Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficacy of Silicon Formulations on Sugarcane Stalk Borers, Quality Characteristics and Parasitism Rate on Five Commercial Varieties

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugarcane is an important cash crop in Iran and it is exclusively cultivated in more than one hundred hectares of Khuzestan province. One proven and ecologically sound best management practice in sugarcane is application of silicon to mitigate for both biotic and abiotic stresses. It has been proved that silicon can enhance resistance of sugarcane against stalk borers. Also, new hypothesis suggests that silicon may increase attraction of biological control agents to infested plants. Field trials were carried out at Salman-Farsi Agro-Industry Farms to determine the effects of three liquid formulations of silicon against infestations of stalk borer, Sesamia spp. and parasitism rates of egg parasitoid Telenomus busseolae Gahan using varieties CP57-614, CP48-103, CP69-1062, IRC99-01 and SP70-1143. The experiments were conducted as complete block design with three formulations of silicon. Prior to harvest twenty stalks were selected at random to determine percentage of stalk damage, percentage of bored internodes, length of borer tunnel, number of larvae + pupae per 100 stalks, number of exit holes as well as cane yield quality characteristics. In two consecutive years, the rate of parasitism on treated and untreated plots in each variety were recorded. The results from the present study showed that there were some significant differences between silicon treatments and control on borer’s damage and quality sugarcane parameters but in some cases the differences were not significant. The present findings on the efficacy of silicon treatments on biological control suggested that silicon enhanced biological control attractions as shown by parasitism rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James G (2004) Sugarcane. Blackwell Publishing, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadeghzadeh-Hemayati S, Hamdi H, Fathollah-Taleghani D, Amili H (2011) Strategic framework for sugarcane research. Phsychology and Arts, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sallam MNS (2006) A review of sugarcane stem borers and their natural enemies in Asia and Indian Ocean Islands: an Australian perspective. Ann de la Société entomologique de France 42:263–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Showler A, Reagan T (2012) Ecology and tactics of control for three sugarcane stalkboring species in the Western Hemisphere and Africa. In: Goncalves J, Correia K (eds) Sugarcane: production, cultivation and uses, Nova, Hauppauge, New York. Nova Science, New York, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goebel FR, Achadian E, McGuire P (2014) The economic impact of sugarcane moth borers in Indonesia. Sugar Tech 16(4):405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuniata LS, Sweet CPM (1994) Management of Sesamia grisescens walker (Lep.: Noctuidae), a sugar-cane borer in Papua New Guinea. Crop Prot 13(7):488–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutherford RS, Conlong DE (2010) Combating sugarcane pests in South Africa: from researching biotic interactions to bio-intensive integrated pest management in the field. In: Proceedings of international society of sugarcane technologists, Veracruz, Mexico

  8. Daniali M (1985) Effects of biological, cultural and chemical control measures against sugarcane stem borers Sesamia spp. (Lep.: Noctuidae) in Haft Tappeh. Dissertation, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran

  9. Long W, Hensley S (1972) Insect pests of sugar cane. Annu Rev Entomol 17(1):149–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuniata L, Chandler K, Korowi K (2001) Management of sugarcane pests at Ramu, Papua New Guinea. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 2:382–388

    Google Scholar 

  11. Askarianzadeh A, Moharramipour S, Kamali K, Fathipour Y (2008) Evaluation of damage caused by stalk borers, Sesamia spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on sugarcane quality in Iran. Entomol Res 38(4):263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leslie G (2004) Pests of sugarcane. In: James G (ed) Sugarcane, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 78–100

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuniata LS (2000) Integrated management of sugarcane borers in Papua New Guinea. In: Sugarcane pest management in the New Millennium. Proceeding of international society of sugar cane technologists, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  14. Nikpay A, Kord H, Goebel F-R, Sharafizadeh P (2014) Assessment of natural parasitism of sugarcane moth borers Sesamia spp. by Telenomus busseolae. Sugar Tech 16(3):325–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beuzelin J, Mészáros A, Akbar W, Reagan T (2011) Sugarcane planting date impact on fall and spring sugarcane borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) infestations. Fla Entomol 94(2):242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reay-Jones FPF, Showler A, Reagan T, Legendre B, Way M, Moser E (2005) Integrated tactics for managing the Mexican rice borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in sugarcane. Environ Entomol 34(6):1558–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandhu HS, Nuessly GS, Cherry RH, Gilbert RA, Webb SE (2011) Effects of harvest residue and tillage on Lesser Cornstalk Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) damage to sugarcane. J Econ Entomol 104(1):155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Keeping M (2006) Screening of South African sugarcane cultivars for resistance to the stalk borer, Eldana saccharina walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Afr Entomol 14(2):277–288

    Google Scholar 

  19. Korowi KT, Samson PR (2013) Screening for borer resistance among sugarcane colons in Papua New Guinea. In: Proceedings of Australian society of sugarcane technologists, Australia

  20. Meagher J, Smith J, Johnson K (1994) Insecticidal management of Eoreuma loftini (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Texas sugarcane: a critical review. J Econ Entomol 87(5):1332–1344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reynolds OL, Keeping MG, Meyer JH (2009) Silicon-augmented resistance of plants to herbivorous insects: a review. Ann Appl Biol 155(2):171–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Korndörfer AP, Grisoto E, Vendramim JD (2011) Induction of insect plant resistance to the spittlebug Mahanarva fimbriolata Stål (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) in sugarcane by silicon application. Neotrop Entomol 40(3):387–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. White W, White P (2013) Sugarcane borer resistance in sugarcane as affected by silicon applications in potting medium. J Am Soc Sugar Cane Tech 33:38–54

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keeping MG, Miles N, Sewpersad C (2014) Silicon reduces impact of plant nitrogen in promoting stalk borer (Eldana saccharina) but not sugarcane thrips (Fulmekiola serrata) infestations in sugarcane. Front Plant Sci 5:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Epstein E (2009) Silicon: its manifold roles in plants. Ann Appl Biol 155(2):155–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma JF (2004) Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50(1):11–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Gangwar S, Prasad SM, Maurya JN, Chauhan DK (2014) Role of silicon in enrichment of plant nutrients and protection from biotic and abiotic stresses. In: Ahmad P, Wani MR, Azooz MM, Tran LSP (eds) Improvement of crops in the Era of climatic changes, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 39–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Jones L, Handreck K (1967) Silica in soils, plants and animals. Adv Agron 19(1):107–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ma JF, Yamaji N (2006) Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci 11(8):392–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Keeping MG, Kvedaras OL, Bruton AG (2009) Epidermal silicon in sugarcane: Cultivar differences and role in resistance to sugarcane borer Eldana saccharina. Environ Exp Bot 66(1):54–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kvedaras OL, An M, Choi Y, Gurr G (2010) Silicon enhances natural enemy attraction and biological control through induced plant defences. Bull Entomol Res 100(3):367–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Connick V, Reynolds OL, Saliba A, Gurr GM, Guisard Y, Simmons AT, Nicol HI (2011) Effects of potassium silicate on grape wines constitutes and induce defenses against an Australian leaf roller pest and its natural enemies. In: 5th international conference on silicon in agriculture, Beijing, China, 13–18 September 2011, p 25

  33. Simpson M, Connick VJ, Guisard Y, Reynolds OL, Saliba A, Gurr GM (2012) Chemical ecology providing novel strategies against vineyard pests in Australia. In: Vincent C, Rufus I, Bostanian NJ (eds) Arthropod management in vineyards. Springer, London, pp 119–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Karban R, Baldwin I (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago, Illinois, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Gomes FB, Moraes JC, Santos CD, Goussain MM (2005) Resistance induction in wheat plants by silicon and aphids. Sci Agricola 62(6):547–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ranger CM, Singh AP, Frantz JM, Canas L, Locke JC, Reding ME, Vorsa N (2009) Influence of silicon on resistance of Zinnia elegans to Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Environ Entomol 38(1):129–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Askarianzadeh A (2004) Survey of resistance mechanism of sugar cane varieties to stem borers Sesamia spp. (Lep.:Noctuidae). Dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran

  38. SPSS (2007) SPSS 16 for Windows User’s Guide Release. Spss Inc, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kvedaras OL, Keeping MG (2007) Silicon impedes stalk penetration by the borer Eldana saccharina in sugarcane. Entomol Exp Appl 125(1):103–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Massey FP, Hartley SE (2009) Physical defences wear you down: progressive and irreversible impacts of silica on insect herbivores. J Anim Ecol 78(1):281–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Savant NK, Korndörfer GH, Datnoff LE, Snyder GH (1999) Silicon nutrition and sugarcane production: a review 1. J Plant Nutr 22(12):1853–1903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Keeping MG, Meyer JH, Sewpersad C (2013) Soil silicon amendments increase resistance of sugarcane to stalk borer Eldana saccharina walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) under field conditions. Plant Soil 363(1):297–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Djamin A, Pathak M (1967) Role of silica in resistance to Asiatic rice borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker), in rce varieties. J Econ Entomol 60(2):347–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sétamou M, Schulthess F, Bosque-Pérez N, Thomas-Odjo A (1993) Effect of plant nitrogen and silica on the bionomics of Sesamia calamistis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull Entomol Res 83(03):405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. de Almeida GD, Pratissoli D, Cola Zanuncio J, Victor BV, Anderson MH, José ES (2009) Calcium silicate and organic mineral fertilizer applications reduce phytophagy by Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on eggplants (Solanum melongena L.). Interciencia 33(11):835–838

    Google Scholar 

  46. Massey FP, Ennos AR, Hartley SE (2006) Silica in grasses as a defence against insect herbivores: contrasting effects on folivores and a phloem feeder. J Anim Ecol 75(2):595–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Mr. Hossein Yavari (NTS Representative in Iran), Mr. Masoud Daniali (Roam-Chemie Representative in Iran) and Ms Michele Paterson (Natural Plant Health Products, Pretoria, South Africa) for providing generously sample of silicon fertilizers for experimentation. Also, best gratitude is extended to the managing director and staff of Plant Protection Department, Salman Farsi Agro-industry, for providing facilities and technical support during trials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

    Amin Nikpay, Ebrahim Soleyman Nejadian & Shila Goldasteh

  2. Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

    Hossein Farazmand

Authors
  1. Amin Nikpay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ebrahim Soleyman Nejadian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shila Goldasteh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hossein Farazmand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Nikpay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This paper is one part of first author’s Ph.D. thesis and published here with the agreement of Islamic Azad University, Arak branch. There is no conflict of interest among the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikpay, A., Nejadian, E.S., Goldasteh, S. et al. Efficacy of Silicon Formulations on Sugarcane Stalk Borers, Quality Characteristics and Parasitism Rate on Five Commercial Varieties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 87, 289–297 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0596-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0596-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation