Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Status of Available Sulfur in Soils of North-Western Indo-Gangetic Plain and Western Himalayan region and Responses of Rice and Wheat to Applied Sulfur in Farmer’s Fields

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Widespread nutrient deficiencies have emerged as the major soil-related constraints, with sulfur (S) being one among them, for sustaining rice–wheat productivity in many parts of the north-western Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) and the Western Himalayan region (WHR). Therefore, soils from different agricultural development blocks (ADBs) of Meerut and Jyotiba Phule Nagar (J.P. Nagar) Districts in the Upper Gangetic Plain (UGP) zone, Sonipat, and Panipat Districts in Trans-Gangetic Plain (TGP) zone, and New Tehri District in Garhwal zone of WHR were analyzed for their available S-status. Farmers’ fertilizer management practices revealed that fertilizer use was highly unbalanced, and use of S fertilizers was generally negligible. Deficiencies of S were noticed in 19–47 % of the soil samples. On-farm experiments at these sites showed that rice (Oryza sativa L.) yields improved by 0.84–1.90 t ha−1 with the additions of 30–45 kg S ha−1 on S-deficient soils of IGPs, whereas the crop response varied from 1.16 to 1.39 t ha−1 on WHR soils. Also, the residual effect of 30–45 kg S ha−1 was noticed in succeeding wheat (Trititicum aestivum L.). Averaged over S rates, 37–49 % of the applied S was recovered in the system at different locations. Skipping S application decreased the available S content of the soils (0.6–2.4 mg kg−1) compared with initial content. Substantial yield gain and economic returns due to the use of S suggested for inclusion of S in the fertilizer schedules for these soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADBs:

Agricultural Development Blocks

AE:

Agronomic efficiency

AICRP:

All India Coordinated Research Project

ANR:

Additional Net Return

DAP:

Di-ammonium phosphate

FAI:

Fertilizer Association of India

FYM:

Farm yard manure

IFA:

International Fertilizer Association

IGP:

Indo-Gangetic Plain

RE:

Recovery efficiency

SOC:

Soil organic carbon

SPM:

Sulfitation pressmud

SSP:

Single superphosphate

TGP:

Trans-Gangetic Plain

TSI:

The Sulfur Institute

UGP:

Upper Gangetic Plain

VCR:

Value Cost Ratio

WHR:

Western Himalayan Region

References

  1. Bahl GS, Pasricha NS (1984) Adsorption and desorption of SO4 2− by soils pre-treated with different cations. Int J Trop Agric 2:143–150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas BC, Tewatia RK (1991) Results of FAO sulphur trials network in India. Fert News 36:11–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandel RS, Kalyan S, Singh AK, Sudhakar PC (2003) Effect of sulphur nutrition in rice and mustard grown in sequence. Indian J Plant Physiol 8(2):155–159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chesnin L, Yien CH (1950) Turbidimetric determination of available sulphur. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 15:149–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dwivedi BS, Shukla AK, Singh VK, Yadav RL (2001a) Results of participatory diagnosis of constraints and opportunities (PDCO) based trials from the state of Uttar Pradesh. In: Subba Rao A, Srivastava S (Ed) Development of farmers’ resource-based integrated plant nutrient supply systems: experience of a FAO-ICAR-IFFCO collaborative project and AICRP on soil test crop response correlation Bhopal. Indian Institute of Soil Science, pp 50–75

  7. Dwivedi BS, Shukla AK, Singh VK, Yadav RL (2001b) Sulphur fertilization for sustaining productivity of rice-wheat system in western Uttar Pradesh. PDCSR Bulletin No 2001-1, pp 35, PDCSR, Modipuram

  8. Dwivedi BS, Dhyan Singh, Chokkar PK, Sahoo RN, Sharma SK, Tiwari KN (2006) Soil fertility evaluation-A potential tool for balanced use of fertilizers. IARI, New Delhi and PPI/PPIC-India programme, Gurgaon, pp 1–60

  9. FAI (2012) Fertiliser Statistics (2011-12). The Fertiliser Association of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ganeshamurthy AN, Takkar PN (1997) Residual management of sulphur applied to soybean or wheat in a soybean-wheat system on Vertisols. Aust J Soil Res 35:119–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hobbs PR, Morris M (1996) Meeting South Asia’s future food requirement from rice-wheat cropping systems: priority issues facing researchers in the post-Green Revolution era. NRG Paper 96-01, CIMMYT, Mexico

  12. Nad BK, Goswami NN (1985) Sulphur utilisation pattern of some oilseed and legume crops. J Nuclear Agric Biol 14:154–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nambiar KKM (1994) Soil fertility and crop productivity under long-term fertilizer use in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, p 144

    Google Scholar 

  14. Page AL, Millar RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Am Soc Agron Inc and Soil Sci Soc Am Inc Publishers, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parr JF (1973) Chemical and biological considerations for maximising the efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen. J Environ Quality 2:75–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pasricha NK, Fox RI (1993) Plant nutrient sulphur in tropics and sub-tropics. Adv Agron 50:209–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pasricha NS, Aulakh MS (1991) Twenty years of sulphur research and oilseed production in Punjab, India. Sulphur Agric 15:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pasricha NS, Sarkar AK (2009) Secondary nutrients. In: Fundamentals of soil science. 2nd edn, New Delhi, pp 449–460

  19. Sachdev MS, Deb DL (1990) N and S uptake and efficiency in mustard-moong-maize cropping system. Fert News 35:49–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sahrawat KL, Wani SP, Rego TJ, Pradhasaradhi G, Murth KVS (2007) Widespread deficiencies of sulphur, boron and zinc in dryland soil of the Indian Semi-arid tropics. Curr Sci 93(10):1428–1432

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Senapati HK, Dash AK, Mohanty B (2007) Effect of long term fertilizer use on sulphur availability to rice in an Inceptisol. Madras Agric J 94(7–12):205–211

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma SK (2003) Characterization and mapping of rice-wheat system: its changes and constraints to system sustainability. NATP (PSR 4.1) Final report, (2003–04), New Delhi

  23. Shukla AK, Singh VK, Dwivedi BS (2009) Macro role of micronutrients. Indian J Fert 5(5):11–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh MV (1999) Current Status of micro and secondary nutrient deficiencies and crop responses in agro-climatic regions, experiences of AICRP on secondary and micro nutrients and pollutants elements in soils and crops. Fert News 44(4):63–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh MV (2001) Sulphur management in Indian agriculture. Indian J Fert 46(2):25–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh VK (2008) On-farm evaluation of site-specific nutrient management technology in rice–wheat cropping system of Indo-Gangetic Plain. Annual Report 2007-08, PDCSR, Modipuram, Meerut, pp 63–67

  27. Singh VK, Gangwar B (2011) Sulphur management in crops and cropping systems for sustainable production. PDFSR Bulletin No 1, Project Directorate for Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, p 70

  28. Subba Rao A (1993) Analysis of soils for available major nutrients. In: Tandon HLS (ed) Methods of analysis of soils, plants, waters and fertilizers. FDCO, New Delhi, pp 13–35

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sukhatme PV, Sukhatme BV, Sukhatme Shashikala (1984) Sampling theory of surveys with applications. IOWA State University Press AMES, IOWA (USA) and Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, New Delhi, p 520

  30. Swarup A, Wanjari RH (2000) Three decades of all India coordinated research project on long-term fertilizer experiments to study changes in soil quality, crop productivity and sustainability. IISS, Bhopal

    Google Scholar 

  31. Takkar PN (1988) Sulphur status of Indian soils. In: Proceedings of the TSI–FAI symposium on sulphur in Indian agriculture. New Delhi, pp SI/2/1–31

  32. Tandon HLS, Messick DL (2007) Practical Sulphur Guide (revised). The Sulphur Instiute, Washington DC, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tandon HLS (2011) Sulphur in soils, crops and fertilizers. Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization, New Delhi, India pp 204 + X

  34. Till AR (2010) Sulphur and sustainable agriculture. IFA, Paris, p 70

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tiwari KN, Dwivedi BS, Ashok Tiwari, Dagur BS, Sharma HL (1995) Status of S Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn in soils and plants and delineation of the areas of their deficiencies in Central, South-western and Bundelkhand zones of Uttar Pradesh. Fert News 40:19–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tiwari KN, Dwivedi BS, Pathak AN (1985) Evaluation of iron pyrites as sulphur fertilizer. Fert Res 5:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tiwari KN, Sharma SK, Singh VK, Dwivedi BS, Shukla Arvind K (2006) Site-specific nutrient management for increasing crop productivity in India: Results with rice-wheat and rice-rice system. PDCSR Modipuram and PPIC India Programme, Gurgaon, p 92

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tripathi SB, Hazra CR (2003) Sulphur requirement of groundnut under wheat based cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci 73(7):368–372

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. TSI (1994) Sulphur: its role and place in balanced fertilizer use in India agriculture. The Sulphur Institute, Washington DC, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  40. TSI–FAI–IFA (2006) Proceedings of TSI-FAI-IFA symposium-cum workshop on sulphur in balanced fertilisation held on October 4–5, 2006 at New Delhi. In: Tewatia RK, Chaudhary RS, Kalwe SP (ed) The fertliser association of India, New Delhi, p 223

  41. Williams CH, Steinbergs A (1969) Soil sulphur fractions as chemical indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils. Aust J Agric Res 20:340–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to The Sulfur Institute, Washington DC; The Fertilizer Association of India, New Delhi; and the International Fertilizer Industry Association for providing financial support. We acknowledge the encouragement and the facilities provided for the field and lab studies by all the past Project Directors, the Project Directorate for Farming Systems Research, Modipuarm, Meerut.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinod K. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, V.K., Dwivedi, B.S., Shukla, A.K. et al. Status of Available Sulfur in Soils of North-Western Indo-Gangetic Plain and Western Himalayan region and Responses of Rice and Wheat to Applied Sulfur in Farmer’s Fields. Agric Res 4, 76–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0149-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0149-7

Keywords

Navigation