Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of reducing CO2 emissions as important greenhouse gas and maximum oil recovery: optimization of two processes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oil and gas sources as fossil fuels have high wealth in the entire world. Furthermore, several dead wells with considerable oil content cannot be used in the universe. So, the oil recovery optimization and also the optimum amount of carbon dioxide storage using the carbon dioxide injection method are investigated in this research. The optimum amount of oil recovery and carbon dioxide storage is simulated by ECLIPSE 300 software combined with genetic algorithm. According to the results, the carbon dioxide capturing till 2050 can prevent greenhouse gas emission. This capturing can remove the CO2 as greenhouse gas more than 4 Gt/year. The results show that the maximum amount of field oil production total (FOPT) and also the maximum amount of carbon dioxide storage are at grid 24 × 7. Also, results state that the first layer is a best location for perforation. In addition, the optimum distance between reticules is 77 ft, approximately. The results show that the amount of recovered oil is about 31.72%, if the gas is injected, continuously. However, the amount of oil recovery factor in the natural state is about 18.74%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Mudhafar Watheq J, Rao Dandina N, Sanjay S (2018) Reservoir sensitivity analysis for heterogeneity and anisotropy effects quantification through the cyclic CO2-Assisted Gravity Drainage EOR process—a case study from South Rumaila oil field. Fuel 221:455–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral Monique A, Emanuel C, Dariva Cláudio F, Vega Lourdes J, Carvalho Pedro AP, João C (2018) High-pressure solubility of CO2 in glymes. Fuel 219:120–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biyanto TR, Jaswadi KM, Setiawan H, Gabriella PD, Setiyawan D, Utomo AP, Triastutik E, Wibawa A (2017) Optimization of carbon dioxide (CO2) captured and distribution for enhanced oil recovery. In: International conference on advanced mechatronics, intelligent manufacture, and industrial automation (ICAMIMIA), Surabaya, Indonesia, https://doi.org/10.1109/icamimia.2017.8387574

  • da Silva TFF, Francielle MC, Corrêa LG Jr., de Paulo JRCM, Isabela ST, Alexandre S, Roberto S (2018) CO2 capture in ethanol distilleries in Brazil: designing the optimum carbon transportation network by integrating hubs, pipelines and trucks. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 71:168–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daoyi Z, Jirui H, Wang Jianfei W, Xuan WP, Baojun B (2018) Acid-alternating-base (AAB) technology for blockage removal and enhanced oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs. Fuel 215(1):619–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Z, Pengchun L, Xi L, Muxin L, Li W (2018) A long-term strategic plan of offshore CO2 transport and storage in northern South China Sea for a low-carbon development in Guangdong province, China. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 70:76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dongxing D, Yingge L, Kun C, Chengcheng W, Dexi W (2018) Laboratory study of the Non-Newtonian behavior of supercritical CO2 foam flow in a straight tube. J Petrol Sci Eng 164:390–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebraheam A-Z, James N, Xianfeng F (2018) Effect of CO2 phase on its water displacements in a sandstone core sample. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 71:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farid T, Seth B, Russell TJ, Suli T, Soumyadeep G (2018) Techno-economic assessment of reservoir heterogeneity and permeability variation on economic value of enhanced oil recovery by gas and foam flooding. In: Journal of petroleum science and engineering (In Press)

  • Fenglan Z, Hongda H, Guangzhong L, Zhixing W, Jirui H, Peng W, Zhang Meng L, Zhongfeng GF, Wenfeng L (2018) Performance improvement of CO2 flooding using production controls in 3D areal heterogeneous models: experimental and numerical simulations. J Petrol Sci Eng 164:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masoud B, Junju MA, Masters J (2018) Impact of variation in multicomponent diffusion coefficients and salinity in CO2-EOR: a numerical study using molecular dynamics simulation. J Petrol Sci Eng 162:685–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mojtaba S, Pedram M, Mehran S (2018a) A comparative study of oil compositional variations during CO2 and carbonated water injection scenarios for EOR. J Petrol Sci Eng 164:685–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mojtaba S, Mehran S, Adam S, Shaun I (2018b) Quantification of oil recovery efficiency, CO2 storage potential, and fluid-rock interactions by CWI in heterogeneous sandstone oil reservoirs. J Mol Liq 249:779–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa L, Masoud R, Shahab A (2018) Experimental investigation of dynamic swelling and Bond number of crude oil during carbonated water flooding; effect of temperature and pressure. Fuel 214(15):135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Na Z, Mingzhen W, Baojun B (2018) Statistical and analytical review of worldwide CO2 immiscible field applications. Fuel 220(15):89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolo M, Chiara V, Ernesto S, Giuseppe M (2018) Pressurized CO2 releases in the framework of carbon sequestration and enhanced oil recovery safety analysis: experiments and model. Process Saf Environ Prot 116:433–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck Wesley D, Azzolina Nicholas A, Ge Jun W, Bosshart Nicholas E, Burton-Kelly Matthew D, Gorecki Charles J, Gorz Andrew C, Ayash Scott V, David N, Stephen ML (2018) Quantifying CO2 storage efficiency factors in hydrocarbon reservoirs: a detailed look at CO2 enhanced oil recovery. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 69:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedram M, Pantelis T, Mehran S, Enezi Sultan A, Yousef Ali A, Ahmed E (2018) Carbonated water injection under reservoir conditions; in situ WAG-type EOR. Fuel 217(1):285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Rognmo UA, Heldal S, Fernø AM (2018) Silica nanoparticles to stabilize CO2-foam for improved CO2 utilization: enhanced CO2 storage and oil recovery from mature oil reservoirs. Fuel 216:621–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Safi R, Agarwal RK, Banerjee S (2016) Numerical simulation and optimization of CO2 utilization for enhanced oil recovery from depleted reservoirs. Chem Eng Sci 144:30–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shuoshi W, Changlong C, Shiau Benjamin H, Jeffrey H (2018) In-situ CO2 generation for EOR by using urea as a gas generation agent. Fuel 217:499–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkat P (2018) Subsurface CO2 storage estimation in Bakken tight oil and Eagle Ford shale gas condensate reservoirs by retention mechanism. Fuel 215(1):580–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Brian M, Feng P, Zhenxue D, Ting X (2018) Uncertainty quantification of CO2 storage using Bayesian model averaging and polynomial chaos expansion. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 71:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao W, Van Klaas V, Peter M, Snehalata H, Vladimir A (2018) Economic co-optimization of oil recovery and CO2 sequestration. Appl Energy 222:132–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Z, Qingchun Yu (2018) Effect of CH4 on the CO2 breakthrough pressure and permeability of partially saturated low-permeability sandstone in the Ordos Basin, China. J Hydrol 556:732–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Yuan Yu, Wei LZ, Kamy S (2018) Simulation study of factors affecting CO2 Huff-n-Puff process in tight oil reservoirs. J Petrol Sci Eng 163:264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhaojie S, Jirui H, Xiaochun L, Qi W, Hongda H, Liya Z (2018) Conformance control for CO2-EOR in naturally fractured low permeability oil reservoirs. J Petrol Sci Eng 166:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Farahbod.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Mohamed F. Yassin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farahbod, F. Evaluation of reducing CO2 emissions as important greenhouse gas and maximum oil recovery: optimization of two processes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 18, 1821–1836 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02936-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02936-1

Keywords

Navigation