Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Procalcitonin-Guided Treatment in Patients with Infections: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Clinical and Epidemiological Study
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to review the effectiveness of procalcitonin (PCT)-guided therapy in comparison to standard therapy in patients with suspected or confirmed bacterial infections in terms of antibiotic prescription at inclusion, duration of antibiotic therapy, total antibiotic exposure days/1,000 days, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), length of stay in the hospital, and mortality.

Methods:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched up to November 2008. Studies considered to be eligible were randomized controlled trials comparing PCT-guided therapy with standard therapy in adult patients with bacterial infections. No language restriction was applied. Data were combined in a meta-analysis using random-effect models.

Results:

Seven studies with 1,458 patients were included. PCT-guided therapy was associated with a significant reduction in antibiotic prescription at inclusion (four studies; pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.506, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.290–0.882, p = 0.016), duration of antibiotic therapy (six studies; weighted mean difference [WMD] 2.785, 95% CI 1.225–4.345, p = 0.000), total antibiotic exposure days/1,000 days (four studies; pooled relative risk [RR] 1.664, 95% CI 1.155–2.172, p = 0.000), and length of stay in the ICU (three studies; 292 patients; pooled WMD 3.49 days, 95% CI 1.28–5.70, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in length of stay in the hospital (three studies; pooled WMD 1.003, 95% CI –0.430 to 2.437, p = 0.17) and mortality (seven studies; pooled OR 0.838, 95% CI 0.571–1.229, p = 0.365).

Conclusions:

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, it would appear that an algorithm based on serial PCT measurements would allow a more judicious use of antibiotics than currently occurs during the traditional treatment of patients with infections. PCT-guided antibiotic treatment appears to be safe and may also improve clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evans HL, Lefrak SN, Lyman J, Smith RL, Chong TW, McElearney ST, Schulman AR, Hughes MG, Raymond DP, Pruett TL, Sawyer RG: Cost of gram-negative resistance. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonzales R, Steiner JF, Lum A, Barrett PH Jr: Decreasing antibiotic use in ambulatory practice: impact of a multidimensional intervention on the treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis in adults. JAMA 1999; 281: 1512–1519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillemot D, Courvalin P: Better control of antibiotic resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 542–547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harbarth S, Nobre V, Pittet D: Does antibiotic selection impact patient outcome? Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. El Moussaoui R, Roede BM, Speelman P, Bresser P, Prins JM, Bossuyt PM: Short-course antibiotic treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD: a meta-analysis of double-blind studies. Thorax 2008; 63: 415–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. File TM Jr, Mandell LA: What is optimal antimicrobial therapy for bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia? Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 396–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tillotson GS, Doern GV, Blondeau JM: Optimal antimicrobial therapy: the balance of potency and exposure. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2006; 15: 335–337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fish DN: Optimal antimicrobial therapy for sepsis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002; 59(Suppl 1): S13–S19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Christ-Crain M, Muller B: Biomarkers in respiratory tract infections: diagnostic guides to antibiotic prescription, prognostic markers and mediators. Eur Respir J 2007; 30: 556–573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oczenski W, Fitzgerald RD, Schwarz S: Procalcitonin: a new parameter for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in the perioperative period. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 202–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muller B, Becker KL: Procalcitonin: how a hormone became a marker and mediator of sepsis. Swiss Med Wkly 2001; 131: 595–602.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Muller B, Becker KL, Kranzlin M, Schachinger H, Huber PR, Nylen ES, Snider RH, White JC, Schmidt-Gayk H, Zimmerli W, Ritz R: Disordered calcium homeostasis of sepsis: association with calcitonin precursors. Eur J Clin Invest 2000; 30: 823–831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang CH, Lu DCT: Clinical applications of procalcitonin (ProCT). J Intern Med Taiwan 2006; 17: 1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chirouze C, Schuhmacher H, Rabaud C, Gil H, Khayat N, Estavoyer JM, May T, Hoen B: Low serum procalcitonin level accurately predicts the absence of bacteremia in adult patients with acute fever. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35: 156–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebell M: Procalcitonin-guided treatment of respiratory tract infections. Am Fam Physician 2008; 78: 756–757.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martinez FJ, Curtis JL: Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in COPD exacerbations: closer but not quite there. Chest 2007; 131: 1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shehabi Y, Seppelt I: Pro/Con debate: is procalcitonin useful for guiding antibiotic decision making in critically ill patients? Crit Care 2008; 12: 211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins JPT, Altman DG: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds): Ochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.0.0. Wiley: London 2008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Wen J, Ren Y, Wang L, Li Y, Liu Y, Zhou M, Liu P, Ye L, Tian W: The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 770–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999; 354: 1896–1900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. DerSimonian R: Combining evidence from clinical trials. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 475–476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539–1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J 1997; 315: 629–634.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Soeken KL, Sripusanapan A: Assessing publication bias in metaanalysis. Nurs Res 2003; 52: 57–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Christ-Crain M, Jaccard-Stolz D, Bingisser R, Gencay MM, Huber PR, Tamm M, Muller B: Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised, single-blinded intervention trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 600–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Bingisser R, Muller C, Miedinger D, Huber PR, Zimmerli W, Harbarth S, Tamm M, Muller B: Procalcitonin guidance of antibiotic therapy in communityacquired pneumonia: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 84–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stolz D, Christ-Grain M, Bingisser R, Leuppi J, Miedinger D, Muller C, Huber P, Muller B, Tamm M: Antibiotic treatment of exacerbations of COPD: a randomized, controlled trial comparing procalcitonin-guidance with standard therapy. Chest 2007; 131: 9–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Svoboda P, Kantorova I, Scheer P, Radvanova J, Radvan M: Can procalcitonin help us in timing of re-intervention in septic patients after multiple trauma or major surgery? Hepato-gastroenterology 2007; 54: 359–363.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Briel M, Schuetz P, Mueller B, Young J, Schild U, Nusbaumer C, Periat P, Bucher HC, Christ-Crain M: Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 2000–2007, discussion 2007–2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hochreiter M, Kohler T, Schweiger A-M, Keck FS, Bein B, Von Spiegel T, Schroder S: Antibiotic treatment of surgical intensive care patients. Procalcitonin to guide duration of therapy. Anaesthesist 2008; 57: 571–577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nobre V, Harbarth S, Graf JD, Rohner P, Pugin J: Use of procalcitonin to shorten antibiotic treatment duration in septic patients: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 498–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Reinhart K, Meisner M, Brunkhorst FM: Markers for sepsis diagnosis: what is useful? Crit Care Clin 2006; 22: 503–519, ix–x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Harbarth S: The effect of antimicrobial use on emergence and selection of resistance. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2007; 42: 130–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carbon C, Bax RP: Regulating the use of antibiotics in the community. Br Med J 1998; 317: 663–665.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Guillemot D, Maison P, Carbon C, Balkau B, Vauzelle-Kervroedan F, Sermet C, Bouvenot G, Eschwege E: Trends in antimicrobial drug use in the community-France, 1981–1992. J Infect Dis 1998; 177: 492–497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tang BM, Eslick GD, Craig JC, McLean AS: Accuracy of procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2007; 7: 210–217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jones AE, Fiechtl JF, Brown MD, Ballew JJ, Kline JA: Procalcitonin test in the diagnosis of bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 50: 34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nylen E, Muller B, Becker KL, Snider R: The future diagnostic role of procalcitonin levels: the need for improved sensitivity. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 823–824, author reply 826–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Becker KL, Snider R, Nylen ES: Procalcitonin assay in systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis: clinical utility and limitations. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 941–952.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schneider HG, Lam QT: Procalcitonin for the clinical laboratory: a review. Pathology 2007; 39: 383–390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Christ-Crain M, Schuetz P, Huber AR, Muller B: Procalcitonin — importance for the diagnosis of bacterial infections. Ther Umsch 2008; 65: 559–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Meisner M: Pathobiochemistry and clinical use of procalcitonin. Clin Chim Acta 2002; 323: 17–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Jing.

Additional information

H. Tang and T. Huang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, H., Huang, T., Jing, J. et al. Effect of Procalcitonin-Guided Treatment in Patients with Infections: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Infection 37, 497–507 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-009-9034-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-009-9034-2

Keywords

Navigation