of a novel trigeneration system taking biomass and solar energy as co-feeds. Appl. Therm. Eng. 104, 697–706 (2016)
D.F. Dominkovic, B. Cosic, Z.B. Medic, N. Duic, A hybrid optimization model of biomass trigeneration system combined with pit thermal energy storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 104, 90–99 (2015)
J. Dersch, M. Geyer, U. Herrmann, S.A. Jones, B. Kelly, R. Kistner, W. Ortmanns, P. Robert, P. Henry, Trough integration into power plants—a study on the performance and economy of integrated solar combined cycle system. Energy 29, 947–959 (2004)
M.J. Montes, A. Rovira, M. Munoz, J.M. Martinez-Vall, Performance analysis of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle using Direct Steam Generation in parabolic trough collectors. Appl. Energy 88, 3228–3238 (2011)
E.M.A. Mokheimer, Y.N. Dabwan, Md.A. Habib, S.M.A. Said, F.A. Al-Sulaiman, Development and assessment of integrating parabolic trough collectors with steam generation side of gas turbine cogeneration systems in Saudi Arabia. Appl. Energy 141, 131–142 (2015)
P. Schwarzbozl, R. Buck, C. Sugarmen, A. Ring, M.J.M. Crespo, P. Altwegg, J. Enrile, Solar gas turbine systems: design, cost and perspectives. Sol. Energy 80, 1231–1240 (2006)
E.J. Sheu, A. Mitsos, A.A. Eter, E.M.A. Mokheimer, M.A. Habib, A. Al-Qutub, A review of hybrid solar–fossil fuel power generation systems and performance metrics. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 134, 1–17 (2012)
M. Horn, H. Fuhring, J. Rheinlander, Economic analysis of integrated solar combined cycle power plants. A sample case: the economic feasibility of an ISCCS power plant in Egypt. Energy 29, 935–945 (2004)
E. Açikkalp, Md.H. Ahmadi, Performance evaluation of PEM fuel cell-chemical heat pump—absorption refrigerator hybrid system. Int. J. Amb. Energy (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2020.1712238
F. Mašic, A. Merzic, A. Bosovic, M. Music, A Microgrid Concept for Thermal and Electrical Energy Supply of a Sport Recreation Center: case study S.R.C.A. IETE J. Res. 1–13 (2020)
A. S. Canbolat, A.H. Bademlioglu, O. Kaynakli, A modeling of electricity generation by using geothermal assisted organic Rankine cycle with internal heat recovery. Energy Sour. Part A Recov. Utiliz. Environ. Effects 41, 1–17 (2019)
M.M. Naeimi, Md.E. Yazdi, G.R. Salehi, Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and exergo environmental analysis and optimization of a solar hybrid CCHP system. Energy Sour. Part A Recov. Utiliz. Environ. Effects 41, 1–21 (2019)
H. Bagheri, A. Azimi, Thermodynamic analysis of a CCHP system for a building using solar collectors and PV panels in two different climate zones in Iran. Energy Sour. Part A Recov. Utiliz. Environ. Effects 42, 1–20 (2020)
E.Ö. Küçük, M. Kiliç, Comparative performance analysis of ORC-VCRC combined systems based on refrigerant selection. Sci. Technol. Built Environ. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2020.1778400
M. Al-Ali, I. Dincer, Performance assessment of integrated energy systems for HVAC applications. Int. J. Green Energy (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.970271
R. Asadi, E. Assareh, R. Moltames, M. Olazar, M. Nedaei, F. Parvaz, Optimisation of combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) systems incorporating the solar and geothermal energy: a review study. Int. J. Amb. Energy (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2019.1630299
F.A. Boyaghchi, M. Chavoshi, V. Sabeti, Optimization of a novel combined cooling, heating and power cycle driven by geothermal and solar energies using the water/CuO (copper oxide) nanofluid. Energy 91, 685–699 (2015)
E. Bellos, C. Tzivanidis, Evaluation of a solar driven trigeneration system with conventional and new criteria. Int. J. Sustain. Energy (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2018.1494173
N. Phuangpornpitak, S. Tia, Opportunities and challenges of integrating renewable energy in smart grid system. Energy Procedia 34, 282–290 (2013)
A.K. Alsaif, Challenges and benefits of integrating the renewable energy technologies into the AC power system grid. Am. J. Eng. Res. 6, 95–100 (2017)
A. Avila-Marin, Volumetric receivers in solar thermal power plants with central receiver system technology: a review. Sol. Energy 85, 891–910 (2011)
Y. Huang, Y.D. Wang, S. Rezvani, D.R. McIlveen-Wright, M. Anderson, N.J. Hewitt, Biomass fuelled trigeneration system in selected buildings. Energy Convers. Manag. 52, 2448–2454 (2011)
S. Karellas, K. Braimakis, Energy–exergy analysis and economic investigation of a cogeneration and trigeneration ORC–VCC hybrid system utilizing biomass fuel and solar power. Energy Convers. Manag. 107, 103–113 (2016)
M. Jradi, S. Riffat, Tri-generation systems: Energy policies, prime movers, cooling technologies, configurations and operation strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 32, 396–415 (2014)
D.B.E. Santo, Energy and exergy efficiency of a building internal combustion engine Trigeneration system under two different operational strategies. Energy Build. 53, 28–38 (2012)
D. Raghulnath, K. Saravanan, J. Mahendran, M.R. Kumar, P. Lakshmanan, Analysis and optimization of organic Rankine cycle for IC engine waste heat recovery system. Mater. Today Proc. 21, 2214–7853 (2019).
H. Ghaebi, T. Parikhani, H. Rostamzadeh, B. Farhang, Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a novel combined cooling and power (CCP) cycle by integrating of ejector refrigeration and Kalina cycles. Energy (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.154
A. Lazzaretto, G. Tsatsaronis, SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy 31, 1257–1289 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, M., Chandra, H., Banchhor, R. et al. Integration of Renewable Energy based Trigeneration Cycle: A Review. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 102, 851–865 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-021-00690-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-021-00690-y