Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Freshwater Fish Diversity in the River Ken of Ganga Basin: Abundance, Threats and Their Management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systematic surveys were conducted to explore the diversity of freshwater fishes, distribution, abundance, trophic ecology and current threats of the fishes at different spatial scale of the river Ken, planned for interlinking in India. Altogether, 57 species representing 42 genera and 20 families were recorded for the first time from the studied river. Of the 57 species, seven belong to the ‘endangered’ category and 13 belong to the vulnerable category. Apart from Indian major carps, Tor tor, Bagarius bagarius, Chitala chitala, Pangasius pangasius, Sperata aor, Wallago attu, Ompok pabda, Ompok bimaculatus, Labeo calbasu, Channa marulius, and Macrognathus pancalus were the other important species. All the species have been reported for the first time in this river. Presence of a protected area and forest cover on the upper stretches of the river tends to have positive effect on the aquatic habitat which is reflected in high fish diversity as compared to lower stretches which is subjected to several anthropogenic activities. The distribution pattern, community dominance index, evenness index, similarity index and trophic ecology have been discussed. Some segment of the river showed the most diversified environmental structure and had the different fish communities. The results of this study would be useful to develop baseline information for a river, planned for river interlinking which enables predictions on the change/loss of the fish diversity in the post interlinking phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duncan JR, Lockwood JL (2001) Extinction in a field of bullets: a search for the cause in the decline of the world’s freshwater fishes. Biol Conserv 102:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aarts BGW, Van den Brink FWB, Nienhuis PH (2004) Habitat loss as the main cause of the slow recovery of fish faunas of regulated large rivers in Europe: the transversal floodplain gradient. River Res Appl 20:3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Water Development Agency (NDWA) (1982) http://www.ndwda.gov.in. Accessed 4 March 2013

  4. Pouillly M, Barrera S, Rosales C (2006) Changes of taxonomic and trophic structure of fish assemblages along an environmental gradient in the Upper Beni water shed (Bolivia). J Fish Biol 68:137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bournaud M, Amoros C (1984) Des indicateurs biologiques aux descripteurs de fonctionnement: quelques exemples dans un syste`me fluvial. Bull d’Ecol 15(1):57–66

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amoros C, Roux AL, Reygrobellet JL, Bravard JP, Pautou G (1987) A method for applied ecological studies of fluvial hydrosystems. Regul River 1(1):17–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bain MB, Knight JG (1996) Classifying stream habitat using fish community analysis, In: Proceedings of the second IAHR symposium on habitat hydraulics. Ecohydraulics 2000, Université du Québec, Quebec

  8. Biswas SP (1993) Manual of methods in fish biology. South Asian Publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jayaram KC (1999) The freshwater fishes of the Indian region. Narendra Publ. House, New Delhi, p 551

    Google Scholar 

  10. Talwar PK, Jhingran AG (1991) Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lakra WS, Sarkar UK (2007) Freshwater fish diversity of central India. In: Proceeding of the workshop on conservation assessment of freshwater fish diversity for central India organized by National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, CIAE, Bhopal, 25 November 2006

  12. Goulding ML, Caravalho M, Ferreira E (1988) Rio Negro, rich life in poor water. Amazonian diversity and food chain: ecology as seen through fish communities. Academic, São Paulo, p 220

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karr JR, Fausch D, Angermeier PL, Yant PR, Schlosser IJ (1986) Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 5, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  14. OPEA (1987) Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic Life, vol. III. Ecological Assessment Section, Division Water Quality, Planning and Assessment, State of Ohio Environmental Assessment Agency. Springer, New York

  15. Wichert GA, Rapport DJ (1998) Fish community structure as a measure of degradation and rehabilitation of riparian systems in an agricultural drainage basin. Environ Manag 22(3):425–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhat A (2003) Diversity and composition of freshwater fishes in river system of Central Western Ghats, India. Environ Biol Fish 68:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarkar UK, Gupta BK, Lakra WS (2010) Biodiversity, ecohydrology, threat status and conservation priority of the freshwater fishes of river Gomti, a tributary of river Ganga (India). Environmentalist 30(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Srivastawa GJ (1988) Fishes of U. P. and Bihar, 3rd edn. Vishwavidyalaya Prakashan, Varanasi

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sarkar UK, Pathak AK, Sinha RK, Sivakumar K, Pandian AK, Pandey A, Dubey VK, Lakra WS (2012) Freshwater fish biodiversity in the River Ganga (India): changing pattern, threats and conservation perspectives. Rev Fish Biol Fish 22:251–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarkar UK, Pathak AK, Tyagi LK, Srivastava SM, Singh SP, Dubey VK (2013) Biodiversity of freshwater fish of a protected river in India: comparison with unprotected habitat. Rev Biol Trop 61(1):161–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lakra WS, Sarkar UK, Kumar RS, Pandey A, Dubey VK, Gusain OP (2010) Fish diversity, habitat ecology and their conservation and management issues of a tropical River in Ganga basin, India. Environmentalist 30:306–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kottelat M, Whitten AJ, Kartikasari SN, Wirjoatmodjo S (1993) Freshwater fishes of Western Indonesia and Sulawesi. Periplus Editions, Hong Kong, p 221

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Silva SS, Abery NW, Nguyen TTT (2007) Endemic freshwater finfish of Asia: distribution and conservation status. Divers Distrib 13:172–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lakra WS, Sarkar UK, Dubey VK, Sani R, Pandey A (2011) River inter linking in India: status, issues, prospects and implications on aquatic ecosystems and freshwater fish diversity. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 21:463–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rahel FJ, Bierwagen B, Taniguchi Y (2008) Managing aquatic species of conservation concern in the face of climate change and invasive species. Cons Biol 22(3):551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson EP (2002) Electricity sector reform means more dams for Costa Rica. World Rivers Rev 17:32–43

    Google Scholar 

  27. Muchlisin A, Azizah MNS (2009) Diversity and distribution of freshwater fishes in Aceh water, Northern-Sumatra, Indonesia. Int J Zool Res 5(2):62–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dubey VK, Sarkar UK, Pandey A, Sani R, Lakra WS (2012) The influence of habitat on the spatial variation in fish assemblage composition in an unimpacted tropical River of Ganga basin, India. Aquat Ecol 46:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Growns I, Gehrke PC, Astles KL, Pollard DA (2003) A comparison of fish assemblage associated with different riparian vegetation types in the Hawksbury-epan River system. Fisheries Manag Ecol 10:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Boruah S, Biswas SP (2002) Ecohydrology and fisheries of the upper Brahmputra basin. Environmentalist 22:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Das MK (2007) Environment and fish health: a holistic assessment of inland fisheries in India. In: Goswami UC (ed) Natural and anthropogenic hazards on fish and fisheries. Narendra Publishing, Delhi, pp 137–151

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dubey VK, Sarkar UK, Pandey A, Lakra WS (2013) Fish communities and trophic metrics as measures of ecological degradation: a case study in the tributaries of the river Ganga basin, India. Rev Biol Trop 61(3):1351–1363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt. of India, New Delhi for providing financial assistance and Director, NBFGR for necessary facilities and suggestions. Authors would also like to thank two anonymous referees for constructive suggestions in improving the MS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uttam Kumar Sarkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarkar, U.K., Lakra, W.S., Dubey, V.K. et al. Freshwater Fish Diversity in the River Ken of Ganga Basin: Abundance, Threats and Their Management. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 84, 1043–1051 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0266-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0266-7

Keywords

Navigation