Abstract
Stipules are known to photosynthesize and provide protection to the organs differentiating at the apex, associated leaf and branch-bud and inflorescence in the axil of leaf. Stipules are expected to affect the bearer plant in multiple ways. To reveal the relative roles of stipules and leaves in Pisum sativum, the growth and development properties of leaf+ stipule− (L+S−), leaf− stipule+ (L−S+) and leaf+ stipule+ (L+S+) plants were compared. The L−S+ and L+S− plants were respectively obtained by surgically removing the leaves and stipules as soon as formed from the post-embryonic nodes of the genetically wild type stipule and leaf bearing plants. The three sets of plants were arranged in a completely randomized design and sampled at the near harvest time for the phenotypic quantitation of ten primary and six secondary traits. The L−S+ and L+S− plants were later in flowering, scarce in branching and total number of nodes, lower in biomass and bore pods in lesser numbers than L+S+ plants. The biomass allocation to leaves and/or stems was higher in L+S−and L−S+ plants as compared to L+S+ plants in which pods were the principal organs of biomass deposition. The observations allowed the conclusions that both stipules and leaves determine the flowering time and presence of stipules maximizes biomass allocation to pods and in turn the harvest index.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tyler AA (1897) The nature and origin of stipules. Ann N Y Acad Sci 10:1–49
Lubbock J (1891) On stipules, their form and function. J Linn Soc Bot 28:217–243
Kumar A, Sharma V, Khan M, Tripathi BN, Kumar S (2012) Pisum sativum wild-type and mutant stipules and those induced by an auxin transport inhibitor demonstrate the entire diversity of laminated stipules observed in angiosperms. Protoplasma (Published online). doi:10.1007/s00709-012-0397-3
Bell AD, Bryan A (2008) Plant form: an illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology. Timber Press, Portland, pp 78–79
Sharma V, Sinha AK, Chaudhary S, Priyadarshini A, Tripathi BN, Kumar S (2012) Genetic analysis of structure and function of stipules in pea Pisum sativum. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 78:9–34
Kumar S, Sharma V, Chaudhary S, Kumari R, Kumari N, Mishra P (2011) Interaction between cochleata and unifoliata genes enables normal flower morphogenesis in the garden pea, Pisum sativum. J Genet 90:309–314
Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, Dagenais N, Christensen SK, Nguyen JT, Chory J, Harrison MJ, Weigel D (1999) Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 286:1962–1965
Abe M, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Daimon Y, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda Y, Ichinoki H, Notaguchi M, Goto K, Araki T (2005) FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science 309:1052–1056
Carmel-Goren L, Liu YS, Lifschitz E, Zamir D (2003) The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato. Plant Mol Biol 52:1215–1222
Chardon F, Damerval C (2005) Phylogenomic analysis of the PEBP gene family in cereals. J Mol Evol 61:579–590
Jaeger KE, Wigge PA (2007) FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 17:1–5
Danilevskaya ON, Meng X, Hou Z, Ananiev EV, Simmons CR (2008) A genomic and expression compendium of the expanded PEBP gene family from maize. Plant Physiol 146:250–264
Igasaki T, Watanabe Y, Nishiguchi M, Kotoda N (2008) The flowering locus t/terminal flower 1 family in Lombardy poplar. Plant Cell Physiol 49:291–300
Jang S, Torti S, Coupland G (2009) Genetic and spatial interactions between FT, TSF and SVP during the early stages of floral induction in Arabidopsis. Plant J 60:614–625
Kikuchi R, Kawahigashi H, Ando T, Tonooka T, Handa H (2009) Molecular and functional characterization of PEBP genes in barley reveal the diversification of their roles in flowering. Plant Physiol 149:1341–1353
Blackman BK, Strasburg JL, Raduski AR, Michaels SD, Rieseberg LH (2010) The role of recently derived FT paralogs in sunflower domestication. Curr Biol 20:629–635
Weller JL, Reid JB, Taylor SA, Murfet IC (1997) The genetic control of flowering in pea. Trends Plant Sci 2:412–418
Hecht V, Knowles CL, Vander Schoor JK, Liew LC, Jones SE, Lambert MJM, Weller JL (2007) Pea late bloomer1 is a gigantea ortholog with roles in photoperiodic flowering, deetiolation, and transcriptional regulation of circadian clock gene homologs. Plant Physiol 144:648–661
Liew LC, Hecht V, Laurie RE, Knowles CL, Vander Schoor JK, Macknight RC, Weller JL (2009) die neutralis and late bloomer 1 contribute to regulation of the pea circadian clock. Plant Cell 21:3198–3211
Hecht V, Laurie RE, Schoor JKV, Ridge S, Knowles CL, Liew LC, Sussmilch FC, Murfet IC, Macknight RC, Weller JL (2011) The pea gigas gene is a flowering locus t homolog necessary for graft-transmissible specification of flowering but not for responsiveness to photoperiod. Plant Cell 23:147–161
Acknowledgments
Grateful thanks are due to the Director of the institute for facilities and respectively to Indian National Science Academy and SKA Institution for Research, Education and Development for scientistship to SK and postgraduate fellowship to VS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, V., Kumar, S. Roles of Stipules Include Determination of Flowering Time and Pod Harvest Index in Garden Pea Grain Legume Pisum sativum . Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 35, 449–456 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-012-0076-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-012-0076-0