Skip to main content
Log in

Regeneration Pattern of Tree Species in Forested Landscapes of Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalayan Region, India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work was conducted to assess the regeneration pattern of dominant tree species in the forested landscapes of Himachal Pradesh, India. The study was conducted in four agro-climatic zones viz., zone I, zone II, zone III and zone IV, of the state at 58 locations during 2002–2007. Stratified random quadrat sampling was employed to estimate regeneration pattern of tree species by classifying them into seedling, sapling and adult stages. The analysis of data was carried out using MS excel while it was spatially represented in Geographic Information System environment. The regeneration pattern was divided in to four classes namely good, fair, poor and no regeneration. A total of 23 forest landscape elements (LSEs) dominated by 18 tree species were observed at the surveyed localities. These tree species are representative of the western Himalayan ecosystem. The number of seedlings, saplings and adults ranged from 0 to 2,700/ha, 0 to 1,500/ha, and 20 to 1,470/ha, respectively in different LSEs. Picea smithiana was observed to posses highest number of seedlings (2,700/ha) and saplings (1,500/ha) in zone IV and zone III, respectively. Cedrus deodara, on the other hand, had the maximum number of adults (1,470/ha) in its pure patch in Shimla in zone III. The results showed that amongst the four agro-climatic zones, the zone I in general had a trend of poor to no regeneration while other zones generally had fair regeneration. Zone I and zone II had poor, fair and no regeneration pattern. The trees in zone III and zone IV had good regeneration pattern in addition to poor, fair and no regeneration. Based on the results of present study, it is suggested that efficient measures are needed to conserve and to increase the tree regeneration growth in zone I of the state, whereas special efforts should be made to maintain the luxuriant forest status in rest of the agro-climatic zones of Himachal Pradesh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharma A, Samant SS (2013) Diversity, structure and composition of forest communities in Hirb and Shoja catchments of Himachal Pradesh, North West Himalaya, India. Int J Bot 9:50–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dhar U, Rawal RS, Upreti J (2000) Setting priorities for conservation of medicinal plants—a case study in the Indian Himalaya. Biol Conserv 95:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubey B, Yadav RR, Singh J, Chaturvedi R (2003) Upward shift of Himalayan pine in western Himalaya, India. Curr Sci 85(8):1135–1136

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh A, Samant SS (2010) Conservation prioritization of habitats and forest communities in the Lahaul valley of proposed cold desert biosphere reserve, North western Himalaya, India. Appl Ecol Environ Res 8(2):101–117

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tandon P, Kumaria S, Das MC (2012) Plant resources of India: potentials for future development. Proc Natl Acad Sci India B 82(2 Suppl):283–289

    Google Scholar 

  6. MFSC (2005) Proceedings of the National Stakeholders’ Consultation on Sacred Himalayan Landscape in Nepal. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zobel DB, Singh SP (1997) Himalayan forests and ecological generalizations. Bioscience 47(11):735–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Uniyal SK, Singh RD (2012) Natural resources assessment and their utilization: analyses from a Himalayan state. Environ Monit Assess 184:4903–4919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chopra VL (2013) Climate change and its ecological implications for the Western Himalaya. Scientific Publishers, India

  10. Rao PB (1988) Effects of environmental factors on germination and seedling growth in Quercus floribunda and Cupressus torulosa, tree species of central Himalaya. Ann Bot 61:531–540

    Google Scholar 

  11. Singh G, Rawat GS (2012) Depletion of oak (Quercus spp.) forests in the Western Himalaya: grazing, fuelwood and fodder collection. In: Okia CK (ed) Global perspectives on sustainable forest management. Intech publishers, Croatia, pp 39–42

  12. Forman TTR, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khanna LS (1996) Principles and practice of silviculture. Khanna Bandhu, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bonham CD (1989) Measurements for terrestrial vegetation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shankar U (2001) A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Curr Sci 81(7):776–786

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bhuyan P, Khan ML, Tripathi RS (2003) Tree diversity and population structure in undisturbed and human-impacted stands of tropical wet evergreen forest in Arunachal Pradesh, Eastern Himalayas, India. Biodivers Conserv 12(8):1753–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Omeja P, Obua J, Cunningham AB (2004) Regeneration, density and size class distribution of tree species used for drum making in central Uganda. Afr J Ecol 42:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. IIRS (2002) Biodiversity characterization at landscape level in western Himalayas India using satellite remote sensing and Geographic Information System. Indian Institute of Remote sensing (IIRS), Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roy PS, Behra MD (2005) Assessment of biological richness in different altitudinal zones in Eastern Himalayas, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Curr Sci 88(2):250–257

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fotheringham AS, Wegener M (2000) Spatial Models and GIS. Taylor and Francis, UK

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parker H (1988) Unique qualities of a Geographic Information System: a commentary. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54(11):1547–1549

    Google Scholar 

  22. SOER (2009) State of environment report Himachal Pradesh. Department of Environment Science and technology, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, pp 5–25

    Google Scholar 

  23. Directorate of Extension Education (2000) Package of practices for vegetable crops. Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan

    Google Scholar 

  24. IASRI (2006) Study relating to formulating long-term mechanization strategy for each agro climatic zone/state in India. Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (IASRI), New Delhi, pp 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  25. Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) The forest types of India. Manager of Publications, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mueller DD, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bankoti NS, Tewari LM (2001) Analysis of forest vegetation at and around Soni-Binsar area in Kumaun Himalaya. In: Pande PC, Samant SS (eds) Plant Diversity of the Himalaya. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, pp 363–376

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dhaulkhandi M, Dobhal A, Bhatt S, Kumar M (2008) Structure and regeneration potential of natural forest site in Gangotri, India. J Basic Appl Sci 4(1):49–52

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saxena AK, Singh JS (1984) Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forest associations and implications concerning their future composition. Vegetatio 58:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhuyan P, Khan M, Tripathi RS (2003) Tree diversity and population structure in undisturbed and human-impacted stands of tropical wet evergreen forest in Arunachal Pradesh, Eastern Himalayas, India. Biodivers Conserv 12:1753–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ESRI (2002) ArcGIS 8.3 user manuals, Redlands

  32. HPKV (2000) Map on agroclimatic zones of HP. CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Palampur

    Google Scholar 

  33. ERDAS (2001) Erdas Imagine 8.5 user manuals. ERDAS Inc, Atlanta, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  34. Demers MN (2005) Fundamentals of Geographic Information System. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. http://www.esri.com. Accessed 17 March 2013

  36. Raizada A, Juyal GP (2012) Tree species diversity, species regeneration and biological productivity of seeded Acacia catechu Willd. In rehabilitated limestone mines in the north west Indian Himalayas. Land Degrad Dev 23:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar M, Kumar S, Jahangeer AB, Mehraj AS (2011) Distribution pattern and regeneration status of two forest types in subtropical region of Garhwal Himalaya. NeBIO 2(3):32–36

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dangwal LR, Singh T (2012) Comparative vegetational analysis and Pinus roxburghii Sarg regeneration in relation to their disturbances in some Chirpine forest of block Nowshera, district Rajouri, J and K, India. ISCA J Biol Sci 1(1):47–54

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tiwari PK, Tiwari SC (2012) Species diversity and environmental regeneration potential of tree species along an altitudinal gradient in subtropical montane forests of a part in Central Himalaya, India. Int J Basic Appl Sci 1(1):27–37

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pant S, Samant SS (2012) Diversity and regeneration status of tree species in Khokhan Wildlife Sanctuary, north-western Himalaya. Trop Ecol 53(3):317–331

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ghimire B, Kumar PM, Lekhak HD, Chaudhary RP, Ghimeray AK (2010) Regeneration of Pinus wallichiana AB Jackson in a trans-Himalayan dry valley of north-central Nepal. Himal J Sci 6(8):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  42. Malik AR, Shamet GS, Butola JS (2012) Natural regeneration status of Chilgoza pine (Pinus gerardiana wall.) in Himachal Pradesh, India: an endangered pine of high edible value. Appl Ecol Environ Res 10(3):365–373

    Google Scholar 

  43. Srivastava MB, Siaguru P (1997) Silvicultural system and sustainable management of Cedar (C. deodara) and Blue pine (P. wallichiana) forests of western Himalaya. Indian J For 20:26–38

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maren IE, Vetaas OR (2007) Does regulated land use allow regeneration of keystone forest species in the Annapurna conservation area Central Himalaya. Mt Res Dev 27(4):345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rawat BS, Uniyal AK (2011) Variability in cone and seed characteristics and seed testing in various provenances of Himalayan spruce (Picea smithiana). J For Res 22(4):603–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are also due to National Bioresource Development Board (NBDB), Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, for providing financial support. The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research is acknowledged for infrastructure support. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editor for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar.

Additional information

Authors dedicate this manuscript to the memory of Late Dr. H. R. Negi, who initiated this work.

This is IHBT communication number 0652.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Singh, K.N., Brij Lal et al. Regeneration Pattern of Tree Species in Forested Landscapes of Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalayan Region, India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 84, 695–707 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0264-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0264-9

Keywords

Navigation