Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the stress–strain behavior of MSW with landfill aging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanical behavior of municipal solid waste (MSW) is of great importance due to many landfill slide failures in recent decades. MSW is the major structural element in landfill which is more complicated than soil owing to nonlinear and time-dependent behavior. In this study to determine the effect of aging on MSW, 60 large-scale direct shear tests with dimensions of 300 × 300 × 150 mm were conducted on samples with three ages of fresh, 3 and 6 months. The tests had four vertical stress increments of 20, 50, 100, and 200 kPa under three different shear displacement rates of 0.8, 8, and 19 mm/min. After the evaluation of shear strength parameters, the hyperbolic model was presented to predict the stress–strain behavior of Kahrizak Landfill MSW as a sample of a disposal site in developing countries. Results indicate that shear strength of MSW samples increases with aging and also curves of hyperbolic function match with the results of direct shear tests. The hyperbolic model was first presented for soil with utilizing results of triaxial tests; however, applying results of direct shear tests for predicting the stress–strain behavior of MSW leads to a more accurate model due to the effect of fiber reinforcement and diversity in MSW composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asadi M, Shariatmadari N, Karimpour-Fard M, Noorzad A (2017) Validation of hyperbolic model by the results of triaxial and direct shear tests of municipal solid waste. Geotech Geol Eng 35:2003–2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D (1994) 3080-90: Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. Annu B ASTM Stand 4:290–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Augello AJ, Matasovic N, Bray JD et al (1995) Evaluation of solid waste landfill performance during the Northridge earthquake. Geotech Spec Publ 54:17–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai CS, Siriwardane HJ (1984) Constitutive laws for engineering materials with emphasis on geologic materials. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM, Chang C-Y (1970) Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. J Soil Mech Found Div 96:1629–1653

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey M, Carter JP (1993) A finite element study of the pressure meter test in sand using a nonlinear elastic plastic model. Can Geotech J 30:348–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fard MK, Shariatmadari N, Keramati M, Kalarijani HJ (2014) An experimental investigation on the mechanical behavior of MSW. Int J Civ Eng 12:292–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Filz GM, Esterhuizen JJB, Duncan JM (2001) Progressive failure of lined waste impoundments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:841–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabr MA, Valero SN (1995) Geotechnical properties of municipal solid waste. Geotech Test J 18:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MS (2002) Mechanics of compressibility and strength of solid waste in bioreactor landfills. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University at Raleigh, NC

  • Karimpour-Fard M (2009) Mechanical behavior of MSW materials with different initial state under static loading. A Dissertation: Doctor of Philosophy in Geotechnical Engineering/M. Karimpour-Fard.—Iran University of Science and Technology

  • Kavazanjian E Jr (2000) Seismic design of solid waste containment facilities. Shock Vib Dig 32:29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavazanjian Edward J (2008) The impact of degradation on MSW shear strength. In: GeoCongress 2008: Geotechnics of Waste Management and Remediation, pp 224–231

  • Keramati M, Reshad SK, Asgarpour S, Tutunchian MA (2014) Predicting shear strength of municipal waste material by evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR). Electron J Geotech Eng 19:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Keramati M, Shariatmadari N, Karimpour-Fard M, Shahrbabak MRN (2016) Dynamic behaviour of MSW materials under cyclic triaxial testing: a case of Kahrizak Landfill, Tehran, Iran. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 40:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keramati M, Shariatmadari N, Sabbaghi M, Abedin MS (2018) Effect of confining stress and loading frequency on dynamic behavior of municipal solid waste in Kahrizak landfill. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:1257–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kölsch F (1996) The influence of fibrous constituents on shear strength of municipal solid waste. Ph.D. thesis, Leichtweiss-Institut, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Brauschweig, Germany (in German)

  • Kondner RL (1963) Hyperbolic stress-strain response: cohesive soils. J Soil Mech Found Div 89:115–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Landva AO, Clark JI (1986) Geotechnical testing of waste fill. In: Proceedings, 39th Canadian geotechnical conference Ottawa, Ontario

  • Machado SL, Carvalho MF, Vilar OM (2002) Constitutive model for municipal solid waste. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128:940–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oweis IS (1993) Stability of landfills. In: Daniel DE (ed) Geotechnical practice for waste disposal. Springer, Berlin, pp 244–268

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaiah BJ, Ramana GV, Datta M (2017) Mechanical characterization of municipal solid waste from two waste dumps at Delhi, India. Waste Manag 68:275–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, Hettiarachchi H, Parakalla NS et al (2009) Geotechnical properties of fresh municipal solid waste at Orchard Hills Landfill, USA. Waste Manag 29:952–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariatmadari N, Machado SL, Noorzad A, Karimpour-Fard M (2009) Municipal solid waste effective stress analysis. Waste Manag 29:2918–2930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh MK (2008) Characterization of stress-deformation behaviour of municipal solid waste. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada

  • Singh MK, Fleming IR (2011) Application of a hyperbolic model to municipal solid waste. Geotechnique 61:533–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh MK, Fleming IR, Sharma JS (2007) Estimation of mechanical properties of municipal solid waste using stochastic modeling. In: Proceedings of 11th international waste management and landfill symposium, Sardinia. CISA, Cagliari, Italy

  • Vilar OM, Carvalho MF (2002) Shear strength properties of municipal solid waste. In: Proceedings of the 4th international congress on environmental geotechnics. AA Balkema Lisse, The Netherlands, pp 59–64

  • Vilar OM, Carvalhod M (2004) Mechanical properties of municipal solid waste. J Test Eval 32:438–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeccos DP (2005) Evaluation of static and dynamic properties of municipal solid-waste. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Zekkos D, Bray JD, Riemer MF (2012) Drained response of municipal solid waste in large-scale triaxial shear testing. Waste Manag 32:1873–1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan TLT, Chen YM, Ling WA (2008) Shear strength characterization of municipal solid waste at the Suzhou landfill, China. Eng Geol 97:97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Keramati.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: BV Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keramati, M., Goodarzi, S., Moradi Moghadam, H. et al. Evaluating the stress–strain behavior of MSW with landfill aging. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 6885–6894 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2106-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2106-z

Keywords

Navigation